岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 37–45.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210104

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟

郭秋麟1, 吴晓智1, 卫延召1, 柳庄小雪1, 刘继丰2, 陈宁生1   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 北京天腾网格技术开发有限公司, 北京 100095
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-21 修回日期:2020-11-09 出版日期:2021-02-01 发布日期:2021-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 柳庄小雪(1993-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气资源评价方面的研究工作。Email:liuzxx@petrochina.com.cn。 E-mail:liuzxx@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:郭秋麟(1963-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事盆地模拟与油气资源评价方面的研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号中国石油勘探开发研究院。Email:qlguo@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“深层-超深层油气藏地质特征、分布规律与目标评价”(编号:2017ZX05008-006)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技项目“陆相中高成熟度页岩油勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2019B-0301)、“大中型岩性地层油气藏富集规律与关键技术”(编号:2019E-2601)联合资助

Simulation of oil and gas migration pathways for Jurassic in hinterland of Junggar Basin

GUO Qiulin1, WU Xiaozhi1, WEI Yanzhao1, LIU-ZHUANG Xiaoxue1, LIU Jifeng2, CHEN Ningsheng1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Beijing Tianteng Grid Technology Co, Ltd., Beijing 100095, China
  • Received:2020-07-21 Revised:2020-11-09 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-01-25

摘要: 2019年在准噶尔盆地钻探的前哨2探井取得重大突破,预示着盆地腹部侏罗系具有广阔的勘探前景。腹部发育远源和次生油气藏,源与储之间距离大,油气运移路径决定了油气藏的分布。基于研究区侏罗系油气主要沿断裂垂向运移、沿砂体侧向运移的特点,制定了以三维地质建模、参数研究和模拟计算为核心的研究思路,提出了断面网格的三维地质建模方法和考虑断裂因素的三维侵入逾渗模型及原油含蜡量定量模型,构建了侏罗系三维地质体,包括54 844个体网格、12 370个面网格及相应的地质参数。模拟得出:运移路径与油气藏分布相关性较好,原油含蜡量与实测值接近,模拟的运移路径与勘探结果一致,原油含蜡量定量模型是有效的。在综合考虑油气运移路径、含油气饱和度和沉积相分布等因素后,确定5个有利区,分别为成1井区、石东1井西区、滴西2井区、董1井北区和盆6井北区。该研究成果可为研究区潜在勘探目标分布的预测提供参考。

关键词: 运移路径, 运移与聚集模拟, 三维地质建模, 侵入逾渗, 侏罗系, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: A major breakthrough was made in well Qianshao-2 in Junggar Basin in 2019,which indicates that Jurassic in the hinterland of basin has broad exploration prospects. Distant and secondary oil and gas reservoirs are developed in the hinterland of the basin. The distance between source and reservoir is large,and the hydrocarbon migration pathway determines the distribution of oil and gas reservoirs. Based on the characteristics of Jurassic oil and gas migration along the vertical direction of faults and the lateral movement along sand bodies in the study area,this paper formulated a research idea with three-dimensional geological modeling,parameter research and simulation calculation as the core,proposed a three-dimensional geological modeling method for section grids,a three-dimensional invasion percolation model considering fault factors and a quantitative model for crude oil wax content,and constructed a three-dimensional geological body for Jurassic,including 54 844 individual grids,12 370 surface grids and corresponding geological parameters. The simulation results show that the migration pathway has a good correlation with the distribution of oil and gas reservoirs,and the wax content of crude oil is close to the measured value,indicating that the simulated migration pathway is consistent with the exploration results,and the quantitative model of wax content of crude oil is effective. After comprehensively considering factors such as hydrocarbon migration pathway,oil and gas saturation and sedimentary facies distribution, five favorable areas were determined,including Cheng 1 well area,Shidong 1 well west area,Dixi 2 well area, Dong 1 well north area and Basin 6 well north area. The research results can provide a reference for the prediction of the distribution of potential exploration targets in the study area.

Key words: migration pathway, migration and accumulation modeling, 3D geological model, invasion percolation, Jurassic, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+2
[1] 胡潇,曲永强,胡素云,等. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力. 岩性油气藏,2020,32(2):67-77. HU X,QU Y Q,HU S Y,et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of shallow oil and gas in slope area of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(2):67-77.
[2] 郭秋麟,刘继丰,陈宁生,等. 三维油气输导体系网格建模与运聚模拟技术. 石油勘探与开发,2018,45(6):947-959. GUO Q L,LIU J F,CHEN N S,et al. Mesh model building and migration and accumulation simulation of 3D hydrocarbon carrier system. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(6):947-959.
[3] 刘德志,许涛,张敏,等. 准噶尔盆地中部1区块侏罗系三工河组油气输导特征分析. 东北石油大学学报,2013,37(2):9-16. LIU D Z,XU T,ZHANG M,et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon pathway system of Sangonghe Formation in block of Z1,Junggar Basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(2):9-16.
[4] 徐冠华,石好果,任新成,等. 盆1井西凹陷斜坡带三工河组成藏条件及油气富集规律. 科学技术与工程,2015,15(17):23-28. XU G H,SHI H G,REN X C,et al. A research on the condition of the reservoir formation and the rule of oil and gas accumulation of Sangonghe Formation in slope belt of Pen 1 well west sag. Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(17):23-28.
[5] 刘刚,卫延召,陈棡,等. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系:白垩系次生油气藏形成机制及分布特征. 石油学报,2019,40(8):914-927. LIU G,WEI Y Z,CHEN G,et al. Genetic mechanism and distribution characteristics of Jurassic:Cretaceous secondary reservoirs in the hinterland of Junggar Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019, 40(8):914-927.
[6] 雷海艳,樊顺,鲜本忠,等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系下乌尔禾组沸石成因及溶蚀机制. 岩性油气藏,2020,32(5):102-112. LEI H Y,FAN S,XIAN B Z,et al. Genesis and corrosion mechanism of zeolite of Lower Urho Formation of Permian in Mahu Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(5):102-112.
[7] HANTSCHEL T,KAUERAUF A I. Fundamentals of basin modeling and petroleum systems modeling. Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2009.
[8] 石广仁. 油气运聚定量模拟技术现状、问题及设想. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(1):1-10. SHI G R. Status,problems and proposals of the quantitative modeling techniques for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30(1):1-10.
[9] 郭秋麟,谢红兵,任洪佳,等. 盆地与油气系统模拟. 北京:石油工业出版社,2018. GUO Q L,XIE H B,REN H J,et al. Basin and petroleum system modeling. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2018.
[10] BAUR F,SCHEIRER A H,PETERS K E. Past,present,and future of basin and petroleum system modeling. AAPG Bulletin, 2018,102(4):549-561.
[11] 乔永富,毛小平,辛广柱. 油气运移聚集定量化模拟. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2005,30(5):617-622. QIAO Y F,MAO X P,XIN G Z. Quantitative Simulation of hydrocarbon migration. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2005,30(5):617-622.
[12] MELLO U T,RODRIGUES J R P,ROSSAAL.Acontrol-volume finite element method for three-dimensional multiphase basin modeling. Marine & Petroleum Geology,2009,26(4):504-518.
[13] 石广仁,马进山,常军华. 三维三相达西流法及其在库车坳陷的应用. 石油与天然气地质,2010,31(4):403-409. SHI G R,MA J S,CHANG J H. 3-D 3-phasce Darcy flow method and its application to the Kuqa Depression. Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(4):403-409.
[14] 郭秋麟,陈宁生,谢红兵,等. 基于有限体积法的三维油气运聚模拟技术. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):817-825. GUO Q L,CHEN N S,XIE H B,et al. Three-dimensional hydrocarbon migration and accumulation modeling technique based on finite volume method. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(6):817-825.
[15] WILKINSON D,WILLEMSEN J F. Invasion percolation:a new form of percolation theory. Journal of Physics A,1983,16(14):3365-3376.
[16] MEAKIN P,WAGNER G,VEDVIK A,et al. Invasion percolation and secondary migration:Experiments and simulations. Marine & Petroleum Geology,2000,17(7):777-795.
[17] CARRUTHERS D J,WIJNGAARDEN M D L V. Modelling viscous-dominated fluid transport using modified invasion percolation techniques. Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2000(69/70):669-672.
[18] 张发强,罗晓容,苗盛,等. 石油二次运移优势路径形成过程实验及机理分析. 地质科学,2004,39(2):159-167. ZHANG F Q,LUO X R,MIAO S,et al. Experiments on oil migrating in a limited pathway and the mechanism analysis. Chinese Journal of Geology,2004,39(2):159-167.
[19] 罗晓容,张立宽,廖前进,等. 埕北断阶带沙河街组油气运移动力学过程模拟分析.石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):191-197. LUO X R,ZHANG L K,LIAO Q J,et al. Simulation of hydrocarbon migration dynamics in Shahejie Formation of Chengbei fault step zone. Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(2):191-197.
[20] 周波,金之钧,罗晓容,等.尺度放大时逾渗模型中的油气运移路径变化规律探讨.石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):175-180. ZHOU B,JIN Z J,LUO X R,et al. Changing patterns of hydrocarbon migration pathway in a up-scaling percolation model. Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(2):175-180.
[21] 万涛,蒋有录,董月霞,等. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷油气运移路径模拟及示踪. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2013,38(1):173-180. WAN T,JIANG Y L,DONG Y X,et al. Reconstructed and traced pathways of hydrocarbon migration in Nanpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2013,38(1):173-180.
[22] 姚城,张新涛,于海波,等. 石臼坨凸起东南斜坡带输导体系与油气运聚模式. 断块油气田,2017,24(6):755-759. YAO C,ZHANG X T,YU H B,et al. Hydrocarbon translocation system and migration-accumulation patterns in southeastern slope area,Shijiutuo Uplift. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2017,24(6):755-759.
[23] 郭秋麟,杨文静,肖中尧,等. 不整合面下缝洞岩体油气运聚模型:以塔里木盆地碳酸盐岩油藏为例. 石油实验地质, 2013,35(5):495-499. GUO Q L,YANG W J,XIAO Z Y,et al. Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation model of fractured-vuggy reservoir under unconformity surface. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013, 35(5):495-499.
[24] YIELDING G,FREEMAN B,NEEDHAM D T. Quantitative fault seal prediction. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(6):897-917.
[1] 陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[2] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[3] 余兴, 尤新才, 白雨, 李鹏, 朱涛. 玛湖凹陷南斜坡断裂识别及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 81-89.
[4] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[5] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[6] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[7] 李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[8] 袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73-84.
[9] 杨甫, 贺丹, 马东民, 段中会, 田涛, 付德亮. 低阶煤储层微观孔隙结构多尺度联合表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 14-23.
[10] 胡潇, 曲永强, 胡素云, 潘建国, 尹路, 许多年, 滕团余, 王斌. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 67-77.
[11] 吴家洋, 吕正祥, 卿元华, 杨家静, 金涛. 致密油储层中自生绿泥石成因及其对物性的影响——以川中东北部沙溪庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 76-85.
[12] 李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 陈静, 牛斌, 张顺存. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 54-66.
[13] 马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, 潘树新, 黄林军, 陈永波, 郭娟娟. 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式——以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 34-43.
[14] 刘冬冬, 杨东旭, 张子亚, 张晨, 罗群, 潘占昆, 黄治鑫. 基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 76-85.
[15] 李亚哲, 王力宝, 郭华军, 单祥, 邹志文, 窦洋. 基于地震波形指示反演的砂砾岩储层预测——以中拐-玛南地区上乌尔禾组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 134-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[5] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[6] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[7] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[8] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[9] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .
[10] 于兴河, 姜 辉, 李胜利, 陈永峤. 中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素 ——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 39 -45 .