岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 63–75.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210407

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统沉积岩层地球化学特征及古环境意义

陈亚军1, 荆文波2, 宋小勇1, 何伯斌2, 伍宏美1, 王睿2, 解士建2, 宋凯辉2, 马强3   

  1. 1. 北京中科联华石油科学研究院, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国石油吐哈油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 哈密 839009;
    3. 中国石油玉门油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 酒泉 735019
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27 修回日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
  • 第一作者:陈亚军(1990-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事火山喷发环境及火山岩储层地质方面的研究工作。地址:(100101)北京市朝阳区北辰东路8号汇宾大厦B座1621室。Email:cjun0707@163.com。ORCID:0000-0003-4747-904X。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油吐哈油田分公司“三塘湖牛东地区石炭系滚动目标优选”(编号:YJYHZC2019022)资助

Geochemical characteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of Upper Carboniferous sedimentary strata in Malang Sag, Santanghu Basin

CHEN Yajun1, JING Wenbo2, SONG Xiaoyong1, HE Bobin2, WU Hongmei1, WANG Rui2, XIE Shijian2, SONG Kaihui2, MA Qiang3   

  1. 1. China United Academy of Petroleum Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, Xinjiang, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735019, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-07-27 Revised:2020-09-29 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

摘要: 为判别三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统火山喷发间歇期沉积岩夹层的古沉积环境,以上石炭统卡拉岗组和哈尔加乌组熔岩和火山碎屑岩中沉积岩夹层样品的微量元素测试结果为基础,通过微量元素地球化学研究,运用w (U)/w (Th),w (V)/w (Cr),w (V)/w (V+Ni),w (V)/w (Sc),w (Sr)/w (Ba),w (B)/w (Ga)等判别出的指标图版,结合因素筛选分析法,用多组组合指标来判别古沉积环境,以了解沉积岩夹层沉积介质的氧化还原状态。结果表明:卡拉岗组和哈尔加乌组熔岩和火山碎屑岩中沉积岩夹层w (V)/w (Cr),w (V)/w (Sc),w (V)/w (V+Ni),w (Sr)/w (Ba)和w (B)/w (Ga)这5类比值演化趋势较稳定,是古沉积环境判别较佳的组合指标;卡拉岗组沉积岩夹层形成于水、陆过渡相及陆上氧化环境介质中,哈尔加乌组沉积岩夹层主要形成于水下还原环境介质中,少量形成于水、陆过渡复杂环境介质中。该地球化学方法具有普适性,可用于不同地质时代、不同区域地质条件下火山喷发间歇期沉积岩层古沉积环境的研究中。

关键词: 微量元素, 地球化学, 古沉积环境, 卡拉岗组, 哈尔加乌组, 马朗凹陷

Abstract: In order to distinguish the paleoenvironment of sedimentary interbeds during the interval of Upper Carboniferous volcanic eruption in Malang Sag,Santanghu Basin,based on the trace element test results of sedimen-tary interbed samples from lava and pyroclastic rocks of Upper Carboniferous Kalagang Formation and Haerjiawu Formation,through the study of trace element geochemistry,the index charts identified by U/Th,V/Cr,V(/V+Ni), V/Sc,Sr/Ba and B/Ga and factor screening analysis were used to distinguish the paleosedimentary environment,so as to understand the redox state of sedimentary medium. The results show that the V/Cr, V/SC, V/(V+Ni),Sr/Ba and B/Ga ratios of sedimentary interbeds in lava and pyroclastic rocks of Kalagang Formation and Haerjiawu Formation are relatively stable, which can be used as a better combination index for distinguishing paleosedimentary environment. The sedimentary interbeds of Kalagang Formation(C2k)were formed in the transitional facies of water and land and the medium of land oxidation environment,the sedimentary interbeds of Haerjiawu Formation(C2h)were mainly formed in the medium of underwater reduction environment,with little in complex transitional environment of water and land. This geochemical method is universal and can be used to distinguish the paleosedimentary environment of sedimentary strata in volcanic eruption intermission period under different geological times and regional geological conditions.

