吐哈盆地北缘博格达山前二叠系地层划分及其勘探意义

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20260303

Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 24-37.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260303

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles Next Articles

Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin

CHEN Xuan¹(), HAO Bin²(), GOU Hongguang¹, ZHANG Jing², XU Xiongfei¹, YANG Zhanlong², HU Jun¹, HE Changsong¹

¹ Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839009, Xinjiang, China
² Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest （NWGI）, PetroChina, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received:2025-12-13 Revised:2026-03-11 Published:2026-04-27 Online:2026-05-01

Abstract

Abstract:

Through comprehensive analysis of palynological assemblages, zircon U-Pb ages, and sedimentary sequences from Permian outcrops in Bogda piedmont on the northern margin of Tuha Basin, the stratigraphic attribution was re-evaluated, the lithofacies paleogeography during the deposition of Lucaogou Formation/Ta’erlang Formation around Bogda mountains was reconstructed, and the exploration potential of the area was discussed. The results show that: （1） The palynological assemblages originally assigned to Ta’erlang Formation in Zhaobishan and Ertanggou sections are significantly different from those of Ta’erlang Formation/Lucaogou Formation in Ta’erlanggou and eastern Junggar Basin, but consistent with those of Wutonggou Formation in eastern Junggar Basin, and thus should be revised as Wutonggou Formation. The regional dark strata originally placed at the top of Yierxitu Formation whose sedimentary sequence and volcanic rock ages can be compared with those of Lucaogou Formation around Bogda mountains, and should be classified as Ta’erlang Formation. Zircon ages indicate Early Permian, earlier than the previously considered Middle Permian. （2） During the deposition of Ta’erlang Formation, Bogda mountains served as the depositional center, and the piedmont zone was in the environment of saline semi-deep-lake to deep-lake facies to half saline semi-deep lake,with the potential to form high-quality source rocks. （3） Permian source rocks in Taibei Sag are of relatively good quality, especially those in the northern part of the sag. The northern piedmont zone lies above the hydrocarbon generation center and contains numerous untested structural traps. The wedge-shaped structures and piedmont deep layer are the prospective areas for new breakthroughs of the mature Permian petroleum system in Tuha Basin.

Key words: stratigraphic division, palynological assemblages, zircon dating, source rock, Lucaogou Formation, Ta’erlang Formation, Permian, Bogda mountains, Tuha Basin

CLC Number:

TE121.34

CHEN Xuan, HAO Bin, GOU Hongguang, ZHANG Jing, XU Xiongfei, YANG Zhanlong, HU Jun, HE Changsong. Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 24-37.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb isotopic analysis results of tuff from dark mudstone strata overlying volcanic rocks of Yierxitu Formation in Kulai section， northern margin of Tuha Basin"

编号	同位素比值				同位素年龄/Ma				w(元素)/10^-6
编号	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	σ₁	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	σ₂	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	σ₃	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	σ₄	Th	U	Pb
1	0.324 1	0.015 6	0.046 0	0.000 6	285.00	12	290.00	4	59.5	139.0	7.33
2	0.335 5	0.013 6	0.046 9	0.000 6	294.00	10	295.00	3	89.1	189.0	10.36
3	0.333 9	0.015 7	0.047 2	0.000 6	293.00	12	297.00	3	67.8	152.0	8.27
4	0.315 0	0.013 9	0.047 1	0.000 6	278.00	11	297.00	4	82.9	180.0	9.71
5	0.333 6	0.015 4	0.047 0	0.000 6	292.00	12	296.00	4	52.0	135.0	7.19
6	0.332 6	0.015 6	0.047 4	0.000 6	292.00	12	299.00	4	64.6	160.0	8.64
7	0.306 7	0.014 0	0.045 8	0.000 5	272.00	11	288.00	3	84.0	188.0	9.85
8	0.328 4	0.015 0	0.046 3	0.000 6	288.00	11	292.00	4	62.5	155.0	8.08
9	0.345 6	0.014 5	0.046 8	0.000 5	301.00	11	295.00	3	78.2	177.0	9.47
10	0.321 9	0.014 3	0.047 0	0.000 6	283.00	11	296.00	4	55.4	142.0	7.48
11	0.316 5	0.014 4	0.046 7	0.000 6	279.00	11	294.00	3	81.7	178.0	9.55
12	0.333 6	0.015 0	0.047 2	0.000 6	292.00	11	297.00	4	59.7	149.0	7.95
13	0.304 6	0.012 8	0.046 4	0.000 5	270.00	10	292.00	3	99.6	212.0	11.29
14	0.337 9	0.013 6	0.045 8	0.000 5	296.00	10	289.00	3	93.6	210.0	11.05
15	0.328 0	0.015 6	0.047 5	0.000 7	288.00	12	299.00	4	67.4	178.0	9.54
16	0.334 2	0.018 2	0.047 8	0.000 6	293.00	14	301.00	4	63.5	152.0	8.04
17	0.323 2	0.015 0	0.046 4	0.000 6	284.00	11	292.00	4	81.9	188.0	10.02
18	0.314 5	0.014 4	0.046 9	0.000 6	278.00	11	295.00	4	73.6	161.0	8.63
19	0.350 2	0.016 9	0.047 8	0.000 6	305.00	13	301.00	4	37.9	134.0	7.19
20	0.346 3	0.016 3	0.047 3	0.000 6	302.00	12	298.00	4	72.5	171.0	9.21
21	0.357 0	0.013 5	0.047 9	0.000 6	310.00	10	301.00	4	96.0	177.0	10.04
22	0.314 1	0.015 4	0.047 3	0.000 6	277.00	12	298.00	4	59.0	156.0	8.31
23	0.327 1	0.013 9	0.046 0	0.000 6	287.00	11	290.00	4	64.9	167.0	8.74
24	0.342 9	0.013 7	0.047 5	0.000 6	299.00	10	299.00	4	63.1	160.0	8.73
25	0.331 2	0.013 4	0.047 3	0.000 6	290.00	10	298.00	4	72.2	168.0	9.15
26	0.347 8	0.015 2	0.046 0	0.000 6	303.00	11	290.00	3	81.9	186.0	10.00
27	0.326 9	0.013 7	0.045 7	0.000 6	287.00	10	288.00	3	82.3	183.0	9.75
28	0.330 7	0.016 3	0.046 8	0.000 5	290.00	12	295.00	3	79.7	179.0	9.71
29	0.316 4	0.013 8	0.046 7	0.000 5	279.00	11	294.00	3	84.4	158.0	8.79
30	0.334 8	0.015 6	0.046 2	0.000 6	293.00	12	291.00	3	80.4	171.0	9.25

Table 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 2

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

References 46

[1]	殷树铮, 何登发, 付国斌, 等. 博格达地区二叠纪原型盆地沉积充填与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2026, 47(1):124-142.
	YIN Shuzheng, HE Dengfa, FU Guobin, et al. Sedimentary fil-ling and evolution of the Permian prototype basin in Bogda area,China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2026, 47(1):124-142.
[2]	郑有伟, 郭建明, 郑建京, 等. 新疆博格达构造带晚古生代构造格局与演化过程探讨[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2015, 30(4):588-593.
	ZHENG Youwei, GUO Jianming, ZHENG Jianjing, et al. Late Paleozoic tectonic framework and evolution process of Bogda tectonic belt in Xinjiang[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2015, 30(4):588-593.
[3]	ZHAO Rui, ZHANG Jinyu, ZHOU Chuanmin, et al. Tectonic evolution of Tianshan-Bogda-Kelameili mountains,clastic wedge basin infill and chronostratigraphic divisions in the source-to-sink systems of Permian-Jurassic,southern Junggar Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 114:104200.
[4]	WANG Jialin, WU Chaodong, LI Zhuang, et al. The tectonic evolution of the Bogda region from Late Carboniferous to Triassic time:Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology and sandstone petrography[J]. Geological Magazine, 2018, 155(5):1063-1088.
[5]	柳益群, 冯乔, 周立发, 等. 吐哈盆地二叠系含油结核研究及生油前景分析[J]. 石油学报, 2002, 23(5):40-43.
	LIU Yiqun, FENG Qiao, ZHOU Lifa, et al. Oil-bearing nodules and oil-generation prospects of Permian in Turpan-Hami basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2002, 23(5):40-43.
[6]	杨有星, 张君峰, 张金虎, 等. 新疆博格达山周缘中上二叠统与中上三叠统沉积特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4):670-682.
	YANG Youxing, ZHANG Junfeng, ZHANG Jinhu, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Permian and Middle-Upper Triassic around Bogda Mountain of Xinjiang,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4):670-682.
[7]	柳益群, 周鼎武, 冯乔, 等. 新疆北部二叠系特征及其与三叠系界线划分[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 36(4):615-622.
	LIU Yiqun, ZHOU Dingwu, FENG Qiao, et al. Characteristics of Permian and the boundary between Permian and Triassic system in the northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 36(4):615-622.
[8]	刘淑文. 新疆中二叠世叶肢介化石[J]. 古生物学报, 2001, 40(1):61-66.
	LIU Shuwen. Middle Permian conchostracans in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2001, 40(1):61-66.
[9]	徐加林, 刘燕学, 柳永清, 等. 新疆吐鲁番—哈密盆地北部下二叠统伊尔稀土组的沉积特征与盆地演化[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3):424-442.
	XU Jialin, LIU Yanxue, LIU Yongqing, et al. Sedimentology and basin evolution of the Early Permian Yierxitu Formation in Turpan-Hami area,Xinjiang[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013, 32(2/3):424-442.
[10]	高岗, 梁浩, 李华明, 等. 吐哈盆地石炭系—下二叠统烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(5):583-592.
	GAO Gang, LIANG Hao, LI Huaming, et al. Organic geochemi-stry of Carboniferous and Lower Permian source rocks,Turpan-Hami Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2009, 36(5):583-592.
[11]	沈传波, 梅廉夫, 刘麟, 等. 新疆博格达山裂变径迹年龄特征及其构造意义[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(2):11-14.
	SHEN Chuanbo, MEI Lianfu, LIU Lin, et al. Characteristics of fission track age of Bogedashan in Xinjiang and its structural significance[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2005, 27(2):11-14.
[12]	王宗秀. 博格达山链的造山活动与山体形成演化[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所, 2003.
	WANG Zongxiu. Orogeny,formation and evolution in the Bogda Mountain Chains,Northwestern China[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geology,China Earthquake Administration, 2003.
[13]	崔泽宏, 汤良杰, 王志欣. 博格达南、北缘成盆过程演化及其对油气形成影响[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25(1):59-64.
	CUI Zehong, TANG Liangjie, WANG Zhixin. Basin-formation evolution and its effect on petroleum formation in the southern and northern margins of Bogda[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(1):59-64.
[14]	李涛, 王宗秀, 周高志, 等. 新疆博格达山分段及深浅构造转换关系[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(3):103-114.
	LI Tao, WANG Zongxiu, ZHOU Gaozhi, et al. The segmentation and the relationship between shallow and deep structures of Bogda Mountain,Xinjiang,Northwest China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2004, 11(3):103-114.
[15]	周鼎武, 柳益群, 邢秀娟, 等. 新疆吐哈、三塘湖盆地二叠纪玄武岩形成古构造环境恢复及区域构造背景示踪[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2006, 36(2):143-153.
	ZHOU Dingwu, LIU Yiqun, XING Xiujuan, et al. Restoration of the Paleotectonic environment and implications for the regional tectonic background of Permian basalts in the Tuha and Santanghu Basins,Xinjiang[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2006, 36(2):143-153.
[16]	汪新伟, 汪新文, 马永生. 新疆博格达山晚中生代以来的差异剥露史[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(11):1507-1517.
	WANG Xinwei, WANG Xinwen, MA Yongsheng. Differential exhumation history of Bogda Mountain,Xinjiang,northwestern China since the Late Mesozoic[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(11):1507-1517.
[17]	张增宝. 吐哈盆地西北缘深部二叠系构造特征、盆地原型及烃源岩评价[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2014.
	ZHANG Zengbao. Deep Permian tectonic characteristics,basin prototype and source rock evaluation in the northwest Tuha Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2014.
[18]	徐希旺, 陈世悦, 王越, 等. 吐哈盆地大河沿地区塔尔朗组细粒沉积岩特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(4):705-713.
	XU Xiwang, CHEN Shiyue, WANG Yue, et al. Characteristics of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Taerlang Formation,Daheyan area,Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):705-713.
[19]	YANG Wan, FENG Qiao, LIU Yiqun, et al. Depositional environments and cyclo- and chronostratigraphy of uppermost Carboni-ferous-Lower Triassic fluvial-lacustrine deposits,southern Bogda Mountains,NW China:A terrestrial paleoclimatic record of mid-latitude NE Pangea[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2010, 73(1/2):15-113.
[20]	SUN Funing, HU Wenxuan, CAO Jian, et al. Sustained and intensified lacustrine methane cycling during Early Permian climate warming[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13:4856.
[21]	袁明生, 梁世君, 燕列灿, 等. 吐哈盆地油气地质与勘探实践[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002.
	YUAN Mingsheng, LIANG Shijun, YAN Liecan, et al. Hydrocarbon geology and exploration practice in the Turpan-Hami Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002.
[22]	侯静鹏, 王智. 新疆北部二叠纪—第三纪地层及孢粉组合[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
	HOU Jingpeng, WANG Zhi. Permian to Tertiary strata and palynological assemblages in the north of Xinjiang[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1990.
[23]	李长民. 锆石成因矿物学与锆石微区定年综述[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2009, 32(3):161-174.
	LI Changmin. A review on the minerageny and in situ microanalytical dating techniques of zircons[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2009, 32(3):161-174.
[24]	HARLEY S L, KELLY N M. Zircon tiny but timely[J]. Elements, 2007, 3(1):3-18.
[25]	王越. 新疆塔尔朗沟剖面中二叠统扇三角洲混合沉积特征及模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(5):922-933.
	WANG Yue. Mixed sedimentary characteristics and pattern of the fan delta in the Middle Permian Taerlanggou profile,Xin-jiang province[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5):922-933.
[26]	樊妍, 王绪龙, 向才富, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部二叠系平地泉组烃源岩富集规律与主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(4):1105-1117.
	FAN Yan, WANG Xulong, XIANG Caifu, et al. Enrichment patterns and main controlling factors of source rocks in the Permian Pingdiquan Formation,eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(4):1105-1117.
[27]	经雅丽, 张克信, 林启祥, 等. 浙江长兴煤山下三叠统和龙山组、南陵湖组沉积地球化学特征与古环境意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2005, 24(1):35-40.
	JING Yali, ZHANG Kexin, LIN Qixiang, et al. Sedimentary geochemistry characteristics and paleoenvironmental meaning of Helongshan Formation and Nanlinghu Formation in Meishan,Changxing county,Zhejiang province[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2005, 24(1):35-40.
[28]	JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1/4):111-129.
[29]	蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6):109-119.
	JIANG Zhongfa, DING Xiujian, WANG Zhongquan, et al. Sedimentary paleoenvironment of source rocks of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6):109-119.
[30]	李建忠, 陈旋, 杨润泽, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部吉南凹陷二叠系油气地质条件与源下成藏特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3):491-503.
	LI Jianzhong, CHEN Xuan, YANG Runze, et al. Petroleum geo-logy and sub-source hydrocarbon accumulation of Permian reservoirs in Jinan Sag,eastern Junggar Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3):491-503.
[31]	罗锦昌, 田继军, 马静辉, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉页1井区二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):73-85.
	LUO Jinchang, TIAN Jijun, MA Jinghui, et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment mechanism of Per-mian Lucaogou Formation in Jiye-1 well area,Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):73-85.
[32]	刘海磊, 朱永才, 刘龙松, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带上盘二叠系芦草沟组页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4):90-101.
	LIU Hailei, ZHU Yongcai, LIU Longsong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential of shale oil of Permian Lucaogou Formation in hanging wall of Fukang fault zone,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4):90-101.
[33]	陈旋, 徐雄飞, 张亦婷, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系油气成藏系统及勘探潜力[J]. 地质学报, 2025, 99(12):4313-4329.
	CHEN Xuan, XU Xiongfei, ZHANG Yiting, et al. Oil and gas reservoir system and exploration potential of Permian in the Fukang fault zone of the Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2025, 99(12):4313-4329.
[34]	龚德瑜, 韩琰, 范谭广, 等. 准噶尔盆地古城凹陷中二叠统芦草沟组烃源岩生烃潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2025, 36(1):57-71.
	GONG Deyu, HAN Yan, FAN Tanguang, et al. Hydrocarbon-generating potential of the Middle Permian Lucaogou source rocks in the Gucheng Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025, 36(1):57-71.
[35]	赵文智, 李伟, 张研. 吐哈盆地鲁克沁稠油藏成藏过程初探与勘探意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1998, 25(2):17-19.
	ZHAO Wenzhi, LI Wei, ZHANG Yan. A preliminary study on the forming process of Lukeqin heavy oil pool and its explo-ratory significance to Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1998, 25(2):17-19.
[36]	武超, 李宏伟, 盛双占, 等. 吐哈盆地鲁克沁构造带二叠系—三叠系油气成藏特征与主控因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):137-148.
	WU Chao, LI Hongwei, SHENG Shuangzhan, et al. Characteri-stics and main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation of Permian-Triassic in Lukeqin structural zone,Tuha Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):137-148.
[37]	曾庆鲁, 张荣虎, 张立强, 等. 超深层储层构造裂缝促溶扩孔增渗效应:以塔里木盆地库车前陆冲断带白垩系砂岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(9):1720-1737.
	ZENG Qinglu, ZHANG Ronghu, ZHANG Liqiang, et al. Effect of structural fractures in ultra-deep reservoirs on promoting dissolution,enhancing porosity and increasing permeability:A case study of Cretaceous sandstone in Kuqa foreland thrust belt,Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(9):1720-1737.
[38]	石玉江, 甘仁忠, 蔺敬旗, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘超深层致密碎屑岩储层油气高产机理与潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2025, 30(1):82-97.
	SHI Yujiang, GAN Renzhong, LIN Jingqi, et al. Mechanism and potential of high-yield oil and gas production in the ultra-deep tight clastic reservoirs in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2025, 30(1):82-97.
[39]	苏勤, 李海亮, 吕彬, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带巴喀三维叠前地震成像处理解释技术研究及应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2011, 16(5/6):29-40.
	SU Qin, LI Hailiang, LYU Bin, et al. 3D prestack seismic ima-ging in Baka area of northern Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2011, 16(5/6):29-40.
[40]	刘护创, 王文慧, 陈俊男. 台北凹陷西部差异逆冲推覆体系与油气聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2):45-49.
	LIU Huchuang, WANG Wenhui, CHEN Junnan. Hydrocarbon accumulation and related differential thrust system in western Taibei Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2):45-49.
[41]	李在光, 陈启林, 吕锡敏, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带石油地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3):29-34.
	LI Zaiguang, CHEN Qilin, LYU Ximin, et al. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration direction in north piedmont zone of Tuha Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(3):29-34.
[42]	吴青鹏, 杨占龙, 姚军, 等. 吐哈盆地北部山前带中下侏罗统水西沟群成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):1-11.
	WU Qingpeng, YANG Zhanlong, YAO Jun, et al. Reservoir forming conditions and exploration prospect of Middle-Lower Jurassic Shuixigou group in northern piedmont belt of Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):1-11.
[43]	管树巍, 张朝军, 何登发, 等. 前陆冲断带复杂构造解析与建模:以准噶尔盆地南缘第一排背斜带为例[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(8):1131-1140.
	GUAN Shuwei, ZHANG Chaojun, HE Dengfa, et al. Complex structural analysis and modeling:The first row of anticlinal belt on the southern margin of the Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(8):1131-1140.
[44]	李本亮, 管树巍, 陈竹新, 等. 楔形构造在山前冲断构造位移量消减中的作用:以准噶尔盆地南缘为例[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(6):890-897.
	LI Benliang, GUAN Shuwei, CHEN Zhuxin, et al. The effect of wedge structure on displacement subduction of piedmont thrust structure:A case study of the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(6):890-897.
[45]	SPRATT D A, LAWTON D C. Variations in detachment levels,ramp angles and wedge geometries along the Alberta thrust front[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1996, 44(2):313-321.
[46]	贾承造. 中国中西部前陆冲断带构造特征与天然气富集规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(4):9-15.
	JIA Chengzao. Foreland thrust-fold belt features and gas accumulation in Midwest China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2005, 32(4):9-15.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

TRENDMD:

盆地	凹陷/剖面	TOC/%	(S₁ + S₂)/（mg·g^-1）	HI/（mg·g^-1）	类型	R_o/%	T_max/℃	成熟度	资料来源
准噶尔	吉木萨尔	0.30~10.90/ 3.40(122)	0.50~79.40/ 15.90(122)	48.40~782.00/ 378.10(122)	Ⅱ—Ⅰ	0.60~1.20/ 0.80(11)	430~455/ 444(122)	低熟—成熟	文献[34]
	古城	0.30~19.40/ 2.50（68）	0.30~128.80/ 7.80（68）	30.70~621.10/ 261.00	Ⅱ—Ⅲ	1.00~1.20/ 1.10(3)	439~453/ 446（68）	成熟	文献[34]
	吉南	0.61~28.17/ 5.36（135）	1.73~238.30/ 30.24	27.00~997.00/ 628.00	Ⅰ，Ⅱ₁	0.52~0.80/ 0.91（135）	439~450/ 443	低熟—成熟	文献[33]
	阜康断裂带上盘	0.80~20.08/ 4.94（18）	2.32~164.40/ 28.00（18）	30.00~805.00/ 463.00	Ⅱ—Ⅰ	1.11~1.83/ 1.56（12）	—	成熟—高成熟	文献[33]
柴窝堡		1.54~10.78	4.13~54.76	—	Ⅱ₁，Ⅱ₂	—	—	成熟—高成熟	本文
吐哈	塔尔朗沟	0.68~11.03/ 3.96（26）	0.13~45.95/ 11.97（26）	18.00~549.00/ 208.00	Ⅱ₁，Ⅱ₂	0.58~0.72/ 0.65（26）	437~466/ 441（26）	低熟—成熟	本文
	照壁山	0.58~3.75/ 2.33（5）	0.07~0.20 0.16（5）	4.20~7.80/ 5.90（5）	—	1.72~1.81	528~533/ 531（5）	高成熟	本文
	照壁山	1.10~4.38/ 2.37	0.11~0.93/ 0.34	—	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	—	—	—	文献[10]
	台北南缘	1.67~8.54	1.62~11.11	—	Ⅱ	1.04~1.27/	—	成熟	文献[36]
	台南	0.17~5.04/ 2.26	0.03~7.85/ 1.83	12.00~191.00/ 106.00	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	0.64~0.78/ 0.71	431~445/ 438	低熟—成熟	本文
	大南湖	0.50~8.25/ 2.58	0.32~18.28/ 2.51	25.00~575.00/ 112	Ⅱ₂，Ⅲ	0.61~0.73/ 0.69	435~449 441	低熟—成熟	本文

Stratigraphic division of Permian and its exploration significance of Bogda piedmont, northern margin of Tuha Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 46

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Xuan, YANG Bin, ZHANG Hua, GOU Hongguang, HU Jun, FU Guobin, HAO Bin, CHENG Yi. Pre-Jurassic source rock evolution features and hydrocarbon accumulation process in Taibei Sag, Turpan-Hami Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(5): 10-22.
[2]	HUANG Li, ZHAO Longmei, CHEN Dong, ZHAO Haoyang, ZHANG Yixin, SHI Shi, ZHANG Wen, JI Liang. Characteristics and exploration potential of coal rock gas reservoirs in Carboniferous-Permian in Yichuan area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(5): 40-50.
[3]	FAN Yujie, WAN Yongping, PU Renhai, SHE Yinnan, CUI Hongjun, GAO Xiaoping. Sedimentary characteristics and exploration potential of the large-scale channel belt in Shan₂³ submember of Yan’an-Ganquan area, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(5): 125-135.
[4]	LI Xinze, WU Hao, CHAO Jiahao, LI Na, WANG Suran, BAI Yuhu, FENG Ruyong, CHENG Jialu. Prediction method for coalbed methane deliverability of Permian Taiyuan Formation in Shenfu block, Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(5): 191-200.
[5]	WANG Zheng, XU Shoucheng, HU Xiuquan, LING Hang, TU Wenmao, ZHOU Yue, ZHANG Xiaoqing, SUN Wenna. Sedimentary models and fine characterization of subtle organic reefs in Permian Changxing Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(4): 12-22.
[6]	WANG Yanjun, BIAN Baoli, XIANG Hui, ZHANG Yongjun, SUN Yongxing, XU Xuelong, MA Delong, LI Yun. Reconstruction and petroleum exploration potential of the Permian prototype basin in the periphery of Fukang fault zone, Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(4): 126-136.
[7]	LI Hongxi, LI Zhuzheng, CAO Yonghong, ZHAO Lei, FU Yu, XING Chaochao, NING Meng. Sedimentary characteristics and hydrocarbon significance of Sinian Doushantuo Formation in the periphery of Hannan paleo-uplift, northwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(4): 148-156.
[8]	HUANG Qiao, LUO Shunshe, ZHANG Liang, HUANG Li, GUO Kang, ZHU Liye, NAN Junwu. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian Qipan Formation reservoirs in Kekeya structural belt, southwestern Tarim Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(4): 23-37.
[9]	LU Ziqi, LI Yuanhao, ZHU Yanhe, CHEN Xiaozhi, PAN Xinzhu, ZHAI Wenbin, CHANG Yirong, SHAN Chang’an. Sedimentary evolution characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation models of Paleogene in Sanmenxia Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(4): 77-90.
[10]	BAI Yiyuan, GONG Hujun, WANG Dongxu, LI Yuan, LUO Fenhong, WANG Junjun. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of helium in Yanchang exploration area of Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 149-161.
[11]	NIE Minglong, LIU Haoyuan, WANG Zhaoming, ZHAO Shumao, YU Taiji. Characteristics, enrichment conditions and exploration implications of helium-rich gas reservoirs in Chu-Sarysu Basin, Kazakhstan [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 162-172.
[12]	ZHAO Ye, XU Peng, HU Hewei, WANG Hang, YANG Jiaojiao. Tectonic characteristics of Miaoxinan area at the margin of Bohai Bay Basin and their controls on hydrocarbon accumulation [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2): 145-152.
[13]	XIAO Fuqiang, XIAO Weidong, JIANG Zhidong, GAO Lei, ZHAO Zhengwei, PAN Xiaofei, CHEN Fugui, ZOU Yongjun. Coal measure shale reservoir characteristics and exploration potential of Permian Leping Formation in Pingle Depression of Lower Yangtze region [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(1): 100-114.
[14]	XUN Xiaoquan, LI Hongtao, LI Changping, YANG Fan, LIU Xiong. A new method for splitting the production of fractured horizontal wells in strong heterogeneous gas reservoirs:Taking Permian He1 member gas reservoir in Dongsheng Gasfield of Ordos Basin as an example [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(1): 191-200.
[15]	YAO Jiayu, CAO Wenjie, WANG Wenqiang, MAO Lixin, LUO Bin. Geological condition for coalbed methane accumulation of Permian Longtan Formation in the central part of Northwest Guizhou [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(1): 67-77.