岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 47–59.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220604

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制

文志刚1,2, 罗雨舒1,2, 刘江艳3, 赵春雨4, 李士祥3, 田伟超1,2, 樊云鹏1,2, 高和婷1,2   

  1. 1. 油气地球化学与环境湖北省重点实验室(长江大学资源与环境学院), 武汉 430100;
    2. 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室 (长江大学), 武汉 430100;
    3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 西安 710018;
    4. 中国石油长庆油田分公司 第十一采油厂, 甘肃 庆阳 745100
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-08 修回日期:2022-05-31 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 第一作者:文志刚(1965-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气地球化学及石油地质学等方面的教学与研究工作。地址:(430100)湖北省武汉市蔡甸区蔡甸街大学路111号。Email:wzg728@sina.com
  • 通信作者: 罗雨舒(1997-),女,长江大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为油气地球化学。Email:3264713690@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油科技创新基金项目“砂砾岩致密油赋存特征及可动用性研究”(编号: 2020D-5007-0101)、中国博士后科学基金项目“砂砾岩致密油可动用性研究” (编号: 2020M682376)和国家科技重大专项“我国油气地质理论重大进展与未来需求”(编号: 2017ZX-05001005-002-001)联合资助

Pore structure characteristics and genetic mechanism of Triassic Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in Longdong area

WEN Zhigang1,2, LUO Yushu1,2, LIU Jiangyan3, ZHAO Chunyu4, LI Shixiang3, TIAN Weichao1,2, FAN Yunpeng1,2, GAO Heting1,2   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry and Environment(Yangtze University), Wuhan 430100, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources(Yangtze University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430100, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi' an 710018, China;
    4. No. 11 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Qingyang 745100, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-05-08 Revised:2022-05-31 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-09

摘要: 通过高压压汞、低温氮气吸附和核磁共振等实验,表征了鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层的孔隙结构特征,并探讨了成岩作用对孔隙结构的影响。研究结果表明:①陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层主要为长石岩屑砂岩和岩屑长石砂岩,孔隙度平均为7.55%,渗透率平均为0.149 mD,属于典型的特低孔、超低渗储层,储集空间类型以溶蚀孔、残余粒间孔、黏土晶间孔为主,并发育少量微裂缝; ②储层整体排驱压力较高,为0.67~27.54 MPa,平均为5.54 MPa,最大进汞饱和度较低,为33.22%~84.35%,平均为64.71%,且平均喉道半径小,为0.008~0.163 μm,平均为0.277 μm,表现出强非均质性特征;③研究区典型样品的等温线形态均呈反“S”型,属于典型的Ⅳ型等温线,易出现H3型“滞回环”现象,孔径小于200 nm的孔隙以平行板状为主;④研究区长7段页岩油储层的孔径大多小于30 μm,且随着样品物性的变好,储层内较大尺寸孔隙(大于200 nm)的占比逐渐增多;⑤研究区长7段页岩油储层经历了较强压实、较弱胶结与较弱溶蚀等3种成岩作用,其中胶结作用和压实作用具有负面影响,溶蚀作用对储层品质和孔隙结构的改善具有建设性作用。

关键词: 微观孔隙结构, 成岩作用, 成因机制, 页岩油储层, 长7, 三叠系, 陇东地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: The pore structure characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil reservoir were characterized by high pressure mercury injection(HPMI), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption(LTNA), and nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR), and the effects of dominant diagenesis on pore structure were discussed. The results show that: (1)The shale oil reservoir of Triassic Chang 7 member in Longdong area is mainly feldspathic lithic sandstone and lithic arkose, with an average porosity of 7.55% and an average permeability of 0.149 mD,belonging to typical ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. The reservoir space types are mainly dissolved pores, residual intergranular pores and clay intercrystalline pores, and a small amount of micro fractures are developed.(2)The reservoir is characterized by high displacement pressure, ranging from 0.67 MPa to 27.54 MPa, with an average of 5.54 MPa low maximum mercury saturation, ranging from 33.22% to 84.35%, with an average of 64.71%, and small average throat radius, ranging from 0.008 μm to 0.163 μm, with an average of 0.277 μm., showing strong heterogeneity. (3)The isotherms of the typical samples in the study area are all in an inverse S shape, belonging to a typical type Ⅳ isotherm. The type of hysteresis loop is dominated by type H3,indicating that the shape of pores less than 200 nm is mainly parallel plate shape.(4)The pore diameter of Chang 7 shale oil reservoir in the study area is mostly less than 30 μm. With the improvement of physical properties of samples,the proportion of larger pores (greater than 200 nm)in the reservoir increases gradually.(5)The shale oil reservoir of Chang 7 member in the study area has experienced three types of diagenesis: strong compaction, weak cementation and weak dissolution. Cementation and compaction have a negative effect,and dissolution has a constructive effect on the improvement of reservoir quality and pore structure.

Key words: microscopic pore structure, genesis, genetic mechanism, shale oil reservoir, Chang 7 member, Triassic, Longdong area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 王倩茹, 陶士振, 关平.中国陆相盆地页岩油研究及勘探开发进展[J].天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(3):417-427. WANG Qianru, TAO Shizhen, GUAN Ping. Progress in research and exploration & development of shale oil in continental basins in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(3):417-427.
[2] 付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7 段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5):870-883. FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5):870-883.
[3] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12. ZOU Caineng, PAN Shiqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[4] 马文忠, 王永宏, 张三, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区长7 段页岩油储层微观特征及控制因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(12):1810-1821. MA Wenzhong, WANG Yonghong, ZHANG San, et al. Microscopic characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 7 member shale oil reservoir in northern Shanxi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(12):1810-1821.
[5] 付金华, 郭雯, 李士祥, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7 段多类型页岩油特征及勘探潜力[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(12):1749- 1761. FU Jinhua, GUO Wen, LI Shixiang, et al. Characteristics and exploration potential of muti-type shale oil in the 7th member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(12):1749-1761.
[6] 付金华, 李士祥, 刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地石油勘探地质理论与实践[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6):1091-1101. FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, LIU Xianyang. Geological theory and practice of petroleum exploration in the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6):1091-1101.
[7] 赵雪娇, 王震亮, 范昌育, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7 段烃源岩排烃机制及成藏意义[J].油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(1):35-38. ZHAO Xuejiao, WANG Zhenliang, FAN Changyu, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion dynamic conditions and accumulation significance of petroleum of source rocks in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(1):35-38.
[8] 宋平, 李文厚, 卢进才, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬源-陇东地区三叠系延长组长7 段致密储层成岩作用[J].地质通报, 2016, 35(增刊1):415-423. SONG Ping, LI Wenhou, LU Jincai, et al. A study of tight reservoir diagenesis in the Chang 7 member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Jiyuan-Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(Suppl 1):415-423.
[9] 高永亮, 文志刚, 李威.湖相富有机质细粒沉积岩地球化学特征及其对致密油气成藏的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长7 段为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5):729-739. GAO Yongliang, WEN Zhigang, LI Wei. Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine organic-rich fine-grained sedimentary rocks and its effects on the accumulation of tight oil:Case study of Chang 7 member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(5):729-739.
[10] 梁晓伟, 鲜本忠, 冯胜斌, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7 段重力流砂体构型及其主控因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2022, 40(3):641-652. LIANG Xiaowei, XIAN Benzhong, FENG Shengbin, et al. Architecture and main controls of gravity-flow sandbodies in Chang 7 member, Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(3):641-652.
[11] 李超正, 柳广弟, 曹喆, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7 段致密砂岩微孔隙特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7):1235- 1247. LI Chaozheng, LIU Guangdi, CAO Zhe, et al. The study of Chang 7 tight sandstone micro pore characteristics in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(7):1235-1247.
[12] 徐永强, 何永宏, 陈小东, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7 致密储层微观孔喉特征及其对物性的影响[J]. 地质与勘探, 2019, 55(3):870-881. XU Yongqiang, HE Yonghong, CHEN Xiaodong, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore throats and their influence on physical properties of the Chang 7 tight reservoir in the Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2019, 55(3):870- 881.
[13] 孙超, 姚素平.页岩油储层孔隙发育特征及表征方法[J].油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1):153-164. SUN Chao, YAO Suping. Pore structure and characterization methods of shale oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1):153-164.
[14] 郭娟, 赵迪斐, 梁孝柏, 等.页岩纳米孔隙的结构量化表征:以川东南地区五峰组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5):113- 121. GUO Juan, ZHAO Difei, LIANG Xiaobo, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale nanopore structure:A case study of Wufeng Formation in southeastern Sichuan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5):113-121.
[15] 杨峰, 宁正福, 孔德涛, 等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(3):450-455. YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, KONG Detao, et al. Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):450-455.
[16] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864. ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, BAI Bin, et al. First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(6):1857-1864.
[17] TIAN Weichao, LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, et al. Study on the full-range pore size distribution and the movable oil distribution in glutenite[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(8):7028- 7042.
[18] 付晶, 吴胜和, 付金华, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组储层定量成岩相研究[J].地学前缘, 2013, 20(2):86-97. FU Jing, WU Shenghe, FU Jinhua, et al. Research on quantitative diagenetic facies of the Yanchang Formation in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2):86- 97.
[19] 钟大康, 祝海华, 孙海涛, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].地学前缘, 2013, 20(2):61-68. ZHONG Dakang, ZHU Haihua, Sun Haitao, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstones in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2):61-68.
[20] 吴浩, 张春林, 纪友亮, 等.致密砂岩孔喉大小表征及对储层物性的控制:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].石油学报, 2017, 38(8):876-887. WU Hao, ZHANG Chunlin, JI Youliang, et al. Pore-throat size characterization of tight sandstone and its control on reservoir physical properties:A case study of Yanchang Formation, eastern Gansu, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(8):876- 887.
[21] 付金华, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7 段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):601-614. FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, DAN Weidong, et al. The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang 7 member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):601-614.
[22] 沈健.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区致密砂岩储层碳酸盐胶结物特征及成因机理[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2):24-32. SHEN Jian. Carbonate cementation characteristics and genetic mechanism of tight sandstone reservoirs in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2):24-32.
[23] 惠潇, 侯云超, 喻建, 等.大型陆相坳陷湖盆深湖区前积型地震地层特征及砂体分布规律:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组中段为例[J].沉积学报, 2022, 40(3):787-800. HUI Xiao, HOU Yunchao, YU Jian, et al. Progradational seismic strata features and distribution of sandstone in the deep-water area of a large-scale lacustrine depression basin:A case study of the middle Yanchang Formation in Longdong, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(3):787-800.
[24] 何维领, 罗顺社, 李昱东, 等.斜坡背景下沉积物变形构造时空展布规律:以鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长7 油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6):62-72. HE Weiling, LUO Shunshe, LI Yudong, et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of soft-sediment deformation structures on slope:A case study of Chang 7 oil reservoir in Zhenyuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6):62-72.
[25] 魏钦廉, 王翀峘, 刘军峰, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地樊家川地区三叠系长63 储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):31-44. WEI Qinlian, WANG Chonghuan, LIU Junfeng, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Triassic Chang 63 reservoir in Fanjiachuan area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):31-44.
[26] 朱世发, 徐黎明, 朱筱敏, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长 4+5致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3):22-27. ZHU Shifa, XU Liming, ZHU Xiaomin, et al. Diagenetic characteristics of tight sandstone of Chang 4+5 reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3):22-27.
[27] ZHANG Quanpei, LIU Yicang, WANG Botao, et al. Effects of pore-throat structures on the fluid mobility in Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoirs of Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 135:105407.
[28] 杨永飞, 刘志辉, 姚军, 等.基于叠加数字岩心和孔隙网络模型的页岩基质储层孔隙空间表征方法[J].中国科学:技术科学, 2018, 48(5):488-498. YANG Yongfei, LIU Zhihui, YAO Jun, et al. Pore space characterization method of shale matrix formation based on superposed digital rock and pore-network model[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2018, 48(5):488-498.
[29] 肖佃师, 赵仁文, 杨潇, 等.海相页岩气储层孔隙表征、分类及贡献[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6):1215-1225. XIAO Dianshi, ZHAO Renwen, YANG Xiao, et al. Characterization, classification and contribution of marine shale gas reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6):1215-1225.
[30] SING K S W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity(Recommendations 1984)[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4):603-619.
[31] 张大智.利用氮气吸附实验分析致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征:以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6):898-908. ZHANG Dazhi. Characterization of microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone reservoirs through nitrogen adsorption experiment:Case study of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression, Songliao Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(6):898-908.
[32] 郭思祺, 肖佃师, 卢双舫, 等.徐家围子断陷沙河子组致密储层孔径分布定量表征[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(11):3742-3751. GUO Siqi, XIAO Dianshi, LU Shuangfang, et al. Quantificational characterization of tight reservoir pore size distribution of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2016, 47(11):3742-3751.
[33] 孙文峰, 李玮, 董智煜, 等.页岩孔隙结构表征方法新探索[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2):125-130. SUN Wenfeng, LI Wei, DONG Zhiyu, et al. A new approach to the characterization of shale pore structure[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2):125-130.
[34] 刘天定, 赵太平, 李高仁, 等.利用核磁共振评价致密砂岩储层孔径分布的改进方法[J].测井技术, 2012, 36(2):119-123. LIU Tianding, ZHAO Taiping, LI Gaoren, et al. An improved method to evaluate pore size distribution of tight sandstone reservoir using NMR[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(2):119-123.
[35] TIAN Weichao, LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, et al. Study on the full-range pore size distribution and the movable oil distribution in glutenite[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(8):7028- 7042.
[36] LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, RAN Ye, et al. Impact of diagenesis on the reservoir quality of tight oil sandstones:The case of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 7 oil layers in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 145:54-65.
[37] 陈威振, 田景春, 吕玉娟, 等.陇东地区长9 砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(3):342-353. CHEN Weizhen, TIAN Jingchun, LYU Yujuan, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of Chang 9 sandstone reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 46(3):342- 353.
[38] 庞军刚, 李文厚, 国吉安, 等.特低渗透-致密砂岩成岩作用特征及其差异性分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].地质科学, 2021, 56(1):121-135. PANG Jungang, LI Wenhou, GUO Ji' an, et al. Diagenesis characteristics and difference analysis of ultra-low permeability and tight sandstone:Taking Yanchang Formation in Longdong area of Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology (Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2021, 56(1):121-135.
[1] 赵军, 李勇, 文晓峰, 徐文远, 焦世祥. 基于斑马算法优化支持向量回归机模型预测页岩地层压力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 12-22.
[2] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[3] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[4] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[6] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[7] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[8] 何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[9] 宋志华, 李垒, 雷德文, 张鑫, 凌勋. 改进的U-Net网络小断层识别技术在玛湖凹陷玛中地区三叠系白碱滩组的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 40-49.
[10] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[11] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[12] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[13] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[14] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[15] 尹路, 许多年, 乐幸福, 齐雯, 张继娟. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组储层特征及油气成藏规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 59-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 张 俊. 隐蔽油气藏的概念与分类及其在实际应用中需要注意的问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 1 -8 .
[2] 雷卞军,张吉,王彩丽,王晓蓉,李世临,刘斌. 高分辨率层序地层对微相和储层的控制作者用——以靖边气田统5井区马五段上部为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 1 -7 .
[3] 杨杰,卫平生,李相博. 石油地震地质学的基本概念、内容和研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 1 -6 .
[4] 王延奇,胡明毅,刘富艳,王辉,胡治华. 鄂西利川见天坝长兴组海绵礁岩石类型及礁体演化阶段[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(3): 44 -48 .
[5] 代黎明, 李建平, 周心怀, 崔忠国, 程建春. 渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 75 -81 .
[6] 段友祥, 曹婧, 孙歧峰. 自适应倾角导向技术在断层识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 101 -107 .
[7] 黄龙,田景春,肖玲,王峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区长6砂岩储层特征及评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 83 -88 .
[8] 杨仕维,李建明. 震积岩特征综述及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 89 -94 .
[9] 李传亮,涂兴万. 储层岩石的2种应力敏感机制——应力敏感有利于驱油[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 111 -113 .
[10] 李君, 黄志龙, 李佳, 柳波. 松辽盆地东南隆起区长期隆升背景下的油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(1): 57 -61 .