Key words: trace element, geochemistry, sedimentary paleoenvironment, Kalagang Formation, Haerjiawu Formation, Malang Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+1
[1] 傅强, 李璟, 邓秀琴, 等.沉积事件对深水沉积过程的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长6油层组为例.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):20-29. FU Q, LI J, DENG X Q, et al. Influence of sedimentary events on deep water sedimentation process:A case of Chang 6 reservoir in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1):20-29.
[2] 熊小辉, 肖加飞. 沉积环境的地球化学示踪. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(3):405-414. XIONG X H, XIAO J F. Geochemical indicators of sedimentary environments. Earth and Environment, 2011, 39(3):405-414.
[3] 李红敬, 解习农, 颜佳新, 等.扬子地区典型剖面二叠系不同沉积相地球化学特征.地质科技情报, 2010, 29(2):16-23. LI H J, XIE X N, YAN J X, et al. Geochemical characteristics of different facies of Permian typical sections in the Yangtze region.Geological Science and Technology Information, 2010, 29(2):16-23.
[4] 程岳宏, 于兴河, 韩宝清, 等.东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段地球化学特征及地质意义.中国地质, 2010, 37(2):357-366. CHENG Y H, YU X H, HAN B Q, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the 3rd member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongpu Depression and their geological implications. Geology in China, 2010, 37(2):357-366.
[5] ALGEO T J, MAYNARD J B. Trace-element behavior and redox facies in core shales of Upper Pennsylvanian Kansas-type cyclothems. Chemical Geology, 2004, 206(3):289-318.
[6] 常华进, 储雪蕾, 冯连君, 等.氧化还原敏感微量元素对古海洋沉积环境的指示意义.地质论评, 2009, 55(1):91-99. CHANG H J, CHU X L, FENG L J, et al. Redox sensitive trace elements as paleoenvironments proxies. Geological Review, 2009, 55(1):91-99.
[7] LEMAITRE R W. The chemical variability of some common igneous rocks. Journal of Petrology, 1976, 17(4):589-598.
[8] DYAR M D, NANEY M T, SWANSON S E. Effects of quench methods on Fe3+/Fe2+ ratios:A Mössbauer and wet-chemical study. American Mineralogist, 1987, 72:792-800.
[9] 张艳, 舒萍, 王璞珺, 等.陆上与水下喷发火山岩的区别及其对储层的影响:以松辽盆地营城组为例.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(6):1259-1265. ZHANG Y, SHU P, WANG P J, et al. Comparison between subaerial and subaqueous volcanic rocks and the reservoir significance:Taking Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin as example. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6):1259-1265.
[10] 王岚, 李文厚, 林潼, 等.陆上、水下喷发成因火山岩储层发育特征和成藏控制因素对比分析:以三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩油藏为例.地质科学, 2010, 45(4):1088-1097. WANG L, LI W H, LIN T, et al. A comparative analysis of submarine eruptive and subaerial eruptive volcaniclastic reservoir on characteristics of reservoir and reservoir forming dominated factor:Taking Carboniferous volcaniclastic reservoir in Santanghu Basin as example. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2010, 45(4):1088-1097.
[11] 王盛鹏, 林潼, 孙平, 等.两种不同沉积环境下火山岩储层成岩作用研究.石油实验地质, 2012, 34(2):145-152. WANG S P, LIN T, SUN P, et al. Influences of diagenetic effects on volcanic rock reservoirs under two different sedimentary environments. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2012, 34(2):145-152.
[12] 焦鑫, 柳益群, 杨晚, 等.水下火山喷发沉积特征研究进展.地球科学进展, 2017, 32(9):926-936. JIAO X, LIU Y Q, YANG W, et al. Progress on sedimentation of subaqueous volcanic eruption. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(9):926-936.
[13] 何衍鑫, 鲜本忠, 牛花朋, 等.基于氧化系数的火山喷发环境判别:以准噶尔盆地西北缘下二叠统为例. 高校地质学报, 2017, 23(4):737-749. HE Y X, XIAN B Z, NIU H P, et al. Discrimination of volcanic eruption environment using oxidation index:A case study of Lower Permian volcanic rocks in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2017, 23(4):737-749.
[14] 邓宏文, 钱凯.沉积地球化学与环境分析.兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社, 1993. DENG H W, QIAN K. Sedimentary geochemistry and environmental analysis. Lanzhou:Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1993.
[15] 梁浩, 苟红光.三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩岩石化学特征及构造环境. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(5):23-28. LIANG H, GOU H G. Petrochemical characteristics and structural environment of the volcanic rock of Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 24(5):23-28.
[16] 林潼, 焦贵浩, 孙平, 等.三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩储层特征及其影响因素分析.天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(4):513-517. LIN T, JIAO G H, SUN P, et al. Characteristic and Influencing Factors of Carboniferous Volcanic Reservoirs in Santanghu Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(4):513-517.
[17] 马雪, 冯成贵, 虞卫东.新疆巴里坤县三塘湖北卡拉岗组火山岩特征.新疆地质, 2005, 23(3):234-238. MA X, FENG C G, YU W D. Kalagang lava formation North Santanghu Lake, Balikun, Xinjiang. Xinjiang Geology, 2005, 23(3):234-238.
[18] 刘俊田, 刘媛萍, 郭沫贞, 等.三塘湖盆地牛东地区石炭系火山岩相储层特征及其形成机理. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2):64-69. LIU J T, LIU Y P, GUO M Z, et al. Volcanic reservoir characteristics and genetic mechanism of Carboniferous in Niudong area of Santanghu Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2):64-69.
[19] 司学强, 王鑫, 陈薇, 等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷哈尔加乌组火山岩旋回与期次划分.地质科技情报, 2012, 31(6):74-79. SI X Q, WANG X, CHEN W, et al. Division of volcanic cycles and stages of the Haerjiawu Formation in Malang Depression, Santanghu Basin.Geological Science and Technology Information, 2012, 31(6):74-79.
[20] 罗权生, 聂朝强, 文川江, 等.新疆三塘湖盆地牛东地区卡拉岗组火山旋回和期次的划分与对比.现代地质, 2009, 23(3):515-522. LUO Q S, NIU C Q, WEN C J, et al. Division and correlation of volcanic eruptible gyration and period of Kalagang Formation in Niudong area, Xinjiang. Geoscience, 2009, 23(3):515-522.
[21] 朱卡, 李兰斌, 梁浩, 等.三塘湖盆地石炭系火山岩喷发环境及储层特征研究.石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(3):49-54. ZHU K, LI L B, LIANG H, et al. The eruption environment and reservoir characteristics of Carboniferous volcanic rocks in Santanghu Basin. Journal of Oil & Gas Technology, 2012, 34(3):49-54.
[22] 刁桂仪, 文启忠, 吴明清, 等.黄河中游马兰黄土中若干微量元素的平均含量及相关性研究. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1996, 16(2):85-92.DIAO G Y, WEN Q Z, WU M Q, et al. Study on the average contents and correlativity of trace elements in Malan loess from the middle reaches of the Yellow River. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 1996, 16(2):85-92.
[23] JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1):111-129.
[24] ERNST W. Geochemical facies analysis. New York:Elsevier, 1970.
[25] 曾春林, 姜波, 尹成明, 等.柴达木盆地北缘微量元素含量及油气地质意义.新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(5):566-568. ZENG C L, JIANG B, YIN C M, et al. Trace element contents and their oil-gas geological significance in northern margin of Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(5):566-568.
[26] KIMURA H, WATANABE Y. Oceanic anoxia at the Precambri-an-Cambrian boundary. Geology, 2001, 29(11):995-998.
[27] RIMMER S M. Geochemical paleoredox indicators in DevonianMississippian black shales,central Appalachian Basin(USA). Chemical Geology, 2004, 206:373-391.
[28] WIGNALL P B, TWITCHETT R J. Oceanic anoxia and the end Permian mass extinction. Science, 1996, 272:1155-1158.
[29] WIGNALL P B, MYERS K J. Interpreting benthic oxygen levels in mud rocks:A new approach. Geology, 1988, 16(5):452-455.
[30] 张国涛, 彭中勤, 王传尚, 等.贵州独山下二叠统梁山组地球化学特征及其沉积环境意义. 中国地质, 2016, 43(4):1291-1303. ZHANG G T, PENG Z Q, WANG C S, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Lower Permian Liangshan Formation in Dushan area of Guizhou province and their implications for the paleoenvironment. Geology in China, 2016, 43(4):1291-1303.
[31] 范玉海, 屈红军, 王辉, 等.微量元素分析在判别沉积介质环境中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地西部中区晚三叠世为例.中国地质, 2012, 39(2):382-389. FAN Y H, QU H J, WANG H, et al. The application of trace elements analysis to identifying sedimentary media environment:A case study of Late Triassic strata in the middle part of western Ordos Basin. Geology in China, 2012, 39(2):382-389.
[32] BAILEY S W, HORNBECK J W, PRISCOLL C T, et al. Calcium inputs and transport in a base -poor forest ecosystem as interpreted by Sr isotopes. Water Resource Research, 1996, 32(3):707-719.
[33] REINHARDT E G, BLENKINSOP J, PATRERSON R T. Assessment of a Sr isotope vital effect(87Sr/86Sr)in marine taxa from Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas. Geo-Marine Letters, 1998, 18(3):241-246.
[34] 梅水泉.岩石化学在湖南前震旦系沉积环境及铀来源研究中的应用.湖南地质, 1988, 7(3):25-31. MEI S Q. Application of rock chemistry in the study of Presinian sedimentary environment and the source of uranium mineralization in Hunan province. Hunan Geology, 1988, 7(3):25-31.
[35] 胡见义, 黄第藩, 徐树宝, 等.中国陆相石油地质理论基础.北京:石油工业出版社, 1991:189. HU J Y, HUANG D F, XU S B, et al. The foundation of china continental petroleum geology theory. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1991:189.
[36] 陈代演, 王华.贵州中北部铝土矿若干微量元素特征及其沉积意义.贵州工业大学学报, 1997, 26(2):37-41. CHEN D Y, WANG H. Characteristics and sedimentary significance of some trace elements in bauxite in the central and northern part of Guizhou Province. Journal of Guizhou University of Technology, 1997, 26(2):37-41.
[37] CHEN Z Y, CHEN Z L, ZHANG W G. Quaternary stratigraphy and trace-element indicates of the Yangtze delta, eastern China, with special reference to marine transgressions. Quaternary Research, 1997, 47(2):181-191.
[38] 于炳松, 陈建强, 李兴武, 等.塔里木盆地下寒武统底部黑色页岩地球化学及其岩石圈演化意义. 中国科学:地球科学, 2002, 32(5):374-382. YU B S, CHEN J Q, LI X W, et al. Geochemistry of black shales and its lithosphere evolution at the bottom of the Lower Cambrian in Tarim Basin. Science in China:Earth Sciences, 2002, 32(5):374-382.
[1] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2] 邹连松, 徐文礼, 梁西文, 刘皓天, 周坤, 霍飞, 周林, 文华国. 川东地区下侏罗统自流井组东岳庙段泥页岩沉积特征及物质来源[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 122-135.
[3] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[4] 李二庭, 米巨磊, 张宇, 潘越扬, 迪丽达尔·肉孜, 王海静, 高秀伟. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 88-97.
[5] 郭谨豪, 胡国艺, 何坤, 米敬奎, 田连杰, 贺飞, 郭楚媛, 卢梦蝶. 川北地区二叠系大隆组烃源岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 139-152.
[6] 梁小聪, 牛杏, 胡明毅, 黎洋, 胡忠贵, 蔡全升. 湘鄂西下寒武统牛蹄塘组黑色页岩发育特征及沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 102-114.
[7] 薛楠, 邵晓州, 朱光有, 张文选, 齐亚林, 张晓磊, 欧阳思琪, 王淑敏. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉北地区三叠系长7段烃源岩地球化学特征及形成环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 51-65.
[8] 邓美玲, 王宁, 李新琦, 陈容涛, 刘岩, 徐耀辉. 渤海莱州湾凹陷中部古近系沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 49-62.
[9] 魏新, 唐建云, 宋红霞, 陈玉宝. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区上古生界烃源岩地球化学特征及生烃潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 92-100.
[10] 王登, 周豹, 冷双梁, 温雅茹, 刘海, 张小波, 余江浩, 陈威. 鄂西咸丰地区五峰组—龙马溪组硅质岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 52-62.
[11] 张小琴, 李威, 王飞龙, 王宁, 徐耀辉, 刘岩, 程如蛟, 刘华秋. 辽东湾地区古近系烃源岩生物标志物特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 73-85.
[12] 阳宏, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 汤国民, 李国雄, 曾晓祥, 吴育平. 渤中凹陷东营组古沉积环境及烃源岩发育模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 81-92.
[13] 马博, 吉利明, 张明震, 金培红, 苑伯超, 龙礼文. 酒西盆地红柳峡地区下白垩统烃源岩孢粉相与沉积古环境特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 22-33.
[14] 徐宇轩, 代宗仰, 胡晓东, 徐志明, 李丹. 川东北沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义——以五宝场地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 209-219.
[15] 蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 赵辛楣. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 109-119.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .