Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 49-61.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230505

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reservoir diagenesis and pore evolution of Paleogene Pinghu Formation in Kongqueting area of Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin

LI Shengqian1,2, ZENG Jianhui1, LIU Yazhou1, LI Miao3, JIAO Panpan1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710200, China
  • Received:2022-02-21 Revised:2022-03-21 Online:2023-09-01 Published:2023-09-28

Abstract: Kongqueting area in Xihu Sag of the East China Sea Basin is highly explored and rich in oil and gas. Through the data of cast thin section,scanning electron microscope and X-diffraction,the diagenesis of Pinghu Formation and its influence on pore evolution in Kongqueting area of Xihu Sag were analyzed. The results show that:(1)The Pinghu Formation in Kongqueting area of the East China Sea Basin is mainly delta-bay sedimentary environment. The lower and upper parts of the lower member of Pinghu Formation are mainly tidal flat sedimentary environment,and the middle and upper members of Pinghu Formation transit from tidal flat to delta sedimentary environment.(2)The reservoir rocks of Pinghu Formation in Kongqueting area are mainly feldspathic lithic sandstone,with medium composition maturity and high structural maturity. It is a low porosity and low permeability reservoir,with an average porosity of 10.44% and an average permeability of 25.65 mD.(3)The study area has experienced a variety of diagenesis. Compaction reduces reservoir physical properties,cementation makes the reservoir physical properties poor,but to a certain extent,the cements can resist compaction and protect the primary intergranular pores,and dissolution is an important factor to improve reservoir physical properties.(4)The reservoir in the study area is mainly in the late diagenetic A2 stage. Two secondary pore development zones were formed at 3 000-3 500 m and 4 000-4 400 m. The relatively high quality reservoirs are conducive to hydrocarbon accumulation.

Key words: diagenesis, pore evolution, Paleogene, Kongqueting area, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 王国纯.东海盆地油气勘探焦点问题探讨[J].中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(1):31-34. WANG Guochun. A discussion on some focal problems of petroleum exploration in East China Sea Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(1):31-34.
[2] 朱扬明,周洁,顾圣啸,等.西湖凹陷始新统平湖组煤系烃源岩分子地球化学特征[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(1):32-39. ZHU Yangming, ZHOU Jie, GU Shengxiao, et al. Molecular geochemistry of Eocene Pinghu Formation coal-bearing source rocks in the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(1):32-39.
[3] 陶士振,邹才能.东海盆地西湖凹陷天然气成藏及分布规律[J].石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(4):103-110. TAO Shizhen, ZOU Caineng. Accumulation and distribution of natural gases in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(4):103-110.
[4] 朱国华.成岩作用与砂层(岩)孔隙的演化[J].石油与天然气地质, 1982, 3(3):195-203. ZHU Guohua. Diagenesis in relation to evolution of pores in sandstone[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1982, 3(3):195-203.
[5] 吕正祥,廖哲渊,李岳峰,等.玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):26-37. LYU Zhengxiang, LIAO Zheyuan, LI Yuefeng, et al. Diagenesis of alkaline lacustrine dolomitic reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):26-37.
[6] 张沛,黄畅.西湖凹陷K构造平湖组储层特征及影响因素[J].海洋石油, 2018, 38(2):1-6. ZHANG Pei, HUANG Chang. Reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of Pinghu Formation in the K Structure of Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil, 2018, 38(2):1-6.
[7] 李杪,罗静兰,赵会涛,等.不同岩性的成岩演化对致密砂岩储层储集性能的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界盒8段天然气储层为例[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(1):97-106. LI Miao, LUO Jinglan, ZHAO Huitao, et al. Impact of the diagenetic evolution of different lithology on tight sandstone reservoir performance:A case study from He 8 natural gas reservoir of the upper Paleozoic in Eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(1):97-106.
[8] 张悦,张翔,田景春,等.鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区山西组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].矿物岩石, 2021, 41(2):118-128. ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Xiang, TIAN Jingchun, et al. Reservoir diagenesis and pore evolution of Shanxi Formation in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2021, 41(2):118-128.
[9] 张明峰,妥进才,张小军,等.柴达木盆地乌南油田油源及油气运移探讨[J].岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2):61-66. ZHANG Mingfeng, TUO Jincai, ZHANG Xiaojun, et al. Discussion on oil sources and petroleum migration in the Wunan Oilfield, Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2):61-66.
[10] 葸克来,操应长,杨春宇,等.廊固凹陷沙四段储层成岩作用与成岩阶段划分[J].断块油气田, 2012, 19(5):583-587. XI Kelai, CAO Yingchang, YANG Chunyu, et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic stage division of Es4 reservoir in Langgu Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012, 19(5):583-587.
[11] 王西强,罗天相,俞保财,等.环江地区三叠系延长组长8油层组储层特征研究[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2012, 2(5):6-10. WANG Xiqiang, LUO Tianxiang, YU Baocai, et al. Research on characteristics of Chang-8 reservoir in Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huanjiang region[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2012, 2(5):6-10.
[12] 黄鑫,林承焰,黄导武,等.西湖凹陷中央反转带中北部花港组砂岩储层成岩差异演化特征[J].油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(2):1-14. HUANG Xin, LIN Chengyan, HUANG Daowu, et al. Diagenetic differential evolution of Huagang Formation sandstone reservoir in north-central part of central reversal structural belt in Xihu Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(2):1-14.
[13] 张武,徐发,徐国盛,等.西湖凹陷某构造花港组致密砂岩储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 39(2):122-129. ZHANG Wu, XU Fa, XU Guosheng, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Huagang Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in a structure in Xihu Depression in East China Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science Technology Edition), 2012, 39(2):122-129.
[14] 黄导武,段冬平,刘彬彬,等.西湖凹陷低渗-致密砂岩气藏储层特征及差异成因[J].中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3):99-107. HUANG Daowu, DUAN Dongping, LIU Binbin, et al. Reservoir characteristics and differential genesis of low permeabilitytight sandstone gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3):99-107.
[15] 高伟中,孙鹏,赵洪,等.西湖凹陷花港组深部储层特征及控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(4):396-404. GAO Weizhong, SUN Peng, ZHAO Hong, et al. Study of deep reservoirs characters and main control factors of Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(4):396-404.
[16] 王岭,王修平,余学兵.西湖凹陷深层储层特征及控制因素研究[J].海洋石油, 2015, 35(3):20-26. WANG Ling, WANG Xiuping, YU Xuebing. Study about reservoir characteristics and the controlling factors on the deep tight gas reservoir in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil, 2015, 35(3):20-26.
[17] 谢晓军,熊连桥,陈莹,等.西湖凹陷平湖组低渗储层特征及"甜点"主控因素分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(30):12890-12900. XIE Xiaojun, XIONG Lianqiao, CHEN Ying, et al. Low permeability reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of "sweet points" of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(30):12890-12900.
[18] 林承焰,孙小龙,马存飞,等.西湖凹陷中央反转构造带花港组储层物性演化[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2017, 46(4):820-829. LIN Chengyan, SUN Xiaolong, MA Cunfei, et al. Physical property evolution of Huagang Formation in central inversion tectonic belt in Xihu Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2017, 46(4):820-829.
[19] 蒲庆南,梁连喜,杨宝星.东海西湖凹陷下第三系储层砂岩次生矿物研究[J].上海地质, 1995, 16(2):46-50. PU Qingnan, LIANG Lianxi, YANG Baoxing. Secondary minerals'analysis of reservoir sandstone in Xihu Sag of East China Sea shelf basin[J]. Shanghai Geology, 1995, 16(2):46-50.
[20] 邹明亮,黄思静,胡作维,等.西湖凹陷平湖组砂岩中碳酸盐胶结物形成机制及其对储层质量的影响[J].岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1):47-52. ZOU Mingliang, HUANG Sijing, HU Zuowei, et al. The origin of carbonate cements and the influence on reservoir quality of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1):47-52.
[21] 张建培,葛和平,漆滨汶.西湖凹陷砂岩自生高岭石发育特征及其对储层物性的影响[J].海洋石油, 2009, 29(1):1-8. ZHANG Jianpei, GE Heping, QI Binwen. Characteristics of authigenic kaolinite in sandstones of Xihu Sag and its impact on reservoir physical properties[J]. Offshore Oil, 2009, 29(1):1-8.
[22] 王春梅,裴昌蓉.利用负胶结物投点图评价西湖凹陷古近系砂岩储层[J].断块油气田, 2010, 17(1):52-54. WANG Chunmei, PEI Changrong. Using minus-cement point diagram to evaluate Paleogene sandstone reservoir in Xihu Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2010, 17(1):52-54.
[23] 张绍亮,张建培,唐贤君,等.东海西湖凹陷断裂系统几何学特征及其成因机制[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34(1):87-94. ZHANG Shaoliang, ZHANG Jianpei, TANG Xianjun, et al. Geometry characteristic of the fault system in Xihu Sag in East China Sea and its formation mechanism[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34(1):87-94.
[24] 许婷.东海盆地西湖凹陷油气成藏系统分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2014. XU Ting. Analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation system in West Lake Sag, East China Sea Basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2014.
[25] 周心怀,牛成民,滕长宇.环渤中地区新构造运动期断裂活动与油气成藏关系[J].石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(4):469-475. ZHOU Xinhuai, NIU Chengmin, TENG Changyu. Relationship between faulting and hydrocarbon pooling during the Neotectonic movement around the central Bohai Bay[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(4):469-475.
[26] 徐志星,刘洋,张武,等.西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带原油地球化学特征及油源探讨[J].中国石油大学胜利学院学报, 2019, 33(2):10-15. XU Zhixing, LIU Yang, ZHANG Wu, et al. Discussion on geochemical characteristics and source of crude oil in Pingbei area of Pinghu slope belt in Xihu Sag[J]. Journal of Shengli College China University of Petroleum, 2019, 33(2):10-15.
[27] 叶加仁,顾惠荣,贾健谊.东海西湖凹陷油气地质条件及其勘探潜力[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2008, 28(4):111-116. YE Jiaren, GU Huirong, JIA Jianyi. Petroleum geological condition and exploration potential of Xihu Depression, East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2008, 28(4):111-116.
[28] 唐贤君,蒋一鸣,张建培,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷平北区断陷层断裂特征及其对圈闭的控制[J].海洋地质前沿, 2019, 35(8):34-43. TANG Xianjun, JIANG Yiming, ZHANG Jianpei, et al. Fault characteristic and its control on traps of fault structural layer in the northern Pinghu slipe belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea shelf basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2019, 35(8):34-43.
[29] 周心怀,徐国盛,崔恒远,等.东海西湖凹陷中央反转构造带古近系花港组致密砂岩储集层裂缝发育特征与油气成藏关系[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3):462-475. ZHOU Xinhuai, XU Guosheng, CUI Hengyuan, et al. Fracture development and hydrocarbon accumulation in tight sandstone reservoirs of the Paleogene Huagang Formation in the central reversal tectonic belt of the Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3):462-475.
[30] 李朝阳,魏琳,刁慧,等.西湖凹陷孔雀亭构造平湖组油气来源及充注特征[J].石油科学通报, 2021, 6(2):196-208. LI Chaoyang, WEI Lin, DIAO Hui, et al. Hydrocarbon source and charging characteristics of the Pinghu Formation in the Kongqueting structure, Xihu Depression[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2021, 6(2):196-208.
[31] 吴峰,任培罡,谈明轩,等.西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区平湖组沉积相演变及其主控因素分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022, 42(2):119-130. WU Feng, REN Peigang, TAN Mingxuan, et al. Facies evolution and its controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in the Kongqueting area of Xihu Depression[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(2):119-130.
[32] 钟大康,周立建,孙海涛,等.储层岩石学特征对成岩作用及孔隙发育的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系延长组为例[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(6):890-899. ZHONG Dakang, ZHOU Lijian, SUN Haitao, et al. Influences of petrologic features on diagenesis and pore development:An example from the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(6):890-899.
[33] HOUSEKENCHT D W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(6):633-542.
[34] 罗静兰, Morad S,阎世可,等.河流-湖泊三角洲相砂岩成岩作用的重建及其对储层物性演化的影响:以延长油区侏罗系-上三叠统砂岩为例[J].中国科学(D辑), 2001, 31(12):1006-1016. LUO Jinglan, MORAD S, YAN Shike, et al. Diagenetic reconstruction of fluvial deltaic sandstones and diagenetic impact on reservoir quality evolution:A case study of Jurassic-Upper Triassic sandstone in Yanchang area[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2001, 31(12):1006-1016.
[35] 张兴文,庞雄奇,李才俊,等.深层-超深层高孔高渗碎屑岩油气藏地质特征、形成条件及成藏模式:以墨西哥湾盆地为例[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(4):466-480. ZHANG Xingwen, PANG Xiongqi, LI Caijun. et al. Geological characteristics, formation conditions and accumulation model of deep and ultra-deep, high-porosity and high-permeability clastic reservoirs:A case study of Gulf of Mexico Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(4):466-480.
[36] 史基安,晋慧娟,薛莲花.长石砂岩中长石溶解作用发育机理及其影响因素分析[J].沉积学报, 1994, 12(3):67-75. SHI Ji'an, JIN Huijuan, XUE Lianhua. Analysis on mechanism of feldspar dissolution and its influencing factors in feldspar-rich sandstone reservoir[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1994, 12(3):67-75.
[37] 杨慧,刘广景,蒋俊,等.西湖凹陷平北地区平湖组储层特征及主控因素研究[J].石油化工应用, 2015, 34(11):77-82. YANG Hui, LIU Guangjing, JIANG Jun, et al. Diagenesis characteristics and its influence on reservoir property in Pinghu Formation of Pingbei area, Xihu Sag[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2015, 34(11):77-82.
[38] 程超,朱文娟,廖恒杰,等.西湖凹陷某构造低渗储层成岩演化研究[J].中国地质调查, 2018, 5(4):33-39. CHENG Chao, ZHU Wenjuan, LIAO Hengjie, et al. Diagenetic evolution research on low permeability reservoirs of one structure in Xihu Sag[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2018, 5(4):33-39.
[39] 侯宇,李斌.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘前陆盆地中生界成岩作用研究[J].东华理工学院学报, 2007, 30(1):1-8. HOU Yu, LI Bin. The research on the diagenesis on Mesozoic in foreland basin of the western margin in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of East China University of Technology, 2007, 30(1):1-8.
[40] 郑荣才,耿威,周刚,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6砂岩成岩作用与成岩相研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2):1-8. ZHENG Rongcai, GENG Wei, ZHOU Gang, et al. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of Chang 6 sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Baibao area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(2):1-8.
[1] YAN Xueying, SANG Qin, JIANG Yuqiang, FANG Rui, ZHOU Yadong, LIU Xue, LI Shun, YUAN Yongliang. Main controlling factors for the high yield of tight oil in the Jurassic Da’anzhai Section in the western area of Gongshanmiao, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2] ZHOU Ziqiang, ZHU Zhengping, PAN Renfang, DONG Yu, JIN Jineng. Simulation and prediction of tight sandstone reservoirs based on waveform facies-controlled inversion:A case study from the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in southern Cangdong sag, Huanghua Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[3] ZHANG Lei, LI Sha, LUO Bobo, LYU Boqiang, XIE Min, CHEN Xinping, CHEN Dongxia, DENG Caiyun. Accumulation mechanism of overpressured lithologic reservoirs of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in northern Dongpu Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[4] FANG Xuqing, ZHONG Qi, ZHANG Jianguo, LI Junliang, MENG Tao, JIANG Zaixing, ZHAO Haibo. Cyclostratigraphy analysis and stratigraphic division of lower Sha-3 member of Paleogene in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[5] FENG Bin, HUANG Xiaobo, HE Youbin, LI Hua, LUO Jinxiong, LI Tao, ZHOU Xiaoguang. Reconstruction of source-to-sink system of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Miaoxibei area,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[6] ZHU Kangle, GAO Gang, YANG Guangda, ZHANG Dongwei, ZHANG Lili, ZHU Yixiu, LI Jing. Characteristics of deep source rocks and hydrocarbon accumulation model of Paleogene Shahejie Form ationin Qingshui subsag,Liaohe Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[7] XI Zhibo, LIAO Jianping, GAO Rongjin, ZHOU Xiaolong, LEI Wenwen. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation in northern Chenjia fault zone,Liaohe Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[8] WANG Ya, LIU Zongbin, LU Yan, WANG Yongping, LIU Chao. Flow unit division based on SSOM and its production application: A case study of sublacustrine turbidity channels of middle Es3 in F oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[9] NIU Chengmin, HUI Guanzhou, DU Xiaofeng, GUAN Dayong, WANG Bingjie, WANG Qiming, ZHANG Hongguo. Sedimentary model of sublacustrine fan of the third member of Paleogene Dongying Formation and large-scale oilfield discovered in western slope of Liaozhong Sag [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[10] HU Wangshui, GAO Feiyue, LI Ming, GUO Zhijie, WANG Shichao, LI Xiangming, LI Shengming, JIE Qiong. Fine characterization of reservoir units of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Langgu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[11] ZHANG Zhenhua, ZHANG Xiaojun, ZHONG Dakang, GOU Yingchun, ZHANG Shiming. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of upper member of Paleogene Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanyishan area, northwestern Qaidam Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 29-39.
[12] ZENG Xu, BIAN Congsheng, SHEN Rui, ZHOU Kejia, LIU Wei, ZHOU Suyan, WANG Xiaoluan. Nonlinear seepage characteristics of shale oil reservoirs of the third member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Qikou Sag,Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 40-50.
[13] YING Kaiying, CAI Chang'e, LIANG Yuqi, CHEN Hong, SHANG Wenliang, SU Guijiao. Vertical sealing of Paleogene faults and its control on reservoirs in Chaluhe fault depression, Yitong Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 136-143.
[14] FENG Mingyou, GAO Ruiqi, WANG Xingzhi, XU Liang, ZHAO Jin, LIU Xiaohong, SHANG Junxin. Sequence filling succession and fluid indication of dolomite reservoirs of the first member of Permian Qixia Formation in Baoxing area, southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 11-20.
[15] ZHENG Bin, DONG Ao, ZHANG Yuanzhi, ZHANG Yi, SU Shan, ZHANG Shichao, FAN Jinjin, LUO Yinshan. Fluid pressure field building process and its petroleum geological significance of Paleogene Shahejie Formatiom in Bonan sag, Jiyang Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 59-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] KUANG Hongwei, GAO Zhenzhong, WANG Zhengyun, WANG Xiaoguang. A type of specific subtle reservoir : Analysis on the origin of diagenetic trapped reservoirs and its significance for exploration in Xia 9 wellblock of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[2] LI Guojun, ZHENG Rongcai, TANG Yulin, WANG Yang, TANG Kai. Sequence-based lithofacies and paleogeography of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 64 -70 .
[3] CAI Jia. Sedimentary facies of Neogene Sanya Formation in Changchang Sag, Qiongdongnan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5): 46 -54 .
[4] ZHANG Hui, GUAN Da, XIANG Xuemei, CHEN Yong. Prediction for fractured tight sandstone reservoir of Xu 4 member in eastern Yuanba area,northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .
[5] FU Guang, LIU Bo, LV Yanfang. Comprehensive evaluation method for sealing ability of mudstone caprock to gas in each phase[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 21 -26 .
[6] MA Zhongliang, ZENG Jianhui, ZHANG Shanwen, WANG Yongshi,WANG Hongyu, LIU Huimin. Migration and accumulation mechanism of sand lens reservoirs and its main controlling factors[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(1): 69 -74 .
[7] WANG Yingming. Analysis of the mess in sequence hierarchy applied in the industrialized application of the sequence stratigraphy[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 9 -15 .
[8] WEI Pingsheng, PAN Shuxin, WAN G Jiangong,LEI Ming. Study of the relationship between lithostratigraphic reservoirs and lakeshore line:An introduction on lakeshore line controlling oil /gas reservoirs in sag basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 27 -31 .
[9] YI Dinghong, SHI Lanting, JIA Yirong. Sequence stratigraphy and subtle reservoir of Aershan Formation in Baorao Trough of Jiergalangtu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 68 -72 .
[10] YANG Zhanlong, PENG Licai, CHEN Qilin, GUO Jingyi,LI Zaiguang, HUANG Yunfeng. Petroleum accumulation condition analysis and lithologic reservoir exploration in Shengbei Depression of Turpan-harmy Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(1): 62 -67 .
TRENDMD: