致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.011

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 91–100.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.04.011

致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例

况晏¹, 司马立强¹, 瞿建华², 温丹妮³, 陈猛¹, 吴丰¹

1. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
3. 中国石化西南石油工程有限公司测井分公司, 成都 610500

收稿日期:2016-12-06 修回日期:2017-02-15 出版日期:2017-07-21 发布日期:2017-07-21
第一作者:况晏(1988-),女,西南石油大学在读博士研究生,研究方向为非常规储层测井资料解释及方法。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都大道8号西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院。Email:493379512@qq.com
通信作者: 司马立强(1961-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气田测井方法、解释及地质应用研究。Email:1023110788@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）项目“致密油多相多尺度流动机理及渗流理论”（编号：2015CB250902）资助

Influencing factors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure of tight glutenite reservoir:a case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field,Mahu Sag

KUANG Yan¹, SIMA Liqiang¹, QU Jianhua², WEN Danni³, CHEN Meng¹, WU Feng¹

1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xingjiang, China;
3. Logging Company, Southwest Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Sinopec, Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2016-12-06 Revised:2017-02-15 Online:2017-07-21 Published:2017-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探索致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构定量评价方法，并为油田的高效开发提供有效手段，以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组致密砂砾岩储层为研究对象，根据铸体薄片、扫描电镜、压汞和核磁共振等资料，分析了砂砾岩的孔隙结构及其影响因素。基于孔隙结构评价特征参数（孔喉半径均值、饱和中值压力、变异系数、排驱压力、核磁大孔比率、T₂几何均值）与储层品质因子（孔隙结构定量表征参数）的统计关系，探讨砂砾岩储层孔隙结构定量评价方法，建立了常规测井曲线连续表征储层品质因子计算模型，其计算结果与实验和油井测试结果相一致，从而实现了对玛131井区百口泉组地层条件下储层品质因子的连续、定量表征。该方法和研究结果可为玛湖凹陷及其类似地区储层孔隙结构定量评价提供参考。

关键词: 储层特征, 影响因素, 岩性油气藏, 深层勘探, 古近系, 霸县凹陷

Abstract: In order to study the quantitative evaluation method of pore structure of tight glutenite reservoir and to provide an effective method for oilfield development,the tight glutenite reservoir of Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field of Mahu Sag was taken as an example, the data of cast thin sections, scanning electron microscope images, mercury injection curves and nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)T₂ spectra were used to study the pore structure and its influencing factors. Based on the statistical relationship between characteristic parameters for pore structure evaluation(average pore-throat radius,saturation median pressure, variation coefficient, displacement pressure, NMR macroporous ratio and T₂ geometric mean values)and reservoir quality factors(quantitative characterization parameter of pore structure),the quantitative evaluation method of pore structure of glu-tenite reservoir was discussed,and then the calculation model for continuously characterizing the reservoir quality factor was established by using conventional well log data. The calculation result has a good consistence with experimental data and oil well test data. The continuous and quantitative characterization of reservoir quality factor of Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field was carried out. This result could provide reference for the quantitative characterization of pore structure in Mahu Sag or other similar area.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, influencing factors, lithologic reservoirs, deep zones exploration, Paleogene, Baxian Sag

中图分类号:

TE122.2

况晏, 司马立强, 瞿建华, 温丹妮, 陈猛, 吴丰. 致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 91–100.

KUANG Yan, SIMA Liqiang, QU Jianhua, WEN Danni, CHEN Meng, WU Feng. Influencing factors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure of tight glutenite reservoir:a case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field,Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4): 91–100.

参考文献

[1] 黄丁杰, 于兴河, 谭程鹏, 等.玛西斜坡区百口泉组储层孔隙结构特征及控制因素分析.东北石油大学学报, 2015, 39(2):9-18. HUANG D J, YU X H, TAN C P, et al. Pore structure features and its controlling factor analysis of reservoirs in Baikouquan Formation, Maxi slope area. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2015, 39(2):9-18.
[2] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践.中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(6):14-23. KUANG L C, TANG Y, LEI D W, et al. Exploration of fan controlled large area lithologic oil reservoirs of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in slope zone of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(6):14-23.
[3] 陈欢庆, 曹晨, 梁淑贤, 等.储层孔隙结构研究进展.天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(2):227-237. CHEN H Q, CAO C, LIANG S X, et al. Research advances on reservoir pores. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(2):227-237.
[4] 卫延召, 陈刚强, 王峰, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷及周缘深大构造有效储层及烃类相态分析.中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1):53-60. WEI Y Z, CHEN G Q, WANG F, et al. Effective reservoirs and hydrocarbon phase in discordgenic in Mahu Sag and its periphery in Junggar Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1):53-60.
[5] 庞宏, 尤新才, 胡涛, 等.准噶尔盆地深部致密油藏形成条件与分布预测——以玛湖凹陷西斜坡风城组致密油为例.石油学报, 2015, 36(增刊2):176-183. PANG H, YOU X C, HU T, et al. Forming conditions and distribution prediction of deep tight reservoir in Junggar Basin:a case study from tight reservoir of Fengcheng Formation in the west slope of Mahu Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(Suppl 2):176-183.
[6] 单祥, 陈能贵, 郭华军, 等.基于岩石物理相的砂砾岩储层分类评价——以准噶尔盆地玛131井区块百二段为例.沉积学报, 2016, 34(1):149-157. SHAN X, CHEN N G, GUO H J, et al. Reservoir evaluation of sand-conglomerate reservoir based on peteophysical facies:a case study on Bai 2 reservoir in the Ma 131 region, Junggar Basin. Acta Sedimentologiga Sinica, 2016, 34(1):149-157.
[7] 吴浩, 郭英海, 张春林, 等.致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征及分类——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠统延长组长7段为例.东北石油大学学报, 2013, 37(6):12-17. WU H, GUO Y H, ZHANG C L, et al. Characteristic and classifications of micro-pore structure in tight oil reservoir:a case study of the Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 7 in Longdong area, Ordos Basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2013, 37(6):12-17.
[8] OUELLET S, BUSSIERE B, AUBERTIN M, et al. Characterization of cemented paste backfill pore structure using SEM and IA analysis. Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environment, 2008, 67(2):139-152.
[9] TIWARI P, DEO M, LIN C L, et al. Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT. Fuel, 2013, 107:547-554.
[10] ZHAO H W, NING Z F, WANG Q, et al. Petrophysical characterization of tight oil reservoirs using pressure-controlled porosimetry combined with rate-controlled porosimetry. Fuel, 2015, 154:233-242.
[11] LUBDA D, LINDNER W, QUAGLIA M, et al. Comprehensive pore structure characterization of silica monoliths with controlled mesopore size and macropore size by nitrogen sorption, mercury porosimetry, transmission electron microscopy and inverse size exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 2005, 1083(1/2):14-22.
[12] GALLEGOS D P, SMITH D M. A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure:determination of continuous pore size distribution. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 1988, 122(1):143-153.
[13] 赵彦超, 陈淑慧, 郭振华.核磁共振方法在致密砂岩储层孔隙结构中的应用——以鄂尔多斯大牛地气田上古生界石盒子组3段为例.地质科技情报, 2006, 25(1):109-112. ZHAO Y C, CHEN S H, GUO Z H, et al. Application of nuclear magnetic resonance technology to pore structure in tight sandstone:a case from third member of Shihezi Formation Upper Paleozonic in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2006, 25(1):109-112.
[14] 吉鸿杰, 李小燕, 陶辉飞, 等.准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系头屯河组储层孔隙结构特征研究.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):47-55. JI H J, LI X Y, TAO H F, et al. Pore structure characteristic of Jurassic Toutunhe Formation in eastern slope of Fukang Depression, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):47-55.
[15] 张宪国, 张涛, 林承焰.基于孔隙分形特征的低渗透储层孔隙结构评价.岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6):40-45. ZHANG X G, ZHANG T, LIN C Y. Pore structure evaluation of low permeability reservoir based on pore fractal features. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(6):40-45.
[16] 赖锦, 王贵文, 陈敏, 等.基于岩石物理相的储集层孔隙结构分类评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组为例.石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5):566-573. LAI J, WANG G W, CHEN M, et al. Pore structures evaluation of low permeability clastic reservoirs based on petrophysical facies:a case study on Chang 8 reservoir in the Jiyuan region, Ordos Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(5):566-573.
[17] 张浩, 甘仁忠, 王国斌, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组多因素流体识别技术及应用. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(1):55-62. ZHANG H, GAN R Z, WANG G B, et al. Multi-factor fluid identification technology and its application in Baikouquan Formation of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(1):55-62.
[18] 谭开俊, 王国栋, 罗惠芬, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖斜坡区三叠系百口泉组储层特征及控制因素. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6):83-88. TAN K J, WANG G D, LUO H F, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu slope area, Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(6):83-88.
[19] 周翔, 何生, 刘萍, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地代家坪地区长6致密油储层孔隙结构特征及分类评价.地学前缘, 2016, 23(3):253-265. ZHOU X, HE S, LIU P, et al. Characteristics and classification of tight oil pore structure in reservoir Chang 6 of Daijiaping area, Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(3):253-265.
[20] 朱华银, 安来志, 焦春艳.恒速与恒压压汞差异及其在储层评价中的应用.天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(7):1316-1322. ZHU H Y, AN L Z, JIAO C Y. The difference between constantrate mercury injection and constant-pressure mercury injection and the application in reservoir assessment. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(7):1316-1322.
[21] 王瑞飞, 沈平平, 宋子齐, 等.特低渗透砂岩油藏储层微观孔喉特征.石油学报, 2009, 30(4):560-563. WANG R F, SHEN P P, SONG Z Q, et al. Characteristics of micro-pore throat in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4):560-563.
[22] 赖锦, 王贵文, 王书南, 等.碎屑岩储层成岩相研究现状及进展.地球科学进展, 2013, 28(1):39-50. LAI J, WANG G W, WANG S N, et al. Research status and advances in the diagenetic facies of clastic reservoirs. Advances in Earth Science, 2013, 28(1):39-50.
[23] 胡海燕, 彭仕宓, 卢春慧, 等.吉林新立油田下白垩统泉头组成岩储集相及储集空间演化. 古地理学报, 2007, 9(1):97-106. HU H Y, PENG S M, LU C H, et al. Diagenetic reservoir facies and reservoir space evolution of the Quantou Formation of Lower Cretaceous in Xinli Oilfield, Jilin province. Journal of Palaeogeography. 2007, 9(1):97-106.
[24] 张龙海, 周灿灿, 刘国强, 等.孔隙结构对低孔低渗储集层电性及测井解释评价的影响. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(6):671-676. ZHANG L H, ZHOU C C, LIU G Q, et al. Influence of pore structure on electric properties and well logging evaluation in low porosity and permeability reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(6):671-676.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例

Influencing factors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure of tight glutenite reservoir:a case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field,Mahu Sag

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2]	程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[3]	易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[4]	周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[5]	张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[6]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[7]	冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[8]	朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[9]	西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[10]	方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[11]	王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[12]	牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[13]	洪国良, 王红军, 祝厚勤, 白振华, 王雯雯. 南苏门答腊盆地J区块中新统Gumai组岩性油气藏成藏条件及有利区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 138-146.
[14]	夏明军, 邵新军, 杨桦, 王忠生, 李之宇, 张超前, 原瑞娥, 法贵方. 海外岩性油气藏储量分类分级方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 37-44.
[15]	李恒萱, 温志新, 宋成鹏, 刘祚冬, 季天愚, 沈一平, 耿珂. 塞内加尔盆地演化过程与岩性油气藏勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 45-53.