岩性油气藏 ›› 2013, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 9–18.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2013.02.002

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

陆相湖盆块体搬运体的沉积特征、识别标志与形成机制

潘树新1,郑荣才2,卫平生1,王天奇1,陈彬滔1,梁苏娟1   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,甘肃兰州730020;2.成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,四川成都610059
  • 出版日期:2013-04-20 发布日期:2013-04-20

Deposition characteristics, recognition mark and form mechanism of mass transport deposits in terrestrial lake Basin

PAN Shuxin1, ZHENG Rongcai2, WEI Pingsheng1, WANG Tianqi1, CHEN Bintao1, LIANG Sujuan1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China; 2. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Online:2013-04-20 Published:2013-04-20

摘要:

块体搬运体已经成为大陆边缘重力流勘探的新领域。与大陆边缘相比,陆相湖盆是否存在大规模的 块体搬运体及其沉积特征、识别标志、形成机制、分布规模、外部形态及与浊积岩的差异性都是值得探索 的重要课题。利用松辽和二连等坳陷或断陷盆地的地震及岩心、分析化验资料,对上述问题进行了探讨和 研究。陆相湖盆的重力流可以分为块体搬运体和浊积岩,二者在沉积特征、流体浓度、流态、流变学特征及 地震响应特征等方面都存在显著差异。块体搬运体以层流为主,具有固体和宾汉流体的特征,常见弹性、 脆性及塑性形变,除常见块状砂岩外,还发育大量包卷层理、滑塌变形构造、布丁构造及微断裂等同沉积 或软沉积变形构造,同时也可见到泥岩漂砾等;浊积岩以紊流为主,具有牛顿流体的特征,发育递变层理。 厚层块体搬运体在地震上具有透明和乱岗状的弱反射特征,而薄层块体搬运体具有眼球形的强反射结构。块体流不仅具有重力流的粒度分布特征,同时还具有牵引流的粒度分布特征。与浊积岩相比,块体搬 运体在陆相湖盆的分布更为广泛,不仅层数多,而且单层厚度大,具有更好的储集性能,是中国陆相湖盆 重力流勘探的新领域。

关键词: 物源分析, 物源区位置, 母岩特征, 搬运路径, 物源区构造背景, 沉积盆地

Abstract:

Extensive mass transport deposits (MTDs) distributed in continental margin have became new filed of gravity flow exploration and development. In order to understand the sedimentary and distribution characteristics of the MTDs which deposited in depression and faulted basins, Songliao Basin and Erlian Bain are chosen as the research object. Based on integrated analysis of seismic, core and laboratory test data, sedimentary features and distribution pattern of MTDs were studied systematically. Gravity flow deposits can be divided into MTDs and turbidite. MTDs are different from turbidities in terms of sedimentary structure, concentration, flow pattern, rheology characteristics and seismic response. MTDs belong to laminar flow with solid and bingham fluid characteristics simultaneously and include movement and emplacement by elastic deformation and brittle deformation and plastic deformation. Besides the common massive sandstone, MTDs also form synsedimentary deformation structures or soft-sedimentary deformation structures, such as convolute bedding, slumping deformation structure, boudinage and microfaults, as well as shale boulder. Turbidite belongs to turbulence which forms grained beddings. Seismic profile reveals that thick layer of MTDs are characterized by chaotic, mounded, and transparent seismic reflection, and thin layer of MTDs have eye-shaped reflection structure. MTDs not only have the particle size distribution characteristics of gravity flow, but also have the particle size distribution characteristics of traction current. MTDs are more widely distributed than turbidite in the study area, have more layers and larger monolayer thickness, and have better reservoir performance. The study shows that MTDs are new areas for terrestrial lacustrine gravity flow exploration.

Key words: provenance analysis, source area, parent rock features, moving path, tectonic setting of source area, sedimentary basin

[1] 雷启鸿,高琼瑶,成良丙,李继红,杨永兴,高军锋. 鄂尔多斯盆地马岭地区长 8 油层组物源及沉积展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2): 70-76.
[2] 张景琦,韩小锋,杨占龙 . 吐哈盆地鄯善弧形带三间房组二段重矿物物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 34-39.
[3] 陈小二,范昆,熊艳,王小兰,王聃,陈丹. 川中 AY 地区须家河组地震层序与物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(1): 45-51.
[4] 魏然,李红阳,于斌,蔡来星,王起龙. 沉积盆地物源体系分析方法及研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(3): 53-57.
[5] 牛小兵,梁晓伟,辛红刚,李廷艳,淡卫东,王昌勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长9 油层组物源区分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(5): 71-75.
[6] 王纹婷,郑荣才,王成玉,王海红,牛小兵,王昌勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8 油层组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 41-46.
[7] 万延周,周立发,白斌,谢其锋,蒲磊. 准噶尔盆地南缘水西沟群物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 35-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .