岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 74–84.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210307

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测

冯德浩1,2, 刘成林1,2, 田继先3, 太万雪1,2, 李培1,2, 曾旭3, 卢振东1,2, 郭轩豪4   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学 (北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学 (北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 河北 廊坊 065007;
    4. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-18 修回日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 刘成林(1970-),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气地球化学与资源评价、非常规油气地质方面的研究工作。Email:liucl@cup.edu.cn。 E-mail:liucl@cup.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:冯德浩(1997—),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气成藏与油气资源评价。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号。Email:apparate_z@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“咸化湖盆条件下盐类对地层超压的作用机制研究”(编号:41872127)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“柴达木盆地建设高原大油气田勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2016E-0102)联合资助

Basin modeling and favorable play prediction of Neogene in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin

FENG Dehao1,2, LIU Chenglin1,2, TIAN Jixian3, TAI Wanxue1,2, LI Pei1,2, ZENG Xu3, LU Zhendong1,2, GUO Xuanhao4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Langfang 065007, Hebei, China;
    4. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China
  • Received:2020-06-18 Revised:2020-09-10 Published:2021-06-03

摘要: 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系天然气资源潜力较大。为了评价一里坪地区天然气资源潜力和风险勘探选区,开展了盆地与含气系统模拟研究,明确了其烃源岩热演化史、主要生气凹陷以及有利运聚方向。结果表明:①一里坪地区新近系烃源岩有机质丰度(TOC质量分数为0.2%~1.0%)与柴西地区相当,具备较好的生烃潜力,有机质类型为Ⅱ2-Ⅲ型,以生气为主。②研究区下油砂山组(N21)和上油砂山组(N22)烃源岩开始大量生烃的关键时期分别为中新世末期和上新世末期,狮子沟组(N23)烃源岩至今处于未成熟-低成熟阶段。③研究区主力气源岩为下油砂山组(N21)烃源岩,主要生气时期为七个泉组(Q1+2)沉积时期;2个主要生气中心分别为碱石山-红三旱四号构造北部和船形丘东北部-台南。④红三旱三号-红三旱四号构造、鄂博梁Ⅲ号-鸭湖-台吉乃尔构造和台南-涩北构造均为天然气聚集的有利区。该研究成果为一里坪地区新近系天然气勘探指明了方向。

关键词: 烃源岩, 生烃动力学, 含气系统, 盆地模拟, 新近系, 一里坪地区, 柴达木盆地

Abstract: There are great potential of Neogene natural gas resources in Yiliping area,Qaidam Basin. In order to evaluate the natural gas resource potential and risk exploration area in Yiliping area,the basin and gas-bearing system modeling was carried out,and the thermal evolution history of source rocks,main gas generation center and favorable migration and accumulation directions were determined. The results show that:(1)The abundance of organic matter(TOC mass fraction is 0.2% -1.0%)of Neogene source rocks in Yiliping area is similar to that in western Qaidam Basin,which has good hydrocarbon generation potential,and the organic matter is type Ⅱ2-Ⅲ.(2)The key periods for the beginning of generating a great deal of hydrocarbons in the source rocks of lower Youshashan Formation(N21)and upper Youshashan Formation(N22)are the late Miocene and the late Pliocene, respectively,and the source rocks of Shizigou Formation(N23)are still immature to low mature.(3)The major source rock in Yiliping area is lower Youshashan Formation(N21),and the main gas generation period is Qigequan Formation(Q1+2). The two main gas generation centers are Jianshishan-Hongsanhan No.4 structure belt and northeastern Chuanxingqiu-Tainan structure belt.(4)Hongsanhan No. 3-Hongsanhan No.4 structural belt, Eboliang No. 3-Yahu-Teginaer structural belt and Tainan-Sebei structural belt are favorable areas for natural gas accumulation. The research results indicate the direction for Neogene gas exploration in Yiliping area.

Key words: source rock, hydrocarbon generation kinetics, gas-bearing system, basin modeling, Neogene, Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] MAGOON L B, DOW W G. The petroleum system-from source to trap. AAPG Memoir 60, 1994:3-24.
[2] 赵靖舟. 油气系统理论及中国西北含油气系统划分. 西安石油学院学报, 1997, 12(5):14-19. ZHAO J Z. Theory of petroleum system(PS) and the classification of the PS in Northwest China. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou Institute, 1997, 12(5):14-19.
[3] 郭秋麟, 谢洪兵, 任洪佳, 等. 盆地与油气系统模拟. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2018. GUO Q L, XIE H B, REN H J, et al. Basin and petroleum systems modeling. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[4] THOMAS H, ARMIN I K. Fundamentals of basin and petroleum systems modeling. Berlin:Springer, 2009.
[5] 刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地和含油气系统模拟(BPSM)研究现状及发展趋势. 石油科学通报, 2017, 2(2):161-175. LIU K Y, LIU J L. Current status and future development trends of basin and petroleum system modeling(BPSM). Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017, 2(2):161-175.
[6] 郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 柳庄小雪, 等. 盆地模拟关键技术之油气运聚模拟技术进展. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5):846-857. GUO Q L, CHEN N S, LIU-ZHUANG X X, et al. Advance of basin modeling key techniques:Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5):846-857.
[7] 付锁堂. 柴达木盆地油气勘探潜在领域. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(5):1-10. FU S T. Potential oil and gas exploration areas in Qaidam Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(5):1-10.
[8] 李谨. 柴达木盆地三湖-一里坪地区天然气地球化学特征及形成机理. 荆州:长江大学, 2018. LI J. Geochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of natural gas in the Sanhu-Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Jingzhou:Yangtze University, 2018.
[9] 谭彦虎, 任冰, 雷涛, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区天然气成藏条件与勘探潜力. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5):891-896. TAN Y H, REN B, LEI T, et al. The conditions of natural gas accumulation and exploration potential in Yiliping region, Qaidam Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(5):891-896.
[10] 王艳清, 张永庶, 夏志远, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪坳陷新生界咸化特征及生烃潜力分析. 中国地质, 2016, 43(4):1317-1330. WANG Y Q, ZHANG Y S, XIA Z Y, et al. An analysis of Cenozoic hydrocarbon generation potential and salty characteristics of Yiliping Depression in Qaidam Basin. Geology in China, 2016, 43(4):1317-1330.
[11] 梁德秀. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系烃源岩评价. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017. LIANG D X. Evaluation of Neogene source rock in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2017.
[12] 徐思渊. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近纪咸化湖相烃源岩有机质富集模式研究. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2018. XU S Y. Organic matter enrichment model of Neogene salt lake source rocks in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2018.
[13] 姜桂凤, 孔红喜, 徐子远, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系油气成藏条件. 新疆石油地质, 2006, 27(5):552-555. JIANG G F, KONG H X, XU Z Y, et al. The hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Neogene in Yiliping area of Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006, 27(5):552-555.
[14] 谭彦虎, 徐彩辉, 任冰, 等. 柴达木盆地三湖地区热成因气成藏条件与勘探潜力. 新疆石油地质, 2012, 33(3):302-304. TAN Y H, XU C H, REN B, et al. Accumulation conditions and prospecting potentials of thermogenic gas of Neogene in Sanhu area, Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012, 33(3):302-304.
[15] 洪唯宇. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区油气成藏条件研究. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2018. HONG W Y. Study on petroleum accumulation conditions of the Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2018.
[16] 杜江民, 龙鹏宇, 杨鹏, 等. 中国陆相湖盆碳酸盐岩储集层特征及其成藏条件. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1):52-69. DU J M, LONG P Y, YANG P, et al. Characteristics of carbonate reservoir and its forming conditions in continental lake basin of China. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(1):52-69.
[17] 付锁堂, 马达德, 陈琰, 等. 柴达木盆地油气勘探新进展. 石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊l):1-10. FU S T, MA D D, CHEN Y, et al. New advance of petroleum and gas exploration in Qaidam Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):1-10.
[18] SIMON M, JASHAR A, FABIAN J K, et al. Source rocks of the German central Graben. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 113:1-15.
[19] Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction and sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1):1-24.
[20] 郭泽清, 王宗礼, 李雪峰, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系沉积相初探. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(3):284-292. GUO Z Q, WANG Z L, LI X F, et al. Preliminary study on sedimentary facies of the Neogene in Yiliping area,Qaidam Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(3):284-292.
[21] 李超, 张立强, 张立宽, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区中生代地层剥蚀厚度估算及古构造恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):72-79. LI C, ZHANG L Q, ZHANG L K, et al. Estimation of denudation thickness of Mesozoic strata and paleostructure restoration in Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):72-79.
[22] 陈亮, 甘华军, 祝春荣, 等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷沉降史研究. 新疆石油学院学报, 2002, 14(4):12-17. CHEN L, GAN H J, ZHU C R, et al. Study on subsidence history of Weixinan Depression in Beibuwan Basin. Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute, 2002, 14(4):12-17.
[23] 邱楠生, 顾先觉, 丁丽华, 等. 柴达木盆地西部新生代的构造-热演化研究. 地质科学, 2000, 35(4):456-464. QIU N S, GU X J, DING L H, et al. Tectono-thermal evolution of western Qaidam Basin, northwest China. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2000, 35(4):456-464.
[24] QIU N S. Geothermal regime in the Qaidam Basin, northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geological Magazine, 2003, 140(6):707-719.
[25] WYGRALA B. Integrated study of an oil field in the southern Po Basin, Northern Italy. Cologne:University of Cologne, Germany, 1989.
[26] 沈菊, 张彩岳, 许显花, 等. 1980-2015年柴达木盆地地表温度变化特征. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(35):58-64. SHEN J, ZHANG C Y, XU X H, et al. Variation characteristics of surface temperature in Qaidam Basin 1980-2015. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(35):58-64.
[27] BURNHAM A K, SWEENEY J J. A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1989, 53(10):2649-2657.
[28] 耿涛, 毛小平, 王昊宸, 等. 伦坡拉盆地热演化史及有利区带预测. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):67-78. GENG T, MAO X P, WANG H C, et al. Thermal evolution history and prediction of favorable zones in Lunpola Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):67-78.
[1] 杨丽莎, 陈彬滔, 马轮, 史忠生, 薛罗, 王磊, 史江龙, 赵艳军. 陆相湖盆坳陷期源—汇系统的要素特征及耦合关系——以南苏丹Melut盆地北部坳陷新近系Jimidi组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 27-38.
[2] 李翔, 王建功, 李飞, 王玉林, 伍坤宇, 李亚锋, 李显明. 柴达木盆地西部始新统湖相微生物岩沉积特征——以西岔沟和梁东地区下干柴沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 63-73.
[3] 龙国徽, 王艳清, 朱超, 夏志远, 赵健, 唐鹏程, 房永生, 李海鹏, 张娜, 刘健. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带油气成藏条件与有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 145-160.
[4] 田光荣, 王建功, 孙秀建, 李红哲, 杨魏, 白亚东, 裴明利, 周飞, 司丹. 柴达木盆地阿尔金山前带侏罗系含油气系统成藏差异性及其主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 131-144.
[5] 孔红喜, 王远飞, 周飞, 朱军, 陈阳阳, 宋德康. 鄂博梁构造带油气成藏条件分析及勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 175-185.
[6] 徐宇轩, 代宗仰, 胡晓东, 徐志明, 李丹. 川东北沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义——以五宝场地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 209-219.
[7] 姚军, 乐幸福, 陈娟, 苏旺, 张永峰. 基于拟三维多属性反演的优质烃源岩分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 248-257.
[8] 蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 赵辛楣. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 109-119.
[9] 王航, 杨海风, 黄振, 白冰, 高雁飞. 基于可容纳空间变化的河流相演化新模式及其控藏作用——以莱州湾凹陷垦利A构造为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 73-83.
[10] 田继先, 赵健, 张静, 孔骅, 房永生, 曾旭, 沙威, 王牧. 柴达木盆地英雄岭地区硫化氢形成机理及分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 84-92.
[11] 张道伟, 薛建勤, 伍坤宇, 陈晓冬, 王牧, 张庆辉, 郭宁. 柴达木盆地英西地区页岩油储层特征及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 1-11.
[12] 陈更新, 王建功, 杜斌山, 刘应如, 李艳丽, 杨会洁, 李志明, 俞晓峰. 柴达木盆地尖北地区裂缝性基岩气藏储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 36-47.
[13] 谢明贤, 陈广坡, 李娟, 马凤良, 宋晓微. 海拉尔盆地外围凹陷南一段烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 24-33.
[14] 黄彦杰, 白玉彬, 孙兵华, 黄礼, 黄昌武. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组长7烃源岩特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 66-75.
[15] 孙哲, 彭靖淞, 江尚昆, 叶涛, 郭颖. 渤海海域庙西中南洼围区烃源岩有机相与测井评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 102-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 魏钦廉, 郑荣才, 肖玲, 王成玉, 牛小兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴旗地区长6 储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 45 -50 .
[3] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[4] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[5] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[6] 旷红伟,高振中,王正允,王晓光. 一种独特的隐蔽油藏——夏9井区成岩圈闭油藏成因分析及其对勘探的启迪[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 8 -14 .
[7] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[8] 王东琪, 殷代印. 水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 159 -164 .
[9] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[10] 章惠, 关达, 向雪梅, 陈勇. 川东北元坝东部须四段裂缝型致密砂岩储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1): 133 -139 .