岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 13–26.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210302

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用

郑荣臣1,2, 李宏涛1,2, 史云清1,2, 肖开华1,2   

  1. 1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石化海相油气藏开发重点实验室, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-29 修回日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 第一作者:郑荣臣（1978—），硕士，高级工程师，主要从事致密气田开发方面的研究工作。地址：（100083）北京市海淀区学院路31号中国石化石油勘探开发研究院。Email：zhengrc.syky@sinopec.com
  • 通信作者: 李宏涛(1977-),博士,高级工程师,主要从事致密气田开发方面的研究工作。Email:liht.syky@sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（编号：2016ZX05002-006）和中国石化科技部项目“杭锦旗十里加汗复杂气藏定量表征及开发对策”（编号：P19019-1）、“东胜气田精细表征及有效开发技术”（编号：P20065-2）联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics and diagenesis of the third member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin

ZHENG Rongchen1,2, LI Hongtao1,2, SHI Yunqing1,2, XIAO Kaihua1,2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Production, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory for Marine Oil and Gas Exploitation, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-04-29 Revised:2020-07-25 Published:2021-06-03

PDF (PC)

439

摘要： 川东北元坝地区多口井在上三叠统须家河组三段（须三段）钙屑砂岩储层中获中-高产工业气流，表明该段具有良好的勘探开发潜力，然而对须三段储层发育控制因素尚缺乏清晰的认识，制约了勘探开发部署。综合利用岩心观察、薄片鉴定、物性分析等结果，对该区须三段储层特征及成岩作用进行了研究，分析了沉积、成岩对储层发育的控制作用。结果表明，元坝地区须三段北西-南东向地层厚度变化大，呈明显的"西北厚、东南薄"的进积特征，属于进积式辫状河三角洲沉积。储层以钙屑砂岩为主，主要储集空间为溶孔、微溶孔等，物性为特低孔-特低渗、非均质性强。压实-压溶、胶结充填、溶蚀、重结晶、破裂等成岩作用在须三段储层成岩演化过程中较发育。就孔隙发育而言，建设性成岩作用主要为埋藏溶蚀和破裂作用等，压实和方解石胶结是重要的破坏性成岩作用。元坝地区须三段辫状河三角洲平原与前缘相对富煤的沉积环境及其中的煤系烃源岩，在生排烃演化过程中，其控制了（水下）分流河道钙屑砂岩储层埋藏溶蚀成岩作用的发育。综上所述，（水下）分流河道沉积微相是须三段钙屑砂岩孔隙发育的基础，埋藏溶蚀、破裂作用等成岩作用有利于储层孔隙的形成和改善。因此，（水下）分流河道中薄煤层或煤层夹层相对发育区，以及断裂、裂缝相对发育区为川东北元坝地区须三段储层发育有利区。

关键词: 钙屑砂岩, 沉积相, 储层, 成岩作用, 须三段, 川东北元坝地区

Abstract: Medium and high production commercial gas flow was found from several wells of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area of northeastern Sichuan Basin，which shows better exploration and development potential here. The controlling factors of reservoir development of the third member of Xujiahe Formation are not clearly understood，which restricts the exploration and development deployment. The data of core observation，thin section identification and physical property analysis were used to study the reservoir characteristics and diagenesis of Xu 3 member，and the control of sedimentation and diagenesis on reservoir development was analyzed. The results show that the strata of Xu 3 member are relatively instable in thickness with the characteristics of thick in northwest and thin in southeast，and belong to progradational braided river delta deposits. Reservoir rocks，which mainly belong to calcarenaceous sandstones with the characteristics of dissolved pores， microscopic dissolved pores，have the characteristics of super-low porosity and super-low permeability with strong heterogeneity. Reservoir diagenesis mainly includes compaction，cementation，dissolution，recrystallization and fracturing. For pore development，constructive diagenesis mainly includes burial dissolution and fracturing， and compaction and calcite cementation belong to important destructive diagenesis. In Yuanba area，calcarenaceous sandstones deposited in the braided river delta plain-front are the most favorable sedimentary microfacies. For reservoir development，the burial dissolution diagenesis could be controlled by the relatively coal-rich sedimentary environment of braided river delta plain-front to a certain extent. In conclusion，the sedimentary microfacies of underwater distributary channel and plain distributary channel in braided river delta front and plain is the foundation of pore development of calcareous sandstone of Xu 3 member. Diagenesis such as burial dissolution and fracturing is conducive to the formation and improvement of reservoir pores. Therefore，the relatively developed areas of thin coal seam or coal seam interlayer in distributary channel and the relatively developed area of faults and fractures may be favorable for reservoir development district.

Key words: calcarenaceous sandstones, sedimentary facies, reservoir, diagenesis, the third member of Xujiahe Formation, Yuanba area in northeastern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 郭彤楼. 四川盆地北部陆相大气田形成与高产主控因素. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(2):139-149. GUO T L. Key controls on accumulation and high production of large non-marine gas fields in northern Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(2):139-149.
[2] 肖开华, 李宏涛, 贾爽.川东北元坝地区须三段钙屑砂岩储层特征及控气因素.石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(5):654-660. XIAO K H, LI H T, JIA S. Characteristics of calcarenaceous sandstone reservoirs and gas accumulation control factors of the 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeast Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(5):654-660.
[3] 马如辉. YB地区须家河组须三段钙屑砂岩气藏成藏主控因素:以X7井为例. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(8):56-62. MA R H. Main controlling factors of gas accumulation in the calcarenaceous sandstone reservoirs in the 3rd member of the Xujiahe Formation in the YB area:A case study of X7 well. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(8):56-62.
[4] 王浩, 周文, 张冲. 元坝气藏须家河组三段储层特征与主控因素. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4):19-26. WANG H, ZHOU W, ZHANG C. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factor of the third member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba gas reservoir. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4):19-26.
[5] 凡睿. 元坝地区须家河组三段钙屑砂体特征及成因. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(3):31-33. FAN R. Features and genesis of calcarenaceous sandbody of member 3 of Xujiahe Fm in Yuanba. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(3):31-33.
[6] 杜红权, 王威, 周霞, 等.川东北元坝地区须三段钙屑砂砾岩储层特征及控制因素.石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4):565-570. DU H Q, WANG W, ZHOU X, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of calcareous coarse clastic rocks of the third member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(4):565-570.
[7] 司马立强, 袁龙, 吴思仪, 等. 川东北地区须三段钙屑砂岩储层特征及控制因素.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(2):178-188. SIMA L Q, YUAN L, WU S Y, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main control factors of Xu 3 member calcarenaceous sandstone in northeast Sichuan area. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(2):178-188.
[8] 葛祥, 张筠.川西地区须家河组三段勘探前景分析. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(5):8-9. GE X, ZHANG J. An analysis of exploration prospect of the third member of Xujiahe Fm in west Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(5):8-9.
[9] 王威. 川东北地区须家河组天然气高效成藏模式探讨. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):27-34. WANG W. High efficient reservoir accumulation models of natural gas of Xujiahe Formation in northeast Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):27-34.
[10] 王威. 高能河道砂体特征及勘探意义:以元坝地区须三段为例. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(6):657-661. WANG W. Characteristics of high-energy channel sandstone and its exploration significance:A case from Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(6):657-661.
[11] 王英华.碳酸盐岩成岩作用与孔隙演化.沉积学报, 1992, 10(3):85-95. WANG Y H. Carbonate diagenesis and porosity evolution. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1992, 10(3):85-95.
[12] 孟万斌, 肖春晖, 冯明石, 等.碳酸盐岩成岩作用及其对储层的影响:以塔中顺南地区一间房组为例.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):26-33. MENG W B, XIAO C H, FENG M S, et al. Carbonate diagenesis and its influence on reservoir:A case study from Yijianfang Formation in Shunnan area,central Tarim Basin. Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):26-33.
[13] 李嵘, 张娣, 朱丽霞. 四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组砂岩致密化研究. 石油实验地质, 2011, 33(3):274-281. LI R, ZHANG D, ZHU L X. Densification of Upper Triassic Xujiahe tight sandstones, western Sichuan, China. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(3):274-281.
[14] 林煜, 徐樟有, 吴胜和, 等.川西丰谷构造上三叠统须四段特低渗储层成岩储集相与成岩演化序列. 大庆石油学院学报, 2011, 35(2):1-8. LIN Y, XU Z Y, WU S H, et al. Diagenetic reservoir facies and diagenetic evolutionary sequences of extra-low permeability reservoir in Xu 4 Formation of Fenggu structure in western Sichuan. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2011, 35(2):1-8.
[15] 张帅, 王国芝, 黄盛, 等. 川西丰谷区须四段砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化. 云南地质, 2012, 31(4):508-511. ZHANG S, WANG G Z, HUANG S, et al. The diagenesis and pore evolution of sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in Fenggu area, west Sichuan. Yunnan Geology, 2012, 31(4):508-511.
[16] 何曼如, 孙廷彬, 王玲, 等. 川东北元坝地区须三段储集层形成机制. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(1):6-10. HE M R, SUN T B, WANG L, et al. Formation mechanism of 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation reservoir in Yuanba area of northeast Sichuan Basin. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(1):6-10.
[17] 唐自成, 钟大康, 王威, 等. 川东北元坝地区须家河组三段钙屑砂岩孔隙类型及地质意义. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):1115-1125. TANG Z C, ZHONG D K, WANG W, et al. Pore types and geological significance of calcarenaceous sandstones in the 3rd member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):1115-1125.
[18] 王威, 黄曼宁. 元坝地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏富集主控因素. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(3):266-273. WANG W, HUANG M N. Main controlling factors of the tight sandstone gas reservoir of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(3):266-273.
[19] 林煜, 吴胜和, 徐樟有, 等.川西丰谷构造须家河组四段钙屑砂岩优质储层控制因素. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4):691-699. LIN Y, WU S H, XU Z Y, et al. Controlling factors for T3x4 calcarenaceous sandstone in Fenggu structure,western Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4):691-699.
[20] 罗文军, 彭军, 曾小英, 等. 川西丰谷地区须四段钙屑砂岩优质储层形成机理. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(4):412-421. LUO W J, PENG J, ZENG X Y, et al. Formation mechanism of high-quality reservoir of calcarenaceous sandstone in fourth member of Xujiahe Formation, Fenggu area, western Sichuan Depression. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(4):412-421.
[21] 吴朝容, 段文燊, 李全虎. FG地区钙屑砂岩储层预测. 工程地球物理学报, 2011, 8(4):483-486. WU C R, DUAN W S, LI Q H. The reservoir prediction of calcium crumbs sandstone in FG area. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2011, 8(4):483-486.
[22] 毛琼, 郑荣才, 邹光富, 等. 川东北前陆盆地上三叠统沉积相及沉积演化. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2012, 32(1):1-11. MAO Q, ZHENG R C, ZOU G F, et al. Upper Triassic sedimentary facies and sedimentary evolution in the northeastern Sichuan foreland basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2012, 32(1):1-11.
[23] 黎静容, 李毓, 程洪亮, 等. 元坝地区须三段沉积特征. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 28(5):43-50. LI J R, LI Y, CHENG H L, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the third member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 28(5):43-50.
[24] 谢继容, 李国辉, 唐大海. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组物源供给体系分析. 天然气勘探与开发, 2006, 29(4):1-3. XIE J R, LI G H, TANG D H. Analysis on provenance-supply system of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation,Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2006, 29(4):1-3.
[25] 李宏涛, 肖开华, 贾爽, 等. 川东北元坝地区须三气藏钙屑砂岩储层评价:以Tx33砂组为例. 武汉:2015年全国天然气学术年会, 2015:69-83. LI H T, XIAO K H, JIA S, et al. Reservoirs comprehensive evaluation of Xu 3 gas pool in Yuanba area, north-eastern Sichuan:An example of sandstone group Tx33. Wuhan:2015 National Natural Gas Academic Annual Meeting, 2015:69-83.
[26] 郑荣才, 李国晖, 雷光明, 等. 四川盆地须家河组层序分析与地层对比. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(6):12-20. ZHENG R C, LI G H, LEI G M, et al. Sequence analysis and stratigraphic correlation of Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(6):12-20.
[27] 王小娟, 唐大海, 张晓丽, 等. 灰屑砂岩在须家河组沉积相研究中的应用. 天然气勘探与开发, 2014, 37(4):10-13. WANG X J, TANG D H, ZHANG X L, et al. Role of Calcarenaceous sandstone in sedimentary facies of Xujiahe Formation. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2014, 37(4):10-13.
[28] 杨帆, 曹正林, 卫延召, 等.玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):30-39. YANG F, CAO Z L, WEI Y Z, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water braided delta of Karamay Formation in Mahu area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):30-39.
[29] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 等. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):36-50. ZHANG J Q, LI S X, ZHOU X P, et al. Development pattern and genesis of gentle slope shallow water delta front sand bodies of Chang 82 sand set in Zhidan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):36-50.
[30] 李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 等. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价:以什邡气藏Jp35砂组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2):78-89. LI H T, MA L Y, SHI Y Q, et al. Distribution and evaluation of underwater distributary channel sandstone reservoir based on wellseismic combination:A case study of Jp35 sand group in Shifang gas reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2):78-89.
[31] 薛辉, 韩春元, 肖博雅, 等. 蠡县斜坡高阳地区沙一下亚段浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及模式. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):69-80. XUE H, HAN C Y, XIAO B Y, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and models of shallow water delta front of the lower first member of Shahejie Formation in Gaoyang area, Lixian Slope. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):69-80.
[32] 曹剑, 张义杰, 胡文瑄, 等. 油气储层自生高岭石发育特点及其对物性的影响. 矿物学报, 2005, 25(4):367-373. CAO J, ZHANG Y J, HU W X, et al. Developing characteristics of kaolinite in central Junggar Basin and their effect on the reservoir quality. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 2005, 25(4):367-373.
[33] 李宏涛. 河坝气藏飞仙关组三段储集岩特征及成岩作用.石油学报, 2013, 34(2):263-271. LI H T. Diagenesis and characteristics of reservoirs in the member 3 of the Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in Heba gas field. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):263-271.
[34] 朱国华.黏土矿物对陕甘宁盆地中生界砂岩储集层性质的影响及意义.石油勘探与开发, 1988, 15(4):20-26. ZHU G H. Effects of clay minerals on the Triassic sandstone reservoir in Shan-Gan-Ning Basin and their significance. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1988, 15(4):20-26.
[35] 王少依, 王行信, 韩守华.影响我国陆相碎屑岩储集层黏土矿物组合和分布的因素.石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(6):19-21. WANG S Y, WANG X X, HAN S H. Factors affecting the clay mineral components and distributions of continental clastic reservoir in China.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(6):19-21.
[36] 陈鑫, 钟建华, 袁静, 等. 渤南洼陷古近系高岭石发育特征及转化机理. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(4):456-62. CHEN X, ZHONG J H, YUAN J, et al.Development and formation of Paleogene kaolinite, Bonan Subsag. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(4):456-462.
[37] 楚翠金, 夏志林, 杨志强. 延川南区块致密砂岩气测井识别与评价技术. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):131-138. CHU C J, XIA Z L, YANG Z Q. Logging identification and evaluation of tight sandstone gas in the southernYanchuan block. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):131-138.
[38] 王英华, 张绍平, 潘荣胜.阴极发光技术在地质学中的应用. 北京:地质出版社, 1990:20. WANG Y H, ZHANG S P, PAN R S. The applications of the technology of cathode luminescence in geology. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1990:20.
[39] 郭艳琴, 何子琼, 郭彬程, 等. 苏里格气田东南部盒8 段致密砂岩储层特征及评价. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):1-11. GUO Y Q, HE Z Q, GUO B C, et al. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of tight sandstone of He 8 member in southeastern Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):1-11.
[40] SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstone:A model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):485-491.
[41] BEARD D C, WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):349-369.
[42] 张兴良, 田景春, 王峰, 等. 致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征与孔隙演化定量评价:以鄂尔多斯盆地高桥地区二叠系下石盒子组盒8 段为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2):212-217. ZHANG X L, TIAN J C, WANG F, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity estimation of tight sandstone reservoirs:A case from the 8th member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in the Gaoqiao region, Ordos Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2):212-217.
[43] 王继伟, 朱玉双, 饶欣久, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山地区长61致密砂岩储层成岩特征与孔隙度定量恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):34-43. WANG J W, ZHU Y S, RAO X J, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and quantitative porosity restoration of Chang 61 tight sandstone reservoir in Hujianshan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):34-43.
[44] 李佳思, 付磊, 张金龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地乌夏地区中上二叠统碎屑岩成岩作用及次生孔隙演化. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):54-66. LI J S, FU L, ZHANG J L, et al. Diagenesis and secondary pore evolution of Middle and Upper Permian clastic rocks in Wu-Xia area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):54-66.
[45] 马永平, 王国栋, 张献文, 等. 粗粒沉积次生孔隙发育模式:以准噶尔盆地西北缘二叠系夏子街组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5):34-43. MA Y P, WANG G D, ZHANG X W, et al. Development model of secondary pores in coarse-grained deposits:A case study of Permian Xiazijie Formation in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(5):34-43.
[46] 黄福堂, 邹信芳, 姜洪启, 等. 松辽盆地北部不同类型干酪根氧化产物中有机酸成分分析及对储层结构影响研究. 石油实验地质, 1995, 17(2):156-166. HUANG F T, ZOU X F, JIANG H Q, et al. Analysis on organic acid composition in the oxidized products of different typed kerogens in the north Songliao Basin and study of its effects on reservoir structure. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 1995, 17(2):156-166.
[47] SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organicinorganic internation and sandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(1):1-23.
[48] SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstone:A model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):485-491.
[49] 佘敏, 寿建峰, 沈安江, 等. 从表生到深埋藏环境下有机酸对碳酸盐岩溶蚀的实验模拟. 地球化学, 2014, 43(3):276-286. SHE M, SHOU J F, SHEN A J, et al. Experimental simulation of dissolution for carbonate rocks in organic acid under the conditions from epigenesist to deep burial environments. Geochimica, 2014,43(3):276-286.
[50] 陈传平, 固旭, 周苏闽, 等.不同有机酸对矿物溶解的动力学实验研究. 地质学报, 2008, 82(7):1007-1012. CHEN C P, GU X, ZHOU S M, et al. Experimental research on dissolution dynamics of main minerals in several aqueous organic acid solutions. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(7):1007-1012.
[51] 李宏涛, 肖开华, 龙胜祥, 等.四川盆地元坝地区长兴组生物礁储层形成控制因素与发育模式.石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(5):744-755. LI H T, XIAO K H, LONG S X, et al. Controlling factors and development models of biohermal reservoirs of the Changxing Formation in Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(5):744-755.
[52] HAMLIN S H, DUTTON S P, SEGGIE R J, et a1. Depositional controls on reservoir properties in a braid delta sandstone, Tirrawarra Oil Field, South Australia. AAPG Bulletin, 1996, 80(2):139-156.
[1] 张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 张文起, 谢明贤, 雷明, 郭强, 张雪锐. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[2] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[3] 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[4] 苏皓, 郭艳东, 曹立迎, 喻宸, 崔书岳, 卢婷, 张云, 李俊超. 顺北油田断控缝洞型凝析气藏衰竭式开采特征及保压开采对策[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 178-188.
[5] 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[6] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[7] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[8] 何文渊, 陈可洋. 哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Doshan斜坡带岩性油气藏储层预测方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 1-11.
[9] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[10] 田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[11] 卢科良, 吴康军, 李志军, 孙永河, 徐少华, 梁锋, 刘露, 李爽. 川中古隆起北斜坡寒武系龙王庙组油气成藏特征及演化模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 159-168.
[12] 唐述凯, 郭天魁, 王海洋, 陈铭. 致密储层缝内暂堵转向压裂裂缝扩展规律数值模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 169-177.
[13] 秦正山, 何勇明, 丁洋洋, 李柏宏, 孙双双. 边水气藏水侵动态分析方法及水侵主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 178-188.
[14] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[15] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇，胡明毅，刘富艳，王辉，胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙，田景春，肖玲，王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维，李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮，涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发