岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 102–108.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190611

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于电成像资料的裂缝有效性评价和储集层品质分类——以鸭儿峡油田白垩系为例

吴伟1, 邵广辉1, 桂鹏飞2, 张虔1, 魏浩元3, 李国利1, 任盼亮3   

  1. 1. 中国石油集团测井有限公司 测井应用研究院, 西安 710000;
    2. 中国石油集团测井有限公司 生产测井中心, 西安 710000;
    3. 中国石油玉门油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 酒泉 735000
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-07 修回日期:2019-07-10 出版日期:2019-11-21 发布日期:2019-09-28
  • 第一作者:吴伟(1985-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事测井储层评价方面的研究工作。地址:(710000)陕西省西安市高新区锦业二路丈八五路50号。Email:wuwei_cpl@cnpc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大专项"酒泉盆地精细地质研究及勘探目标优选"（编号：2018D-0704）资助

Fracture effectiveness evaluation and reservoir quality classification based on electrical imaging data: a case study of Cretaceous in Yaerxia Oilfield

WU Wei1, SHAO Guanghui1, GUI Pengfei2, ZHANG Qian1, WEI Haoyuan3, LI Guoli1, REN Panliang3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Logging Application, CNPC Logging Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710000, China;
    2. Production Logging Center, CNPC Logging Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710000, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Yumen Oilfield Company, Jiuquan 735000, Gansu, China
  • Received:2019-05-07 Revised:2019-07-10 Online:2019-11-21 Published:2019-09-28

PDF (PC)

405

摘要： 酒泉盆地鸭儿峡油田柳北地区K1g0段为扇三角洲前缘亚相的砂砾岩裂缝性油藏，有效裂缝是主要的储集空间和渗流通道，也是产能的主控因素。为了研究K1g0段裂缝的有效性和储集层的品质分类方法，综合利用电成像和试油试采资料，分析了裂缝宽度、密度和倾角这3项关键参数对裂缝有效性的影响；通过关键参数和裂缝发育厚度构建了裂缝发育度和裂缝开启度用以定量表征裂缝的有效性，并建立了这2项表征参数和米采油量指数的定量评价图版。结果表明：裂缝发育度和裂缝开启度指数能较好地评价研究区裂缝的有效性；裂缝有效性指数和储层产油量的评价图版可实现定量、快速的裂缝性砂砾岩储层品质分类。这为研究区裂缝性储层的老井复查和新井产量预测提供了参考依据。

关键词: 电成像测井, 裂缝有效性, 储层品质, 鸭儿峡油田, 酒泉盆地

Abstract: K1g0 member of Yaerxia Oilfield is a fractured glutenite reservoir with fan delta front subfacies in Liubei area,Jiuquan Basin. Effective fracture is not only the main reservoir space and seepage channel,but also the main controlling factor of productivity. In order to study the validity of fracture in K1g0 member and the classification method of reservoir quality,the effects of three key parameters including fracture width,density and dip angle, on fracture validity were analyzed by using electrical imaging and production test data. Through key parameters and fracture development thickness,the fracture development degree and fracture opening degree were constructed to quantitatively characterize the effectiveness of fractures,and the quantitative evaluation charts of the above two characterization parameters and index of oil production per meter were established. The results show that the fracture development and fracture opening index can better evaluate the effectiveness of fractures in the study area, and the evaluation chart of fracture effectiveness index and reservoir oil production can carry out quantitative and rapid classification of fractured glutenite reservoir quality. The study results can provide a basis for the review of old wells and production prediction of new wells in fractured reservoirs in the study area.

Key words: electrical imaging logging, fracture effectiveness, reservoir quality, Yaerxia Oilfield, Jiuquan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • P631.8+4
[1] 邓虎成,周文,周秋媚,等.新场气田须二气藏天然裂缝有效性定量表征方法及应用.岩石学报,2013,29(3):1087-1097. DENG H C,ZHOU W,ZHOU Q M,et al. Quantitative characterization of the valid natural fractures in the 2nd Xu member, Xinchang gas field. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(3):10871097.
[2] 王正和,余谦.准南上二叠统芦草沟组非常规油气储层特征. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(5):28-35. WANG Z H,YU Q. Unconventional reservoir characteristics of Upper Permian Lucaogou Formation in southern margin of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):28-35.
[3] 冯建伟,任启强,徐珂.基于地质力学方法的低渗透砂岩储层构造裂缝预测研究.地球科学进展,2016,31(9):946-967. FENG J W,REN Q Q,XU K. Using geomechanical method to predict tectonic fractures in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs. Advances in Earth Science,2016,31(9):946-967.
[4] 张昊天.新场气田须二气藏天然裂缝有效性评价.成都:成都理工大学,2013. ZHANG H T. Effectiveness evaluation of natural fracture in Xuer gas reservoir in Xinchang area. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2013.
[5] 吴辉,谭修中,孙万高,等.窟窿山油藏下沟组裂缝性储集层测井评价.新疆石油地质,2004,25(3):274-276. WU H,TAN X Z,SUN W G,et al. Well log evaluation of fractured reservoir of Xiagou Formation in Kulongshan reservoir. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2004,25(3):274-276.
[6] 王华超,韩登林,欧阳传湘,等.库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素.岩性油气藏,2019,31(2):115-123. WANG H C,HAN D L,OUYANG C X,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs in Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019,31(2):115-123.
[7] 任大忠,张晖,周然,等.塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究.岩性油气藏,2018,30(6):30-39. REN D Z,ZHANG H,ZHOU R,et al. Sensitivity study of tight sandstone reservoirs of Bashkiqike Formation in Keshen area, Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(6):30-39.
[8] 丁文龙,王兴华,胡秋嘉,等.致密砂岩储层裂缝研究进展.地球科学进展,2015,30(7):737-750. DING W L,WANG X H,HU Q J,et al. Progress in tight sandstone reservoir fractures research. Advances in Earth Science, 2015,30(7):737-750.
[9] 蒋健美.川西DY地区须家河组裂缝识别方法研究.成都:成都理工大学,2013. JIANG J M. The research on the fracture identification of Xujiahe formation in DY region in western Sichuan. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2013.
[10] LUTHI S,SOUHAITE P. Fracture aperture from electrical borehole scans. Geophysics,1990,74:821-833.
[11] 斯麦霍夫.裂缝性油气储集层勘探的基本理论与方法.陈定宝, 刘明新,刘慈群,等,译.北京:石油工业出版社,1985:207-214. SMAKHOV. Basic theory and method of fractured reservoir exploration. CHEN D B,LIU M X,LIU C Q,et al,trans. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1985:207-214.
[12] 曾联波.低渗透油气储层裂缝研究方法.北京:石油工业出版社,2010:115-126. ZENG L B. Fracture research methods for low permeability reservoirs. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2010:115-126.
[13] 柯式镇,孙贵霞.井壁电成像测井资料定量评价裂缝的研究. 测井技术,2002,26(2):101-103. KE S Z,SUN G X. On quantitative evaluation of fractures by STAR imagerⅡ. Well Logging Technology,2002,26(2):101-103.
[14] 孙寅森,郭少斌.基于图像分析技术的页岩微观孔隙特征定性及定量表征.地球科学进展,2016,31(7):751-763. SUN Y S,GUO S B. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of shale microscopic pore characteristics based on image analysis technology. Advances in Earth Science,2016,31(7):751-763.
[15] 肖文联,李闽,赵金洲,等.非线性有效压力计算.地球物理学报,2013,56(8):2808-2817. XIAO W L,LI M,ZHAO J Z,et al. Calculation of non-linear effective pressure. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(8):2808-2817.
[16] 赵光宇.裂缝型储层应力敏感与裂缝角度关系实验研究.钻采工艺,2018,41(3):66-68. ZHAO G Y. Experimental study on relationship between stress sensitivity and fracture angle of fractured reservoir. Drilling & Production Technology,2018,41(3):66-68.
[17] NELSON R. eological analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs. Houston:Gulf Publishing Company,2001:219-238.
[18] 徐新丽.含微裂缝低渗储层应力敏感性及其对产能影响.特种油气藏,2015,22(1):127-130. XU X L. Stress sensitivity of low permeability reservoirs with micro-fractures and its influence on productivity. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(1):127-130.
[19] 刘智颖,章成广,唐军,等.裂缝对岩石电阻率的影响及其在含气饱和度计算中的应用.岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):120-128. LIU Z Y,ZHANG C G,TANG J,et al. Influence of fracture on rock resistivity and its application in saturation calculation. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):120-128.
[1] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[2] 罗群, 张泽元, 袁珍珠, 许倩, 秦伟. 致密油甜点的内涵、评价与优选——以酒泉盆地青西凹陷白垩系下沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 1-12.
[3] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[4] 张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[5] 况晏, 司马立强, 瞿建华, 温丹妮, 陈猛, 吴丰. 致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 91-100.
[6] 谢冰, 白利, 赵艾琳, 张红英, 王玥. Sonic Scanner声波扫描测井在碳酸盐岩储层裂缝有效性评价中的应用——以四川盆地震旦系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 117-123.
[7] 王崇孝，田多文，魏军，杭伟. 酒泉盆地窟窿山油藏裂缝分布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 20-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭　林,王　波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉，郑荣才，肖玲，马国富，窦世杰，田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发