玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20190104

岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 30–39.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190104

玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征

杨帆¹, 曹正林¹, 卫延召¹, 路琳琳¹, 吴爱成², 马丽亚¹, 王瑞菊¹

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2018-09-17 修回日期:2018-11-24 出版日期:2019-01-18 发布日期:2019-01-18
作者简介:杨帆(1984-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号。Email:yangfan84@foxmail.com。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“准噶尔盆地岩性地层油气藏分布规律与目标评价”（编号：2017ZX05001-004）资助

Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water braided delta of Karamay Formation in Mahu area

YANG Fan¹, CAO Zhenglin¹, WEI Yanzhao¹, LU Linlin¹, WU Aicheng², MA Liya¹, WANG Ruiju¹

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

Received:2018-09-17 Revised:2018-11-24 Online:2019-01-18 Published:2019-01-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组的多口井获得工业油气流，展现了该地区中浅层较大的勘探潜力。为了查明玛湖地区克拉玛依组沉积体系特征，明确主要砂体的成因和分布，开展了岩心观察、物源分析、沉积相研究、砂体平面展布规律及控制因素研究。结果表明：①克拉玛依组沉积时期，准噶尔盆地处于坳陷湖盆演化阶段，玛湖地区由"多隆多凹"逐渐转化为"大型缓坡"背景，在此基础上发育四大物源体系，主要为浅水辫状河三角洲沉积，三角洲前缘水下分流河道砂体为主要储集体类型；②克拉玛依组下段的砂体主要集中于底部，与泥岩呈互层状，在夏子街、黄羊泉等主物源区较为发育；③克拉玛依组上段的砂体主要发育于顶部，三角洲砂体呈叠瓦状向湖盆中心进积，延伸较远。克拉玛依组下段砂体与上段厚层暗色泥岩形成的储盖组合和克拉玛依组顶部砂岩与白碱滩组巨厚泥岩形成的储盖组合均为有利勘探领域。该研究成果对玛湖地区克拉玛依组的油气勘探具有指导意义。

关键词: 浅水三角洲, 叠瓦状前积, 克拉玛依组, 三叠系, 玛湖地区

Abstract: Recently,several wells of Karamay Formation in Mahu area have obtained industrial oil and gas flow,which shows a favorable exploration potential of middle and shallow strata. In order to find out the characteristics of sedimentary system of Karamay Formation in Mahu area and to clarify the origin and distribution of main sand bodies,core observation,provenance analysis,sedimentary facies study,plane distribution rule and controlling factors of sand bodies were carried out. The results show that:(1)During the sedimentary period of Karamay Formation,Junggar Basin was a depression lacustrine basin,and Mahu area was gradually transformed from a "multi-uplift and multi-depression" to a "large gentle slope" background. Based on this structural background,four provenance systems were developed during the Karamay Formation. The sedimentary facies are mainly shallow braided river delta. The main reservoir types are underwater distributary channel sand bodies in the front of shallow braided river delta.(2)The sand bodies in the lower Karamay Formation are mainly concentrated at the bottom,interbedded with mudstone,and relatively developed in Xiazijie,Huangyangquan and other main provenance areas;(3)The sand bodies in the upper Karamay Formation are mainly developed at the top, and the delta sand bodies deposit in the form of imbrication toward the center of the lacustrine and extend far away. Reservoir-seal assemblage formed by sand bodies of lower Karamay Formation and thick dark mudstone of upper Karamay Formation and reservoir-seal assemblage formed by sand bodies at top of Karamay Formation and huge thick mudstone of Baijiantan Formation are favorable exploration zones. The research results have guiding significance for oil and gas exploration of Karamay Formation in Mahu area.

Key words: shallow-water braided delta, imbricated progradation, Karamay Formation, Triassic, Mahu area

中图分类号:

TE121.3

杨帆, 曹正林, 卫延召, 路琳琳, 吴爱成, 马丽亚, 王瑞菊. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1): 30–39.

YANG Fan, CAO Zhenglin, WEI Yanzhao, LU Linlin, WU Aicheng, MA Liya, WANG Ruiju. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water braided delta of Karamay Formation in Mahu area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1): 30–39.

参考文献

[1] 支东明,唐勇,郑孟林,等. 玛湖凹陷源上砾岩大油区形成分布与勘探实践. 新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):1-8. ZHI D M,TANG Y,ZHENG M L,et al. Discovery,distribution and exploration practice of large oil provinces of above source conglomerate in Mahu Sag. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018,39(1):1-8.
[2] 唐勇,徐洋,李亚哲,等. 玛湖凹陷大型浅水退覆式扇三角洲沉积模式及勘探意义. 新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):16-23. TANG Y,XU Y,LI Y Z,et al. Sedimentation model and exploration significance of large-scaled shallow retrogradation fan delta in Mahu Sag. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2018,39(1):16-23.
[3] 唐勇,徐洋,瞿建华,等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲群特征及分布. 新疆石油地质,2014,35(6):628-635. TANG Y,XU Y,QU J H,et al. Fan delta group characteristics and its distribution of the Triassic Baikouquan reservoirs in Mahu Sag of Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):628-635.
[4] 彭飚,金振奎,朱小二,等.扇三角洲沉积模式探讨:以准噶尔盆地玛北地区下三叠统百口泉组为例. 古地理学报,2017,19(2):315-326. PENG B,JIN Z K,ZHU X E,et al. Discussion about depositional models of fan delta:a case study from the Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei area,Junggar Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2017,19(2):315-326.
[5] 周立宏,肖敦清,蒲秀刚,等.陆相断陷湖盆复式叠合油气成藏与优势相富集新模式:以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷为例. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):7-11. ZHOU L H,XIAO D Q,PU X G,et al. New pattern of composite superimposed reservoirs and advantageous phase accumulation in continental rifted lake basin:a case study from Qikou Sag of Bohai Bay Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):7-11.
[6] 刘震,陈艳鹏,赵阳,等. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):121-128. LIU Z,CHEN Y P,ZHAO Y,et al. Distribution and controlling factors of hydrocarbon reservoirs in continental fault basins. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):121-128.
[7] 吴胜和,范峥,许长福,等. 新疆克拉玛依油田三叠系克下组冲积扇内部构型. 古地理学报,2012,14(3):331-340. WU S H,FAN Z,XU C F,et al. Internal architecture of alluvial fan in the Triassic Lower Karamay Formation Oilfield,Xinjiang. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2012,14(3):331-340.
[8] 余宽宏,金振奎,李桂仔,等. 准噶尔盆地克拉玛依油田三叠系克下组洪积砾岩特征及洪积扇演化. 古地理学报,2015, 17(2):143-159. YU K H,JIN Z K,LI G Z,et al. Conglomerate characteristics and alluvial fan evolution of the Triassic Lower Karamay Formation in Karamay Oilfield,Junggar Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),2015,17(2):143-159.
[9] 刘和甫,汪泽成,熊保贤,等. 中国中西部中、新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析. 地学前缘,2000,7(3):55-72. LIU H F,WANG Z C,XIONG B X,et al. Coupling analysis of Mesozoic-Cenozoic foreland basin and mountain system in central and western China. Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(3):55-72.
[10] 蔡忠贤,陈发景,贾振远. 准噶尔盆地的类型和构造演化. 地学前缘,2000,7(4):431-440. CAI Z X,CHEN F J,JIA Z Y. Types and tectonic evolution of Junggar Basin. Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(4):431-440.
[11] 陈新,卢华复,舒良树,等. 准噶尔盆地构造演化分析新进展. 高校地质学报,2002,8(3):257-267. CHEN X,LU H F,SHU L S,et al. Study on tectonic evolution of Junggar Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities,2002, 8(3):257-267.
[12] 贾承造,魏国齐,李本亮,等. 中国中西部两期前陆盆地的形成及其控气作用. 石油学报,2003,24(2):13-17. JIA C Z,WEI G Q,LI B L,et al. Tectonic evolution of two-epoch foreland basins and its control for natural gas accumulation in China's midwestern areas. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(2):13-17.
[13] 何登发,陈新发,张义杰,等. 准噶尔盆地油气富集规律. 石油学报,2004,25(3):1-25. HE D F,CHEN X F,ZHANG Y J,et al. Enrichment characteristics of oil and gas in Junggar Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004, 25(3):1-25.
[14] 陈发景,汪新文,汪新伟. 准噶尔盆地的原型和构造演化. 地学前缘,2005,12(3):77-89. CHEN F J,WANG X W,WANG X W. Prototype and tectonic evolution of the Junggar Basin,northwestern China. Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12(3):77-89.
[15] 方世虎,贾承造,郭召杰,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠纪盆地属性的再认识及其构造意义. 地学前缘,2006,13(3):108-121. FANG S H,JIA C Z,GUO Z J,et al. New view on the Permian evolution of the Junggar Basin and its implications for tectonic evolution. Earth Science Frontiers,2006,13(3):108-121.
[16] 夏林圻,夏祖春,徐学义,等. 天山及邻区石炭纪-早二叠世裂谷火山岩岩石成因. 西北地质,2008,41(4):1-68. XIA L Q,XIA Z C,XU X Y,et al. Petrogenesis of CaboniferousEarly Permian rift-related volcanic rocks in the Tianshan and its neighboring areas,northwestern China. Northwestern Geology, 2008,41(4):1-68.
[17] 刘冬冬,郭召杰,张志诚,等. 准噶尔南缘古生代晚期盆山关系:阿尔巴萨依组火山岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年及岩石地球化学限定. 岩石学报,2012,28(7):2355-2368. LIU D D,GUO Z J,ZHANG Z C,et al. The Late Paleozoic tectonic relationship between the Tian Shan orogenic belt and Junggar Basin:Constraints from zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating and geochemistry characteristics of volcanic rocks in Arbasay Formation. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(7):2355-2368.
[18] 冯有良,胡素云,李建忠,等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘同沉积构造坡折对层序建造和岩性油气藏富集带的控制. 岩性油气藏, 2018,30(4):14-25. FENG Y L,HU S Y,LI J Z,et al. Controls of syndepotitional structural slope-break zones on sequence architecture and enrichment zones of lithologic reservoirs in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(4):14-25.
[19] 谭开俊,王国栋,罗惠芬,等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖斜坡区三叠系百口泉组储层特征及控制因素. 岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):83-88. TAN K J,WANG G D,LUO H F,et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu slope area,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014,26(6):83-88.
[20] 邹妞妞,张大权,钱海涛,等. 准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):24-33. ZOU N N,ZHANG D Q,QIAN H T,et al. Main controlling factors of gultenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):24-33.
[21] 黄成刚,关新,倪祥龙,等. 柴达木盆地英西地区E₃²咸化湖盆白云岩储集层特征及发育主控因素. 天然气地球科学,2017, 28(2):219-231. HUANG C G,GUAN X,NI X L,et al. The characteristics and major factors controlling on the E₃² dolomite reservoirs in saline lacustrine basin in the Yingxi area of Qaidam Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(2):219-231.
[22] 于兴河,瞿建华,谭程鹏,等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式. 新疆石油地质,2014,35(6):619-627. YU X H,QU J H,TAN C P,et al. Conglomerate lithofacies and origin models of fan deltas of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):619-627.
[23] 李兴,张立强,施辉,等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组沉积古环境分析:以玛18井为例. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):24-33. LI X,ZHANG L Q,SHI H,et al. Sedimentary environment of Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin:a case study from Ma 18 well. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(4):24-33.
[24] 施辉,刘震,连良达,等. 高原咸化湖盆岩性油气藏富集规律:以柴达木盆地西南区为例. 天然气地球科学,2013,24(4):701-711. SHI H,LIU Z,LIAN L D,et al. Enrichment regularity of lithologic reservoirs in plateau saline lacustrine basin:Taking the southwestern Qaidam Basin for example. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):701-711.
[25] 陈启林. 大型咸化湖盆地层岩性油气藏有利条件与勘探方向:以柴达木盆地柴西南古近纪为例. 岩性油气藏,2007,19(1):46-51. CHEN Q L. Favorable condition and exploration prospecting of lithologic hydrocarbon reservoir in large-scale saline basin:a case study on the Eogene in the southwest of Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(1):46-51.
[26] 石亚军,曹正林,张小军,等.大型高原内陆咸化湖盆油气特殊成藏条件分析及勘探意义:以柴达木盆地柴西地区为例. 石油与天然气地质,2011,32(4):577-583. SHI Y J,CAO Z L,ZHANG X J,et al. Special reservoir formation conditions and their exploration significance of the large saline lacustrine basin of inland plateau:Taking the western Qaidam Basin for example. Qil & Gas Geology,2011,32(4):577-583.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征

Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water braided delta of Karamay Formation in Mahu area

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[3]	杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[4]	袁选俊, 周红英, 张志杰, 王子野, 成大伟, 郭浩, 张友焱, 董文彤. 坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲沉积特征与生长模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 1-11.
[5]	薛辉, 韩春元, 肖博雅, 王芳, 李玲. 蠡县斜坡高阳地区沙一下亚段浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 69-80.
[6]	徐子煜, 王安, 韩长城, 田继军, 张军生, 刘磊, 张楠. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组优质砂砾岩储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 82-92.
[7]	张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长8₂砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[8]	丁超, 郭顺, 郭兰, 郭小波, 杜贵超, 吴洪帅. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长8油藏油气充注期次[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 21-31.
[9]	刘桂珍, 高伟, 张丹丹, 陈龙, 李爱荣. 姬塬地区长8₁亚油层组浅水型三角洲砂体结构及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 16-23.
[10]	樊奇, 田继军, 樊太亮, 冯烁, 葛旭, 成赛男. 松辽盆地四方坨子地区上白垩统姚家组浅水三角洲实例分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 39-49.
[11]	韩登林，张双源，袁文芳，冯志超，欧阳传湘，彭舒琪. 储层速敏效应形成机理及其垂向差异因素分析---以塔北隆起吉拉克地区三叠系储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 19-24.
[12]	孙廷彬,国殿斌，李中超，王玲,尹楠鑫,李胜玉. 鄱阳湖浅水三角洲分支河道分布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 144-148.
[13]	孙春燕, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 薛丹, 刘诗宇. 松辽盆地兴城地区泉四段浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 66-74.
[14]	王变阳,贺永红,王康乐,王彦龙,董丽红,李爱荣. 鄂尔多斯盆地定边—安塞地区延长组下组合储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 64-68.
[15]	王珂，戴俊生，贾开富，刘海磊. 塔河油田 1 区三叠系储层流动单元研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3): 119-124.