大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20200607

岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 73–84.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200607

大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例

袁纯^1,2, 张惠良², 王波²

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国石油杭州地质研究院, 杭州 310023

收稿日期:2020-01-17 修回日期:2020-02-26 出版日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:袁纯(1996-),女,中国石油勘探开发研究院在读硕士研究生,研究方向为沉积与储层地质。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号。Email:yuanchun1996@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“大型岩性油气藏形成主控因素与有利区带评价”（编号:2017ZX05001002）资助

Sand body configuration and reservoir characteristics of large braided river delta: a case study of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression， Tarim Basin

YUAN Chun^1,2, ZHANG Huiliang², WANG Bo²

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2020-01-17 Revised:2020-02-26 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 库车坳陷北部下侏罗统阿合组是油气勘探的重要目的层，但是岩相变化快、砂体构型复杂、储层相对致密、非均质性强，制约了油气勘探。通过建立露头基干剖面、横向砂体追踪、砂体构型精细描述、针对性取样和储层实验分析，分析砂体的垂向建造、横向展布规律及不同岩相的储集性能，结果表明：阿合组纵向上有大型砂砾质辫状水道-侧积坝-纵向砂坝、中型砂砾质辫状水道-横向砂坝-滨湖复合砂体、小型砂质辫状水道-斜列砂坝等3种沉积建造。其中中型辫状水道-横向砂坝储集性能相对较优，有利储层主要是槽状交错层理砂质细砾岩、板状交错层理中砂岩和低角度平行层理细砂岩。研究区下辫状河三角洲平原和前缘均是有利勘探方向。

关键词: 储层特征, 辫状河三角洲, 砂体构型, 阿合组, 侏罗系, 库车坳陷

Abstract: Large sand-gravel braided river delta was deposited in the Jurassic Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin,which is an important target for oil and gas exploration. However,the rapid change of lithofacies, complex sand body architecture, relatively tight reservoir and strong heterogeneity restrict the exploration and development of oil and gas. Through the establishment of outcrop basal section,transverse sand body tracking,sand body configuration description,sampling and experimental analysis of sandstone with different lithofacies,the vertical construction,transverse distribution regularity and reservoir properties of different lithofacies were analyzed. The results show that there are three types of sedimentary formations formed on the longitudinal of Ahe Formation:large-scale sandy gravel braided channel-lateral accretion bar-longitudinal sand bar,mediumsized sandy gravel braided channel-transverse sand bar-lakeside composite sand body,and small-sized sandy braided channel-inclined sand bar. Among them,the reservoir performance of medium-sized channel-transverse sand bar is relatively better,and the favorable reservoirs are mainly trough cross bedding sandy fine conglomerate, tabular cross bedding medium sandstone and low angle parallel bedding fine sandstone. The lower braided river delta plain and front are favorable exploration directions.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, braided river delta, sand body configuration, Ahe Formation, Jurassic, Kuqa Depression

中图分类号:

TE122.2+1

袁纯, 张惠良, 王波. 大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 73–84.

YUAN Chun, ZHANG Huiliang, WANG Bo. Sand body configuration and reservoir characteristics of large braided river delta: a case study of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression， Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6): 73–84.

参考文献

[1] 张荣虎, 杨海军, 魏红兴, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带中东段中下侏罗统砂体特征及油气勘探意义.天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9):1243-1252. ZHANG R H, YANG H J, WEI H X, et al. The sandstone characteristics and hydrocarbon exploration signification of Lower Jurassic in middle east section of northern tectonic belt in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(9):1243-1252.
[2] 高志勇, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 等.库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组泥砾的成因机制与厚层状砂体展布.石油学报, 2016, 37(8):996-1010. GAO Z Y, ZHOU C M, FENG J R, et al. Mechanism and sedimentary environment of the muddy gravel concomitant with thick layer sandstone of Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(8):996-1010.
[3] 贾承造, 顾家裕, 张光亚.库车拗陷大中型气田形成的地质条件.科学通报, 2002, 47(增刊1):49-55. JIA C Z, GU J Y, ZHANG G Y. The geological conditions of large and medium gas fields to form in Kuqa Depression. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(Suppl 1):49-55.
[4] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等.库车再生前陆盆地的构造与油气.石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(4):297-303 LIU Z H, LU H F, JIA C Z, et al. Structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in Kuqa rejuvenated foreland basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(4):297-303.
[5] 王根海, 寿建峰.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统砂体特征与储集层性质的关系.石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(4):33-35. WANG G H, SHOU J F. The relationship between the characteristics of sand bodies and the properties of Lower Jurassic reservoirs in eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(4):33-35.
[6] 陈子炓, 寿建峰, 张惠良, 等.库车坳陷吐格尔明下侏罗统阿合组储层沉积非均质性. 石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22(1):60-63. CHEN Z L,SHOU J F,ZHANG H L, et al. Heterogeneity of reservoirs from Ahe Formation Lower Jurassic in Tugeerming, Kuqa Depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 2001, 22(1):60-63.
[7] 张惠良, 寿建峰, 陈子炓, 等.库车坳陷下侏罗统沉积特征及砂体展布.古地理学报, 2002, 4(3):47-58. ZHANG H L, SHOU J F, CHEN Z L, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and sandstone body distribution of the Lower Jurassic in Kuqa Depression. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4(3):47-58.
[8] 刘云田, 陈子炓, 施泽进, 等.库车坳陷下侏罗统阿合组高分辨率层序地层特征.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(1):40-45. LIU Y T, CHEN Z L, SHI Z J, et al. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy in Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation in Kuqa Depression. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(1):40-45.
[9] 何宏, 郭建华, 高云峰.塔里木盆地库车坳陷侏罗系层序地层与沉积相.江汉石油学院学报, 2002, 24(4):1-3. HE H, GUO J H, GAO Y F. Jurassic sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary facies in Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2002, 24(4):1-3.
[10] 黄克难, 詹家镇, 邹义声, 等.新疆库车河地区三叠系和侏罗系沉积环境及古气候.古地理学报, 2003, 5(2):197-206. HUANG K N,ZHAN J Z,ZOU Y S, et al. Sedimentary environments and palaeoclimate of the Triassic and Jurassic in Kuqa River area,Xinjiang. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(2):197-206.
[11] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬.库车前陆地区吐格尔明背斜下侏罗统砂岩成岩作用及孔隙发育的控制因素分析.沉积学报, 2007, 25(6):869-875. SHOU J F, ZHANG H L, SHEN Y. The analysis of controlling factors on sandstone diagenesis and porosity preservation of Lower Juarassic in Tugerming anticline,Kuqa forland basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007, 25(6):869-875.
[12] 寿建峰, 张惠良, 沈扬, 等.中国油气盆地砂岩储层的成岩压实机制分析.岩石学报, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170. SHOU J F, ZHANG H L, SHEN Y, et al. Diagenetic mechanism of sandstone reservoirs in China oil and gas-bearing basins. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(8):2165-2170.
[13] 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 等.库车坳陷东部下侏罗统致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素.沉积学报, 2015, 33(1):160-169. ZHANG N N, LIU L F, SU T X, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Lower Jurassic tight sandstone in eastern Kuqa Depression. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(1):160-169.
[14] 杨帆, 邸宏利, 王少依, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷依奇克里克构造带侏罗系储层特征及成因.古地理学报, 2002, 4(2):46-55. YANG F, DI H L, WANG S Y, et al. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of the Jurassic in Yiqikelike tectonic zone of Kuqa Depression in Tarim Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2002, 4(2):46-55.
[15] 申延平, 吴朝东, 岳来群, 等. 库车坳陷侏罗系砂岩碎屑组分及物源分析. 地球学报, 2005, 26(3):235-240. SHEN Y P, WU C D, YUE L Q, et al. An analysis of Jurassic sandstone fragment components and their provenance in Kuqa Depression. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2005, 26(3):235-240.
[16] 王华超, 韩登林, 欧阳传湘, 等.库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):115-123. WANG H C, HAN D L, OUYANG C X, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):115-123.
[17] ALMEIDA R P, FREITAS B T, TURRA B B, et al. Reconstructing fluvial bar surfaces from compound cross-strata and the interpretation of bar accretion direction in large river deposits. Sedimentology, 2016, 63(3):609-628.
[18] 陈彬滔, 于兴河, 王天奇, 等.砂质辫状河岩相与构型特征:以山西大同盆地中侏罗统云冈组露头为例. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1):111-117. CHEN B T, YU X H, WANG T Q, et al. Lithofacies and architectural characteristics of sandy braided river deposits:a case from outcrops of the Middle Jurassic Yungang Formation in the Datong Basin, Shanxi Province. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1):111-117.
[19] 李国欣, 易士威, 林世国, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷东部地区下侏罗统储层特征及其主控因素.天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10):1506-1517. LI G X, YI S W, LIN S G, et al. Reservoir characteristics and major factors influencing the reservoir quality of Lower Jurassic in eastern Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2018, 29(10):1506-1517.
[20] 杨有星, 金振奎, 白忠凯, 等.辫状河单河道砂体接触关系及主控因素分析:以新疆克拉玛依、山西柳林、大同和陕西延安辫状河露头为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):30-38. YANG Y X, JIN Z K, BAI Z K, et al. Contact relationship and main controlling factors of braided river single channel sand body:a case of braided river from Karamay in Xinjiang, Liulin and Datong in Shanxi, Yan'an in Shaanxi. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):30-38.
[21] 单敬福, 张彬, 赵忠军, 等.复合辫状河道期次划分方法与沉积演化过程分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区苏X区块为例.沉积学报, 2015, 33(4):773-785. SHAN J F, ZHANG B, ZHAO Z J, et al. Single stage and sedimentary evolution process analysis of braided river:a case from Su X block of western Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(4):773-785.
[22] 刘钰铭, 侯加根, 王连敏, 等.辫状河储层构型分析.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 33(1):11-17. LIU Y M, HOU J G, WANG L M, et al. Architecture analysis of brained river reservoir. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2009, 33(1):11-17.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

大型辫状河三角洲砂体构型与储层特征——以库车坳陷北部阿合组为例

Sand body configuration and reservoir characteristics of large braided river delta: a case study of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression， Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一₁亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[2]	李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[3]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[4]	李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[5]	张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[6]	郭秋麟, 吴晓智, 卫延召, 柳庄小雪, 刘继丰, 陈宁生. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 37-45.
[7]	陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[8]	田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[9]	杨甫, 贺丹, 马东民, 段中会, 田涛, 付德亮. 低阶煤储层微观孔隙结构多尺度联合表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 14-23.
[10]	童强, 余建国, 田云吉, 胡克来, 杨红梅, 程旭明, 朱玉双. 演武油田Y116井区延8段构型界面约束下的单河道砂体构型[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 144-158.
[11]	庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲. 黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 1-13.
[12]	田清华, 刘俊, 张晨, 王文胜, 黄丹. 苏里格气田下古生界储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 33-42.
[13]	李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP₃⁵砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[14]	赵超峰, 贾振甲, 田建涛, 高荣锦, 张伟, 赵建宇. 基于井中微地震监测方法的压裂效果评价——以吉林探区Y22井为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 161-168.
[15]	吴家洋, 吕正祥, 卿元华, 杨家静, 金涛. 致密油储层中自生绿泥石成因及其对物性的影响——以川中东北部沙溪庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 76-85.