岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 97–105.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.011

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于分形特征的碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构定量评价

刘航宇, 田中元, 徐振永   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-23 修回日期:2017-04-22 出版日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2017-09-21
  • 作者简介:刘航宇(1992-),男,中国石油勘探开发研究院在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气藏开发地质。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号中国石油勘探开发研究院。Email:liuhangyu_riped@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家“十三五”重大科技专项“伊拉克大型生物碎屑灰岩油藏注水开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2017ZX05030-001)资助

Quantitative evaluation of carbonate reservoir pore structure based on fractal characteristics

LIU Hangyu, TIAN Zhongyuan, XU Zhenyong   

  1. Petrochina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2017-02-23 Revised:2017-04-22 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

摘要: 伊拉克W油田Mishrif组巨厚孔隙型生屑灰岩为强非均质性储层,孔隙结构评价难度较大。结合薄片、孔渗试验和压汞毛管压力曲线资料,使用分形理论研究储层孔隙结构,建立了以分形维数定量评价孔隙型生屑灰岩储层孔隙结构的方法和标准。该储层孔隙结构分形特征可分为2类,第1类储层孔隙结构整体具有显著的“单段型”分形特征;第2类储层孔隙结构整体分形特征不显著,但其较大孔喉系统和较小孔喉系统各自具有显著的分形特征,即“多段型”分形特征。分形维数能够反映孔隙型灰岩孔隙结构的复杂程度和非均质性,分形维数越大,孔隙结构越复杂;压汞毛管压力和含水饱和度分段越多,孔隙结构非均质性越强。利用孔隙结构分形维数的分区性对储层进行分类,同一类样品压汞毛管压力曲线的相似性验证了分形维数分类结果的合理性。Ⅰ类与Ⅱ类储层多对应“多段型”分形特征,Ⅲ类与Ⅳ类储层多对应“单段型”分形特征。该研究成果对相同类型碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构定量评价具有指导意义。

关键词: 凝灰岩, 脱玻化, 储层特征, 形成条件, 致密油, 条湖组, 马朗凹陷

Abstract: Pore structure of large scale porous limestone reservoir with strong heterogeneity is very complex,so it is difficult to evaluate its pore structure of Mishrif Formation of W oilfield in Iraq. Based on thin section observation, porosity and permeability test and mercury injection capillary pressure test,fractal theory was applied to quantitative pore structure evaluation,and the pore fractal dimension criterion for reservoir type classification was established. There are two types of reservoir pore structure fractal characteristics. Some samples called "single segment" perform obvious fractal character overall. Others called "multiple segments" have distinct large pore throat system and small pore throat system which perform unique fractal characters respectively while have no uniform fractal character overall. The complexity and heterogeneity of pore structure of porous limestone can be reflected by fractal dimension,the greater the fractal dimension,the more complex pore structure,and the more conspicuous segmental character in the relationship between capillary pressure and water saturation,the stronger the heterogeneity. The samples were classified based on the fractal dimension combined with porosity and permeability distribution of the samples. The majority of type Ⅰ-Ⅱ and type Ⅲ-Ⅳrespectively corresponded to "multiple segments" and "single segment" fractal characteristics. It has an important guiding significance for the quantitative evaluation of pore structure to similar carbonate reservoir.

Key words: tuff, devitrification, reservoir characteristics, formation conditions, tight oil, Tiaohu Formation, Malang Depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 罗蛰潭,王允诚. 油气储集层的孔隙结构. 北京:科学出版社, 1986. LUO Z T,WANG Y C. The pore structure of reservoir. Beijing:Science Press,1986.
[2] 邓虎成,周文,郭睿,等. 伊拉克艾哈代布油田中-下白垩统碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构及控制因素. 岩石学报,2014,30(3):801-812. DENG H C,ZHOU W,GUO R,et al. Pore structure characteristics and control factors of carbonate reservoirs:the Middle-Lower Cretaceous formation,AI Hardy cloth Oilfield,Iraq. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2014:30(3):801-812.
[3] 秦瑞宝,李雄炎,刘春成,等. 碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构的影响因素与储层参数的定量评价. 地学前缘,2013,20:1-9. QIN R B,LI X Y,LIU C C,et al. Infiuential factors of pore structure and quantitative evaluation of reservoir parameters in carbonate reservoir. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20:1-9.
[4] 郭振华,李光辉,吴蕾,等. 碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构评价方法——以土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸气田为例. 石油学报,2011,32(3):459-465. GUO Z H,LI G H,WU L,et al. Pore texture evaluation of carbonate reservoirs in Gasfield A,Turkmenistan. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011,32(3):459-465.
[5] TUCKER M E,WRIGHT V P. Carbonate sedimentology. Malden:Blackwell Science,1990.
[6] MOORE C H. Carbonate diagenesis and porosity. Amsterdam:Elsevier,1989.
[7] MOORE C H,WADE W J. Carbonate reservoirs:porosity and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework. 2nd ed. Amsterdam:Elsevier,2013:67.
[8] 王瑞,朱筱敏,陈烨菲,等. 滨里海盆地肯基亚克地区中、下石炭统碳酸盐岩储层特征与成岩作用. 石油与天然气地质, 2012,33(2):225-235. WANG R,ZHU X M,CHEN Y F,et al. Diagenesis and reservoir characteristics of the Lower-Middle Carboniferous carbonates in Kenkyak area,Pre-Caspian Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012,33(2):225-235.
[9] LUCIAF J. Carbonate reservoir characterization:an integrated approach. 2nd ed. Austin:Springer,2007.
[10] 王小敏,樊太亮. 碳酸盐岩储层渗透率研究现状与前瞻. 地学前缘,2013,20(5):166-174. WANG X M,FAN T L. Progress of research on permeability of carbonate rocks. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(5):166-174.
[11] WEGER R J,EBERLI G P,BAECHLE G T,et al. Quantification of pore structure and its effect on sonic velocity and permeability in carbonates. AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(10):1297-1317.
[12] SALMAN S M,BELLAH S. Rock typing:an integrated reservoir characterization tool to construct a robust geological model in Abu Dhabi carbonate oil field. SPE 125498,2009.
[13] 裘怿楠,薛叔浩. 油气储层评价技术. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1997. QIU Y N,XUE S H. Appraisal technology of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997.
[14] 罗平,裘怿楠,贾爱林,等. 中国油气储层地质研究面临的挑战和发展方向.沉积学报,2003,21(1):142-147. LUO P,QIU Y N,JIAA L,et al. The present challenges of Chinese petroleum reservoir geology and research direction. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2003,21(1):142-147.
[15] 郝乐伟,王琪,唐俊. 储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述. 岩性油气藏,2013,25(5):123-128. HAO L W,WANG Q,TANG J. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(5):123-128.
[16] 白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等. 利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构.石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):329-333. BAI B,ZHU R K,WU S T,et al. Multi-scale method of Nano (Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sand stone of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.
[17] 刘晓鹏,胡晓新. 近五年核磁共振测井在储集层孔隙结构评价中的若干进展. 地球物理学进展,2009,24(6):2194-2201. LIU X P,HU X X. Progress of NMR log in evaluating reservoir pore structure in the last five years. Progress in Geophysics(in Chinese),2009,24(6):2194-2201.
[18] 李爱芬,任晓霞,王桂娟,等. 核磁共振研究致密砂岩孔隙结构的方法及应用. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(6):92-98. LI A F,REN X X,WANG G J,et al. Characterization of pore structure of low permeability reservoirs using a nuclear magnetic resonance method. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(6):92-98.
[19] 肖飞,何宗斌,周静萍. 核磁共振测井连续表征储层孔隙结构方法研究.石油天然气学报,2012,34(2):93-97. XIAO F,HE Z B,ZHOU J P. A research of successively characterizing reservoir pore structures with NMR logging data. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2012,34(2):93-97.
[20] VERWER K,EBERLI G P,WEGER R J. Effect of pore structure on electrical resistivity in carbonates. AAPG Bulletin, 2011,95(2):175-190.
[21] 姜均伟,朱宇清,徐星,等. 伊拉克H油田碳酸盐岩储层的孔隙结构特征及其对电阻的影响. 地球物理学进展,2015,30(1):203-209. JIANG J W,ZHU Y Q,XU X,et al. Pore structure characteristics of the carbonate reservoir and their influence on electric properties in H oilfield,Iraq. Progress in Geophysics(in Chinese), 2015,30(1):203-209.
[22] 倪国辉,郭海峰,徐星,等. 碳酸盐岩复杂孔隙结构的测井识别和分类评价——以中东某油田H地层为例. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2014,36(1):60-65. NI G H,GUO H F,XU X,et al. Pore structure recognition and classification evaluation of complex carbonate reservoirs by using logging data:by taking H formation of an oilfield in the middle east for example. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2014,36(1):60-65.
[23] MANDELBROT B B. The fractal geometry of nature. New York:W. H. Freeman & Co.,1982.
[24] 张立强,纪友亮,马文杰,等. 博格达山前带砂岩孔隙结构分形几何学特征与储层评价. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1998,22(5):31-33. ZHANG L Q,JI Y L,MAW J,et al. Characteristics of fractional geometry and reservoir evaluation of fore mountain belt at Begedashan. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China(Edition of Natural Science),1998,22(5):31-33.
[25] 李晓晖,袁峰,周涛发,等. 新疆塔尔巴哈台-萨吾尔地区多重分形地球化学异常提取及成矿预测. 岩石学报,2015,31(2):426-434. LI X H,YUAN F,ZHOU T F,et al. Mineral prospectivity mapping and geochemical anomalies identification based on multifractal modeling in the Taerbahatai-Sawuer area,Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2015,31(2):426-434.
[26] 王志伟,卢双舫,王民,等. 湖相、海相泥页岩孔隙分形特征对比.岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):88-93. WANG Z W,LU S F,WANG M,et al. Fractal characteristics of lacustrine shale and marine shale. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(1):88-93.
[27] 张宪国,张涛,林承焰. 基于孔隙分形特征的低渗透储层孔隙结构评价.岩性油气藏,2013,25(6):40-45. ZHANG X G,ZHANG T,LIN C Y. Pore structure evaluation of low permeability reservoir based on pore fractal features. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(6):40-45.
[28] 马立民,林承焰,范梦玮. 基于微观孔隙结构分形特征的定量储层分类与评价. 石油天然气学报,2012,34(5):15-19. MA L M,LIN C Y,FAN M W. Quantitative classification and evaluation of reservoirs based on fractal features of micro-pore structures. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2012,34(5):15-19.
[29] 赵明,郁伯铭. 数字岩心孔隙结构的分形表征及渗透率预测. 重庆大学学报,2011,34(4):88-94. ZHAO M,YU B M. The fractal characterization of pore structure for some numerical rocks and prediction of permeabilities. Journal of Chongqing University,2011,34(4):88-94.
[30] 邓亚,郭睿,田中元,等. 碳酸盐岩储集层隔夹层地质特征及成因——以伊拉克西古尔纳油田白垩系Mishrif组为例. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):1-9. DENG Y,GUO R,TIAN Z Y,et al. Geologic features and genesis of the barriers and intercalations in carbonates:a case study of the Cretaceous Mishrif Formation,West Qurna oil field, Iraq. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(1):1-9.
[31] PEREZ G,CHOPRA A K. Evaluation of fractal models to describe reservoir heterogeneity and performance. SPE 452260, 1997.
[32] KROHN C E. Fractal measurements of sandstones, shales, and carbonates. Journal of Geophysical Research:Soild Earth, 1988,93(B4):3297-3305.
[33] 贺承祖,华明琪. 储层孔隙结构的分形几何描述. 石油与天然气地质,1998,19(1):17-23. HE C Z,HUA M Q. Fractal geometry description of reservoir pore structure. Oil & Gas Geology,1998,19(1):17-23.
[34] 冯其红,崔传志,王卫阳,等. 油田开发与开采原理. 东营:中国石油大学出版社,2011:32-33. FENG Q H,CUI C Z,WANG W Y,et al. Principle of oilfield development and production. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2011:32-33.
[1] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2] 陈亚军, 荆文波, 宋小勇, 何伯斌, 伍宏美, 王睿, 解士建, 宋凯辉, 马强. 三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统沉积岩层地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 63-75.
[3] 李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[4] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[5] 李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[6] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[7] 王付勇, 杨坤. 致密油藏孔喉分布特征对渗吸驱油规律的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 155-162.
[8] 曹思佳, 孙增玖, 党虎强, 曹帅, 刘冬民, 胡少华. 致密油薄砂体储层预测技术及应用实效——以松辽盆地敖南区块下白垩统泉头组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 239-247.
[9] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[10] 冯越, 黄志龙, 李天军, 张华, 李宏伟, 周亚东. 吐哈盆地胜北洼陷七克台组二段致密油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 97-108.
[11] 庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[12] 田清华, 刘俊, 张晨, 王文胜, 黄丹. 苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 33-42.
[13] 黄健玲, 傅强, 邱旭明, 赵世杰, 李林祥. 咸化断陷湖盆混积岩特征及沉积模式——以金湖凹陷阜二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 54-66.
[14] 李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP35砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[15] 赵超峰, 贾振甲, 田建涛, 高荣锦, 张伟, 赵建宇. 基于井中微地震监测方法的压裂效果评价——以吉林探区Y22井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 161-168.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .