岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 121–127.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210413

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多元线性回归的地层平均速度分析及应用——以渤海A油田为例

谷志猛, 明君, 刘传奇, 王腾   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司天津分公司 渤海石油研究院, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-11 修回日期:2020-11-05 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
  • 第一作者:谷志猛(1982-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事构造解释与储层预测方面的研究工作。地址:(300452)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号海洋大厦B座。Email:lengyangu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“近海隐蔽油气藏勘探技术”(编号:2011ZX05023)资助

Analysis and application of formation average velocity based on multiple linear regression: A case study from A oilfield in Bohai Sea

GU Zhimeng, MING Jun, LIU Chuanqi, WANG Teng   

  1. Bohai Oilfield Research Institute, Tianjin Branch, CNOOC, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2020-05-11 Revised:2020-11-05 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

摘要: 为了反映地下构造特征,通常采用地层平均速度进行时深转换,而影响地层平均速度的因素很多,要得到准确的速度值并不容易。在稳定的沉积条件下进行地层平均速度公式推导,通过分析影响地层平均速度的敏感因素,将其转化为包含流体信息的含气比、含油比和砂地比的多元线性拟合公式,利用已知钻井信息通过最小二乘法求解未知项,得到最终的地层平均速度表达式。数值模拟结果和在渤海A油田的应用实例表明,多元线性回归的平均速度公式的计算结果与真实值的相对误差低于0.5%,具有较高的预测精度。该方法对类似地质条件地区具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 平均速度, 多元线性回归, 砂地比, 最小二乘法, 低幅度构造

Abstract: Formation average velocity is often used for time depth conversion to reflect the real characteristics of underground structures,however,there are many factors that affect formation average velocity and it is not easy to get the accurate velocity value. The formation average velocity formula was derived under stable deposition conditions,and it was transformed into a multiple linear fitting formula of gas-sand ratio,oil-sand ratio and sandstrata ratio by analyzing the sensitive factors affecting the formation average velocity of the study layer. The known drilling information was brought into the formula and the unknown term was solved by the least square method,then the final average velocity expression was obtained. The results of numerical simulation and application in A oilfield in Bohai Sea show that the calculated value of average velocity formula based on multiple linear regression has high prediction accuracy,the relative error between the calculated value and the real value is less than 0.5%. This method can be used for reference in areas with similar geological conditions.

Key words: average velocity, multivariate linear regression, sand-strata ratio, least-square method, low-amplitude structure

中图分类号: 

  • P631.8
[1] 李伍志, 王璞珺,张功成, 等.珠江口盆地深部基底地层的地震时深转换研究.地球物理学报, 2011, 54(2):449-456. LI W Z, WANG P J, ZHANG G C, et al. Researches on timedepth conversion of deep-seated basal strata of Pearl River Mouth Basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(2):449-456.
[2] RUSSELL B. A simple seismic imaging exercise. The Leading Edge, 1998, 19(7):885-889.
[3] 王华忠, 冯波, 李辉, 等.各种速度分析与反演方法的对比研究.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(5):1-11. WANG H Z, FENG B, LI H, et al. Comparison among velocity analysis and inversion methods. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(5):1-11.
[4] 陈林, 邓勇, 盖永浩, 等.复杂断块构造时深转换方法探讨:以涠西南凹陷为例.地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(3):1121-1127. CHEN L, DENG Y, GAI Y H, et al. Exploration of time-depth conversion method in complicated fault block:Take Weixinan sag for example. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(3):1121-1127.
[5] 韩令贺, 胡自多, 冯会元, 等.井震联合网格层析各向异速度建模研究及应用.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4):91-97. HAN L H, HU Z D, FENG H Y, et al. Grid tomography based on well-to-seismic integration in anisotropic velocity modeling and its application. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(4):91-97.
[6] 孔庆河, 李铭铭, 张文德.地震勘探中平均速度的求取方法及应用.辽宁工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 31(1):54-56. KONG Q H, LI M M, ZHANG W D. Calculation method of average velocity in seismic exploration and its application. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 31(1):54-56.
[7] 徐立恒, 鲜波, 薛玉英, 等.高精度地震时深转换方法研究及应用.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5):1712-1719. XU L H, XIAN B, XUE Y Y, et al. Study and application on seismic time-depth conversion with high-precision. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(5):1712-1719.
[8] 边立恩, 于茜, 谷志猛, 等.低速异常带平均速度场建模方法研究.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3):122-126. BIAN L E, YU Q, GU Z M, et al. Research on mean velocity field modeling method for low velocity anomaly zone:A case study from Q oilfield,Bohai. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3):122-126.
[9] 梁卫, 李熙盛, 罗东红, 等.井震时深转换技术在低幅度构造评价中的应用.中国海上油气, 2014, 26(3):61-64. LIANG W, LI X S, LUO D H, et al. Applying a technique of borehole seismic time-depth conversion to the evaluation of low relief structures. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(3):61-64.
[10] 蔡刚, 刘化清, 姚军, 等.变速成图方法应用:以歧南斜坡区为例.地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(2):947-953. CAI G, LIU H Q, YAO J, et al. Application of variable velocity structure mapping method:A case study of Qinan slope area. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(2):947-953.
[11] 虞永征, 杨长清.东海陆架盆地南部区域地震速度分析.海洋地质前沿,2018, 34(4):63-70. YU Y Z, YANG C Q. Analysis of velocity data from the south of East China Sea shelf basin. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2018, 34(4):63-70.
[12] 陆基孟. 地震勘探原理. 北京:中国石油大学出版社, 2008:195-203. LU J M. Principle of seismic exploration. Beijing:China University of Petroleum Press, 2008:195-203.
[13] 余为维, 冯磊, 杜艳艳.旬邑地区野外露头岩性组合地震反射特征研究.特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5):24-29. YU W W, FENG L, DU Y Y. Seismic reflection characterization of field outcrop lithology association in Xunyi. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(5):24-29.
[14] 胡修权, 施泽进, 王长城, 等.涪陵地区飞仙关组储层地球物理响应特征及正演模拟.地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(3):1148-1156. HU X Q, SHI Z J, WANG C C, et al. Reservoir geophysical response feature and forward modeling of Feixianguan Formation in Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(3):1148-1156.
[15] 苑雅轩, 樊太亮, 苑学军, 等.塔河油田蓬莱坝组异常地震特征及地质成因分析.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):98-108. YUAN Y X, FAN T L, YUAN X J, et al. Characteristics and geological genesis of anomalous seismic facies of Penglaiba Formation in Tahe Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):98-108.
[1] 窦立荣, 李志, 杨紫, 张兴阳, 康海亮, 张明军, 张良杰, 丁梁波. 中国石油海外岩性地层油气藏勘探进展与前景展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 1-9.
[2] 陈国文, 邓志文, 姜太亮, 张军勇, 于雪娇, 祁成业, 郗晓萍. 纵横波联合解释技术在气云区的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 79-87.
[3] 李小燕, 乔华伟, 张建魁, 马俊杰, 闫江涛, 李树同. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层矿物含量与孔隙度的线性关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2): 66-74.
[4] 潘有军, 荆文波, 徐赢, 赵嗣君, 李继成, 陶登海. 火山岩油藏水平井体积压裂产能预测研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 159-164.
[5] 袁 瑞,朱 锐,瞿建华,孙玉,唐 勇,潘 进. 一种基于岩石薄片图像的粒度分析新方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 104-107.
[6] 边立恩, 于 茜, 谷志猛, 韩自军, 屈 勇. 低速异常带平均速度场建模方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 122-126.
[7] 付广,夏云清. 南堡凹陷东一段油气成藏与分布的主控因素及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6): 27-31.
[8] 白晓寅,郭娟娟,陈永波,王斌,黄玉. S 变换在低幅度构造识别中的应用———以准噶尔盆地腹部陆10—陆6井区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(5): 83-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .