岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 74–84.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210307

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系盆地模拟及有利区预测

冯德浩1,2, 刘成林1,2, 田继先3, 太万雪1,2, 李培1,2, 曾旭3, 卢振东1,2, 郭轩豪4   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学 (北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学 (北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 河北 廊坊 065007;
    4. 西安石油大学 地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-18 修回日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 第一作者:冯德浩(1997—),男,中国石油大学(北京)在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气成藏与油气资源评价。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号。Email:apparate_z@126.com
  • 通信作者: 刘成林(1970-),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气地球化学与资源评价、非常规油气地质方面的研究工作。Email:liucl@cup.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“咸化湖盆条件下盐类对地层超压的作用机制研究”(编号:41872127)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“柴达木盆地建设高原大油气田勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2016E-0102)联合资助

Basin modeling and favorable play prediction of Neogene in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin

FENG Dehao1,2, LIU Chenglin1,2, TIAN Jixian3, TAI Wanxue1,2, LI Pei1,2, ZENG Xu3, LU Zhendong1,2, GUO Xuanhao4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Langfang 065007, Hebei, China;
    4. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China
  • Received:2020-06-18 Revised:2020-09-10 Published:2021-06-03

摘要: 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系天然气资源潜力较大。为了评价一里坪地区天然气资源潜力和风险勘探选区,开展了盆地与含气系统模拟研究,明确了其烃源岩热演化史、主要生气凹陷以及有利运聚方向。结果表明:①一里坪地区新近系烃源岩有机质丰度(TOC质量分数为0.2%~1.0%)与柴西地区相当,具备较好的生烃潜力,有机质类型为Ⅱ2-Ⅲ型,以生气为主。②研究区下油砂山组(N21)和上油砂山组(N22)烃源岩开始大量生烃的关键时期分别为中新世末期和上新世末期,狮子沟组(N23)烃源岩至今处于未成熟-低成熟阶段。③研究区主力气源岩为下油砂山组(N21)烃源岩,主要生气时期为七个泉组(Q1+2)沉积时期;2个主要生气中心分别为碱石山-红三旱四号构造北部和船形丘东北部-台南。④红三旱三号-红三旱四号构造、鄂博梁Ⅲ号-鸭湖-台吉乃尔构造和台南-涩北构造均为天然气聚集的有利区。该研究成果为一里坪地区新近系天然气勘探指明了方向。

关键词: 烃源岩, 生烃动力学, 含气系统, 盆地模拟, 新近系, 一里坪地区, 柴达木盆地

Abstract: There are great potential of Neogene natural gas resources in Yiliping area,Qaidam Basin. In order to evaluate the natural gas resource potential and risk exploration area in Yiliping area,the basin and gas-bearing system modeling was carried out,and the thermal evolution history of source rocks,main gas generation center and favorable migration and accumulation directions were determined. The results show that:(1)The abundance of organic matter(TOC mass fraction is 0.2% -1.0%)of Neogene source rocks in Yiliping area is similar to that in western Qaidam Basin,which has good hydrocarbon generation potential,and the organic matter is type Ⅱ2-Ⅲ.(2)The key periods for the beginning of generating a great deal of hydrocarbons in the source rocks of lower Youshashan Formation(N21)and upper Youshashan Formation(N22)are the late Miocene and the late Pliocene, respectively,and the source rocks of Shizigou Formation(N23)are still immature to low mature.(3)The major source rock in Yiliping area is lower Youshashan Formation(N21),and the main gas generation period is Qigequan Formation(Q1+2). The two main gas generation centers are Jianshishan-Hongsanhan No.4 structure belt and northeastern Chuanxingqiu-Tainan structure belt.(4)Hongsanhan No. 3-Hongsanhan No.4 structural belt, Eboliang No. 3-Yahu-Teginaer structural belt and Tainan-Sebei structural belt are favorable areas for natural gas accumulation. The research results indicate the direction for Neogene gas exploration in Yiliping area.

Key words: source rock, hydrocarbon generation kinetics, gas-bearing system, basin modeling, Neogene, Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1
[1] MAGOON L B, DOW W G. The petroleum system-from source to trap. AAPG Memoir 60, 1994:3-24.
[2] 赵靖舟. 油气系统理论及中国西北含油气系统划分. 西安石油学院学报, 1997, 12(5):14-19. ZHAO J Z. Theory of petroleum system(PS) and the classification of the PS in Northwest China. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou Institute, 1997, 12(5):14-19.
[3] 郭秋麟, 谢洪兵, 任洪佳, 等. 盆地与油气系统模拟. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2018. GUO Q L, XIE H B, REN H J, et al. Basin and petroleum systems modeling. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[4] THOMAS H, ARMIN I K. Fundamentals of basin and petroleum systems modeling. Berlin:Springer, 2009.
[5] 刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地和含油气系统模拟(BPSM)研究现状及发展趋势. 石油科学通报, 2017, 2(2):161-175. LIU K Y, LIU J L. Current status and future development trends of basin and petroleum system modeling(BPSM). Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017, 2(2):161-175.
[6] 郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 柳庄小雪, 等. 盆地模拟关键技术之油气运聚模拟技术进展. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5):846-857. GUO Q L, CHEN N S, LIU-ZHUANG X X, et al. Advance of basin modeling key techniques:Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation simulation. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5):846-857.
[7] 付锁堂. 柴达木盆地油气勘探潜在领域. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(5):1-10. FU S T. Potential oil and gas exploration areas in Qaidam Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(5):1-10.
[8] 李谨. 柴达木盆地三湖-一里坪地区天然气地球化学特征及形成机理. 荆州:长江大学, 2018. LI J. Geochemical characteristics and formation mechanism of natural gas in the Sanhu-Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Jingzhou:Yangtze University, 2018.
[9] 谭彦虎, 任冰, 雷涛, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区天然气成藏条件与勘探潜力. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5):891-896. TAN Y H, REN B, LEI T, et al. The conditions of natural gas accumulation and exploration potential in Yiliping region, Qaidam Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(5):891-896.
[10] 王艳清, 张永庶, 夏志远, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪坳陷新生界咸化特征及生烃潜力分析. 中国地质, 2016, 43(4):1317-1330. WANG Y Q, ZHANG Y S, XIA Z Y, et al. An analysis of Cenozoic hydrocarbon generation potential and salty characteristics of Yiliping Depression in Qaidam Basin. Geology in China, 2016, 43(4):1317-1330.
[11] 梁德秀. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系烃源岩评价. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017. LIANG D X. Evaluation of Neogene source rock in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2017.
[12] 徐思渊. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近纪咸化湖相烃源岩有机质富集模式研究. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2018. XU S Y. Organic matter enrichment model of Neogene salt lake source rocks in Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2018.
[13] 姜桂凤, 孔红喜, 徐子远, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系油气成藏条件. 新疆石油地质, 2006, 27(5):552-555. JIANG G F, KONG H X, XU Z Y, et al. The hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Neogene in Yiliping area of Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006, 27(5):552-555.
[14] 谭彦虎, 徐彩辉, 任冰, 等. 柴达木盆地三湖地区热成因气成藏条件与勘探潜力. 新疆石油地质, 2012, 33(3):302-304. TAN Y H, XU C H, REN B, et al. Accumulation conditions and prospecting potentials of thermogenic gas of Neogene in Sanhu area, Qaidam Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012, 33(3):302-304.
[15] 洪唯宇. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区油气成藏条件研究. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2018. HONG W Y. Study on petroleum accumulation conditions of the Yiliping area, Qaidam Basin. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2018.
[16] 杜江民, 龙鹏宇, 杨鹏, 等. 中国陆相湖盆碳酸盐岩储集层特征及其成藏条件. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1):52-69. DU J M, LONG P Y, YANG P, et al. Characteristics of carbonate reservoir and its forming conditions in continental lake basin of China. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(1):52-69.
[17] 付锁堂, 马达德, 陈琰, 等. 柴达木盆地油气勘探新进展. 石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊l):1-10. FU S T, MA D D, CHEN Y, et al. New advance of petroleum and gas exploration in Qaidam Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):1-10.
[18] SIMON M, JASHAR A, FABIAN J K, et al. Source rocks of the German central Graben. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 113:1-15.
[19] Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction and sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1):1-24.
[20] 郭泽清, 王宗礼, 李雪峰, 等. 柴达木盆地一里坪地区新近系沉积相初探. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(3):284-292. GUO Z Q, WANG Z L, LI X F, et al. Preliminary study on sedimentary facies of the Neogene in Yiliping area,Qaidam Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(3):284-292.
[21] 李超, 张立强, 张立宽, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇泾地区中生代地层剥蚀厚度估算及古构造恢复. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(2):72-79. LI C, ZHANG L Q, ZHANG L K, et al. Estimation of denudation thickness of Mesozoic strata and paleostructure restoration in Zhenjing area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(2):72-79.
[22] 陈亮, 甘华军, 祝春荣, 等. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷沉降史研究. 新疆石油学院学报, 2002, 14(4):12-17. CHEN L, GAN H J, ZHU C R, et al. Study on subsidence history of Weixinan Depression in Beibuwan Basin. Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute, 2002, 14(4):12-17.
[23] 邱楠生, 顾先觉, 丁丽华, 等. 柴达木盆地西部新生代的构造-热演化研究. 地质科学, 2000, 35(4):456-464. QIU N S, GU X J, DING L H, et al. Tectono-thermal evolution of western Qaidam Basin, northwest China. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2000, 35(4):456-464.
[24] QIU N S. Geothermal regime in the Qaidam Basin, northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geological Magazine, 2003, 140(6):707-719.
[25] WYGRALA B. Integrated study of an oil field in the southern Po Basin, Northern Italy. Cologne:University of Cologne, Germany, 1989.
[26] 沈菊, 张彩岳, 许显花, 等. 1980-2015年柴达木盆地地表温度变化特征. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(35):58-64. SHEN J, ZHANG C Y, XU X H, et al. Variation characteristics of surface temperature in Qaidam Basin 1980-2015. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(35):58-64.
[27] BURNHAM A K, SWEENEY J J. A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1989, 53(10):2649-2657.
[28] 耿涛, 毛小平, 王昊宸, 等. 伦坡拉盆地热演化史及有利区带预测. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):67-78. GENG T, MAO X P, WANG H C, et al. Thermal evolution history and prediction of favorable zones in Lunpola Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):67-78.
[1] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2] 屈卫华, 田野, 董常春, 郭小波, 李立立, 林斯雅, 薛松, 杨世和. 松辽盆地德惠断陷白垩系烃源岩特征及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 122-134.
[3] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[4] 乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[5] 冉逸轩, 王健, 张熠. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起基岩气藏形成条件与有利勘探区[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 66-76.
[6] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[7] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[8] 程焱, 王波, 张铜耀, 齐玉民, 杨纪磊, 郝鹏, 李阔, 王晓东. 渤中凹陷渤中A-2区新近系明化镇组岩性油气藏油气运移特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 46-55.
[9] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[10] 卞保力, 刘海磊, 蒋文龙, 王学勇, 丁修建. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系火山岩凝析气藏的发现与勘探启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 96-105.
[11] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[12] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[13] 李二庭, 米巨磊, 张宇, 潘越扬, 迪丽达尔·肉孜, 王海静, 高秀伟. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 88-97.
[14] 洪国良, 王红军, 祝厚勤, 白振华, 王雯雯. 南苏门答腊盆地J区块中新统Gumai组岩性油气藏成藏条件及有利区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 138-146.
[15] 岳世俊, 刘应如, 项燚伟, 王玉林, 陈汾君, 郑长龙, 景紫岩, 张婷静. 一种水侵气藏动态储量和水侵量计算新方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 153-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .