Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 113-119.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prestack gather residual moveout correction based on shape context and dynamic time warping

SHI Zhanzhan1, TANG Xiangrong2, PANG Su1, CHI Yuelong1   

  1. 1. Engineering & Technical College of Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, Sichuan, China;
    2. College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2017-02-16 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

Abstract: Prestack reflection events cannot be flatten by conventional velocity analysis and NMO,statics correction, due to anisotropy and heterogeneity of the subsurface media. This is a difficult problem for AVO attribute analysis and prestack inversion. Based on shape context and dynamic time warping(SC-DTW),a new method of prestack residual moveout correction was introduced and verified by numerical simulation(model)and example analysis. The results show that the residual moveout correction method based on SC-DTWprestack gather has better anti-noise capability,better robustness to seismic waveform distortion,and can effectively eliminate the residual moveout of prestack seismic traces. The continuous waveform of the seismic events and the amplitude characteristics are not changed,which can improve the accuracy of seismic data processing and interpretation,such as AVO attribute analysis and prestack inversion. Using waveforms similarity of prestack gathers,the method optimizes for a reference trace,and run SC-DTW calculation of each trace with reference trace in calculation window, to calculate the dynamic warping path and residual moveout correction. The utility model has better practicability and popularization value.

Key words: static and dynamic identification, carbonate, reservoir type, Ordovician, Tarim Basin

CLC Number: 

  • P631.4
[1] SPRATT S. Effect of normal moveout errors on amplitude versus offset-derived shear reflectivity. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. New Orleans:SEG,1987.
[2] SWAN H W. Amplitude-versus-offset measurement errors in a finely layered medium. Geophysicists,1991,56(1):41-49.
[3] 曲寿利. AVO分析中的剩余时差校正. 石油地球物理勘探, 1991,26(4):523-528. QU S L. Residual moveout correction in AVO analysis. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,1991,26(4):523-528.
[4] 郭树祥. 分频剩余静校正方法及应用效果分析. 石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(6):735-739. GUO S X. Method of frequency-divisional residual statics and its application.OilGeophysical Prospecting,2001,36(6):735-739.
[5] SWAN H W. Velocities from amplitude variations with offset. Geophysicists,2001,66(6):1735-1743.
[6] 周鹏,刘志斌,张益明,等. 动校剩余时差处理方法及应用. 地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2349-2353. ZHOU P,LIU Z B,ZHANG Y M,et al. The processing method and application of the residual moveout NMO. Progress in Geophysics, 2015,30(5):2349-2353.
[7] HINKLEY D,BEAR G W,DAWSON C. Prestack gather flattening for AVO. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Denver:SEG,2004.
[8] GULUNAY N,GAMAR F,HOEBER H. Robust residual gather flattening. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. San Antonio:SEG,2007.
[9] SAKOE H,CHIBA S. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing,1978,26(1):43-49.
[10] SALVADOR S,CHAN P. Fast DTW:toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2007,11(5):561-580.
[11] AL-NAYMAT G,CHAWLAS,TAHERI J. Sparse DTW:a novel approach to speed up dynamic time warping. The 2009 Australasian Data Mining. Melbourne:Australian Computer Society,2009.
[12] ZHANG Z,TANG P,DUAN R B. Dynamic time warping under pointwise shape context. Information Sciences,2015,315(10):88-101.
[13] MORI G,BELONGIE S,MALIK J. Efficient shape matching using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2005,27(11):1832-1837.
[14] QIAN D H,CHEN T S,QIAO H. Background of shape contexts for point matching. Pattern Recognition Letters,2016,84:114-119.
[15] ZINKEA,MAYER D. Iterative multi scale dynamic time warping. Bonn:Universität Bonn,2006.
[1] ZHANG Tianze, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, ZHANG Wenqi, XIE Mingxian, LEI Ming, GUO Qiang, ZHANG Xuerui. Application of ray-path elastic impedance inversion in carbonate gas reservoir prediction of the right bank of Amu Darya River [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[2] YI Zhenli, SHI Fang, YIN Taiju, LI Bin, LI Meng, LIU Liu, WANG Zhukun, YU Ye. Provenance transformation and sedimentary filling response of Mesozoic in Halahatang-Hade area,Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[3] MENG Qinghao, ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Xianghui, ZHU Rui, XIANG Jianbo. Morphology,distribution and main controlling factors of modern distributive fluvial system in Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 44-56.
[4] CHENG Jing, YAN Jianping, SONG Dongjiang, LIAO Maojie, GUO Wei, DING Minghai, LUO Guangdong, LIU Yanmei. Low resistivity response characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Changning area,southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[5] LI Changhai, ZHAO Lun, LIU Bo, ZHAO Wenqi, WANG Shuqin, LI Jianxin, ZHENG Tianyu, LI Weiqiang. Connectivity of fracture networks of Carboniferous carbonate reservoirs in North Truva Oilfield,eastern margin of Precaspian Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 113-123.
[6] CHEN Shuyang, HE Yunfeng, WANG Lixin, SHANG Haojie, YANG Xinrui, YIN Yanshu. Architecture characterization and 3D geological modeling of Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Shunbei No. 1 fault zone,Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 124-135.
[7] SUN Hanxiao, XING Fengcun, XIE Wuren, QIAN Hongshan. Lithofacies paleogeography evolution of Late Ordovician in Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[8] LUO Beiwei, YIN Jiquan, HU Guangcheng, CHEN Hua, KANG Jingcheng, XIAO Meng, ZHU Qiuying, DUAN Haigang. Characteristics and controlling factors of high porosity and permeability limestone reservoirs of Cretaceous Cenomanian in the western United Arab Emirates [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 63-71.
[9] FAN Rui, LIU Hui, YANG Peiguang, SUN Xing, MA Hui, HAO Fei, ZHANG Shanshan. Identification of carbonate dissolution valleys filled with mudstones of Cretaceous in block A,Oman Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 72-81.
[10] LIU Yaming, WANG Dandan, TIAN Zuoji, ZHANG Zhiwei, WANG Tongkui, WANG Chaofeng, YANG Xiaofa, ZHOU Yubing. Characteristics and prediction methods of igneous rocks in complex carbonate oilfields in Santos Basin,Brazil [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 127-137.
[11] TANG Yuzhe, CHAI Hui, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, CHEN Pengyu, ZHANG Wenqi, JIANG Lingzhi, PAN Xingming. Characteristics and new prediction methods of Jurassic subsalt carbonate reservoirs in the eastern right bank of Amu Darya,Central Asia [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 147-158.
[12] WANG Xueke, WANG Zhen, JI Zhifeng, YIN Wei, JIANG Ren, HOU Yu, ZHANG Yiqiong. Hydrocarbon accumulation rules and exploration technologies of Carboniferous subsalt carbonate reservoirs in the eastern margin of Pre-Caspian Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(6): 54-62.
[13] DU Jiangmin, CUI Zihao, JIA Zhiwei, ZHANG Yi, NIE Wancai, LONG Pengyu, LIU Boyuan. Sedimentary characteristics of Ma 55 sub-member of Ordovician Majiagou Formation in Sulige area,Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
[14] ZHU Xiuxiang, ZHAO Rui, ZHAO Teng. Characteristics and control effect on reservoir and accumulation of strike-slip segments in Shunbei No. 1 fault zone,Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 131-138.
[15] BU Xuqiang, WANG Laiyuan, ZHU Lianhua, HUANG Cheng, ZHU Xiuxiang. Characteristics and reservoir accumulation model of Ordovician fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oil and gas field,Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 152-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] LI Zaiguang,LI Lin. Automatic mapping based on well data[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] CHENG Yuhong,GUO Yanru,ZHENG Ximing,FANG Naizhen,MA Yuhu. The interpretation method and application effect determined by multiple seismic and logging factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] LIU Juntian,JIN Zhenjia,LI Zaiguang,TAN Xinping,GUO Lin,WANG Bo,LIU Yuxiang. Controlling factors for lithologic hydrocarbon reservoirs and petroleum prospecting target in Xiaocaohu area , Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] SHANG Changliang, FU Shouxian. Application of 3D seismic survey in loess tableland[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] WANG Changyong, ZHENG Rongcai, WANG Jianguo, CAO Shaofang, Xiao Mingguo. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution of Badaowan Formation of Lower Jurassic in northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] WANG Ke1 LIU Xianyang, ZHAO Weiwei, SONG Jianghai, SHI Zhenfeng, XIANG Hui. Char acter istics and geological significance of seismites of Paleogene in Yangxin Subsag of J iyang Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] SUN Hongbin, ZHANG Fenglian. Structural-sedimentary evolution char acter istics of Paleogene in Liaohe Depr ession[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] LI Chuanliang. Can uplift r esult in abnormal high pr essur e in formation?[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] WEI Qinlian,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Ling,MA Guofu,DOU Shijie,TIAN Baozhong. Study on horizontal heterogeneity in Serie Inferiere of Triassic in 438b block , Algeria[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .
TRENDMD: