岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 68–79.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230207

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地开江—梁平海槽东侧三叠系飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及控制因素

文雯1, 杨西燕2,3, 向曼1, 陶夏妍1, 杨容2,3, 李阳2,3, 范家兴2,3, 蒲柏宇1   

  1. 1. 中国石油西南油气田公司 勘探开发研究院, 成都 610041;
    2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610500;
    3. 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-01 修回日期:2022-06-28 出版日期:2023-03-01 发布日期:2023-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 杨西燕(1982-),女,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事储层沉积学等方面的教学与研究工作。Email:j4035389399@qq.com。 E-mail:j4035389399@qq.com
  • 作者简介:文雯(1988-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事开发地质方面的研究工作。地址:(610041)成都市高新区天府大道北段12号。Email:jiangtx.sripe@sinopec.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”子课题“全球性海侵与气候变化对大型地层油气藏形成的控制作用”(编号:2017ZX05001001-002)和中国石油股份有限公司2021年天然气开发评价项目“开江—梁平海槽西侧礁滩体有利目标评价与效益建产研究”(编号:1719A0006080010306)联合资助。

Characteristics and main controlling factors of oolitic shoal reservoirs of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in eastern Kaijiang-Liangping trough, Sichuan Basin

WEN Wen1, YANG Xiyan2,3, XIANG Man1, TAO Xiayan1, YANG Rong2,3, LI Yang2,3, FAN Jiaxing2,3, PU Baiyu1   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu 610500, China;
    3. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2022-06-01 Revised:2022-06-28 Online:2023-03-01 Published:2023-03-07

摘要: 通过岩心观察、微观薄片鉴定、扫描电镜等资料,在层序划分基础上对四川盆地开江—梁平海槽东侧飞仙关组的储层特征及控制因素进行了研究。研究结果表明: ①铁山坡—普光地区飞仙关组储层以鲕粒云岩和细粉晶白云岩为主,渡口河—七里北地区以(含砾屑、砂屑、豆粒)鲕粒白云岩为主,鲕粒岩原始结构组分保存更好。②研究区储层具有多期次发育特征,铁山坡—普光地区储层在ssq1,ssq2,ssq3层序均有分布,具有发育早、厚度大、分布面积广的特征,Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ类储层均发育;渡口河—七里北地区储层发育在ssq2,ssq3层序,发育较晚、厚度小、分布面积有限,以Ⅱ,Ⅲ类储层为主。③研究区沉积古地貌及海平面升降控制了鲕滩储层发育的期次、厚度等,在ssq1沉积中晚期海平面开始下降时,古地貌高地开始发育鲕滩储层,厚度大,白云石化作用明显。④研究区内陡坡型和缓坡型台缘斜坡带,水体能量的强弱控制了鲕滩沉积物类型,为成岩期溶蚀作用和白云石化作用奠定了物质基础,进而控制了储层的物性和规模。

关键词: 鲕滩储层, 古地貌, 海平面变化, 层序划分, 飞仙关组, 三叠系, 开江-梁平海槽, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on core observation, micro thin section identification and scanning electron microscope analysis, combined with sequence division, the reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in eastern Kaijiang-Liangping trough of Sichuan Basin were studied. The results show that:(1) The reservoirs of Triassic Feixianguan Formation are dominated by oolitic dolomite and fine silty dolomite in TieshanpoPuguang area, and oolitic dolomite(with gravel, sand and bean grains) in Dukouhe -Qilibei area, and the original structural components of oolitic rocks are better preserved.(2) The reservoirs in the study area are characterized by multi-stage development. The reservoirs in Tieshanpo-Puguang area are developed in ssq1, ssq2 and ssq3 sequences, with the characteristics of early development, large thickness and wide distribution area, and type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ reservoirs are developed. The reservoirs in Dukouhe Qilibei area are developed in ssq2 and ssq3 sequences, which are late developed, small in thickness and limited in distribution area, and are dominated by type Ⅱ and Ⅲ reservoirs.(3) Sedimentary palaeogeomorphology and sea-level change control the development stages and thickness of oolitic shoal reservoirs in the study area. When sea-level began to decline in the middle and late stages of ssq1, oolitic shoal reservoirs began to develop in the paleogeomorphic highlands with large thickness and obvious dolomitization.(4) The water energy in steep slope and gentle slope margin slope zones affects the types of oolitic shoal sediments, provides a material basis for diagenetic dissolution and dolomitization, and thus controls the physical properties and scale of the reservoir.

Key words: oolitic shoal reservoir, paleogeomorphology, sea-level change, sequence division, Feixianguan Formation, Triassic, Kaijiang-Liangping trough, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] ESRAFILI-DIZAJI B, RAHIMPOUR-BONAB H. A review of Permo-Triassic reservoir rocks in the Zagros area, SW Iran:Influence of the Qatar-Fars Arch[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2013, 36(3):257-279.
[2] SPARK A G, RANKEY E C. Relations between geomorphic form and sedimentologic-stratigraphic variability:Holocene ooid sand shoal, Lily Bank, Bahamas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(1):61-85.
[3] 马新华, 杨雨, 文龙, 等.四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩大中型气田分布规律及勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1):1-13. MA Xinhua, YANG Yu, WEN Long, et al. Distribution and exploration direction of medium-and large-sized marine carbonate gas fields in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1):1-13.
[4] 马永生.四川盆地普光超大型气田的形成机制[J].石油学报, 2007, 28(2):9-14. MA Yongsheng. Generation mechanism of Puguang gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(2):9-14.
[5] 吴婷婷, 王兴志, 冯仁蔚.普光气田飞仙关组成岩作用对滩相储层的影响[J].岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):94-100. WU Tingting, WANG Xingzhi, FENG Renwei. Influence of diagenesis on beach reservoirs of Feixianguan Formation in Puguang gas field[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):94-100.
[6] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等.四川盆地元坝气田发现与理论技术[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(1):14-26. GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Discovery and theoretical and technical innovations of Yuanba gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(1):14-26.
[7] 邵晓州, 秦启荣, 范晓丽, 等.川东北黄龙场构造飞仙关组四段底部裂缝预测研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(5):96-100. SHAO Xiaozhou, QIN Qirong, FAN Xiaoli, et al. Fracture prediction of bottom T1f4 in Huanglongchang structure, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(5):96-100.
[8] 邢凤存, 卢永潮, 郭彤楼, 等. 碳酸盐岩台地边缘沉积结构差异及其油气勘探意义:以川东北早三叠世飞仙关期台地边缘带为例[J].岩石学报, 2017, 33(4):1305-1316. XING Fengcun, LU Yongchao, GUO Tonglou, et al. Sedimentary texture diversity of different carbonate platform margins and it its significance for petroleum exploration:A case study of carbonate platform margins in Feixianguan period of the Early Triassic, NE Sichuan basin, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4):1305-1316.
[9] 李阳, 王兴志, 蒲柏宇, 等.四川盆地开江-梁平海槽东侧三叠系飞仙关组鲕滩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 34(3):116-130. LI Yang, WANG Xingzhi, PU Baiyu, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of oolitic beach of Triassic Feixianguan Formation in eastern Kaijiang-Liangping trough, Sichuan Basin of China[J]. Lithologic Rervoirs, 2021, 34(3):116-130.
[10] TAN Xiucheng, LIU Hong, LI Ling, et al. Primary intergranular pores in oolitic shoal reservoir of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation, Sichuan Basin, southwest China:Fundamental for reservoir formation and retention diageneses[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2011, 22(1):101-114.
[11] 刘建强, 罗冰, 谭秀成, 等.川东北地区飞仙关组台缘带鲕滩分布规律[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(4):805-814. LIU Jianqiang, LUO Bing, TAN Xiucheng, et al. Distribution of marginal-platform oolitic schoal in Feixianguan Formation, northeast Sichuan, China[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2012, 37(4):805-814.
[12] 刘宏, 谭秀成, 周彦, 等.川东北黄龙场气田飞仙关组台缘滩型碳酸盐岩储层预测[J].石油学报, 2009, 30(2):219-224. LIU Hong, TAN Xiucheng, ZHOU Yan, et al. Prediction of platform-edge bank carbonate reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of Huanglongchang gas field in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(2):219-224.
[13] 郭彤楼.川东北地区飞仙关组鲕滩储层成岩作用:以宣汉-达县及元坝区块为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(5):620-631. GUO Tonglou. Diagenesis of the Feixianguan oolitic shoal reservoirs in the northeastern Sichuan Basin:Examples from Xuanhan-Daxian and Yuanba areas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(5):620-631.
[14] 牟传龙, 马永生, 谭钦银, 等.四川通江-南江-巴中地区长兴组-飞仙关组沉积模式[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(6):820-826. MOU Chuanlong, MAYongsheng, TAN Qinyin, et al. Sedimentary model of the Changxing-Feixianguan formations in the TongjiangNanjiang-Bazhong area, Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(6):820-826.
[15] 黄思静, 李小宁, 胡作维, 等.四川盆地东部开江-梁平海槽东西两侧三叠系飞仙关组碳酸盐岩碳氧同位素组成对比及古海洋学意义[J].地球化学, 2016, 45(1):24-40. HUANG Sijing, LI Xiaoning, HU Zuowei, et al. Comparison of carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of Feixianguan carbonates, Early Triassic, between east and west sides of Kaijiang-Liangping trough, Sichuan Basin, and the significance for paleoceanography[J]. Geochimica, 2016, 45(1):24-40.
[16] 马永生, 牟传龙, 谭钦银, 等.关于开江-梁平海槽的认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2006, 27(3):326-331. MA Yongsheng, MOU Chuanlong, TAN Qinyin, et al. A discussion on Kaijiang-Liangping ocean trough[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(3):326-331.
[17] 黄仁春.四川盆地二叠纪-三叠纪开江-梁平陆棚形成演化与礁滩发育[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(4):452-457. HUANG Renchun. Formation and evolution of Permian-Triassic Kaijiang-Liangping shelf and development of reef-shoal reservoirs in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 41(4):452-457.
[18] 王兴志, 李博, 杨西燕, 等.四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期"广元-旺苍" 海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3):562-574. WANG Xingzhi, LI Bo, YANG Xiyan, et al. Characteristics of "Guangyuan-Wangcang" trough during late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3):562-574.
[19] 王一刚, 文应初, 张帆, 等.川东地区上二叠统长兴组生物礁分布规律[J].天然气工业, 1998, 18(6):10-15. WANG Yigang, WEN Yingchu, ZHANG Fan, et al. Distribution law of the organic reefs in Changxing Formation of Upper Permian in east Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1998, 18(6):10-15.
[20] 姚军辉, 罗志立, 孙玮, 等.峨眉地幔柱与广旺-开江-梁平等拗拉槽形成关系[J].新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(1):97-101. YAO Junhui, LUO Zhili, SUN Wei, et al. Relationship between Emei mantle plume and aulacogens of Guangwang-Kaijiang-Liangping[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(1):97-101.
[21] 魏国齐, 陈更生, 杨威, 等.川北下三叠统飞仙关组"槽台" 沉积体系及演化[J].沉积学报, 2004, 22(2):254-260. WEI Guoqi, CHEN Gengsheng, YANG Wei, et al. Sedimentary system of platformal trough of Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic in northern Sichuan Basin and its evolution[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(2):254-260.
[22] 王一刚, 张静, 刘兴刚, 等.四川盆地东北部下三叠统飞仙关组碳酸盐蒸发台地沉积相[J].古地理学报, 2005, 7(3):75-89. WANG Yigang, ZHANG Jing, LIU Xinggang, et al. Sedimentary facies of evaporative carbonate platform of the Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005, 7(3):75-89.
[23] 任婕, 胡忠贵, 胡明毅, 等.涪陵地区下三叠统飞仙关组沉积相特征及有利储集体分布[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6):70-80. REN Jie, HU Zhonggui, HU Mingyi, et al. Sedimentary facies characteristics and favorable reservoirs distribution of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in Fuling area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(6):70-80.
[24] 马永生, 牟传龙, 郭彤楼, 等.四川盆地东北部飞仙关组层序地层与储层分布[J].矿物岩石, 2005, 25(4):73-79. MA Yongsheng, MOU Chuanlong, GUO Tonglou, et al. Sequence stratigraphy and reservoir distribution of Feixianguan Formation in northeastern Sichuan[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 25(4):73-79.
[25] 李国军, 郑荣才, 唐玉林, 等.川东北地区飞仙关组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4):64-70. LI Guojun, ZHENG Rongcai, TANG Yulin, et al. Sequence-based lithofacies paleogeography of Lower Triassic Feixianguang Formation in northeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4):64-70.
[26] 郑雅丽, 丁国生, 张险峰.层序地层学在碳酸盐岩气藏开发早期地质评价阶段的应用:以川东北罗家寨鲕滩气藏为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(4):466-469. ZHENG Yali, DING Guosheng, ZHANG Xianfeng. Application of sequence stratigraphy to early geological evaluation of carbonate gas reservoir development:An example from Luojiazhai Ooliticbank gas reservoir in NE Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(4):466-469.
[27] 殷鸿福, 童金南, 丁梅华, 等.扬子区晚二叠世-中三叠世海平面变化[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 1994, 19(5):627-632. YIN Hongfu, TONG Jinnan, DING Meihua, et al. Late PermianMiddle Triassic sea level changes of Yangtze platform[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1994, 19(5):627-632.
[28] 王成善, 李祥辉, 陈洪德, 等.中国南方二叠纪海平面变化及升降事件[J].沉积学报, 1999, 17(4):39-44. WANG Chengshan, LI Xianghui, CHEN Hongde, et al. Permian sea-level changes and rising-falling events in south China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(4):39-44.
[29] 王兴志, 张帆, 马青, 等.四川盆地东部晚二叠世-早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(2):249-254. WANG Xingzhi, ZHANG Fan, MA Qing, et al. The characteristic of reef and bank and the fluctuation of sea level in Feixianguang period of Late Permain-Early Triassic, east Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(2):249-254.
[30] 朱鹏宇.开江-梁平海槽长兴组生物礁地震识别研究[D].成都:西南石油大学, 2016. ZHU Pengyu. Seismic research about reefs in Changxing Formation of Kaijiang-Liangping trough[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[31] 王一刚, 文应初, 洪海涛, 等.四川盆地北部晚二叠世-早三叠世碳酸盐岩斜坡相带沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(2):143-156. WANG Yigang, WEN Yingchu, HONG Haitao, et al. Carbonate slop facies sedimentary characteristics of the Late Permian to Early Triassic in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(2):143-156.
[32] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):12-22. PENG Jun, CHU Jiangtian, CHEN Youlian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
[1] 黄彦庆, 刘忠群, 王爱, 肖开华, 林恬, 金武军. 四川盆地元坝地区上三叠统须家河组三段致密砂岩气甜点类型与分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 21-30.
[2] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[3] 黄军立, 张伟, 刘力辉, 蔡国富, 曾有良, 孟庆友, 刘浩. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 103-112.
[4] 胡忠贵, 王纪煊, 李世临, 郭艳波, 左云安, 庞宇来. 川东地区寒武系高台组白云岩-蒸发岩共生地层高频层序划分及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 113-124.
[5] 何春丰, 张翔, 田景春, 夏永涛, 杨燕茹, 陈杰, 王鑫宇. 塔北新和地区下白垩统舒善河组薄砂体沉积相特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 120-131.
[6] 文华国, 罗冰, 钟克修, 冯青平, 刘磊, 廖义沙, 彭才, 蔡家兰, 徐文礼, 朱宜新, 郝静, 罗鑫, 徐姁. 川东地区三叠系嘉陵江组邻水-丰都台凹的发现及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 12-24.
[7] 李凌, 张照坤, 李明隆, 倪佳, 耿超, 唐思哲, 杨文杰, 谭秀成. 四川盆地威远—高石梯地区二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 32-46.
[8] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[9] 耿夏童, 邢凤存, 闫海军, 付辉, 柴寒冰, 刘志波, 陈孝全, 古强. 四川盆地磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段储层特征及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 126-140.
[10] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 王志宏, 崔俊峰, 朱秋影, 武雪琼, 白壮壮. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 86-99.
[11] 彭妙, 张磊, 陶金雨, 赵康, 张祥辉, 张昌民. 玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组砂砾岩中砾石磨圆度定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 121-129.
[12] 杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, 姚宗全, 尤新才, 刘海磊, 卫延召. 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 63-72.
[13] 李珊珊, 姜鹏飞, 刘磊, 雷程, 曾云贤, 陈仕臻, 周刚. 四川盆地高磨地区寒武系沧浪铺组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩地震响应特征及展布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 22-31.
[14] 张岩, 侯连华, 崔景伟, 罗霞, 林森虎, 张紫芸. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7富有机质段岩石热膨胀系数随温度演化特征及启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 32-41.
[15] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!