岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 116–127.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220411

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征

白雨1, 汪飞1, 牛志杰1, 金开来2, 李沛毅2, 许多年3, 陈刚强2   

  1. 1. 中国石油新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区 石油学院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院 西北分院, 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-05 修回日期:2021-12-04 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 陈刚强(1983-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油气成藏方面的研究工作。Email:25654678@qq.com。 E-mail:25654678@qq.com
  • 作者简介:白雨(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气勘探地质研究工作。地址:(834000)新疆克拉玛依市克拉玛依区准噶尔路32号。Email:741366305@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    自然资源部“十三五”全国油气资源评价项目“新疆油田探区‘十三五’油气资源及经济、环境评价进展”（编号：135YQZP-2017-KT09）资助

Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin

BAI Yu1, WANG Fei1, NIU Zhijie1, JIN Kailai2, LI Peiyi2, XU Duonian3, CHEN Gangqiang2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. Faculty of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2021-11-05 Revised:2021-12-04 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-07

PDF (PC)

172

摘要： 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷及其周缘累计探明石油地质储量近30×108 t，油源主要来自凹陷内的二叠系风城组碱湖相烃源岩。通过黄金管热模拟试验，并采用Kinetic软件进行计算，获得了玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩的各类烃产率和动力学参数，建立了生烃模式，进而对该套烃源岩的生烃能力进行了综合评价。研究结果表明：①玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖相烃源岩总烃产率高达412.24 mg/（g·TOC），其中液态烃类产率随温度升高先增加而后降低，高峰温度为420~460℃，气态烃产率持续增加，总产油率高于产气率，气态烃碳同位素具油型气特征。②风城组碱湖相烃源岩C1，C2—C5，C6—C14，C14+的生成活化能主峰值分别为268 kJ/mol，255 kJ/mol，251 kJ/mol，247 kJ/mol。③玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖相烃源岩的生烃模式与国内外14个不同盆地具有相似性，均为早期出现生油高峰、晚期持续生气的特征，且单位TOC的生烃能力中等偏上。

关键词: 生烃动力学, 烃源岩, 黄金管热模拟, 油型气, 风城组, 二叠系, 玛湖凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: The total proven reserves in Mahu Sag and its surrounding areas in Junggar Basin are nearly 30×108 t, and the oil mainly comes from the alkali lacustrine source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in the sag. Based on thermal simulation data of gold tube experiment,combined with the calculation with Kinetic software, various hydrocarbon yields and kinetic parameters of the source rocks of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag were obtained,the hydrocarbon generation model was established,and then the hydrocarbon generation capacity of this set of source rocks was evaluated. The results show that:(1)The total hydrocarbon yield of alkali lacustrine source rocks of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag is as high as 412.24 mg/(g·TOC),in which the liquid hydrocarbon yield first increases and then decreases with the increase of temperature,the peak temperature is between 420℃ and 460℃,the gaseous hydrocarbon yield continues to increase,the total oil production rate is higher than the gas production rate, and the carbon isotope of gaseous hydrocarbon has the characteristics of oil-formed gas.(2)The peaks of activation energy of C1, C2-C5, C6-C14 and C14+ of the source rocks of Fengcheng Formation are 268 kJ/mol, 255 kJ/mol, 251 kJ/mol and 247 kJ/mol respectively.(3)The hydrocarbon generation model of alkali lacustrine source rocks of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag is similar to that of source rocks in 14 different basins at home and abroad. It has the characteristics of early oil generation peak and late continuous gas generation, and per unit TOC has upper-middle hydrocarbon generation capacity.

Key words: hydrocarbon generation kinetics, source rocks, gold tube thermal simulation, oil-formed gas, Fengcheng Formation, Permian, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 苏鹏, 徐建永, 汪航, 等.南黄海盆地南二凹古近系泥岩生烃动力学特征[J].高校地质学报, 2019, 25(6):871-878. SU Peng, XU Jianyong, WANG Hang, et al. Kinetics characteristics of hydrocarbon generation of Paleogene shales in the Naner Sag, South Yellow Sea Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2019, 25(6):871-878.
[2] 谢明贤, 陈广坡, 李娟, 等.海拉尔盆地外围凹陷南一段烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):24-33. XIE Mingxian, CHEN Guangpo, LI Juan, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks of the first member of Nantun Formation in peripheral sags of Hailar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):24-33.
[3] 刘大永, 彭平安, 林会喜, 等.生烃动力学、同位素动力学方法在烃源岩研究中的应用[J].地质通报, 2006, 25(9/10):1201-1204. LIU Dayong, PENG Ping'an, LIN Huixi, et al. Application of hydrocarbon generation kinetics and isotopic distillation kinetics to the study of hydrocarbon source rocks[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25(9/10):1201-1204.
[4] 汤庆艳, 张铭杰, 张同伟, 等.生烃热模拟实验方法述评[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(1):52-62. TANG Qingyan, ZHANG Mingjie, ZHANG Tongwei, et al. A review on pyrolysis experimentation on hydrocarbon generation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(1):52-62.
[5] 饶松, 胡圣标, 汪集旸, 等.有机质生烃动力学参数研究进展:回顾和展望[J].地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(4):1424-1432. RAO Song, HU Shengbiao, WANG Jiyang, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetic parameters of organic matter:Review and outlook[J]. Progress in Geophysics(in Chinese), 2010, 25(4):1424-1432.
[6] 陈晓艳, 田福清, 邹华耀, 等.湖相烃源岩热演化生烃研究:基于冀中坳陷烃源岩加水热模拟实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1):103-113. CHEN Xiaoyan, TIAN Fuqing, ZOU Huayao, et al. Study on hydrocarbon-generation of lacustrine source rocks based on hydrous pyrolysis experiments of source rocks from Jizhong Depresssion, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(1):103-113.
[7] 刘洋, 何坤, 李贤庆, 等.湖相烃源岩生烃动力学及排油效率:以松辽盆地青山口组为例[J].现代地质, 2016, 30(3):627-634. LIU Yang, HE Kun, LI Xianqing, et al. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics and the efficiency of petroleum expulsion of Lacustrine source rocks:Taking the Qingshankou Formation in the Songliao Basin as an example[J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30(3):627-634.
[8] 熊敏. 惠民凹陷西部烃源岩生排烃动力学与勘探方向研究[D].广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所, 2007. XIONG Min. Petroleum generation and expulsion kinetics of source rocks from the western Huimin Depression and exploration potential[D]. Guangzhou:Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007.
[9] 王建宝, 肖贤明, 郭汝泰, 等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J].石油实验地质, 2003, 25(4):403-409. WANG Jianbao, XIAO Xianming, GUO Rutai, et al. Study on the hydrocarbon generation kinetics of source rocks from the Dongying Depression, the Bohaiwan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2003, 25(4):403-409.
[10] 曹怀仁. 松辽盆地烃源岩形成环境与页岩油地质评价研究[D].广州:中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2017. CAO Huairen. Formation environment of source rocks and geological evaluation of shale oil in Songliao Basin[D]. Guangzhou:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2017.
[11] 邓模, 翟常博, 杨振恒, 等.低成熟海相黑色页岩生烃特征的热模拟实验[J].科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(1):130-137. DENG Mo, ZHAI Changbo, YANG Zhenheng, et al. Thermal simulation experiment on hydrocarbon generation characteristics of low-mature marine black shale[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(1):130-137.
[12] 单云.芦草沟组干酪根的生烃模式及产物谱学特征研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2018. SHAN Yun.Hydrocarbon evolution pattern and spectrum characteristics of products of kerogen of Lucaogou Formation[D]. Guangzhou:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2018.
[13] 耿新华, 耿安松.济阳坳陷下古生界碳酸盐岩二次生烃及其动力学研究[J].海相油气地质, 2011, 16(1):56-62. GENG Xinhua, GENG Ansong. Kinetics of the secondary hydrocarbon generation of Lower Palaeozoic marine carbonate source rocks in Jiyang Depression, Bohaiwan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2011, 16(1):56-62.
[14] 王宁, 李荣西, 王香增, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地山西组海陆过渡相页岩生烃动力学及页岩气形成过程研究[J].地球化学, 2019, 48(5):493-501. WANG Ning, LI Rongxi, WANG Xiangzeng, et al. Generation kinetics and generation process of transitional facies shale gas for Shanxi Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Geochemistry, 2019, 48(5):493-501.
[15] 耿新华, 耿安松, 熊永强, 等.海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩热解动力学研究:气液态产物演化[J]. 科学通报, 2006, 51(5):582-588. GENG Xinhua, GENG Ansong, XIONG Yongqiang, et al. Pyrolysis kinetics of marine carbonate source rocks:Evolution characteristics of gas-liquid products[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 51(5):582-588.
[16] SHAO Deyong, ZHANG Tongwei, KO L T, et al. Experimental investigation of oil generation, retention, and expulsion within type Ⅱ kerogen-dominated marine shales:Insights from gold-tube nonhydrous pyrolysis of Barnett and Woodford Shales using miniature core plugs[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2020, 217:103337.
[17] WANG Zixiang, TANG Youjun, WANG Yongli,et al. Kinetics of shale oil generation from kerogen in saline basin and its exploration significance:An example from the Eocene Qianjiang Formation, Jianghan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2020, 150(2):104885.
[18] 刘敏, 张顺存, 孔玉华, 等.准噶尔盆地西北缘风城地区二叠系风城组沉积相研究[J].新疆地质, 2013, 31(3):236-242. LIU Min, ZHANG Shuncun, KONG Yuhua, et al. The sedimentary faceis research of Fengcheng Formation of Permian in Fengcheng area, the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2013, 31(3):236-242.
[19] 刘文彬.准噶尔盆地西北缘风城组沉积环境探讨[J].沉积学报, 1989, 7(1):61-70. LIU Wenbin. Study on sedimentary environment of Fengcheng Formation at northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1989, 7(1):61-70.
[20] 尤兴弟.准噶尔盆地西北缘风城组沉积相探讨[J].新疆石油地质, 1986, 7(1):49-54. YOU Xingdi. Study on sedimentary facies of Fengcheng Formation at northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1986, 7(1):49-54.
[21] 王小军, 王婷婷, 曹剑, 等.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J].新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1):9-15. WANG Xiaojun, WANG Tingting, CAO Jian, et al. Basic characteristics and highly efficient hydrocarbon generation of alkaline-lacustrine source rocks in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1):9-15.
[22] 任江玲, 靳军, 马万云, 等.玛湖凹陷早二叠世咸化湖盆风城组烃源岩生烃潜力精细分析[J].地质论评, 2017, 63(增刊1):51-52. REN Jiangling, JIN Jun, MA Wanyun, et al. Analysis of hydrocarbon potential of Fengcheng saline lacustrine source rock of Lower Permian in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2017, 63(Suppl 1):51-52.
[23] HORSFIELD B, CURRY D J, BOHACS K, et a. Organic geochemistry of freshwater and alkaline lacustrine sediments in the Green River Formation of the Washakie Basin, Wyoming, U.S. A[. J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1994, 22(3/4/5):415-440.
[24] 李任伟.蒸发盐环境沉积岩有机质和生油研究[M].北京:海洋出版社, 1993:62-148. LI Renwei. Study on organic matter and oil generation of sedimentary rocks in evaporative salt environment[M]. Beijing:China Ocean Press, 1993:62-148.
[25] 李苗苗, 马素萍, 夏燕青, 等.泌阳凹陷核桃园组湖相烃源岩微观形态特征与形成机制[J].岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):45-50. LI Miaomiao, MA Suping, XIA Yanqing, et al. Microscopic morphology and formation mechanism of lacustrine source rocks of Hetaoyuan Formation in Biyang Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):45-50.
[26] 曹剑, 雷德文, 李玉文, 等.古老碱湖优质烃源岩:准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(7):781-790. CAO Jian, LEI Dewen, LI Yuwen, et al. Ancient high-quality alkaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7):781-790.
[27] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区三叠系百口泉组扇控大面积岩性油藏勘探实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(7):14-23. KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al. Exploration of fan-controlled large-area lithologic oil reservoirs of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in slope zone of Mahu Depression in Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(7):14-23.
[28] 陈刚强, 安志渊, 阿布力米提, 等.玛湖凹陷及其周缘石炭-二叠系油气勘探前景[J].新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(7):259-263. CHEN Gangqiang, AN Zhiyuan, ABULIMITI, et al. Petroleum exploration prospects of Carboniferous-Permian in Peripheral Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(7):259-263.
[29] 张善文.准噶尔盆地哈拉阿拉特山地区风城组烃源岩的发现及石油地质意义[J].石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(2):145-152. ZHANG Shanwen. Identification and its petroleum geologic significance of the Fengcheng Formation source rocks in Hala' alt area, the northern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(2):145-152.
[30] 陈建平, 王绪龙, 邓春萍, 等.准噶尔盆地油气源、油气分布与油气系统[J].地质学报, 2016, 90(3):421-450. CHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, DENG Chunping, et al. Oil and gas source, occurrence and petroleum system in the Junggar Basin,northewest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(3):421-450.
[31] 刘金钟.岩石样品的生烃动力学高压热模拟实验方法和装置:CN101149363[P].2008-03-26. LIU Jinzhong. High pressure thermal simulation experiment methods and device for hydrocarbon generation kinetics of rock samples:CN101149363[P]. 2008-03-26.
[32] 国家能源局.黄金管生烃热模拟实验方法:SY/T 7035-2016[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2016. National Energy Administration. Method of thermal simulation in gold tubes for hydrocarbon generation of source rocks:SY/T 7035-2016[S]. Beijing:Oil Industry Press, 2016.
[33] 何坤, 张水昌, 米敬奎.原油裂解的动力学及控制因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(2):211-218. HE Kun, ZHANG Shuichang, MI Jingkui. Research on the kinetics and controlling factors for oil cracking[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(2):211-218.
[34] 熊加贝, 何登发.全球碳酸盐岩地层-岩性大油气田分布特征及其控制因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):187-200. XIONG Jiabei, HE Dengfa. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of global giant carbonate stratigraphic-lithologic oil and gas fields[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):187-200.
[35] 刘得光, 周路, 李世宏, 等.玛湖凹陷风城组烃源岩特征与生烃模式[J].沉积学报, 2020, 38(5):946-955. LIU Deguang, ZHOU Lu, LI Shihong, et al. Characteristics of source rocks and hydrocarbon generation models of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(5):946-955.
[36] 胡涛, 庞雄奇, 于飒, 等.准噶尔盆地风城地区风城组烃源岩生排烃特征及致密油资源潜力[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(2):427-439. HU Tao, PANG Xiongqi, YU Sa, et al. Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics of P1f source rocks and tight oil accumulation potential of Fengcheng area on northwest margin of Junggar Basin, northwest China[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2017, 48(2):427-439.
[37] 何文军, 王绪龙, 邹阳, 等.准噶尔盆地石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].海相油气地质, 2019, 24(2):75-84. HE Wenjun, WANG Xulong, ZOU Yang, et al. The geological conditions, resource potential and exploration direction of oil in Junggar Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(2):75-84.
[1] 阴钰毅, 姚志纯, 郭小波, 王乐立, 陈思谦, 余小雷, 岑向阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘二叠系隐伏构造特征及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 79-88.
[2] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[3] 张俊龙, 何幼斌, 梁建设, 邱春光, 吴东胜, 李华, 童乐. 东非海岸盆地下侏罗统沉积特征及其控源作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 128-140.
[4] 雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
[5] 柳忠泉, 曾治平, 田继军, 李艳丽, 李万安, 张文文, 张治恒. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组“甜点”成因与分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 15-28.
[6] 肖威, 张兵, 姚永君, 王艳, 杨洪宇, 杨凯. 川东二叠系龙潭组页岩岩相特征与沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 152-162.
[7] 屈童, 高岗, 徐新德, 王瑞, 甘军, 梁刚, 游君君. 三角洲—浅海沉积体系泥质沉积规律模拟实验——以琼东南盆地崖南凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 24-33.
[8] 张小琴, 李威, 王飞龙, 王宁, 徐耀辉, 刘岩, 程如蛟, 刘华秋. 辽东湾地区古近系烃源岩生物标志物特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 73-85.
[9] 常少英, 刘玲利, 崔钰瑶, 王锋, 宋明星, 穆晓亮. 浅水三角洲薄砂层地震沉积表征技术——以准噶尔盆地芳草湖地区清水河组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 139-147.
[10] 阳宏, 刘成林, 王飞龙, 汤国民, 李国雄, 曾晓祥, 吴育平. 渤中凹陷东营组古沉积环境及烃源岩发育模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 81-92.
[11] 潘宾锋, 高月泉, 潘涛, 李宗贤, 王志伟, 邱文波, 封蓉. 银额盆地拐子湖凹陷北部地区白垩系烃源岩特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 114-123.
[12] 陈永波, 张虎权, 张寒, 曾华会, 王斌, 王洪求, 许多年, 马永平, 宗兆云. 基于OVT域偏移数据的云质岩储层预测技术及应用——以玛湖凹陷乌夏地区风三段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 145-155.
[13] 杜猛, 向勇, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 张景, 张代燕. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 120-131.
[14] 毛锐, 牟立伟, 王刚, 樊海涛. 基于核磁共振自由弛豫特征的含油性评价方法——以玛湖凹陷下乌尔禾组砾岩储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 140-147.
[15] 马博, 吉利明, 张明震, 金培红, 苑伯超, 龙礼文. 酒西盆地红柳峡地区下白垩统烃源岩孢粉相与沉积古环境特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 22-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蔡佳，姜华，赵忠新，!陈少平，罗家群. 泌阳凹陷下二门油田南部H31层序沉积体系及沉积相演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 53 -58 .
[2] 李相博，刘化清，完颜容，魏立花，廖建波，马玉虎. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组砂质碎屑流储集体的首次发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 19 -21 .
[3] 王春连，侯中健，刘丽红. 板桥—北大港地区沙三段重力流沉积特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 45 -49 .
[4] 钟倩倩，黄思静，邹明亮，佟宏鹏，黄可可，张雪花. 碳酸盐岩中白云石有序度的控制因素———来自塔河下古生界和川东北三叠系的研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 50 -55 .
[5] 加东辉，周心怀，李建平，赖维成，刘小鸿，李军. 一种少井地区“岩性圈闭表征”的思路———以辽东湾地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 124 -129 .
[6] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[7] 王秋语. 国外高含水砂岩油田提高水驱采收率技术进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3): 123 -128 .
[8] 乔博，张昌民，杜家元，朱锐. 珠江口盆地浅水区和深水区重力流沉积特征对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(2): 59 -63 .
[9] 郭秋麟，周长迁，陈宁生，胡俊文，谢红兵. 非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(4): 12 -19 .
[10] 崔维平，杨玉卿. 利用测井资料识别重力流沉积及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(5): 78 -81 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发