岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 126–140.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220611

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段储层特征及勘探启示

耿夏童1,2, 邢凤存1,2, 闫海军3, 付辉4, 柴寒冰2, 刘志波2, 陈孝全2, 古强2   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610059;
    2. 成都理工大学沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    4. 成都北方石油勘探开发技术有限公司, 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-03 修回日期:2021-11-16 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 第一作者:耿夏童(1996-),女,成都理工大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为碳酸盐岩沉积学。地址:(610059)四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号成都理工大学。Email:419252340@qq.com
  • 通信作者: 邢凤存(1978-),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积学、油气储层地质学、层序地层学等方面的教学与研究工作。Email:xingfengcun2012@cdut.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“川北江油-剑阁地区早三叠世近源重力流滑塌砾石早期白云石化记录及其地质意义”（编号： 41672103）与国家自然科学基金项目“川东北早三叠世飞仙关期同期多排碳酸盐岩台缘带不对称沉积结构及成因”（编号： 41302089）联合资助

Reservoir characteristics of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation and its implications for oil and gas exploration in Moxi area，Sichuan Basin

GENG Xiatong1,2, XING Fengcun1,2, YAN Haijun3, FU Hui4, CHAI Hanbing2, LIU Zhibo2, CHEN Xiaoquan2, GU Qiang2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    2. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Chengdu North Petroleum Exploration and Development Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610051, China
  • Received:2021-11-03 Revised:2021-11-16 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-09

PDF (PC)

271

摘要： 综合岩心、薄片、成像测井等资料，在高精度层序地层划分及沉积相研究的基础上，对四川盆地磨溪地区震旦系灯影组四段的台缘丘、台缘丘后滩及局限台地等相带储层特征进行了描述和对比。研究结果表明：①磨溪地区灯影组四段可划分出2个三级层序、7个准层序组和13个准层序。②研究区台地边缘带可划分出台缘丘、台缘滩、丘（滩）间等亚相，在局限台地内部识别出了台内丘、台内滩、丘（滩）间、潟湖和局限潮下等亚相，并细分了微相类型。③台缘区与台内区的储集岩石类型、储集空间及储集类型等基本一致，受三级层序高位体系域控制，垂向上发育2套储层，低角度和高角度微裂缝密度垂向上差异较大，物性具有向上变好的趋势。④不同相带储层孔隙空间类型及储层物性存在差异，台缘微生物丘发育区储层物性好，微裂缝和孔洞发育好，台缘丘后滩发育区微裂缝和孔隙发育程度及储层物性均变差，台内区进一步变差，但远离台缘区的局限台地区仍发育良好储层。

关键词: 微生物丘, 台缘丘, 局限台地, 表生岩溶, 灯影组四段, 震旦系, 磨溪地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on the high-precision sequence stratigraphic division and sedimentary facies research， the reservoir characteristics of the platform-margin mound，the back shoal of platform-margin mound and the restricted platform of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Moxi area， Sichuan Basin were characterized and compared by using the data of cores， thin sections and imaging logging. The results show that： （1）The fourth member of Dengying Formation in Moxi area can be divided into two third-order sequences，seven parasequence sets and 13 parasequence.（2）Platform-margin mound， platform-margin shoal，inter-mound and shoal were recognized in platform-margin，and restricted platform were divided into inner mound，inner shoal，inter mound，lagoons and restricted subtidal subfacies，then the microfacies were divided further.（3）The reservoir rock type，reservoir space and reservoir type of platform-margin zone and intra-platform area are basically the same and controlled by the highstand systems tract. Two sets of reservoirs are developed vertically，low angle and high angle microfractures are differently developed vertically，and physical properties tend to improve upward.（4）The reservoir space types and physical properties in different facies zones are different. The platform-margin microbial mound has the characteristics of good reservoir physical properties， with microfractures and pores well developed. The development degree of microfractures and pores and physical properties in the development area of back shoal of platform-margin mound is weakened，and it is further weakened in the intra-platform zones. However，there are good reservoirs developed in the restricted platform far from the platform-margin zones.

Key words: microbial mound, platform-margin mound, restricted platform, supergene karst, the fourth member of Dengying Formation, Sinian, Moxi area, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 杨雨, 文龙, 谢继容, 等.四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩天然气勘探进展与方向[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):44-55. YANG Yu, WEN Long, XIE Jirong, et al. Progress and direction of marine carbonate gas exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):44-55.
[2] LUO Bin, YANG Yaoming, LUO Wenjun, et al. Controlling factors of Dengying Formation reservoirs in the central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Petroleum Research, 2017, 2(1):54-63.
[3] 邢凤存, 陆永潮, 郭彤楼, 等.碳酸盐岩台地边缘沉积结构差异及其油气勘探意义:以川东北早三叠世飞仙关期台地边缘带为例[J].岩石学报, 2017, 33(4):1305-1316. XING Fengcun, LU Yongchao, GUO Tonglou, et al. Sedimentary texture diversity of different carbonate platform marlins and its significance for petroleum exploration:A case study of carbonate platform marlins in Feixianguan period of the early Triassic, NE Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4):1305-1316.
[4] 汪泽成, 王铜山, 文龙, 等.四川盆地安岳特大型气田基本地质特征与形成条件[J].中国海上油气, 2016, 28(2):45-52. WANG Zecheng, WANG Tongshan, WEN Long, et al. Basic geological characteristics and accumulation conditions of Anyue giant gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(2):45-52.
[5] 李晓清, 汪泽成, 张兴为, 等.四川盆地古隆起特征及对天然气的控制作用[J].石油与天然气地质, 2016, 22(4):347-351. LI Xiaoqing, WANG Zecheng, ZHANG Xingwei, et al. Characteristics of Paleo-uplifts in Sichuan Basin and their control action on natural gases[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 22(4):347-351.
[6] 徐会林, 罗文军, 徐伟, 等.磨溪震旦系灯影组台内优质储层主控因素[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(3):11-18. XU Huilin, LUO Wenjun, XU Wei, et al. Main factors controlling intraplatform quality reservoirs of Sinian Dengying Formation, Moxi block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(3):11-18.
[7] 张明, 戴晓峰, 庞春晓, 等.川中地区震旦系灯影组台内带优质储层识别及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(5):764- 771. ZHANG Ming, DAI Xiaofeng, PANG Chunxiao, et al. Identification and application of the gas reservoirs in the intra-platform of the Sinian Dengying Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(5):764-771.
[8] 肖富森, 陈康, 冉崎, 等.四川盆地高石梯地区震旦系灯影组气藏高产井地震模式新认识[J].天然气工业, 2018, 38(2):8-15. XIAO Fusen, CHEN Kang, RAN Qi, et al. New understandings of the seismic modes of high productivity wells in the Sinian Dengying Formation gas reservoirs in the Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2):8-15.
[9] 朱讯, 徐伟, 李菡韵, 等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪区块灯四段沉积相变对岩溶储层发育影响[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41(3):51-57. ZHU Xun, XU Wei, LI Hanyun, et al. Effects of sedimentary facies change on development of karst reservoirs in Dengying 4 member, Gaoshiti-Moxi block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41(3):51-57.
[10] 兰才俊, 徐哲航, 马肖琳, 等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J].石油学报, 2019, 40(9):1069- 1084. LAN Caijun, XU Zhehang, MA Xiaolin, et al. Development and distribution of mound-shoal complex in the Sinian Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs Formation. Sichuan Basin and its control on reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9):1069-1084.
[11] 谢武仁, 杨威, 汪泽成, 等.台缘带特征、形成主控因素及其对油气成藏的控制:以四川盆地灯影组为例[J]. 地质科学, 2021, 56(3):867-883. XIE Wuren, YANG Wei, WANG Zecheng, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors on the development of a platform margin belt and its effect on hydrocarbon accumulation:A case study of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2021, 56(3):867-883.
[12] 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 田兴旺, 等.川中地区震旦系灯影组丘滩相储层差异性对勘探模式的影响[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(2):13-21. ZHANG Xihua, PENG Hanlin, TIAN Xingwang, et al. Influence of difference among bioherm beach facies reservoirs on exploration model:An example from Sinian Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(2):13-21.
[13] 邓韦克, 刘翔, 李翼杉.川中震旦系灯影组储集层形成及演化研究[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2015, 38(3):12-16. DENG Weike, LIU Xiang, LI Yishan. Reservoir formation and evolution of Sinian Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2015, 38(3):12-16.
[14] 李博媛, 张殿伟, 庞雄奇, 等.川北米仓山地区震旦系灯影组差异化岩溶作用分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(11):2075-2084. LI Boyuan, ZHANG Dianwei, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Differential karstification analysis of the Sinian Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(11):2075-2084.
[15] 李启桂, 李克胜, 周卓铸, 等.四川盆地桐湾不整合面古地貌特征与岩溶分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4):516-521. LI Qigui, LI Kesheng, ZHOU Zhuozhu, et al. Palaeogeomorphology and karst distribution of Tongwan unconformity in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(4):516-521.
[16] 张林, 万玉金, 杨洪志, 等.四川盆地高石梯构造灯影组四段溶蚀孔洞型储层类型及组合模式[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8):1191-1198. ZHANG Lin, WAN Yujin, YANG Hongzhi, et al. The type and combination pattern of karst vuggy reservoir in the fourth member of the Dengying Formation of Gaoshiti structure in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(8):1191-1198.
[17] ZHOU You, YANG Fengli, JI Youliang, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of dolomite karst reservoirs of the Sinian Dengying Formation, central Sichuan Basin, southwestern China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2020, 343:105708.
[18] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):12-22. PENG Jun, CHU Jiangtian, CHEN Youlian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
[19] 何溥为, 胥旺, 张连进, 等.川中磨溪-高石梯地区栖霞组白云岩特征及成因机制[J].沉积学报, 2021, 39(6):1532-1545. HE Puwei, XU Wang, ZHANG Lianjin, et al. Characteristics and genetic mechanism of Qixia Formation dolomite in MoxiGaoshiti area, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(6):1532-1545.
[20] 邢凤存, 侯明才, 林良彪, 等.四川盆地晚震旦世-早寒武世构造运动记录及动力学成因讨论[J].地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):115-125. XING Fengcun, HOU Mingcai, LIN Liangbiao, et al. The records and its dynamic genesis discussion of tectonic movement during the Late Sinian and the Early Cambrian of Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):115-125.
[21] 杨帆, 刘立峰, 冉启全, 等.四川盆地磨溪地区灯四段风化壳岩溶储层特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2):43-53. YANG Fan, LIU Lifeng, RAN Qiquan, et al. Characteristics of weathering crust karst reservoir of Deng 4 member in Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2):43-53.
[22] 李英强, 何登发, 文竹.四川盆地及邻区晚震旦世古地理与构造-沉积环境演化[J].古地理学报, 2013, 15(2):231-245. LI Yingqiang, HE Dengfa, WEN Zhu. Palaeogeography and tectonic-depositional environment evolution of the Late Sinian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2013, 15(2):231-245.
[23] 夏青松, 黄成刚, 杨雨然, 等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系灯影组储层特征及主控因素[J].地质论评, 2021, 67(2):441-458. XIA Qingsong, HUANG Chenggang, YANG Yuran, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of oil and gas accumulation of Dengying Formation, Sinian system, in GaoshitiMoxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2021, 67(2):441-458.
[24] 邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3):278-293. ZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):278-293.
[25] 刘树根, 孙玮, 罗志立, 等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(5):511-520. LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LUO Zhili, et al. Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(5):511-520.
[26] 徐欣, 胡明毅, 高达.磨溪-高石梯地区灯影组四段微生物岩沉积特征及主控因素[J].中国海上油气, 2018, 30(2):25-34. XU Xin, HU Mingyi, GAO Da. Sedimentary characteristics and main control factors for microbialite of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area,central Sichuan Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(2):25-34.
[27] YANG Wei, WEI Guoqi, XIE Wuren, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration prospect of mound-shoal complexes on the platform margin of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in the east of Mianzhu-Changning intracratonic rift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1262-1274.
[28] 闫海军, 邓惠, 万玉金, 等.四川盆地磨溪区块灯影组四段强非均质性碳酸盐岩气藏气井产能分布特征及其对开发的指导意义[J].天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8):1152-1160. YAN Haijun, DENG Hui, WAN Yujin, et al. The gas well productivity distribution characteristics in strong heterogeneity carbonate gas reservoir in the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(8):1152-1160.
[29] 周文, 徐浩, 余谦, 等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):18-25. ZHOU Wen, XU Hao, YU Qian, et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):18-25.
[30] 徐昉昊, 袁海锋, 徐国盛, 等.四川盆地磨溪构造寒武系龙王庙组流体充注和油气成藏[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3):426-435. XU Fanghao, YUAN Haifeng, XU Guosheng, et al. Fluid charging and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of Moxi structure, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3):426- 435.
[31] 文龙, 杨跃明, 游传强, 等.川中-川西地区灯影组沉积层序特征及其对天然气成藏的控制作用[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(7):8-17. WEN Long, YANG Yueming, YOU Chuanqiang, et al. Characteristics of Dengying Fm sedimentary sequence in the centralwestern Sichuan Basin and their controlling effect on gas accumulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(7):8-17.
[32] 柴寒冰.磨溪地区灯影组灯四段持续性古隆起背景下的古岩溶储层结构特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2020. CHAI Hanbing. Structural characteristics of paleokarst reservoirs under the background of persistent Paleo-uplift of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Moxi[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2020.
[33] 余继峰, 李增学.测井数据小波变换及其地质意义[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2003, 32(3):336-339. YU Jifeng, LI Zengxue. Wavelet transform of logging data and its geological significance[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2003, 32(3):336-339.
[34] 邢凤存, 胡华蕊, 侯明才, 等.构造和古地理控制下的碳酸盐岩储集体旋回和集群性探讨:以四川盆地为例[J].地球科学, 2018, 43(10):3540-3552. XING Fengcun, HU Huarui, HOU Mingcai, et al. Carbonate reservoirs cycles and assemblages under the tectonic and palaeogeography control:A case study from Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(10):3540-3552.
[35] FENG Qingfu,XIAO Yuxiang,HOU Xiulin,et al. Logging identification method of depositional facies in Sinian Dengying Formation of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Science, 2021, 18(4):1086-1096.
[36] 杨威, 魏国齐, 谢武仁, 等.古隆起在四川盆地台内碳酸盐岩丘滩体规模成储中的作用[J].天然气工业, 2021, 41(4):1-12. YANG Wei, WEI Guoqi, XIE Wuren, et al. Role of paleouplift in the scale formation of intra-platform carbonate mound-bank body reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(4):1-12.
[37] 张红英, 周肖, 王安庆.四川盆地安岳区块灯影组缝洞型储层测井评价方法[J].测井技术, 2018, 42(1):91-97. ZHANG Hongying, ZHOU Xiao, WANG Anqing. Log evaluation method for fractured-vuggy reservoir in the Dengying Formation of the Anyue block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2018, 42(1):91-97.
[38] CHEN Yana, SHEN Anjiang, PAN Liyin, et al. Features, origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs:A case study of 4 th member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5):745-757.
[39] 周红飞, 戴鑫, 贾敏, 等.川中古隆起北斜坡震旦系灯影组二段油气成藏特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5):130-138. ZHOU Hongfei, DAI Xin, JIA Min, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of the second member of Sinian Dengying Formation in the north slope of central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(5):130-138.
[40] ZHOU Zheng, WANG Xinzhi, YIN Ge, et al. Characteristics and genesis of the(Sinian)Dengying Formation reservoir in central Sichuan, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 29(2):311-321.
[41] HOU Lianhua, YANG Fan, YANG Chun, et al. Characteristics and formation of Sinian(Ediacaran)carbonate karstic reservoirs in Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Research, 2021, 6(2):144-157.
[42] JIN Mindong, ZENG Wei, TAN Xiucheng, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of beach-controlled karst reservoirs in Longwangmiao Formation, Moxi-Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):650-660.
[43] 王良军.川北地区灯影组四段优质储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):35-45. WANG Liangjun. Characteristics and controlling factors of highquality reservoirs of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):35-45.
[44] 张道伟.四川盆地未来十年天然气工业发展展望[J].天然气工业, 2021, 41(8):34-45. ZHANG Daowei. Development prospect of natural gas industry in the Sichuan Basin in the next decade[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8):34-45.
[45] 焦方正, 杨雨, 冉崎, 等. 四川盆地中部地区走滑断层的分布与天然气勘探[J].天然气工业, 2021, 41(8):92-101. JIAO Fangzheng, YANG Yu, RAN Qi, et al. Distribution and gas exploration of the strike-slip faults in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8):92-101.
[1] 闫雪莹, 桑琴, 蒋裕强, 方锐, 周亚东, 刘雪, 李顺, 袁永亮. 四川盆地公山庙西地区侏罗系大安寨段致密油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 98-109.
[2] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[3] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[4] 周刚, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 严威, 张亚, 文华国, 和源, 刘四兵. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系沧浪铺组沉积充填过程及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 25-34.
[5] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[6] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[7] 夏茂龙, 张本健, 曾乙洋, 贾松, 赵春妮, 冯明友, 李勇, 尚俊鑫. 川中地区蓬莱气田震旦系灯影组二段储层发育主控因素及分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 50-60.
[8] 白雪峰, 李军辉, 张大智, 王有智, 卢双舫, 隋立伟, 王继平, 董忠良. 四川盆地仪陇—平昌地区侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征及富集条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 52-64.
[9] 岑永静, 梁锋, 王立恩, 刘倩虞, 张鑫哲, 丁熊. 四川盆地蓬莱—中江地区震旦系灯影组二段成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 89-98.
[10] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[11] 孙汉骁, 邢凤存, 谢武仁, 钱红杉. 四川盆地及周缘地区晚奥陶世岩相古地理演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 121-135.
[12] 李毕松, 苏建龙, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 张文军, 肖伟, 张雷, 江馀. 四川盆地元坝地区二叠系茅口组相控岩溶刻画及预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 69-77.
[13] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[14] 张坦, 贾梦瑶, 孙雅雄, 丁文龙, 石司宇, 范昕禹, 姚威. 四川盆地南部中二叠统茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 111-120.
[15] 杜江民, 崔子豪, 贾志伟, 张毅, 聂万才, 龙鹏宇, 刘泊远. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区奥陶系马家沟组马五5亚段沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 37-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉，陆正元，袁帅，李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云， 卢渊，伊向艺，张俊良，张锦良，王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发