岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 25–36.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210103

• 论坛与综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩性地层油气藏区带及圈闭评价技术研究新进展

刘化清1, 刘宗堡2, 吴孔友3, 徐怀民4, 杨占龙1, 孙夕平5, 倪长宽1, 康继伦6, 王牧7, 靳继坤6   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院, 兰州 730020;
    2. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    3. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    4. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    5. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    6. 中国石油吐哈油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆 哈密 839009;
    7. 中国石油青海油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736202
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-10 修回日期:2020-10-18 出版日期:2021-02-01 发布日期:2021-01-25
  • 作者简介:刘化清(1969-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事沉积学、地震沉积学及石油地质综合研究方面的工作。地址:(730020)甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号。Email:liu_hq@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”(编号:2017ZX05001-003)资助

New progress in study of play and trap evaluation technology for lithostratigraphic reservoirs

LIU Huaqing1, LIU Zongbao2, WU Kongyou3, XU Huaimin4, YANG Zhanlong1, SUN Xiping5, NI Changkuan1, KANG Jilun6, WANG Mu7, JIN Jikun6   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China;
    2. School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    3. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    4. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    5. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    6. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami, 839009, Xinjiang, China;
    7. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202, Gansu, China
  • Received:2020-07-10 Revised:2020-10-18 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-01-25

摘要: 立足“十三五”期间的研究成果,总结地质与物探相结合的方法,突出智能化技术应用,形成岩性地层区带评价、圈闭边界识别和有效性评价2项技术体系,①以断层/砂体输导体系定量评价、基于断层破坏程度细化分析的泥岩盖层有效性评价、地层不整合风化黏土层识别与封堵性定量评价为核心的源外岩性油气藏和地层油气藏区带评价技术体系;②形成以隐蔽层序界面识别与高频层序格架建立、基于多属性变时窗波形聚类为基础的沉积体宏观分布地震预测、基于稀疏理论地震反演和最小地震干涉分析的薄互储层预测等为核心的岩性地层圈闭边界识别与有效性评价技术。这些技术方法在推广应用后,为在相关盆地部署风险探井提供了有力的技术支撑。

关键词: 岩性地层油气藏, 区带评价技术, 圈闭评价技术, 输导体系, 盖层有效性, 风化黏土层, 不整合结构体

Abstract: Based on the research results during the 13th Five-Year Plan period,two sets of technology system of play evaluation,trap boundary identification and effectiveness evaluation for lithostratigraphic reservoirs were summarized by combining geology with geophysical exploration and highlighting the application of intelligent technology.(1)The play evaluation technology system for lithostratigraphic reservoirs outside the source area is based on quantitative evaluation of fault/sand body migration system,effectiveness evaluation of fault-related mudstone seals,weathered-clay identification in unconformity belt and quantitative evaluation of sealing ability. (2)The trap boundary identification and effectiveness evaluation technology system for lithostratigraphic reservoirs is based on the recognition of subtle sequence boundary and the establishment of high-frequency sequence framework,seismic prediction of sedimentary system distribution based on multi-attribute clustering in laterally changing seismic window,and thin interbedded reservoir prediction based on sparse theoretical seismic inversion and stratal slicing using minimum seismic interference frequency data. After being popularized and applied, these technologies provide strong technological support for deploying risk exploration wells in related basins.

Key words: lithostratigraphic reservoirs, play evaluation technology, trap evaluation technology, migration system, sealing effectiveness, weathered-clay bed, unconformity structure

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] 贾承造,赵文智,邹才能,等. 岩性地层油气藏地质理论与勘探技术. 石油勘探与开发,2007,34(3):257-272. JIA C Z,ZHAO W Z,ZOU C N,et al. Geological theory and exploration technology for lithostratigraphic hydrocarbon reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(3):257-272.
[2] 邹才能,郭秋麟,王宁,等. SY/T 6894-2012岩性地层区带评价技术规范.北京:石油工业出版社,2013. ZOU C N,GUO Q L,WANG N,et al. SY/T 6894-2012 Technical specifications for lithologic and stratigraphic play evaluation. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013.
[3] 陶士振,袁选俊,侯连华,等. 中国岩性油气藏区带类型、地质特征与勘探领域. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):863-872. TAO S Z,YUAN X J,HOU L H,et al. Play types,geologic characteristics and exploration domains of lithological reservoirs in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016, 43(6):863-872.
[4] 侯连华,杨帆,陶士振,等. 地层油气藏.北京:地质出版社,2017. HOU L H,YANG F,TAO S Z,et al. Stratigraphic reservoir. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2017.
[5] 陶士振,李建忠,柳少波,等. 远源/次生油气藏形成与分布的研究进展和展望. 中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(4):633-648. TAO S Z,LI J Z,LIU S B,et al. Formation condition,distribution law and exploration potential of far-source secondary oil and gas reservoirs. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(4):633-648.
[6] LARUE D K,HOVADIK J. Connectivity of channelized reservoirs:a modelling approach. Petroleum Geoscience,2006,12(4):291-308.
[7] GE H X,ANDERSON J K. Fault throw profile and kinematics of normal fault:Conceptual models and geologic examples. Geological Journal of China Universities,2007,13(1):75-88.
[8] BAUDON C,CARTWRIGHT J A. 3D seismic characterization of an array of blind normal faults in the Levant Basin,EasternMediterranean. Journal of Structural Geology,2008,30(6):746-760.
[9] MORRIS A,FERRILL D A,HENDERSON D B. Slip-tendency analysis and fault reactivation. Geology,1996,24(3):275-278.
[10] ROWAN M G,HART B S,NELSON S,et al. Three-dimensional geometry and evolution of a salt-related growth-fault array:Eugene Island 330 field,offshore Louisiana,Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Petroleum Geology,1998,17:309-328.
[11] 付晓飞,孙兵,王海学,等.断层分段生长定量表征及在油气成藏研究中的应用. 中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(3):271-281. FU X F,SUN B,WANG H X,et al. Fault segmentation growth quantitative characterization and its application on sag hydrocarbon accumulation research. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2015,44(3):271-281.
[12] FRISTAD T,GROTH A,YIELDING G,et al. Quantitative fault seal prediction:a case study from Oseberg Syd. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications,1997,7(97):107-124.
[13] 吴孔友,查明,柳广弟. 准噶尔盆地二叠系不整合面及其油气运聚特征.石油勘探与开发,2002,29(2):53-57. WU K Y,ZHA M,LIU G D.The unconformity surface in the Permian of Junggar Basin and the character of oil-gas migration and accumulation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002,29(2):53-57.
[14] 吴孔友,查明,洪梅. 准噶尔盆地不整合结构的地球物理响应及油气成藏意义.石油实验地质,2003,25(4):328-332. WU K Y,ZHA M,HONG M. Relationship of reservoir formation with unconformities and their geophysical response in the Junggar Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2003,25(4):328-332.
[15] 熊尚发,朱园健,周茹,等. 白水黄土-红黏土化学风化强度的剖面特征与粒度效应.第四纪研究,2008,28(5):812-821. XIONG S F,ZHU Y J,ZHOU R,et al. Chemical weathering intensity and its grain size dependence for the loess red clay deposit of the Baishui section,Chinese Loess Plateau.Quaternary Sciences,2008,28(5):812-821.
[16] 白斌,周立发,邹才能,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘若干不整合界面的厘定. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(3):270-280. BAI B,ZHOU L F,ZOU C N,et al. Definition of some unconformities in the south margin of Junggar Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(3):270-280.
[17] 杨占龙,沙雪梅,魏立花,等. 2019地震隐性层序界面识别、高频层序格架建立与岩性圈闭勘探:以吐哈盆地西缘侏罗系-白垩系为例.岩性油气藏,2019,31(6):1-13. YANG Z L,SHA X M,WEI L H,et al. Seismic subtle sequence boundary identification,high-frequency sequence framework establishment and lithologic trap exploration:a case study of Jurassic to Cretaceous in the western margin of Turpan-Kumul Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(6):1-13.
[18] 王明春,明君. 一种变时窗地震波形分类技术及其应用. 中国海上油气,2011,23(5):303-306. WANG M C,MING J. A technique of seismic waveform classification within a variable time window and its application. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2011,23(5):303-306.
[19] 袁成,苏明军,倪长宽. 基于稀疏贝叶斯学习的薄储层预测方法及应用.岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):229-238. YUAN C,SU M J,NI C K. A novel method of thin reservoir identification based on sparse Bayesian learning and its application. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):229-238.
[20] NI C K,HU G M,LIU H Q,et al.Thin-bed detection using amplitude slicing at minimum interference frequency:Method and application. Interpretation,2018,7(1):1-43.
[21] 刘化清,苏明军,倪长宽,等. 薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(2):1-11. LIU H Q,SU M J,NI C K,et al.Thin bed prediction from interbeded background:Revised seismic sedimentological method. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(2):1-11.
[22] DOU Y. A method to remove depositional background data based on the Modified Kernel Hebbian Algorithm. Acta Geophysics, 2020,68(3):701-710.
[23] WIDESS M B. How thin is thin bed? Geophysics,1973,38(6):1176-1180.
[1] 陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[2] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[3] 杨元亮, 朱筱敏, 马瑞国, 董艳蕾, 侯帅军, 江强, 刘成权. 准噶尔盆地新春地区新近系油气富集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 20-29.
[4] 高长海,查 明,赵贤正,彭 浦. 冀中坳陷潜山油气藏输导体系及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 26-30.
[5] 林玉祥,王玉伟,孟 彩,韩继雷. 潍北凹陷输导体系及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 75-82.
[6] 赵建华,曾溅辉,张永旺,黄理力. 博兴洼陷高89 块沙四上亚段砂岩输导体系研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(1): 111-115.
[7] 韩永林, 王海红, 陈志华, 王芳, 梁晓伟, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 耿湾— 史家湾地区长6 段微量元素地球化学特征及古盐度分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 20-26.
[8] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1-8.
[9] 王英民. 对层序地层学工业化应用中层序分级混乱问题的探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 9-15.
[10] 卫平生, 潘树新, 王建功, 雷 明. 湖岸线和岩性地层油气藏的关系研究 —— 论“坳陷盆地湖岸线控油”[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 27-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .