岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 7081.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220307
程丹华1,2, 焦霞蓉1, 王建伟2, 庄东志2, 王政军2, 江山1
CHENG Danhua1,2, JIAO Xiarong1, WANG Jianwei2, ZHUANG Dongzhi2, WANG Zhengjun2, JIANG Shan1
摘要: 南堡凹陷古近系沙一段页岩油藏为黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷未来勘探的重点领域。利用岩心及薄片观察、扫描电镜、核磁共振、X射线衍射等多种分析测试手段,研究了南堡凹陷沙一段页岩储层的岩石学特征、储集空间类型及孔隙结构特征。研究结果表明:①研究区页岩发育灰暗相间水平纹层长英质页岩、深灰色块状混合质页岩、灰色粒序纹层混合质页岩、黑灰色水平纹层混合质页岩等4种岩相,页岩油主要储集在深灰色块状混合质页岩、灰色粒序纹层混合质页岩、黑灰色水平纹层混合质页岩中。②黑灰色水平纹层混合质页岩的裂缝最为发育,孔隙度最大;灰色粒序纹层混合质页岩比深灰色块状混合质页岩孔隙度大,但深灰色块状混合质页岩比灰色粒序纹层混合质页岩裂缝发育;储集空间包括裂缝、残余粒间孔、矿物晶间孔及溶蚀孔,孔喉特征主要为大孔微细喉,孔隙半径为125.369~156.048 μm,平均为133.209 μm,喉道半径为0.377~0.860 μm,平均为0.622 μm。③南堡凹陷沙一段混合质页岩厚度大、含油性好、裂缝发育、储集性能好,具有良好的页岩油形成条件,具有较大的页岩油勘探潜力。
中图分类号:
[1] 金之钧,朱如凯,梁新平,等.当前陆相页岩油勘探开发值得关注的几个问题[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287. JIN Zhijun, ZHU Rukai, LIANG Xinping, et al. Several issues worthy of attention in current lacustrine shale oil exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287. [2] 金之钧,白振瑞,高波,等.中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3):451-458. JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and ga revolution?[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3):451-458. [3] 杨雷,金之钧.全球页岩油发展及展望[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):553-559. YANG Lei, JIN Zhijun. Global shale oil development and prospects[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):553-559. [4] Energy Information Administration. Drilling productivity report[R/OL].[2021-05-14]. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/. [5] 金之钧,王冠平,刘光祥,等.中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):821-835. JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):821-835. [6] 郑红菊,董月霞,朱光有.南堡凹陷优质烃源岩的新发现[J].石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(4):385-450. ZHENG Hongju, DONG Yuexia, ZHU Guangyou. High-quality source rocks in Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(4):385-450. [7] 范泓澈,黄志龙,庞雄奇.南堡凹陷古近系深层烃源岩分布特征及厚度预测[J].油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(2):21-25. FAN Hongche, HUANG Zhilong, PANG Xiongqi. Distribution characteristics and thickness prediction of Paleogene deep source rocks in Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(2):21-25. [8] 袁立新,毕永斌,张梅,等.冀东南堡凹陷非常规油气资源潜力研究[J].海洋石油, 2014, 34(4):16-21. YUAN Lixin, BI Yongbin, ZHANG Mei, et al. Study of the hydrocarbon potential of unconventional oil and gas resources in Jidong Nanpu Depression[J]. Offshore Oil, 2014, 34(4):16-21. [9] 侯敬瑶.南堡凹陷泥页岩油气赋存方式及其有利勘探目标评价[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2014. HOU Jingyao. Occurrence mode of shale oil and gas and evaluation of favorable exploration targets in Nanpu Sag[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum (Eastern China), 2014. [10] 罗瑞,查明,何皓,等.南堡凹陷古近系泥页岩孔隙结构特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(2):23-33 LUO Rui, ZHA Ming, HE Hao, et al. Characteristics of pore structures in Paleogene shales in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Sciences), 2016, 40(2):23-33. [11] 李文奇.南堡凹陷拾场次洼沙三4亚段页岩孔隙发育及演化特征[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2020. LI Wenqi. Characteristics of shale pore development and evolution in the 34 sub-member of Shahejie Formation of Shichangzi Sag, Nanpu Sag[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2020. [12] 曾棒,刘小平,刘国勇,等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相测井识别与预测:以南堡凹陷拾场次洼为例[J].地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1):69-79. ZENG Bang, LIU Xiaoping, LIU Guoyong, et al. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang sub-sag, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1):69-79. [13] WANG Enze, FENG Yue, LIU Guoyong, et al. Hydrocarbon source potential evaluation insight into source rocks:A case study of the first member of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Nanpu Sag, NE China[J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7:32-42. [14] CHEN Di, PANG Xiongqi, LI Long, et al. Organic geochemical characteristics and shale oil potential of the middle Eocene earlymature shale in the Nanpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 133:105248. [15] 董月霞,杨赏,陈蕾,等.渤海湾盆地辫状河三角洲沉积与深部储集层特征:以南堡凹陷南部古近系沙一段为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(4):385-393. DONG Yuexia, YANG Shang, CHEN Lei, et al. Braided river delta deposition and deep reservoir characteristics in Bohai Bay Basin:A case study of Paleogene Sha 1 member in the south area of Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(4):385-393. [16] WANG Enze, LIU Guoyong, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Diagenetic evolution and formation mechanisms of middle to deep clastic reservoirs in the Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development (English Edition), 2020, 47(2):343-356. [17] 黎茂稳,金之钧,董明哲,等.陆相页岩形成演化与页岩油富集机理研究进展[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):489-505. LI Maowen, JIN Zhijun, DONG Mingzhe, et al. Advances in the basic study of lacustrine shale evolution and shale oil accumulation[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2020, 42(4):489-505. [18] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039. JIANG Zaixing, LIANG Chao, WU Jing, et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039. [19] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,邓远,等.细粒沉积岩研究中几个值得关注的问题[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1):6-15. ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, DENG Yuan, et al. Several issues in studies on fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1):6-15. [20] MA Xiaoxiao, LI Maowen, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Paradox in bulk and molecular geochemical data and implications for hydrocarbon migration in the inter-salt lacustrine shale oil reservoir, Qianjiang Formation, Jianghan Basin, central China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2019, 209:72-88. |
[1] | 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88. |
[2] | 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24. |
[3] | 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86. |
[4] | 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70. |
[5] | 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108. |
[6] | 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158. |
[7] | 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30. |
[8] | 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95. |
[9] | 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157. |
[10] | 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136. |
[11] | 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169. |
[12] | 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42. |
[13] | 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88. |
[14] | 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58. |
[15] | 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61. |
|