岩性油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 110–121.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240611

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价

白玉彬1,2, 李梦瑶3, 朱涛3, 赵靖舟1,2, 任海姣3, 吴伟涛1,2, 吴和源1,   

  1. 1. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065;
    2. 陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065;
    3. 中国石油新疆油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-09 修回日期:2024-01-05 出版日期:2024-11-01 发布日期:2024-11-04
  • 第一作者:白玉彬（1981—）,男,博士,副教授,主要从事致密油（页岩油）形成机理与富集规律等方面的教学和科研工作。地址:（710065）陕西省西安市电子二路18号。Email:baiyubin@xsyu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“流体活动与自生矿物形成转化及有机质热演化对页岩孔隙发育和烃类赋存的影响”（编号：42372155）资助。

Geochemical characteristics of source rocks and evaluation of shale oil “sweet spot”of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag

BAI Yubin1,2, LI Mengyao3, ZHU Tao3, ZHAO Jingzhou1,2, REN Haijiao3, WU Weitao1,2, WU Heyuan1,   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Petroleum University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2023-10-09 Revised:2024-01-05 Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-11-04

PDF (PC)

112

摘要： 通过岩石薄片、总有机碳（TOC）、岩石热解、氯仿沥青“A”、镜质体反射率（Ro）等多种岩石学及有机地球化学分析资料，对准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩特征进行了评价，并建立了页岩油“甜点”评价标准，以典型井为例系统刻画了研究区“甜点”的分布特征。研究结果表明：①玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩矿物组成主要为石英、长石和白云石，其次为方解石和黏土矿物，岩石类型包括灰质泥岩、砂质泥岩、云质泥岩与泥岩。②不同岩性烃源岩的有机质丰度存在一定的差异，TOC平均为0.75%；有机质类型以生油Ⅱ型为主，其次为Ⅰ型和少量的Ⅲ型；处于低成熟—成熟演化阶段，以中等—极好烃源岩为主。③优选TOC、氯仿沥青“A”、游离烃S1和Ro作为页岩油“甜点”评价参数，将其划分为富集、中等富集、低效与无效共4种资源类型。④典型井玛页1井的页岩油“甜点”评价结果显示，高TOC、高氯仿沥青“A”和S1、高油饱指数（OSI）的层段页岩油勘探潜力最好；相对贫有机质、S1较高的层段，页岩油也具有一定的勘探潜力。

关键词: 烃源岩, 有机地球化学, 页岩油, “甜点”评价, 有机质类型, 有机质丰度, 有机质成熟度, 风城组, 二叠系, 玛湖凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: The source rock characteristics of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag were defined based on a variety of petrographic and organic geochemical data，such as rock slices，total organic carbon（TOC）， rock-eval pyrolysis，chloroform bitumen“A”and vitrinite reflectance（Ro）. The evaluation standard of shale oil “sweet spot”was established，and the distribution characteristics of“sweet spot”in the study area were systematically described by taking typical wells as examples. The results show that：（1）The source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag are mainly composed of quartz，feldspar and dolomite，followed by calcite and clay minerals. The rock types include calcareous mudstone，sandy mudstone，dolomitic mudstone and mud stone.（2）The abundance of organic matter in source rocks with different lithologies is different，and TOC is 0.75% on average. The organic matter type is mainly type Ⅱ，which is the main source of oil generation，fol lowed by type Ⅰ and a small amount of type Ⅲ. It is in the low maturity to mature evolution stage，and dominated by medium to very high-quality source rocks.（3）TOC，chloroform bitumen“A”，free hydrocarbon S1 and Ro were selected as evluation parameters for shale oil“sweet spot”and divided into four resource types：enriched， medium enriched，low efficiency and ineffective.（4）The evaluation results of shale oil“sweet spot”in typical well Maye 1 show that the shale oil exploration potential is the best in the layers with high TOC，chloroform bitu men“A”，S1，and oil saturation index（OSI）. In addition，shale oil also has exploration potential in the relatively organic-poor interval with high S1.

Key words: source rock, organic geochemistry, shale oil, “sweet spot”evaluation, organic matter type, organic matter abundance, organic matter maturity, Fengcheng Formation, Permian, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] SOEDER D J. The successful development of gas and oil re sources from shales in North America[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2018，163:399-420.
[2] 罗群，张泽元，袁珍珠，等. 致密油甜点的内涵、评价与优选: 以酒泉盆地青西凹陷白垩系下沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏， 2022，34（4）:1-12. LUO Qun，ZHANG Zeyuan，YUAN Zhenzhu，et al. Connota tion，evaluation and optimization of tight oil sweet spots:A case study of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Qingxi Sag，Jiu quan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2022，34（4）:1-12.
[3] WANG Pengwei，CHEN Zhuoheng，JIN Zhijun，et al. Shale oil and gas resources in organic pores of the devonian duvernay shale，western Canada sedimentary basin based on petroleum system modeling[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engi neering，2018，50:33-42.
[4] 李梦莹，朱如凯，胡素云. 海外陆相页岩油地质特征与资源潜力[J].岩性油气藏，2022，34（1）:163-174. LI Mengying，ZHU Rukai，HU Suyun. Geological characteris tics and resource potential of overseas terrestrial shale oil[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2022，34（1）:163-174.
[5] DONOHUE C M，BARRIE C D. A review of the Bakken petro leum systems in the United States and Canada:Recognizing the importance of the middle member play[J]. AAPG Bulletin，2021， 105（9）:1847-1866.
[6] CURIALE J A，CURTIS J B. Organic geochemical applications to the exploration for source-rock reservoirs:A review[J]. Jour nal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources，2016，13:1-31.
[7] YOU Jiyuan，LIU Yiqun，LI Yijun，et al. Influencing factor of Chang 7 oil shale of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin: Constraint from hydrothermal fluid[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2021，201:108532.
[8] 曾治平，柳忠泉，赵乐强，等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘哈山地区二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏， 2023，35（1）:25-35.ZENG Zhiping，LIU Zhongquan，ZHAO Leqiang，et al. Shale oil reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Hashan area，northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2023，35（1）:25-35.
[9] ZHAO Xianzheng，PU Xiugang，JIN Fengming，et al. Geologi cal characteristics and key exploration technologies of continen tal shale oil sweet spots:A case study of member 2 of Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong sag in the Huanghua depression， Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Research，2019，4:97-112.
[10] FENG Yue，XIAO Xianming，WANG Enze，et al. Oil Retention in shales:A Review of the mechanism，controls and assessment [J]. Frontiers in Earth Science，2021，9:720839.
[11] WANG Enze，LI Changrong，FENG Yue，et al. Novel method for determining the oil moveable threshold and an innovative model for evaluating the oil content in shales[J]. Energy，2022， 239:121848.
[12] WANG Enze，FENG Yue，GUO Tonglou，et al. Oil content and resource quality evaluation methods for lacustrine shale:A re view and a novel three-dimensional quality evaluation model [J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2022，232:104134.
[13] ZHU Chenxi，JIANG Fujie，ZHANG Pengyuan，et al. Identifi cation of effective source rocks in different sedimentary envi ronments and evaluation of hydrocarbon resources potential:A case study of paleogene source rocks in the Dongpu Depression， Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engi neering，2021，201:108477.
[14] ZHANG Pengyuan，JIANG Fujie，ZHU Chenxi，et al. Gas Generation Potential and characteristics of oil-prone shale in the saline lacustrine rifting basins:A case study of the Dongpu Depres sion，Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Energy & Fuels，2021，35:2192-2208.
[15] 曹剑，雷德文，李玉文，等. 古老碱湖优质烃源岩:准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组[J]. 石油学报，2015，36（7）:781-790. CAO Jian，LEI Dewen，LI Yuwen，et al. Ancient high-quality al kaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation，Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica， 2015，36（7）:781-790.
[16] 唐勇，王智强，庞燕青，等.准噶尔盆地西部坳陷二叠系下乌尔禾组烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J]. 岩性油气藏，2023，35（4）: 16-28. TANG Yong，WANG Zhiqiang，PANG Yanqing，et al. Hydro carbon-generating potential of source rocks of Permian lower Urho Formation in western depression，Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2023，35（4）:16-28.
[17] 雷德文，阿布力米提，秦志军，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷碱湖轻质油气成因与分布[M]. 北京:科学出版社，2017. LEI Dewen，ABULIMITI，QIN Zhijun，et al. Origin and oc currence of the light oil and gas in the alkaline lake of Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[M]. Beijing:Science Press，2017.
[18] 白雨，汪飞，牛志杰，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏，2022，34（4）:116-127. BAI Yu，WANG Fei，NIU Zhijie，et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2022，34（4）:116-127.
[19] 陈建平，王绪龙，邓春萍，等. 准噶尔盆地烃源岩与原油地球化学特征[J]. 地质学报，2016，90（1）:37-67. CHEN Jianping，WANG Xulong，DENG Chunping，et al. Geo chemical features of source rocks and crude oil in the Junggar Basin，northwest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica，2016，90（1）: 37-67.
[20] 尹路，许多年，乐幸福，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组储层特征及油气成藏规律[J]. 岩性油气藏，2024，36（1）:59-68. YIN Lu，XU Duonian，YUE Xingfu，et al. Reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation rules of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2024，36（1）:59-68.
[21] 唐勇，郭文建，王霞田，等.玛湖凹陷砾岩大油区勘探新突破及启示[J]. 新疆石油地质，2019，40（2）:127-137. TANG Yong，GUO Wenjian，WANG Xiatian，et al. A new breakthrough in exploration of large conglomerate oil province in Mahu Sag and its implications[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology， 2019，40（2）:127-137.
[22] 宋永，杨智峰，何文军，等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖型页岩油勘探进展[J]. 中国石油勘探，2022，27（1）: 60-72. SONG Yong，YANG Zhifeng，HE Wenjun，et al. Exploration progress of alkaline lake type shale oil of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration，2022，27（1）:60-72.
[23] 刘英辉，朱筱敏，朱茂，等. 准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区二叠系风城组致密油储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏，2014，26（4）:62-72. LIU Yinghui，ZHU Xiaomin，ZHU Mao，et al. Characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wu-Xia area，Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2014， 26（4）:62-72.
[24] 金之钧，梁新平，王小军，等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集机制与甜点段优选[J].新疆石油地质，2022，43（6）:631-639. JIN Zhijun，LIANG Xinping，WANG Xiaojun，et al. Shale oil enrichment mechanism and sweet spot selection of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2022，43（6）:631-639.
[25] 王伟，王振林，刘财广，等. 页岩油甜点评价关键技术及甜点类型划分:以玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组为例[J]. 地球科学， 2023，48（1）:223-234. WANG Wei，WANG Zhenlin，LIU Caiguang，et al. Key technology of shale oil sweet spot evaluation and sweet spot type divi sion in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag[J]. Earth Science， 2023，48（1）:223-234.
[26] 刘财广，季瑞雪，王伟，等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油产量影响因素及甜点评价[J].新疆石油地质，2022，43（6）:733-742. LIU Caiguang，JI Ruixue，WANG Wei，et al. Factors influencing shale oil production and sweet spot evaluation of Fengcheng Formation，Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology，2022，43（6）:733-742.
[27] 邹阳，韦盼云，曹元婷，等. 碱湖型页岩油“甜点”分类与主控因素:以准噶尔盆地风城组为例[J].石油学报，2023，44（3）: 458-470. ZOU Yang，WEI Panyun，CAO Yuanting，et al. Classification and main controlling factors of sweet spots of alkaline lake type shale oil:A case study of Fengcheng Formation in Junggar Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinca，2023，44（3）:458-470.
[28] 李晓慧，姜振学，黄立良，等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集主控因素及有利富集层段[J].东北石油大学学报，2022，46（2）: 33-44. LI Xiaohui，JIANG Zhenxue，HUANG Liliang，et al. Main con trolling factors of shale oil enrichment and optimization of fa vorable enrichment intervals of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University，2022，46（2）:33-44.
[29] 匡立春，唐勇，雷德文，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探，2014，19（6）:14-23. KUANG Lichun，TANG Yong，LEI Dewen，et al. Exploration of fan-controlled large-area lithologic oil reservoirs of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in slope zone of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration，2014，19（6）:14-23.
[30] 吕正祥，廖哲渊，李岳峰，等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏，2022，34（5）:26-37. LYU Zhengxiang，LIAO Zheyuan，LI Yuefeng，et al. Diagenesis of alkaline lacustrine dolomitic reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2022，34（5）: 26-37.
[31] 黄飞，辛茂安.陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法:SY/T 5735— 1995[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社，1995. HUANG Fei，XIN Mao’an. Geochemical evaluation method of nonmarine source rocks:SY/T 5735—1995[S]. Beijing:Stan dards Press of China，1995.
[32] 邬立言，顾信章，盛志纬，等.生油岩热解快速定量评价[M]. 北京:科学出版社，1986. WU Liyan，GU Xinzhang，SHENG Zhiwei，et al. Fast quantita tive evaluation of pyrolysis of source rock[M]. Beijing:Science Press，1986.
[33] TANG Yong，HE Wenjun，BAI Yubin，et al. Source rock evalua tion and hydrocarbon generation model of a Permian Alkaline Lakes:A case study of the Fengcheng Formation in the Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin[J]. Minerals，2021，11（6）:1-18.
[34] PETERS K E. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin，1986，70（3）: 318-329.
[35] RIEDIGER C，CARRELLIAND G G，ZONNEVELD J P. Hy drocarbon source rock characterization and thermal maturity of the Upper Triassic Baldonnel and Pardonet formations，north eastern British Columbia，Canada[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Pe troleum Geology，2004，52（4）:277-301.
[36] CHEN Zhuoheng，JIANG Chunqing. A revised method for or ganic porosity estimation in shale reservoirs using Rock-Eval data:Example from Duvernay Formation in the western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin，2016，100（3）:405-422.
[37] OBERMAJER M，STEWART K R，DEWING K. Geological and geochemical data from the Canadian Arctic Islands，Part Ⅱ :Rock -Eval / TOC data[R]. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 5459，2007.
[38] YANG Shengyu，HORSFIELD B. Critical review of the uncer tainty of Tmax in revealing the thermal maturity of organic mat ter in sedimentary rocks[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology，2020，225:103500.
[39] KATZ B J，LIN F. Consideration of the limitations of thermal maturity with respect to vitrinite reflectance，Tmax，and other proxies[J]. AAPG Bulletin，2021，105（4）:695-720.
[40] 李二庭，米巨磊，张宇，等. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏，2024，36（1）:88-97. LI Erting，MI Julei，ZHANG Yu，et al. Source rock characteris tics of Permian Pingdiquan Formation in Dongdaohaizi sag， Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2024，36（1）:88-97.
[41] 卢双舫，黄文彪，陈方文，等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2012，39（2）:249-256. LU Shuangfang，HUANG Wenbiao，CHEN Fangwen，et al. Clas sification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and De velopment，2012，39（2）:249-256.
[42] 邹才能，朱如凯，白斌，等. 致密油与页岩油内涵、特征、潜力及挑战[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报，2015，34（1）:3-17. ZOU Caineng，ZHU Rukai，BAI Bin，et al. Significance，geo logic characteristics，resource potential and future challenges of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy，Petrology and Geochemistry，2015，34（1）:3-17.
[43] 邱振，卢斌，施振生，等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油滞留聚集机理及资源潜力探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2016，27（10）:1817-1827. QIU Zhen，LU Bin，SHI Zhensheng，et al. Residual accumula tion and resource assessment of shale oil from the Permian Lu caogou Formationin Jimusar Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience， 2016，27（10）:1817-1827.
[44] 杨智峰，唐勇，郭旭光，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油赋存特征与影响因素[J]. 石油实验地质，2021，43（5）:784-796. YANG Zhifeng，TANG Yong，GUO Xuguang，et al. Occurrence states and potential influencing factors of shale oil in the Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag，Junggar Basin[J]. Petro leum Geology & Experiment，2021，43（5）:784-796.
[45] 邓美玲，王宁，李新琦，等. 渤海莱州湾凹陷中部古近系沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J].岩性油气藏，2023，35（1）:49-62. DENG Meiling，WANG Ning，LI Xinqi，et al. Geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environment of source rocks of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in central Lai zhouwan sag，Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2023，35（1）: 49-62.
[46] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas part 2- shale-oil resource systems[G]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs— Giant resources for the 21st Century. AAPG 97，2012:89-119.
[47] JARVIE D M，Claxton B L，Henk F，et al. Oil and shale gas from the Barnett Shale，Fort Worth Basin，Texas[J]. AAPG An nual Meeting Program，2001，10:100.
[48] 姜福杰，胡美玲，胡涛，等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集主控因素与模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2023，50（4）:1-13. JIANG Fujie，HU Meiling，HU Tao，et al. Major controlling fac tors and model of shale oil enrichment in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation，Mahu Sag，Junggar Basin，NW China[J]. Pe troleum Exploration and Development，2023，50（4）:1-13.
[49] 杨智，侯连华，陶士振，等.致密油与页岩油形成条件与“甜点区”评价[J].石油勘探与开发，2015，42（5）:555-565. YANG Zhi，HOU Lianhua，TAO Shizhen，et al. Formation con ditions and“sweet spot”evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2015，42（5）:555-565.
[50] 匡立春，雷德文，王志章，等. 咸化湖相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷为例[M]. 北京:科学出版社，2020. KUANG Lichun，LEI Dewen，WANG Zhizhang，et al. Geo logical characteristics and exploration practice in shale oil of sa line lacustrine facies:Taking the Jimsar Sag in the Junggar Basin as an example[M]. Beijing:Science Press，2020.
[51] 雷海艳，郭佩，孟颖，等. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏，2022，34（3）:142-153. LEI Haiyan，GUO Pei，MENG Ying，et al. Pore structure and classification evaluation of shale oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs，2022， 34（3）:142-153.
[1] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[3] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[4] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[5] 洪智宾, 吴嘉, 方朋, 余进洋, 伍正宇, 于佳琦. 纳米限域下页岩中可溶有机质的非均质性及页岩油赋存状态[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 160-168.
[6] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[7] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[8] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[9] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[10] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[11] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[12] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[13] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[14] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[15] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张　俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[5] 雷卞军，张吉，王彩丽，王晓蓉，李世临，刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[6] 杨杰，卫平生，李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[7] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[8] 旷红伟，高振中，王正允，王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[9] 李国军, 郑荣才,唐玉林,汪洋,唐楷. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序- 岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[10] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发