岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 143–154.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200415

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

饶阳凹陷大王庄地区沙一上亚段河口坝结构对油藏开发的影响

吕文睿1,2, 张峰3, 纪友亮1,2, 周勇1,2, 罗妮娜1,2, 张艺楼1,2, 梁星如4, 程煜宗5   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院 北京, 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油华北油田分公司 开发部, 河北 任丘 062552;
    4. 中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河北 任丘 062552;
    5. 中国石油华北油田分公司 第三采油厂, 河北 河间 062450
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-10 修回日期:2019-08-05 出版日期:2020-08-01 发布日期:2020-06-16
  • 第一作者:吕文睿(1995-),女,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积学、储层地质学和层序地层学。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号。Email:972482643@qq.com
  • 通信作者: 纪友亮(1962-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学等方面的教学和科研工作。Email:jiyouliang@cup.edu.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“高频湖平面变化背景下复合三角洲砂体的结构及分布模式”（编号：41672098）、中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“富油气区带整体再评价关键技术研究与应用”（编号：2017E-1504）联合资助

Influence of estuary bar structure on reservoir exploitation of upper Sha-1 submember in Dawangzhuang area,Raoyang Sag

LYU Wenrui1,2, ZHANG Feng3, JI Youliang1,2, ZHOU Yong1,2, LUO Nina1,2, ZHANG Yilou1,2, LIANG Xingru4, CHENG Yuzong5   

  1. 1. College of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Department of Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China;
    4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China;
    5. No.3 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hejian 062450, Heibei, China
  • Received:2019-07-10 Revised:2019-08-05 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-06-16

PDF (PC)

195

摘要： 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区沙一上亚段Ⅲ，Ⅳ油组发育水下分流河道与河口坝砂体，其内部结构影响着油藏的开发，但该区河口坝内部结构和隔夹层的分布情况缺乏系统的研究。利用岩心资料、测井数据、生产数据等多种资料，在识别和分析沉积微相的基础上，对河口坝、泥质隔夹层的结构特征及油藏特征进行解剖，明确了河口坝的内部结构对油藏开发的影响，建立了油藏模式。结果表明：大王庄地区沙一上亚段Ⅲ，Ⅳ油组发育三角洲前缘亚相，包括水下分流河道、河口坝和水下分流间湾3种微相。不同期河口坝之间和同一期河口坝内部发育泥质隔夹层。在顺物源方向上，河口坝呈S型叠置前积；在垂直物源方向上，多期河口坝纵向上叠置堆积；河口坝间发育泥质隔层，单个河口坝内部发育泥质夹层。研究区一共发育3种类型的油藏：断层控制油藏、岩性控制油藏、断层-岩性复合油藏。不同期次河口坝间的泥质隔层作为油气的隔挡，是造成油水界面不统一的原因，而河口坝内部的夹层厚度较薄，规模小，不影响连通性。

关键词: 河口坝, 泥质隔夹层, 内部结构, 油藏开发, 沙一上亚段, 饶阳凹陷

Abstract: Underwater distributary channels and estuary bar sandbodies were developed in the third and fourth oil members of the upper Sha 1 member(Es1)in Dawangzhuang area of Raoyang Sag,and their internal structure influences the development of reservoirs. However, there is a lack of systematic research on the internal structure of estuary bar and the distribution of interbeds in this area. Based on the identification and analysis of sedimentary microfacies,the structural characteristics and reservoir characteristics of estuary bars and muddy interbeds were dissected by using core data,logging and production data. The influence of the internal structure of estuary bars on reservoir development was clarified and the reservoir model was established. The results show that in the third and fourth oil groups of upper Es1 in Dawangzhuang area,delta front subfacies was developed,including three microfacies:underwater distributary channel,estuary bar and underwater distributary bay. Muddy interbeds were developed between and within estuary bars. Along the source direction,estuary bar was S-shaped superimposed pre-accumulation,while in the vertical source direction,the multi-stage estuary bar was stacked vertically. The muddy barriers were developed between the estuary bars,and muddy interbeds were developed within the single estuary bar. There are three types of reservoirs developed in the study area:fault-controlled reservoir, lithology-controlled reservoir and fault-lithology composite reservoir. The muddy barriers between estuary bars in different stages are the reason for the inconsistency of oil-water interface, while the muddy interbeds within estuary bars are thin and the scale is small, which does not affect the connectivity.

Key words: estuary bar, muddy interbed, internal structure, reservoir exploitation, upper Es1, Raoyang Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 倪超, 纪友亮. 饶阳凹陷古近系沙河街组层序地层分析及沉积体系研究. 中国地质, 2006, 33(1):193-200. NI C, JI Y L. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary system of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Raoyang sub basin. Geology in China, 2006, 33(1):193-200.
[2] 张大智, 纪友亮, 张瑞峰, 等.饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层研究. 地质调查与研究, 2008, 33(1):33-42. ZHANG D Z, JI Y L, ZHANG R F, et al. Research on the sequence stratigraphy of Eogene in Raoyang Depression. Geological Survey and Research, 2008, 33(1):33-42.
[3] 易定红, 何琼英, 杨勤林. 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区古近系层序地层特征. 东华理工学院学报, 2006, 29(3):229-233. YI D H, HE Q Y, YANG Q L. Sequence stratigraphy of Palaeogene in Dawafngzhuang area, Raoyang Sag. Journal of East China Institute of Technology, 2006, 29(3):229-233.
[4] 邓述全. 层序地层学在饶阳凹陷隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用研究. 广州:中国科学院研究生院, 2005. DENG S Q. Application study of sequence stratigraphy on subtle oil-gas trap in Raoyang Depression. Guangzhou:Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005.
[5] 郑荣华. 饶阳凹陷肃宁地区古近系沉积相研究. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2015. ZHENG R H. The Paleogene sedimentary facies study in Suning area of Raoyang Depression. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2015.
[6] 纪友亮, 杜金虎, 赵贤正, 等. 冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及演化模式. 古地理学报, 2006, 8(3):397-406. JI Y L, DU J H, ZHAO X Z, et al. Sequence stratigraphy and evolution models of the Paleogene in Raoyang Sag, Jizhong Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2006, 8(3):397-406.
[7] HOY R G, RIDGWAY K D. Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of fan-delta and river-delta deposystems, Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado. AAPG Bulletin, 2003, 87(7):1169-1191.
[8] GANIL M R, BHATTACHARYA J P. Basic building blocks and process variability of a Cretaceous delta:Internal facies architecture reveals a more dynamic interaction of river, wave, and tidal processes than is indicated by external shape. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2007, 77(4):284-302.
[9] 易定红. 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区古近系沙一段至东营组层序地层与沉积体系分析. 新疆石油天然气, 2006, 2(4):21-25. YI D H. Study on sequence stratigraphy and depositional system from the first segment of Shahejie Formation to Dongying Formation in Dawangzhuang area,Raoyang Sag, central Hebei Province. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2006, 2(4):21-25.
[10] 王子龙. 大王庄地区沙河街组油气成藏机制研究. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2014. WANG Z L. Researches on the formation mechanism of reservoirs in Shahejie Formation of Dawangzhuang area. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2014.
[11] 朱茂, 朱筱敏, 曾洪流, 等.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷浅水曲流河三角洲沉积体系:以赵皇庄-肃宁地区沙一段为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):59-67. ZHU M, ZHU X M, ZENG H L, et al. Depositional system of shallow-water meandering river delta:a case from the first member of Shahejie Formation in Zhaohuangzhuang-Suning area of Raoyang Sag, Jizhong Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):59-67.
[12] 石兰亭, 杨勤林, 易定红, 等. 冀中饶阳凹陷大王庄地区古近系沉积演化特征与储盖组合分析. 东华理工学院学报, 2007, 30(2):132-136. SHI L T, YANG Q L, YI D H, et al. Sedimentary evolution and reservoir cap rock assemblages of Palaeogeue in Dawangzhuang area, Raoyang Sag central Heibei Province. Journal of East China Institute of Technology, 2007, 30(2):132-136.
[13] 张亚军. 饶阳凹陷赵皇庄东地区沙一上段-东营组层序地层与沉积体系研究. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011. ZHANG Y J. Study on sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary system of Upper S_1 to Dongying Formation in east Zhaohuangzhuang area, Raoyang Depression. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[14] 曾洪流, 赵贤正, 朱筱敏, 等. 隐性前积浅水曲流河三角洲地震沉积学特征:以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷肃宁地区为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5):566-576. ZENG H L, ZHAO X Z, ZHU X M, et al. Seismic sedimentology characteristics of sub-clinoformal shallow-water meandering river delta:a case from the Suning area of Raoyang Sag in Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, NE China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5):566-576.
[15] 陈彬滔, 史忠生, 薛罗, 等. 古潜山周缘滩坝沉积模式与岩性油藏勘探实践:以南苏丹Melut盆地Ruman地区Galhak组为例. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):37-44. CHEN B T, SHI Z S, XUE L, et al. Depositional models and lithologic reservoir exploration of sandy beach-bar around buriedhill:a case from Galhak Formation in Ruman region of Melut Basin, South Sudan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):37-44.
[16] 宋永东. 饶阳凹陷中北部构造特征及有利勘探方向研究. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2010. SONG Y D. Study on structural characteristics and the favorable exploration zones of the middle-northern area in Raoyang Sag. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2010.
[17] 崔树清. 冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷构造特征及油气聚集. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2009. CUI S Q. The structural characteristics and pools of petroleum accumulation of Raoyang Sag in Jizhong Depression. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2009.
[18] 张玮. 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区古近系油气富集特征研究. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2011. ZHANG W. Research on hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of Paleogene reservoirs in Dawangzhuang district of Raoyang Depression. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2011.
[19] 马学峰, 杨德相, 王建, 等. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(3):8-20. MA X F, YANG D X, WANG J, et al. The geological conditions, resource potential and exploration direction of oil in Jizhong Depression, Bohai Bay Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(3):8-20.
[20] 王志宏, 柳广弟, 李建明, 等. 饶阳凹陷下第三系隐蔽油气藏的形成. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2005, 27(2):26-29. WANG Z H, LIU G D, LI J M, et al. Formation of Lower Tertiary subtle reservoirs in Raoyang Sag. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2005, 27(2):26-29.
[21] 许丽丽. 饶阳凹陷中北部古近系储层研究. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2010. XU L L. Study of reservoir of the Paleogene in north-central of Raoyang Sag. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China), 2010.
[22] 黄志佳. 饶阳凹陷大王庄地区隐蔽油藏成藏研究. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014. HUANG Z J. The research of Dawangzhuang area in the Raoyang Sag. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2014.
[23] 张锐锋. 饶阳凹陷古近系层序地层学及隐蔽油气藏勘探研究. 北京:中国地质科学院, 2006. ZHANG R F. Sequence stratigraphy of Paleogene and exploration of subtle reservoirs in Raoyang Sag. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2006.
[24] 杜维良, 高园, 耿海燕, 等. 饶阳凹陷中部东营组-沙一上亚段河道砂体成藏模式及圈闭识别. 中国石油勘探, 2013, 18(6):7-12. DU W L, GAO Y, GENG H Y, et al. Reservoir forming model and trap recognition of channel sandbody in Dongying Formationupper submember of first member of Shahejie Formation, Middle of Raoyang Sag. China Petroleum Exploration, 2013, 18(6):7-12.
[25] 金凤鸣, 侯凤香, 焦双志, 等. 断陷盆地断层-岩性油藏成藏主控因素:以饶阳凹陷留107区块为例. 石油学报, 2016, 37(8):986-995. JIN F M, HOU F X, JIAO S Z, et al. Major controlling factors of fault-lithologic reservoir accumulation in rifted basin:a case study of Liu 107 block, Raoyang Sag. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(8):986-995.
[26] 赵贤正, 卢学军, 王权. 华北油田地层-岩性油藏勘探发现与启示. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(5):597-604. ZHAO X Z, LU X J, WANG Q. Discoveries and their implications in the stratigraphic-lithologic reservoir exploration of Huabei Oilfield. Oil & Gas Geology, 2007, 28(5):597-604.
[27] 赵力民, 赵贤正, 刘井旺, 等. 冀中坳陷古近系地层岩性油藏成藏特征及勘探方向. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4):492-497. ZHAO L M, ZHAO X Z, LIU J W, et al. Characteristics of Paleogene stratigraphic and lithologic reservoirs and its exploration direction in Jizhong Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4):492-497.
[28] 王余泉, 漆家福, 郑荣华, 等. 饶阳凹陷中部地区古近纪构造变形及控制因素. 大地构造与成矿学, 2018, 42(4):628-638. WANG Y Q, QI J F, ZHENG R H, et al. Paleogene deformation and its control mechanism in the central part of Raoyang Sag. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2018, 42(4):628-638.
[29] 张文朝, 崔周旗, 韩春元, 等. 冀中坳陷老第三纪湖盆演化与油气. 古地理学报, 2001, 3(1):45-54. ZHANG W C, CUI Z Q, HAN C Y, et al. Evolution of Palaeogene lacustrine basins and oil and gas potentials in the Central Hebei Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2001, 3(1):45-54.
[30] 甘立琴, 苏进昌, 谢岳, 等.曲流河储层隔夹层研究:以秦皇岛32-6油田为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):128-134. GAN L Q, SU J C, XIE Y, et al. Interlayers of meandering river reservoir:a case from Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):128-134.
[31] 王健, 程建莉, 戴荣东, 等. 红岗油田H 113井区萨尔图含油层系河口坝储集层构型. 录井工程, 2018, 29(1):97-102. WANG J, CHENG J L, DAI R D, et al. Reservoir configuration of mouth bar in Saertu oil bearing series of wellblock H113 in Honggang Oilfield. Mud Logging Engineering, 2018, 29(1):97-102.
[1] 周洪锋, 吴海红, 杨禹希, 向红英, 高吉宏, 贺昊文, 赵旭. 二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷B51井区白垩系阿四段扇三角洲前缘沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 85-97.
[2] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[3] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 梁益财, 郭睿良, 闫灿灿, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 36-50.
[4] 秦国省，吴胜和，郑联勇，喻 宸 . 基于沉积过程的三角洲前缘河口坝储层构型精细分析——以老君庙油田 L 1 1 小层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 55-63.
[5] 李少华，胡晓玲，王军，宋道万，史敬华. 单一河口坝砂体规模的定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 1-5.
[6] 牟中海，廖 春，丁晓军，陈 袁，于 跃. 跃进二号油田下干柴沟组下段Ⅰ-11号小层河口坝增生体的精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 8-14.
[7] 王志宏，李建明. 饶阳凹陷异常高压与油气成藏关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 15-19.
[8] 董世泰，张立新，徐光成，孙荣. 大井距井间地震技术在辽河曙68 井区的试验与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 69-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴　萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超，郭兰，闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山，张占松，张超谟，陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平，屠小龙，夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰，才业，樊佐春，姜懿洋，秦启荣，蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英，付锁堂，曹正林，阎存凤，张水昌，马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战，贺振华，文晓涛，唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发