渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新生代构造演化特征及控藏作用

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20250506

岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 59–69.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250506

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新生代构造演化特征及控藏作用

赵宝银¹, 杨晓利¹, 徐颖新², 孟令箭¹, 崔紫瑄³, 王方鲁¹, 刘剑伦², 于福生³

1. 中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院, 河北唐山 063004;
2. 中国石油东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司研究院冀东分院, 河北涿州 072751;
3. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2024-12-02 修回日期:2025-01-17 发布日期:2025-09-06
第一作者:赵宝银（1968—），男，高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探方面的研究工作。地址:（063004）河北省唐山市新华道明光西里。Email:zhaoby_jd@petrochina.com.cn。
通信作者: 崔紫瑄（1999—），女，中国石油大学（北京）在读硕士研究生，研究方向为油区构造解析。Email:934159594@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“分期异向分层伸展断裂系统叠加过程模拟研究：以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例”（编号：41472116）课题“南堡凹陷二次三维连片处理地震资料解释与区带目标优选”资助。

Characteristics and reservoir control of Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Nanpu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin

ZHAO Baoyin¹, YANG Xiaoli¹, XU Yingxin², MENG Lingjian¹, CUI Zixuan³, WANG Fanglu¹, LIU Jianlun², YU Fusheng³

1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Jidong Oilfield Company, CNPC, Tangshan 063004, Hebei, China;
2. Jidong Branch of Geological Research Institute of Geology, GRI, BGP lnc., CNPC, Zhuozhou 072751, Hebei, China;
3. Department of Earth Sciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China

Received:2024-12-02 Revised:2025-01-17 Published:2025-09-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于最新三维地震资料分析，结合地质背景、不整合面和古生物化石特征，从同沉积断层发育特征、沉积中心迁移规律两方面对南堡凹陷古近系沙河街组沉积期（断陷阶段）构造幕进行了再划分，并研究了其控藏作用。研究结果表明：①南堡凹陷古近系沙河街组四段（沙四段）主要分布于凹陷东部，沙四段与沙三段、沙三段与沙二段均呈角度不整合接触，沙二段与沙一段为整合接触。②研究区新生代经历了3幕断陷（沙四段沉积期，沙三段沉积期，沙一、二段沉积期）、断拗转换（东营组沉积期）、热拗陷（馆陶组沉积期）、拗断（明化镇组沉积期）6期构造演化阶段，构造应力场由NW—SE转变为近SN向，伸展与走滑构造叠加，形成张扭性变形带，同沉积断层控制的沉积中心表现为SE—NW—SEE迁移规律。③研究区新生代构造演化控制着烃源岩、储层及圈闭的发育，主力烃源岩包括沙四段、沙三段、沙一段及东三段4套，砂体发育模式可分为“转换斜坡”、“转换鼻凸”、“断槽-坡折”3种类型，断-圈交叉发育，纵向上发育3套成藏组合，构成以层状油气藏为主的多层系叠置的复式油气聚集带。老爷庙扇体，高柳断层下降盘及南堡1号、南堡2号、南堡4号坡折带断背斜、断鼻构造圈闭为下一步有利勘探目标。

关键词: 构造演化, 幕式构造运动, 同沉积断层, 断背斜, 断鼻构造, 新生代, 南堡凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Based on the analysis of the latest 3D seismic data，combined with the evidence of regional geological background，unconformity surface and paleontological fossils，sedimentary period（fault depression stage）tectonic episodes of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Nanpu Sag were redivided from two aspects：the development characteristics of synsedimentary faults and migration rule of sedimentary centers，and its control effects on reservoir was studied. The results show that：（1）The fourth member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation（Es₄）in Nanpu Sag mainly distribute in the eastern part of the sag. Es₃ is angular unconformity contact with underlying Es₄ and overlying Es₂，and Es₁ is integrated contact with Es₂.（2）In the study area，Cenozoic experienced six stages of tectonic evolution，such as three episodes of fault depression（Paleogene Es₄，Es₃，Es₁-Es₂），faultdepression conversion（Paleogene Ed），thermal depression（Neogene Ng），and depression fault（Neogene Nm）. The tectonic stress field rotated clockwise from NW-SE to near SN，and the superimposion of extension and strike-slip structures formed a tensional-torsional deformation zone. The sedimentary center controlled by the synsedimentary fault exhibits the migration law of SE-NW-SEE.（3）Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the study area controls the development of source rocks，reservoirs and traps. Four sets of main source rocks，such as Es₄， Es₃，Es₁ and Ed₃ are developed，and development models of sand body can clasified as three types：“conversion slope”“conversion nose-bulge”and“fault trough-slope break”. Faults and traps are across developed，and three sets of accumulation combinations are developed vertically，which constitute a multi-layer superimposed composite oil and gas accumulation zone dominated by layered oil and gas reservoirs. Laoyemiao fan body，Gaoliu fault downthrown wall and Nanpu No. 1 fault，Nanpu No. 2 fault and Nanpu No. 4 slope break belt faulted anticline，fault nose structural trap are prioritized as the next-phase exploration targets.

Key words: tectonic evolution, episodic tectonic movement, synsedimentary fault, faulted anticline, fault nose structure, Cenozoic, Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号:

TE121.1+1

赵宝银, 杨晓利, 徐颖新, 孟令箭, 崔紫瑄, 王方鲁, 刘剑伦, 于福生. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新生代构造演化特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 59–69.

ZHAO Baoyin, YANG Xiaoli, XU Yingxin, MENG Lingjian, CUI Zixuan, WANG Fanglu, LIU Jianlun, YU Fusheng. Characteristics and reservoir control of Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Nanpu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5): 59–69.

参考文献

[1] 焦养泉,周海民,刘少峰,等. 断陷盆地多层次幕式断陷作用与沉积充填响应:以南堡老第三纪断陷盆地为例[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报,1996,21(6):69-72. JIAO Yangquan,ZHOU Haimin,LIU Shaofeng,et al. Multistage episodic rifting and its controls on filling in rift basin:Taking the Eogene Nanpu Rift Basin as an example[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,1996,21(6):69-72.
[2] 姜华,王华,林正良,等. 南堡凹陷古近纪幕式断陷作用及其对沉积充填的控制[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(5):976-982. JIANG Hua,WANG Hua,LIN Zhengliang,et al. Periodic rifting activity and its controlling on sedimentary filling of Paleogene period in Nanpu Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009,27(5):976-982.
[3] 林畅松,张燕梅,李思田,等. 中国东部中新生代断陷盆地幕式断陷过程的动力学响应和模拟模型[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2004,29(5):583-588. LIN Changsong,ZHANG Yanmei,LI Sitian,et al. Episodic rifting dynamic process and quantitative model of Mesozoic-Cenozoic faulted basins in eastern China[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2004,29(5):583-588.
[4] 严德天,王华,王清晨. 中国东部第三系典型断陷盆地幕式构造旋回及层序地层特征[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(2):185-190. YAN Detian,WANG Hua,WANG Qingchen. Episodic tectonic cycles and sequence pattern of the Tertiary rifted basins of East China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(2):185-190.
[5] 刘圣乾,何幼斌,姜在兴,等. 湖相碳酸盐岩礁滩体系沉积特征、主控因素及成因模式:以东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段为例[J]. 古地理学报,2023,25(4):872-888. LIU Shengqian,HE Youbin,JIANG Zaixing,et al. Sedimentary characteristics,dominant factors and genetic model of lacustrine carbonate reef-shoal depositional system:A case study from the upper 4th Member of Shahejie Formation in western Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2023, 25(4):872-888.
[6] 卢双舫,陈国辉,王民,等. 辽河坳陷大民屯凹陷沙河街组四段页岩油富集资源潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2016, 37(1):8-14. LU Shuangfang,CHEN Guohui,WANG Min,et al. Potential evaluation of enriched shale oil resource of member 4 of the Shahejie Formation in the Damintun Sag,Liaohe Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):8-14.
[7] 缪欢,王延斌,何川,等. 渤海湾盆地埕北断阶带断裂发育特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2022,34(2):105-115. MIAO Huan,WANG Yanbin,HE Chuan,et al. Fault development characteristics and reservoir control in Chengbei fault step zone,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):105-115.
[8] 周立宏,肖敦清,蒲秀刚,等. 陆相断陷湖盆复式叠合油气成藏与优势相富集新模式:以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):7-11. ZHOU Lihong,XIAO Dunqing,PU Xiugang,et al. New pattern of composite superimposed reservoirs and advantageous phase accumulation in continental rifted lake basin:A case study from Qikou Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):7-11.
[9] 周海民,魏忠文,曹中宏,等. 南堡凹陷的形成演化与油气的关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):345-349. ZHOU Haimin,WEI Zhongwen,CAO Zhonghong,et al. Relationship between formation,evolution and hydrocarbon in Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2000,21(4):345-349.
[10] 刘琼颖,何丽娟. 渤海湾盆地新生代以来构造-热演化模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2019,62(1):219-235. LIU Qiongying,HE Lijuan. Tectono-thermal modeling of the Bohai Bay Basin since the Cenozoic[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2019,62(1):219-235.
[11] 姚秀田,王超,闫森,等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新生界断层精细表征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏,2023,35(4):50-60. YAO Xiutian,WANG Chao,YAN Sen,et al. Fine characterization of Cenozoic faults and its geological implications in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2023,35(4):50-60.
[12] 管红,朱筱敏. 南堡凹陷东营组层序地层格架与沉积体系[J]. 沉积学报,2008,26(5):730-736. GUAN Hong,ZHU Xiaomin. Sequence framework and sedimentary facies of Ed Formation in Paleogene,Nanpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2008,26(5):730-736.
[13] 杨晓利,张自力,孙明,等. 同沉积断层控砂模式:以南堡凹陷南部地区Es₁段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2014,35(4):526-533. YANG Xiaoli,ZHANG Zili,SUN Ming,et al. Models of contemporaneous fault controlling sandstone deposition:A case study of Es₁ in southern Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(4):526-533.
[14] 陈发景,张光亚,陈昭年. 不整合分析及其在陆相盆地构造研究中的意义[J]. 现代地质,2004,18(3):269-275. CHEN Fajing,ZHANG Guangya,CHEN Zhaonian. Unconformity analysis and its significance in the study of continental basin tectonics[J]. Geoscience,2004,18(3):269-275.
[15] 王惠君,吴伟,于静. 渤海辽中凹陷古近系孢粉组合带及地层划分[J]. 微体古生物学报,2017,34(2):192-200. WANG Huijun,WU Wei,YU Jing. The paleogene palynological assemblages and stratigraphic subdivision of Liaozhong Sag,Bohai,China[J]. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica,2017, 34(2):192-200.
[16] 杜庆祥,郭少斌,沈晓丽,等.渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷南部古近系沙河街组一段古水体特征[J]. 古地理学报,2016,18(2):173-183. DU Qingxiang,GUO Shaobin,SHEN Xiaoli,et al. Palaeowater characteristics of the Member 1 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in southern Nanpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2016,18(2):173-183.
[17] TONG Hengmao,KOYI H,HUANG S,et al. The effect of multiple pre-existing weaknesses on formation and evolution of faults in extended sandbox models[J]. Tectonophysics,2014, 626:197-212.
[18] 郑红菊,董月霞,朱光有,等. 南堡凹陷优质烃源岩的新发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2007,34(4):385-391. ZHENG Hongju,DONG Yuexia,ZHU Guangyou,et al. Highquality source rocks in Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(4):385-391.
[19] 刘露,孙永河,陈昌,等. 南堡凹陷4号构造带断裂活化及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2022,49(4):716-727. LIU Lu,SUN Yonghe,CHEN Chang,et al. Fault reactivation in No.4 structural zone and its control on oil and gas accumulation in Nanpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(4):716-727.
[20] 王华,姜华,林正良,等. 南堡凹陷东营组同沉积构造活动性与沉积格局的配置关系研究[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2011,33(1):70-77. WANG Hua,JIANG Hua,LIN Zhengliang,et al. Relations between synsedimentary tectonic activity and sedimentary framework of Dongying Formation in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(1):70-77.
[21] 于兴河,姜辉,李胜利,等. 中国东部中、新生代陆相断陷盆地沉积充填模式及其控制因素:以济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):39-45. YU Xinghe,JIANG Hui,LI Shengli,et al. Depositional filling models and controlling factors on Mesozoic and Cenozoic fault basins of terrestrial facies in eastern China:A case study of Dongying Sag of Jiyang Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007,19(1):39-45.
[22] 林伟强,曲丽丽,朱露,等. 井震藏结合判定井间砂体连通性研究及应用:以南堡油田M区中深层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2022,12(2):373-381. LIN Weiqiang,QU Lili,ZHU Lu,et al. Evaluation of inter-well sand body connectivity by combination of well,seismic,and reservoir and its application:Taking the middle and deep layers of M area of Nanpu Oilfield as an example[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2022,12(2):373-381.
[23] 任梦怡,江青春,刘震,等. 南堡凹陷柳赞地区沙三段层序结构及其构造响应[J]. 岩性油气藏,2020,32(3):93-103. REN Mengyi,JIANG Qingchun,LIU Zhen,et al. Sequence architecture and structural response of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Liuzan area,Nanpu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(3):93-103.
[24] 姜华,王建波,张磊,等. 南堡凹陷西南庄断层分段活动性及其对沉积的控制作用[J]. 沉积学报,2010,28(6):1047-1053. JIANG Hua,WANG Jianbo,ZHANG Lei,et al. Segment activity of Xi'nanzhuang fault in Nanpu Sag and its controlling on sedimentary process[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(6):1047-1053.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新生代构造演化特征及控藏作用

Characteristics and reservoir control of Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Nanpu Sag，Bohai Bay Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈家旭, 陈长伟, 刘国全, 邹磊落, 董晓伟, 刘川, 杨飞, 钟巍. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷深凹区古近系孔二段原油充注特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(4): 136-146.
[2]	陈怀毅, 李龙, 白冰, 岳军培, 康荣, 张兴强. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷古近系沙四段走滑盐拱带特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(3): 120-128.
[3]	廖新武, 杨庆红, 李超, 郭诚, 赵大林. 渤海湾盆地垦利6-1油田新近系明化镇组下段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 1-11.
[4]	薛辉, 叶大帅, 郭悦苗, 陈柯童, 吴健平, 许梦婷, 李雅雯. 渤海湾盆地保定凹陷清苑地区古近系东三段曲流河沉积特征及控储作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(2): 139-152.
[5]	方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[6]	冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[7]	董柔, 李坤, 殷际航, 薛煜恒, 江涛, 徐国盛. 渤东凹陷新生代伸展-走滑叠合断裂时空差异演化模式及控藏效应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 106-116.
[8]	西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[9]	刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[10]	王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[11]	聂礼尚, 马静辉, 唐小飞, 杨智, 张婉金, 李鸿蕊. 准噶尔盆地东部帐篷沟地区中新生代构造事件及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 81-91.
[12]	胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[13]	姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新生界断层精细表征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 50-60.
[14]	曾旭, 卞从胜, 沈瑞, 周可佳, 刘伟, 周素彦, 汪晓鸾. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[15]	薛罗, 史忠生, 马轮, 赵艳军, 岳世俊, 洪亮, 王磊, 雷明. 南苏丹Melut盆地北部地区中—新生界稠油成藏模式及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 76-85.