Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 107-119.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260309

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin

XU Zhongfan1(), DING Xiong1(), YIN Hong2, TIAN Yunying2, SONG Yi1, YANG Xiran1,3   

  1. 1 School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    2 Northwest Sichuan Gas Mine, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company, Jiangyou 621000, Sichuan, China
    3 Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2025-12-23 Revised:2026-01-09 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-02-10

Abstract:

Based on data,such as logging, core, thin section, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury injection, sedimentary facies, reservoir characteristics, and main controlling factors of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area of northwestern Sichuan Basin were analyzed, favorable exploration areas were further delineated. The results show that: (1) Sedimentary characteristics of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuang-yushi area of northwestern Sichuan Basin are generally characterized by an evolution from a marine continental transitional facies (shoreline-shallow sea) to a terrestrial delta-alluvial fan system. Sandstone reservoirs are dominated by light-gray fine to medium grained feldspar lithic sandstone and lithic feldspar sandstone. And the storage space is mainly intergranular/intragranular dissolved pores, with an average porosity of 5.13% and an average permeability of 0.420 mD. Overall, it belongs to a medium low porosity and low-permeability reservoir. The conglomerate are mainly brownish gray carbonate conglomerate, with underdeveloped pores and a small number of fractures. (2) Sedimentary facies is one of the main controlling factors of reservoirs, forming the initial porosity of rocks. Relatively high-quality reservoirs are mainly distributed in high-energy microfacies, such as distributary channels in fan delta front, mouth bars, and nearshore-foreshore, while conglomerate reservoirs are mainly distributed in high-energy channel sedimentary microfacies near provenance. Compaction and cementation reduce reservoir space, while dissolution contributes to reservoir improvement. (3) Relatively high-quality sandstone reservoirs are mainly concentrated in delta front-plain channel sand bodies in the second member of Xujiahe Formation. Local beach bars/nearshore sand bodies in the first member of Xujiahe Formation, and local front sand bodies in the third member of Xujiahe Formation are with good quality.

Key words: sandstone reservoir, carbonate conglomerate reservoir, sedimentary facies, diagenesis, pore-throat structure, tight gas, Xujiahe Formation, Upper Triassic, Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122

Fig. 1

Tectonic location of Shuangyushi area (a) and comprehensive stratigraphic column of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation (b), northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 2

Sedimentary facies of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Table 1

Depositional systems and sedimentary facies classification of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

沉积体系 沉积相 亚相 微相
冲积扇 冲积扇 扇中 辫状河道、辫状河道间
扇缘 漫流沉积、洪泛平原
三角洲 扇三角洲 扇三角洲平原 辫状分流河道、分流间平原
辫状河
三角洲
辫状河三角洲
平原
辫状分流河道、分流间平原
辫状河三角洲
前缘
水下分流河道、河口坝、
分流间湾
滨岸—
浅海
滨岸—
浅海
近滨—前滨 滨岸砂坝
浅海 滩坝砂、浅海泥
冲溢扇 冲溢扇砂、泥坪

Fig. 3

Sandstone classification of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 4

Photographs of typical cores from sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 5

Pore types and their proportion of sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 6

Microphotos of core thin sections of sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs from Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 7

Porosity-permeability correlation of sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs from Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 8

SEM images of sandstone reservoirs from the second member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Table 2

Core mercury injection parameters of sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs from Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

储层类型 排驱
压力/MPa
中值喉道
半径/μm
最大汞
饱和度/%
退汞效率/%
砂岩 0.11~4.12(1.09) 0.04~0.13(0.08) 85.49~98.47(92.99) 41.46~58.66(51.92)
砾岩 5.73~22.79(13.66) 0.03~0.10(0.07) 76.89~92.81(87.76) 42.40~47.56(44.80)

Fig. 9

Core mercury injection curves of sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs from Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Table 3

Comparison of reservoir characteristics between sandstone and conglomerate of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

储层特征 岩性 孔隙类型 裂缝发育 孔渗关系 孔隙度/% 渗透率/mD 孔喉结构
砂岩 浅灰色中—细粒长石岩屑砂岩、岩屑长石砂岩为主 以粒间溶孔和粒内溶孔为主 构造缝、层间缝
为主,分布频率
为10%
孔渗关系较好,决定系数R2 = 0.416 1 1.30~11.40 0.021~1.380 连通性较好,以管束状喉道、缩颈状喉道为主的孔喉配置关系
砾岩 褐灰色中—细粒碳酸盐质砾岩 以粒间溶孔和粒内溶孔为主 溶蚀缝、微裂缝
为主,分布频率
为37%
孔渗关系较差,决定系数R2 = 0.089 5 0.82~7.20 0.001~0.620 连通性差,以细喉-不连续喉道为主,可能具有狭缝(片状)通道特征,局部受裂缝控制

Fig. 10

Comparison of average porosity (a) and permeability (b) of sedimentary microfacies of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Table 4

Comparison of main genetic types and characteristics of sand (gravel) bodies of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

储层类别 砂(砾)体成因类型 岩性 沉积构造 GR响应特征 垂向序列
砂岩 辫状分流河道砂体 以浅灰色中—细粒砂岩为主 底冲刷面,块状构造,向上变为交错层理、平行层理 底突变,箱形或钟形,叠加呈中—
高幅的圣诞树形或齿化箱形
向上变细
水下分流河道砂体 以浅灰色中—细粒砂岩为主 底冲刷面,块状构造,向上变为交错层理、平行层理 底突变,箱形或钟形,叠加呈中—
高幅的齿化箱形
向上变细
河口坝砂体 以浅灰色细粒砂岩为主,下部为粉砂岩 底冲刷面,含砾块状砂岩,大—中型板状、槽状交错层理,平行层理 底突变,钟形或箱形,叠加呈中—
高幅的圣诞树形或箱形
向上变粗
砂质滩坝砂体 以浅灰—灰白色泥质粉、细砂岩为主 低角度的板状、槽状交错层理,楔状交错层理,下部为砂纹层理 顶突变,漏斗形或指形,具外收敛
前积式组合
向上变粗
砾岩 辫状河道砂(砾)体 以褐灰色砾岩、浅灰色细砂岩为主 块状构造
底突变,箱形或钟形,叠加呈中—
高幅的圣诞树形或齿化箱形
向上变细
漫流沉积砂(砾)体 以浅灰色细砂岩、褐灰色砾岩为主 块状构造,向上变为交错层理、
平行层理

Fig. 11

Microfacies sedimentary characteristics and logging responses of sandstone and conglomerate of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 12

Microphotos of typical diagenesis of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Table 5

Relative contents of clay mineral of sandstone from the second member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in well Y1, Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"


深度/m w(黏土矿物)/% 间层比/
S(%)
伊利
石(I)
伊蒙
混层
(I/S)
蒙皂
石(S)
高岭
石(K)
绿泥
石(C)
1 4 312.03~4 313.08 79 21
2 4 314.91~4 315.36 69 31
3 4 315.90~4 316.35 30 70
4 4 327.70~4 328.16 72 28
5 4 328.59~4 328.75 60 21 19 10
6 4 329.16~4 329.60 65 35
7 4 330.18~4 330.43 73 27
8 4 331.15~4 331.40 29 71
9 4 334.85~4 335.27 54 46
10 4 336.77~4 337.85 56 6 38 10
11 4 340.12~4 340.58 60 40

Fig. 13

Diagenetic stages division and diagenetic events of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 14

Burial history and pore evolution of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 15

Favorable exploration areas for sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin"

[1] 童晓光, 张光亚, 王兆明, 等. 全球油气资源潜力与分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):727-736.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.19
TONG Xiaoguang, ZHANG Guangya, WANG Zhaoming, et al. Distribution and potential of global oil and gas resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):727-736.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.19
[2] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
doi: 10.7623/syxb201202001
ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
[3] 王威, 季春辉. 通南巴地区飞仙关组三段高效气藏成因及勘探方向[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(3):39-47.
WANG Wei, JI Chunhui. Genesis and exploration direction of high-efficiency gas reservoir in the third member of Feixianguan Formation in Tongnanba area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(3):39-47.
[4] 熊亮, 杨映涛, 张玲, 等. 四川盆地合兴场致密砂岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(5):1009-1024.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202505012
XIONG Liang, YANG Yingtao, ZHANG Ling, et al. Accumulation conditions and key technologies for exploration and deve-lopment of Hexingchang tight sandstone gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(5):1009-1024.
[5] 芦刚, 王长城, 邓宾, 等. 川西北地区须家河组古环境分析与沉积演化特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2024, 44(4):166-177.
LU Gang, WANG Changcheng, DENG Bin, et al. Analysis of the paleowater property of the Xujiahe Formation in northwest Sichuan and its geological significance[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2024, 44(4):166-177.
[6] 李春阳, 王勃力, 颜晓, 等. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须家河组四段致密储层现今地应力测井评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6):151-161.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250614
LI Chunyang, WANG Boli, YAN Xiao, et al. Current geostress logging evaluation of tight reservoir in the fourth member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6):151-161.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250614
[7] 冉崎, 雷程, 陈康, 等. 四川盆地西北地区构造变形特征、演化及油气地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 2023, 58(1):18-35.
RAN Qi, LEI Cheng, CHEN Kang, et al. Structural styles,evolution and their oil-gas geological significance in the northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology(Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2023, 58(1):18-35.
[8] 薄尚尚, 田继先, 王晔桐, 等. 四川盆地东北部须家河组海陆过渡相沉积环境演化:来自元素地球化学的证据[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2024, 35(4):645-660.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.09.020
BO Shangshang, TIAN Jixian, WANG Yetong, et al. Sedimentary environment evolution of marine-continental transitional facies in Xujiahe Formation,northeastern Sichuan Basin:Evidence from element geochemistry[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2024, 35(4):645-660.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.09.020
[9] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 等. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):86-99.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220507
SU Yiqing, YANG Wei, JIN Hui, et al. Deep-reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):86-99.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220507
[10] 苏加亮, 林良彪, 余瑜, 等. 川西新场地区上三叠统须家河组二、四段物源及储层特征差异对比研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2023, 41(5):1451-1467.
SU Jialiang, LIN Liangbiao, YU Yu, et al. Comparative study on the provenance and reservoir characteristics of the second and fourth members of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Xinchang area,western Sichuan,China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023, 41(5):1451-1467.
[11] 林良彪, 陈洪德, 姜平, 等. 川西前陆盆地须家河组沉积相及岩相古地理演化[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 33(4):376-383.
LIN Liangbiao, CHEN Hongde, JIANG Ping, et al. Sedimentary facies and litho-paleogeographic evolution of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in west Sichuan foreland basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Techno-logy Edition), 2006, 33(4):376-383.
[12] 赵正望, 谢继容, 吴长江, 等. 川西北地区须家河组碎屑组分特征与物源分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2012, 35(4):6-11.
ZHAO Zhengwang, XIE Jirong, WU Changjiang, et al. Detrital composition of Xujiahe Formation and its source,northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2012, 35(4):6-11.
[13] 王兴龙. 川西坳陷新场地区上三叠统须家河组沉积砂体展布及主控因素[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2021.
WANG Xinglong. Sedimentary sand body distribution and main controlling factors of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Xichang area,Western Sichuan Depression[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021.
[14] 罗瑀峰, 厚刚福, 刘占国, 等. 四川盆地大安探区须家河组致密气成藏条件与勘探领域[J]. 海相油气地质, 2025, 30(2):157-166.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2025.02.006
LUO Yufeng, HOU Gangfu, LIU Zhanguo, et al. The formation conditions and exploration fields of tight gas of Xujiahe Formation in Da’an exploration area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2025, 30(2):157-166.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2025.02.006
[15] 杨雨, 文龙, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12):2045-2069.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202312004
YANG Yu, WEN Long, ZHOU Gang, et al. New fields,new types and resource potentials of hydrocarbon exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(12):2045-2069.
doi: 10.7623/syxb202312004
[16] 薄尚尚, 田继先, 李曜良, 等. 川东北地区上三叠统须家河组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2):99-112.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240210
BO Shangshang, TIAN Jixian, LI Yaoliang, et al. Provenance analysis of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2):99-112.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240210
[17] 林良彪, 陈洪德, 侯明才. 须家河组砂岩组分特征与龙门山推覆体的形成演化[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 27(4):28-30.
LIN Liangbiao, CHEN Hongde, HOU Mingcai. Characteristics of sandstone composition of Xujiahe Formation and evolution of Longmenshan thrust nappe[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(4):28-30.
[18] 淡永, 林良彪, 钟怡江, 等. 米仓山—大巴山前缘上三叠统须家河组四段砾岩特征及其对物源的指示[J]. 地质论评, 2013, 59(1):15-23.
DAN Yong, LIN Liangbiao, ZHONG Yijiang, et al. The conglomerate composition of the fourth member of Xujiahe Formation,Upper Triassic,in the front of Micang—Daba mountains,Sichuan,China:Implication for provenance analysis[J]. Geological Review, 2013, 59(1):15-23.
[19] 黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2):21-30.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230203
HUANG Yanqing, LIU Zhongqun, WANG Ai, et al. Types and distribution of tight sandstone gas sweet spots of the third member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2):21-30.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230203
[20] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 等. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4):20-28.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210403
ZHANG Benjian, TIAN Yunying, ZENG Qi, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4):20-28.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210403
[21] 陈贤良, 纪友亮, 杨克明. 川西坳陷中段须四段层序地层格架内沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6):1615-1627.
CHEN Xianliang, JI Youliang, YANG Keming. Sedimentary characteristics within sequence stratigraphic framework of the fourth member of Xujiahe Formation in middle area of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(6):1615-1627.
[22] 国家能源局. 油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
National Energy Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs:SY/T 6285—2011[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2011.
[23] 胡浩, 路遥, 唐群英, 等. 川东北地区须家河组储层成岩作用对孔隙演化影响的定量研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):103-109.
HU Hao, LU Yao, TANG Qunying, et al. Quantitative research on the effect of diagenesis on porosity evolution of Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):103-109.
[24] FOLK R L. A review of grain-size parameters[J]. Sedimento-logy, 1966, 6(2):73-93.
[25] HOUSEKNECHT D W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(6):633-642.
doi: 10.1306/9488787F-1704-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[26] 赵小萌, 郭峰, 彭晓霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地安边地区延10砂质辫状河相储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):124-134.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210613
ZHAO Xiaomeng, GUO Feng, PENG Xiaoxia, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Yan 10 sandy braided fluvial facies in Anbian area,Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):124-134.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210613
[27] 黄彦庆, 肖开华, 金武军, 等. 川东北元坝西部须家河组致密砂岩裂缝发育特征及控制因素[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(2):105-114.
HUANG Yanqing, XIAO Kaihua, JIN Wujun, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir fractures in the Xujiahe Formation of the western Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(2):105-114.
[28] YU Yu, LIN Liangbiao, ZHAI Changbo, et al. Diagenesis and reservoir characteristics analysis of the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation tight gas sandstone in the northern Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2018, 36(4):1-21.
[29] 杨烁, 王威, 张莉, 等. 元坝—通南巴地区须家河组绿泥石膜胶结相砂岩发育控制因素与分布规律[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(2):479-488.
YANG Shuo, WANG Wei, ZHANG Li, et al. Control factors and distribution of chlorite-cemented facies in the Xujiahe Sandstone,Yuanba and Tongnanba area[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(2):479-488.
[30] LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, WANG Song, et al. Review of diagenetic facies in tight sandstones:Diagenesis,diagenetic mine-rals,and prediction via well logs[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 185:234-258.
doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.009
[1] ZHAN Wangzhong, SUI Boyu, WANG Zhongwei, HUO Fei, QI Jun, XIE Shangke, ZENG Shengqiang, HOU Qian. Sedimentary characteristics and reservoir evaluation of Jurassic Quemocuo Formation in Maqu area, eastern part of North Qiangtang Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2): 162-177.
[2] TIAN Wenzhong, QIAO Lin, YUAN Jian, LI Xingwen, XIANG Lei, WANG Changcheng, LU Gang, LU Xihe. Seismic prediction method for thin sandstone reservoirs in shallow water delta front: A case study of the second member of Jurassic Penglaizhen Formation in Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(1): 78-88.
[3] YANG Liu, ZHU Yadong, LIANG Hong, DIAO Yongbo, PENG Xin, SI Guoshuai, XU Jiao, SUN Qingli. Discovery of seismic anomalies in Silurian reefs in Jiange area of northwestern Sichuan Basin and their geological significance for oil and gas [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 131-139.
[4] MIAO Zhiwei, LI Shikai, ZHANG Wenjun, XIAO Wei, LIU Ming, YU Tong. Seismic prediction technology for complex network fractures in fault-fracture reservoir of tight sandstones: A case study of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 140-150.
[5] LI Chunyang, WANG Boli, YAN Xiao, LI Kesai, DENG Hucheng, SU Jinyi, WU Yajun, YE Tairan. Current geostress logging evaluation of tight reservoir in the fourth member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 151-161.
[6] ZHAO Rundong, WANG Jinchang, LUO Yi, ZHOU Ruili, ZHOU Jian. A new calculation method for dynamic reserves of gas water coproduction volumetric gas reservoirs in Daniudi Gasfield of Ordos Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5): 186-192.
[7] YANG Xu, BAI Mingsheng, GONG Hanbo, LI Gao, TAO Zuwen. Characteristics and quantitative prediction of structural fractures in the second member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area, western Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(3): 73-83.
[8] HE Xiaolong, ZHANG Bing, XU Chuan, XIAO Bin, TIAN Yunying, LI Zhuo, HE Yifan. Characteristics of calcareous interlayer in narrow channel sand body and their influence on reservoir quality:A case study of the first member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Zitong area,northwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(3): 129-139.
[9] XU Youjie, REN Zongxiao, XIANG Zuping, FAN Xiaohui, YU Mengnan. Numerical well testing model of fractured well with complex fractures multi-well interference in heterogeneous tight gas reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(3): 194-200.
[10] YANG Jie, ZHANG Wenping, DING Chaolong, SHI Cunying, MA Yunhai. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight gas reservoirs in the second member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation,central Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(1): 137-148.
[11] YAN Xueying, SANG Qin, JIANG Yuqiang, FANG Rui, ZHOU Yadong, LIU Xue, LI Shun, YUAN Yongliang. Main controlling factors for the high yield of tight oil in the Jurassic Da’anzhai Section in the western area of Gongshanmiao, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[12] BO Shangshang, TIAN Jixian, LI Yaoliang, WANG Yetong, WANG Hao, SUN Guoqiang. Provenance analysis of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[13] WANG Tianhai, XU Duonian, WU Tao, GUAN Xin, XIE Zaibo, TAO Huifei. Sedimentary facies distribution characteristics and sedimentary model of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Shawan Sag,Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[14] BAI Jiajia, SI Shuanghu, TAO Lei, WANG Guoqing, WANG Longlong, SHI Wenyang, ZHANG Na, ZHU Qingjie. Mechanism of DES+CTAB composite oil displacement agent system to improve oil recovery of low-permeability tight sandstone reservoirs [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1): 169-177.
[15] LI Shengqian, ZENG Jianhui, LIU Yazhou, LI Miao, JIAO Panpan. Reservoir diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene Pinghu Formation in Kongqueting area of Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
TRENDMD: