岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 40–50.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230304

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层非线性渗流特征

曾旭1,2, 卞从胜1, 沈瑞1, 周可佳2, 刘伟1, 周素彦3, 汪晓鸾3   

  1. 1. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油大学 (北京), 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油大港油田公司, 天津 300280
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-09 修回日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2023-04-25
  • 作者简介:曾旭（1987—）男，中国石油大学（北京）在读博士研究生，高级工程师，研究方向为非常规油气地质、含油气盆地分析。地址：（102249）北京市海淀区学院路中国石油勘探开发研究院。Email：zengxu20212021@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司前瞻性与基础性重大科技项目 “不同类型大气田 （区） 成藏主控因素及领域评价”（编号： 2021DJ0605）资助。

Nonlinear seepage characteristics of shale oil reservoirs of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Qikou Sag，Bohai Bay Basin

ZENG Xu1,2, BIAN Congsheng1, SHEN Rui1, ZHOU Kejia2, LIU Wei1, ZHOU Suyan3, WANG Xiaoluan3   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2022-05-09 Revised:2022-07-20 Published:2023-04-25

PDF (PC)

115

摘要： 通过高压压汞与低温气体吸附实验,结合核磁共振在线检测系统和驱替实验,对渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近系沙三段页岩油储层的渗流特征进行了研究。研究结果表明:①歧口凹陷古近系沙三段3种岩相页岩的微孔数量占比最大。与块状泥岩相比,纹层状及层状页岩储层的孔径大于100 nm的中大孔喉更为发育,储集性及渗流能力更优。②赋存在页岩储层大孔喉中的可流动油能有效产出,但由于渗流阻力较大,微小孔喉(小于100 nm)中的油即使在很大压差下也难以产出。③页岩储层中的石油渗流具有启动压力梯度和非线性渗流的特征,但不同岩相的渗透特征差异较大,其中纹层状页岩拟启动压力梯度最小,渗流能力最强,层状页岩储层具有一定的渗流能力,块状页岩储层渗流能力最差。在相同压力梯度下,块状页岩中的流量仅为纹层状页岩中流量的10%左右,基本无自然产能。

关键词: 页岩油, 启动压力梯度, 非线性渗流, 渗流能力, 沙三段, 古近系, 歧口凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Through high-pressure mercury injection and low-temperature gas adsorption experiments， combined with nuclear magnetic resonance online detection system and displacement experiment，the seepage characteristics of shale oil reservoirs of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation（Es3）in Qikou Sag， Bohai Bay Basin were studied. The results show that： （1）The micropores of the three lithofacies shales of the third member of Paleogene Shehejie Formation in Qikou Sag account for the largest proportion. Compared with massive mudstone，the medium and large pore throats with pore diameter greater than 100 nm in laminated and layered shale reservoirs are more developed，and the reservoir properties and seepage capacity are better.（2）The flowable oil that occurs in the large pore throats of shale reservoirs can be output effectively， but the oil in the small pore throats（less than 100 nm）is difficult to output even under a large pressure difference due to the large seepage resistance.（3）The seepage of shale oil in shale reservoir has the characteristics of start-up pressure gradient and nonlinear seepage，but there are great differences among different lithofacies. The laminated shale reservoir has the lowest pseudo start-up pressure gradient and the strongest seepage capacity，the layered shale reservoir has a certain seepage capacity，while the massive shale reservoir has the poorest seepage capacity. Under the same pressure gradient，the flow rate in the massive shale is only about 10% of that in laminated shale，and there is no natural productivity.

Key words: shale oil, start-up pressure gradient, nonlinear seepage, seepage capacity, the third member of Shahejie Formation, Paleogene, Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):1-10. ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1):1-10.
[2] 赵文智,朱如凯,胡素云,等.陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6):1079-1089. ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, HU Suyun, et al. Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1079-1089.
[3] 胡素云,赵文智,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4):819-828. HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al. Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4):819-828.
[4] 邹才能,潘松圻,荆振华,等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12. ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[5] 焦方正,邹才能,杨智.陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6):1067-1078. JIAO Fangzheng, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi. Geological theory and exploration&development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1067-1078.
[6] 付金华,刘显阳,李士祥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段页岩油勘探发现与资源潜力[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(5):1-11. FU Jinhua, LIU Xianyang, LI Shixiang, et al. Discovery and resource potential of shale oil of Chang 7 member, Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(5):1-11.
[7] 付锁堂,付金华,牛小兵,等.庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(7):777-795. FU Suotang, FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Accumulation conditions and key exploration and development technologies in Qingcheng Oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(7):777-795.
[8] 孙莎莎,董大忠,李育聪,等.四川盆地侏罗系自流井组大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及成藏控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1):124-135. SUN Shasha, DONG Dazhong, LI Yucong, et al. Geological characteristics and controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in terrestrial shale in the Da'Anzhai member of the Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1):124-135.
[9] 张抗,张立勤,刘冬梅.近年中国油气勘探开发形势及发展建议[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(1):15-28. ZHANG Kang, ZHANG Liqin, LIU Dongmei. Situation of China's oil and gas exploration and development in recent years and relevant suggestions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1):15-28.
[10] 郝乐伟,王琪,唐俊.储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述[J].岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(5):123-128. HAO Lewei, WANG Qi, TANG Jun. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(5):123-128.
[11] 李梦莹,朱如凯,胡素云.海外陆相页岩油地质特征与资源潜力[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):163-174. LI Mengying, ZHU Rukai, HU Suyun. Geological characteristics and resource potential of overseas terrestrial shale oil[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):163-174.
[12] 柳波,孙嘉慧,张永清,等.松辽盆地长岭凹陷白垩系青山口组一段页岩油储集空间类型与富集模式[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3):521-535. LIU Bo, SUN Jiahui, ZHANG Yongqing, et al. Reservoir space and enrichment model of shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Changling Sag, southern Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3):521-535.
[13] 刘雅利,张顺,刘惠民,等.断陷盆地陡坡带富有机质页岩基本特征及勘探前景:以济阳坳陷为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(6):1108-1118. LIU Yali, ZHANG Shun, LIU Huimin, et al. Basic characteristics and exploration prospect of shale in steep slope belt of continental faulted basin:A case study of Jiyang Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2021, 50(6):1108-1118.
[14] 余燕,周琳琅,甘笑非,等.二次压力梯度三孔渗流模型及非线性渗流特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):143-150. YU Yan, ZHOU Linlang, GAN Xiaofei, et al. A triple-porosity flow model and its nonlinear flow characteristics with considering quadratic pressure gradient[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):143-150.
[15] 张记刚,杜猛,陈超,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4):89-102. ZHANG Jigang, DU Meng, CHEN Chao, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of Permian Lucaogou Formation shale reservoir in Jimsar Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4):89-102.
[16] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,韩文中,等.细粒沉积岩性识别新方法与储集层甜点分析:以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4):492-502. ZHAO Xianzheng, PU Xiugang, HAN Wenzhong, et al. A new method for lithology identification of fine-grained deposits and reservoir sweet spot analysis:A case study of Kong 2 member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4):492-502.
[17] 向雪冰,司马立强,王亮,等.页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算:以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4):137-146. XIANG Xuebing, SIMA Liqiang, WANG Liang, et al. Pore fluid division and effective pore size calculation of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Longtan Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4):137-146.
[18] 朱维耀,马东旭.层理缝对页岩渗透率的影响及表征[J].特种油气藏, 2018, 25(2):130-133. ZHU Weiyao, MA Dongxu. Effect of bedding seam on shale permeability and its characterization[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(2):130-133.
[19] 雷浩,郑有恒,何建华,等.页岩油藏流体渗流特征物理模拟新方法[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(10):1346-1356. LEI Hao, ZHENG Youheng, HE Jianhua, et al. A new method for physical simulation of flow characteristics of fluids in shale oil reservoirs[J]. Acta Pertolei Sinica, 2021, 42(10):1346-1356.
[20] 何建华,丁文龙,付景龙,等.页岩微观孔隙成因类型研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5):30-35. HE Jianhua, DING Wenlong, FU Jinglong, et al. Study on genetic type of micropore in shale reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5):30-35.
[21] 李蕾,郝永卯,王程伟,等.页岩油藏单相流体低速渗流特征[J].特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6):70-75. LI Lei, HAO Yongmao, WANG Chengwei, et al. Low-velocity seepage characteristics of single-phase fluid in shale reservoir[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(6):70-75.
[22] 杨学峰,雷启鸿,王瑞飞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油储层启动压力梯度对比分析[J].地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(1):310-317. YANG Xuefeng, LEI Qihong, WANG Ruifei, et al. Comparative study on threshold pressure gradient of tight oil reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2021, 36(1):310-317.
[23] 周立宏,陈长伟,韩国猛,等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷陆相湖盆页岩气富集条件及勘探潜力[J].天然气工业, 2021, 41(5):1-10. ZHOU Lihong, CHEN Changwei, HAN Guomeng, et al. Enrichment conditions and exploration potential of shale gas in continental lake basins in Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5):1-10.
[24] 杨有星,高永进,张君峰,等.歧口和泌阳凹陷两种类型湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特点[J].现代地质, 2019, 33(4):831-840. YANG Youxing, GAO Yongjin, ZHANG Junfeng, et al. Depositional models and differences of lacustrine carbonate rocks:Comparison between Qikou Sag and Biyang Sag[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(4):831-840.
[25] 马钰凯,孙永河,马妍,等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷构造演化及断裂带成因[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(5):526-539. MA Yukai, SUN Yonghe, MA Yan, et al. Tectonic evolution and genesis of fault zones in Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5):526-539.
[26] 韩国猛,陈冬霞,马建英,等.黄骅坳陷歧北斜坡油气成藏机制与成藏模式[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6):1636-1653. HAN Guomeng, CHEN Dongxia, MA Jianying, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism and accumulation model of Qibei slope in Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6):1636-1653.
[27] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,周立宏,等.深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景:以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(2):143-162. ZHAO Xianzheng, PU Xiugang, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Enrichment theory, exploration technology and prospects of shale oil in lacustrine facies zone of deep basin:A case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(2):143-162.
[28] 蔚远江,王红岩,刘德勋,等.陆相页岩油勘探"进源找油"探索与思考:以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷沙一段为例[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2021, 43(1):117-134. YU Yuanjiang, WANG Hongyan, LIU Dexun, et al. Probing and thinking on "exploring petroleum inside source kitchen" of continental shale oil exploration[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2021, 43(1):117-134.
[29] 胡贺伟,李慧勇,许鹏,等.断裂密集带油气差异富集主控因素探讨:以歧口凹陷歧南断阶带为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):34-45. HU Hewei, LI Huiyong, XU Peng, et al. Main controlling factors of differential enrichment of oil and gas in fault concentrated zones:A case study from Qinan step-fault zone in Qikou Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):34-45.
[30] 张顺,刘惠民,陈世悦,等.中国东部断陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相划分方案探讨:以渤海湾盆地南部古近系细粒沉积岩为例[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(5):1108-1119. ZHANG Shun, LIU Huimin, CHEN Shiyue, et al. Classification scheme for lithofacies of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in faulted basins of Eastern China:Insights from the fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Paleogene, Southern Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(5):1108-1119.
[31] 陈扬,胡钦红,赵建华,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷湖相富有机质页岩纹层特征和储集性能[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):307-324. CHEN Yang, HU Qinhong, ZHAO Jianhua, et al. Lamina characteristics and their influence on reservoir property of lacustrine organic-rich shale in the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):307-324.
[32] 沈云琦,金之钧,苏建政,等.中国陆相页岩油储层水平渗透率与垂直渗透率特征:以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷和江汉盆地潜江凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):378-389. SHEN Yunqi, JIN Zhijun, SU Jianzheng, et al. Characteristics of horizontal and vertical permeability of continental shale oil reservoirs in China:A case from Jiyang Depression in Bohai Bay Basin and Qianjiang Sag in Jianghan Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):378-389.
[33] 杨万芹,蒋有录,王勇.东营凹陷沙三下-沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4):19-26. YANG Wanqin, JIANG Youlu, WANG Yong. Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es3-upper Es4 in Dongying Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(4):19-26.
[34] LIU Bo, WANG Haoli, FU Xiaofei, et al. Lithofacies and depositional setting of a highly prospective lacustrine shale oil succession from the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Gulong Sag, northern Songliao Basin, northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2019, 103(2):405-432.
[35] 朱如凯,李梦莹,杨静儒,等.细粒沉积学研究进展与发展方向[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):251-264. ZHU Rukai, LI Mengying, YANG Jingru, et al. Advances and trends of fine-grained sedimentology[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):251-264.
[36] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039. JIANG Zaixing, LIANG Chao, WU Jing, et al. Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(6):1031-1039.
[37] 卢双舫,李俊乾,张鹏飞,等.页岩油储集层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3):436-444. LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, ZHANG Pengfei, et al. Classification of microscopic pore-throats and the grading evaluation on shale oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3):436-444.
[38] 党伟,张金川,聂海宽,等.页岩油微观赋存特征及其主控因素:以鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组7段3亚段陆相页岩为例[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(4):507-523. DANG Wei, ZHANG Jinchuan, NIE Haikuan, et al. Microscopic occurrence characteristics of shale oil and their main controlling factors:A case study of the 3rd submember continental shale of member 7 of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an aera, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4):507-523.
[39] 张建国,姜在兴,刘立安,等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(3):293-306. ZHANG Jianguo, JIANG Zaixing, LIU Li'an, et al. Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):293-306.
[40] 王苗,陆建林,左宗鑫,等.纹层状细粒沉积岩特征及主控因素分析:以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上-沙三下亚段为例[J].石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4):470-478. WANG Miao, LU Jianlin, ZUO Zongxin, et al. Characteristics and dominating factors of lamellar fine-grained sedimentary rocks:A case study of the upper Es4 member-lower Es3 member, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2018, 40(4):470-478.
[41] 曾联波,吕文雅,徐翔,等.典型致密砂岩与页岩层理缝的发育特征、形成机理及油气意义[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(2):180-191. ZENG Lianbo, LYU Wenya, XU Xiang, et al. Development characteristics, formation mechanism and hydrocarbon significance of bedding fractures in typical tight sandstone and shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(2):180-191.
[42] 王玉霞,周立发,焦尊生,等.基于三参数非线性渗流的低渗透砂岩油藏CO2非混相驱相渗计算模型[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(1):107-114. WANG Yuxia, ZHOU Lifa, JIAO Zunsheng, et al. Relative permeability calculation model of CO2 immiscible flooding in low permeability reservoir based on the three-parameter nonlinear seepage[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(1):107-114.
[43] 徐兴友,刘卫彬,陈珊,等.松辽盆地南部陆相页岩油气勘查突破及意义[J].天然气工业, 2022, 42(3):12-20. XU Xingyou, LIU Weibin, CHEN Shan, et al. Breakthroughs in continental shale oil and gas exploration in the southern Songliao Basin and its implications for carbon neutrality[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(3):12-20.
[44] 金之钧,朱如凯,梁新平,等.当前陆相页岩油勘探开发值得关注的几个问题[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287. JIN Zhijun, ZHU Rukai, LIANG Xinping, et al. Several issues worthy of attention in current lacustrine shale oil exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1276-1287.
[45] 韩文中,赵贤正,金凤鸣,等.渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段湖相页岩油甜点评价与勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4):777-786. HAN Wenzhong,ZHAO Xianzheng,JIN Fengming,et al. Sweet spots evaluation and exploration of lacustrine shale oil of the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4):777-786.
[1] 张振华, 张小军, 钟大康, 苟迎春, 张世铭. 柴达木盆地西北部南翼山地区古近系下干柴沟组上段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 29-39.
[2] 杨润泽, 赵贤正, 刘海涛, 李宏军, 赵长毅, 蒲秀刚. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古生界源内和源下油气成藏特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 110-125.
[3] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 田继军, 李正强, 罗锦昌, 胡美玲. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 126-137.
[4] 郑彬, 董翱, 张源智, 张毅, 苏珊, 张士超, 樊津津, 骆垠山. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组流体压力建场过程及其石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 59-67.
[5] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[6] 完颜泽, 龙国徽, 杨巍, 柴京超, 马新民, 唐丽, 赵健, 李海鹏. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区古近系油气成藏过程及其演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 94-102.
[7] 黄军立, 张伟, 刘力辉, 蔡国富, 曾有良, 孟庆友, 刘浩. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 103-112.
[8] 应凯莹, 蔡长娥, 梁煜琦, 陈鸿, 尚文亮, 苏桂娇. 伊通盆地岔路河断陷古近系断层的垂向封闭性及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 136-143.
[9] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[10] 邓美玲, 王宁, 李新琦, 陈容涛, 刘岩, 徐耀辉. 渤海莱州湾凹陷中部古近系沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 49-62.
[11] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[12] 张卫卫, 刘军, 刘力辉, 张晓钊, 白海军, 杨登锋. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组岩性预测技术及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 118-125.
[13] 李国欣, 石亚军, 张永庶, 陈琰, 张国卿, 雷涛. 柴达木盆地油气勘探、地质认识新进展及重要启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
[14] 王茂桢, 吴奎, 郭涛, 惠冠洲, 郝轶伟. 辽东凹陷东南缘古近系沙二段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 66-78.
[15] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发