岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 139–152.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250213

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    

渤海湾盆地保定凹陷清苑地区古近系东三段曲流河沉积特征及控储作用

薛辉, 叶大帅, 郭悦苗, 陈柯童, 吴健平, 许梦婷, 李雅雯   

  1. 中国石油华北油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062550
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-12 修回日期:2024-07-18 发布日期:2025-03-06
  • 第一作者:薛辉(1986—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。地址:(062550)河北省任丘市建设中路1号勘探开发研究院。Email:XH630445@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司华北油田公司项目“保定-饶阳凹陷重点层系沉积微相研究及有利区带优选”(编号:2023-HB-A06-02)资助。

Meandering river sedimentary characteristics and its control on reservoir of Paleogene Dong 3 Member in Qingyuan area, Baoding Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

XUE Hui, YE Dashuai, GUO Yuemiao, CHEN Ketong, WU Jianping, XU Mengting, LI Yawen   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development of Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062550, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-06-12 Revised:2024-07-18 Published:2025-03-06

摘要: 在渤海湾盆地保定凹陷清苑地区古近系东三段岩石学特征研究的基础上,从岩相描述、沉积微相识别以及地球物理响应特征分析3个方面入手,明确了其沉积相展布特征、沉积模式及控储机理,并预测了有利区。研究结果表明:①保定凹陷清苑地区东三段泥岩以氧化色为主,砂岩主要为岩屑质长石砂岩和长石质岩屑砂岩,岩石成分成熟度、结构成熟度低—中等,具明显的河流牵引流特征,沉积时气候干旱—半干旱,属于陆相淡水、氧化环境。②研究区可识别出9种岩相类型,包括4种细砂岩相、3种粉砂岩相和2种泥岩相;曲流河沉积可划分为河床滞留沉积、边滩、天然堤、牛轭湖、决口扇、泛滥平原等6种微相;具有中—高幅箱形、中—高幅钟形、中幅指形、中—低幅漏斗形、低幅线形等5种测井响应特征,地震上具有振幅中等—偏强、频率较高、连续性中等—较差的特征。③研究区平面上砂体呈南西—北东向展布,自下而上曲流河砂体厚度、分布范围逐渐减小,发育单一条带型和网状连片型两种曲流河沉积模式。④研究区沉积控储特征明显,边滩和河床滞留沉积微相储层物性最好,强而稳定的水动力条件、低黏土矿物含量和厚层砂体是优质储层形成的基础;Ⅰ类储层物性条件最好,垂向上主要分布在Ⅱ和Ⅲ油组,G77-70X,G77-30X等井区是下一步有利勘探目标。

关键词: 曲流河, 干旱气候, 氧化环境, 沉积控储作用, 边滩, 河床滞留, 东三段, 古近系, 清苑地区, 保定凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Based on the study of petrological characteristics of Paleogene Dong 3 Member in Qingyuan area,Baoding Sag,Bohai Bay Basin,three aspects such as lithofacies description,sedimentary facies identification and analysis of geophysical response characteristics were analyzed,in order to clarify the sedimentary distribution characteristics,sedimentary model and the control mechanisms of sedimentation on reservoir. Meanwhile,the favorable zones were predicted in this area. The results show that:(1)The mudstone color of Dong 3 Member in Qingyuan area were mainly oxidation color,the sandstones were dominated by lithic feldspathic sandstone and feldspathic lithic sandstone,the rock of Dong 3 Member have low-middle compositional maturity and textural maturity,and have obvious river traction flow characteristics. During the deposition of the Dong 3 Member,the climate was arid and semi-arid,which indicated a terrestrial freshwater and oxidizing environment.(2)Nine lithofacies types can be identified in the study area,including four kinds of sandstone lithofacies,three kinds of siltstone lithofacies,two kinds of mud stone lithofacies. The study area developed meandering river facies, which can be divided into six microfacies:river bed retention sediment,point bar,natural levees,oxbow lake, crevasse splay,flood plain,five well logging response characteristics can be identified,including middle-high amplitude box-shaped,middle-high amplitude bell-shaped,middle amplitude finger-shaped,middle-low amplitude funnel-shaped,low amplitude linear,and the reservoir have moderate-strong ampitude,high frequency,middle and bad continuity on seismic section. The sand bodies were deposited in southwest-northeast trending in the plane,the thickness and distribution of the sand body of meandering river decreases from lower to upper,single belt type and network continuous sedimentary model of meandering river were established.(3)The sedimentation determined the reservoir characteristics in study area,the reservoirs physical properties of river bed retention sediment and point bar were the best microfacies,strong and stable hydrodynamic conditions,low content of clay mineral and thick sandbody were the basis of the formation of high-quality hydrocarbon reservoirs,the Ⅰ reservoir have the best physical properties,which were mainly distributed in the Ⅱ and Ⅲ oil-bearing formations in the vertical direction,well area G77-70X and G77-30X were the favorable target areas.

Key words: meandering river, arid climate, oxidation environment, controls of sedimentation on reservoir, point bar, river bed retention, Dong 3 Member, Paleogene, Qingyuan area, Baoding Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 钟建华,刘云田,姜波,等.柴达木盆地英雄岭曲流河边滩的沉积学特征[J].石油学报,2002,23(3):43-47. ZHONG Jianhua,LIU Yuntian,JIANG Bo,et al. Sedimentary features of the point bar intermane (seasonal) meandering stream-taking the meandering stream developed in Hero Hill of Qaidam Basin as an example[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(3):43-47.
[2] 王海峰,范廷恩,宋来明,等.高弯度曲流河砂体规模定量表征研究[J].沉积学报,2017,35(2):279-289. WANG HaiFeng,FAN Ting'en,SONG Laiming,et al. Quanti-tative characterization study on sand body scale in high sinuos-ity meandering river[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2017,35(2):279-289.
[3] 陈德坡,柳世成.孤东油田七区西曲流河沉积微相定量识别技术[J].断块油气田,2003,10(2):17-20. CHEN Depo,LIU Shicheng. A method to quantitatively iden-tify sedimentary microfacies of meandering river:A case of Qiquxi unit in Gudong oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field,2003,10(2):17-20.
[4] 岳大力,李伟,杜玉山,等.河流相储层地震属性优选与融合方法综述[J].地球科学,2022,47(11):3929-3943. YUE Dali,LI Wei,DU Yushan,et al. Review on optimization and fusion of seismic attributes for fluvial reservoir character-ization[J]. Earth Science,2022,47(11):3929-3943.
[5] 单敬福,赵忠军,李浮萍,等.曲流河道沉积演化过程与历史重建-以吉林油田扶余采油厂杨大城子油层为例[J].沉积学报,2015,33(3):448-458. SHAN Jingfu,ZHAO Zhongjun,LI Fuping,et al. Evolution process and historical reconstruction of meandering river:An example from Fuyu oil reservoir of Yangdachengzi oil production plant in Jilin oilfield[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015,33(3):448-458.
[6] 马东烨,陈宇航,赵靖舟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系下石盒子组8段河流相砂体构型要素[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(1):63-73. MA Dongye,CHEN Yuhang,ZHAO Jingzhou,et al. Architec-tural elements of fluvial sand bodies of the eighth member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(1):63-73.
[7] 岳欣欣.准噶尔盆地春光地区新近系沙湾组辫-曲演化与成藏特点[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(6):967-975. YUE Xinxin. Meander-braided transition features and hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics in Neogene Shawan Formation,Chunguang exploration block,Junggar Basin[J]. Petro-leum Geology&Experiment,2021,43(6):967-975.
[8] 马立驰.曲流河河道砂体油气选择性充注原因:以济阳坳陷新近系为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(4):17-19. MA Lichi. Study on petroleum selective injection into meandering stream sand bodies:A case of Neogene in Jiyang depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(4):17-19.
[9] 韩春元,师玉雷,刘静,等.冀中坳陷保定凹陷油气勘探前景与突破口选择[J].中国石油勘探,2017,22(4):61-72. HAN Chunyuan,SHI Yulei,LIU Jing,et al. Prospect and break-through point of oil and gas exploration in Baoding sag,Ji-zhong depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(4):61-72.
[10] 张锐锋,何海清,朱庆忠,等.渤海湾盆地保定凹陷东营组油气勘探重要发现与启示[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(2):11-23. ZHANG Ruifeng,HE Haiqing,ZHU Qingzhong,et al. Major discovery and enlightenment from petroleum exploration of Dongying Formation in Baoding Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(2):11-23.
[11] 谢静平,马红岩,卢永合,等.保定凹陷同口西部三维区沙河街组油气成藏模式与富集规律[J].录井工程,2016,27(4):81-85. XIE Jingping,MA Hongyan,LU Yonghe,et al. Oil and gas accumulation model and enrichment law of Shahejie Formation in the west of Tongkou,Baoding Sag[J]. Mud Logging Engi-neering,2016,27(4):81-85.
[12] 张保卫,岳航羽,谢伟,等.反射地震在冀中坳陷保定凹陷精细地质结构探测中的应用[J].物与化探,2022,46(6):1359-1368. ZHANG Baowei,YUE Hangyu,XIE Wei,et al. Application of the seismic reflection method in detecting the fine-scale geological structure of the Baoding sag,Jizhong depression[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,2022,46(6):1359-1368.
[13] 李志军,马学峰,罗强,等.渤海湾盆地保定凹陷早熟低熟油特征及成烃机制[J].石油学报,2024,45(3):500-516. LI Zhijun,MA Xuefeng,LUO Qiang,et al. Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation mechanism of early low-mature oil in baoding Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024, 45(3):500-516.
[14] 张文朝,杨德相,陈彦均,等.冀中坳陷古近系沉积构造特征与油气分布规律[J].地质学报,2008,82(8):1103-1112. ZHANG Wenchao,YANG Dexiang,CHEN Yanjun,et al. Sedimentary structural characteristics and hydrocarbon distributed rules of Jizhong Depression[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2008, 82(8):1103-1112.
[15] 黄第藩,张大江,王培荣,等.中国未成熟石油成因机制和成藏条件[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003. HUANG Difan,ZHANG Dajiang,WANG Peirong,et al. Genetic mechanism and accumulation condition of immature oil in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.
[16] 付文俊,张昌民,冀东升,等.准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2023,35(4):145-160. FU Wenjun,ZHANG Changmin,JI Dongsheng,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow water delta of Middle Jurassic Toutunhe Formation in southern Anjihai river outcrops,Jung-gar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(4):145-160.
[17] 周洪峰,吴海红,杨禹希,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2024,36(4):85-97. ZHOU Hongfeng,WU Haihong,YANG Yuxi,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta front of the Fourth member of A'ershan Formation in Bayindulan Sag,Erlian Basin[J]. Litho-logic Reservoirs,2024,36(4):85-97.
[18] 杜江民,崔子豪,贾志伟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五5亚段沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(5):37-48. DU Jiangmin,CUI Zihao,JIA Zhiwei,et al. Sedimentary char-acteristics of Ma 55 sub-member of Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Sulige area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023,35(5):37-48.
[19] 魏嘉怡,王红伟,刘刚,等.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(5):120-130. WEI Jiayi,WANG Hongwei,LIU Gang,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Carboniferous Yanghugou Formation in thrust belt on the western margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(5):120-130.
[20] 付金华,李士祥,徐黎明,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段古沉积环境恢复及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(6):936-946. FU Jinhua,LI Shixiang,XU Liming,et al. Paleo-sedimentary environmental restoration and its significance of Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(6):936-946.
[21] 邢智峰,周虎,林佳,等.河南宜阳下三叠统刘家沟组微生物成因沉积构造演化及其对古环境变化的响应[J].古地理学报,2018,20(3):191-206. XING ZhiFeng,ZHOU Hu,LIN Jia,et al. Evolution of micro-bially induced sedimentary structures and their response to pal-aeoenvironment variation of the Lower Triassic Liujiagou Formation in Yiyang area,Henan Province[J]. Journal of Palaeo-geography (Chinese Edition),2018,20(3):191-206.
[22] 胡俊杰,马寅生,王宗秀,等.地球化学记录揭示的柴达木盆地北缘地区中-晚侏罗世古环境与古气候[J].古地理学报, 2017,19(3):480-490. HU Junjie,MA Yinsheng,WANG Zongxiu,et al. Palaeoenvi-ronment and palaeoclimate of the Middle to Late Jurassic re-vealed by geochemical records in northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2017,19(3):480-490.
[23] 何春丰,张翔,田景春,等.塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式[J].岩性油气藏,2023,35(1):120-131. HE Chunfeng,ZHANG Xiang,TIAN Jingchun,et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics and sedimentary model of thin sand bodies of Lower Cretaceous Shushanhe Formation in Xinhe area,northern Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(1):120-131.
[24] 于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008. YU Xinghe. Clastic petroleum reservoir sedimentology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[25] 吴东旭,喻建,周进高,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组四段沉积特征及其控储效应[J].古地理学报,2021,23(6):1140-1157. WU Dongxu,YU Jian,ZHOU Jingao,et al. Sedimentary char-acteristics and reservoir controlling effect of the Member 4 of Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition),2021,23(6):1140-1157.
[26] 杨有星,金振奎,王濮,等.准噶尔盆地腹部地区白垩系呼图壁河组沉积特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,36(1):40-46. YANG Youxing,JIN Zhenkui,WANG Pu,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Cretaceous Hutubihe formation in hinterland of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2012,36(1):40-46.
[27] 鲁新川,安永福,夏维民,等.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系三工河组沉积微相特征及对储层的控制[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1810-1820. LU Xinchuan,AN Yongfu,XIA Weimin,et al. The characteris-tics and reservoir-controlling of sedimentary facies of Jurassic Sangonghe Formation at eastern Fukang Slope,Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1810-1820.
[28] 宫清顺,刘占国,龙国辉,等.柴达木盆地昆仑山前带下干柴沟组下段储层差异性[J].海相油气地质,2023,28(3):239-249. GONG Qingshun,LIU Zhanguo,LONG Guohui,et al. Reser-voir difference of the lower section of Lower Ganchaigou Formation in Kunlun piedmont zone,Qaidam Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2023,28(3):239-249.
[29] 钟大康,朱筱敏,张琴.不同埋深条件下砂泥岩互层中砂岩储层物性变化规律[J].地质学报,2004,78(6):863-871. ZHONG Dakang,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHANG Qin. Variation char-acteristics of sandstone reservoirs when sandstone and mud-stone are interbedded at different buried depths[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2004,78(6):863-871.
[1] 廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[2] 朱文奇, 昝春景, 张莹, 王涛, 史朝文, 巴李霞, 陈亮, 季汉成. 渤中凹陷西次洼古近系东营组异常高孔带特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 70-80.
[3] 胡心玲, 荣焕青, 杨伟, 张再昌, 漆智先. 东营凹陷八面河地区古近系沙四段湖相白云岩测井识别及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 13-23.
[4] 刘志峰, 朱小二, 柳广弟, 王祥, 李泽坤, 吴璇, 梁禹洋. 渤中凹陷西洼古近系和新近系油气成藏差异对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 78-89.
[5] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[6] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[7] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[8] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[9] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[10] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[11] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[12] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[13] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[14] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[15] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!