阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.009

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 68–76.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.02.009

阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征

魏巍^1,2, 朱筱敏^1,2, 朱世发^1,2, 何明薇^1,2, 吴健平³, 王名巍³

1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
3. 中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河北任丘 062552

收稿日期:2016-11-18 修回日期:2016-12-18 出版日期:2017-03-21 发布日期:2017-03-21
第一作者:魏巍(1988-),女,中国石油大学(北京)在读博士研究生,研究方向为储层沉积和成岩研究。地址:(102249)北京市昌平区府学路18号中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院。Email:hunqiu8854@gmail.com
通信作者: 朱筱敏(1960-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事沉积储层和层序地层学方面的教学和科研工作。Email:xmzhu@cup.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”（编号：2011ZX05001-002）和中国石油华北油田分公司项目“二连盆地特殊岩类储集层特征及其成因机制研究“（编号：HBYT-YJY-2014-JS-307）联合资助

Lithofacies and reservoir space characteristics of the tuffaceoussiliciclastic mixed rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation in Anan Sag, Erlian Basin

WEIWei^1,2, ZHU Xiaomin^1,2, ZHU Shifa^1,2, HE Mingwei^1,2, WU Jianping³, WANG Mingwei³

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu 062552, Hebei, China

Received:2016-11-18 Revised:2016-12-18 Online:2017-03-21 Published:2017-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 二连盆地阿南凹陷下白垩统发育一套湖相致密油凝灰质混积岩岩性段，是近年来重要的勘探领域。通过岩心精细描述、薄片鉴定、扫描电镜及X 射线衍射分析等技术，对这套混积岩岩性段的岩性、岩相和储集空间特征进行了综合研究。该套混积岩岩性主要为灰绿色—灰色凝灰质岩，包括凝灰岩、沉凝灰岩、凝灰质砂岩和凝灰质泥岩，其中沉凝灰岩和凝灰质泥岩发育最为广泛；其岩相可划分为块状凝灰岩、块状沉凝灰岩、变形构造沉凝灰岩、块状凝灰质砂岩、波状层理凝灰质砂岩、块状凝灰质泥岩及水平层理凝灰质泥岩。块状凝灰岩岩相储集性能最好，储集空间为脱玻化孔，属于低—中孔、超低渗储层；变形构造沉凝灰岩岩相储集性能较好，以溶蚀孔和基质孔为主，属于特低孔、低—超低渗储层；块状沉凝灰岩岩相、块状凝灰质砂岩岩相和波状层理凝灰质砂岩岩相储集性能均较差，主要发育晶屑溶蚀孔和晶间孔，属于特低孔、超低渗储层。

Abstract: The Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation developed a set of lacustrine tight oil tuffaceous-siliciclastic mixed rocks in Anan Sag of Erlian Basin, which has become an important exploration target. Based on the data of core observation, thin section, scanning electron microscope, and X-ray diffraction, the lithologies, lithofacies and reservoir spaces of the mixed rocks were studied. This set of mixed rocks are mainly grey-green to grey tuffaceous rocks, including tuff, tuffite, tuffaceous sandstone and tuffaceous mudstone. The tuffite and tuffaceous mudstone are widely developed. There are six types of lithofacies:massive tuff, massive tuffite, deformed tuffite, massive tuffaceous sandstone, wavy-bedding tuffaceous sandstone, massive tuffaceous mudstone and horizonalbedding tuffaceous mudstone. The massive tuff lithofacies is characterized by middle to low porosity and ultralow permeability reservoir. It is the best reservoir in the mixed rocks,and its main reservoir space is devitrified pores. The deformed tuffite lithofacies is chaterized by extremely low porosity and low to ultra-low permeability reservoir, with good reservoir properties and the main reservoir space of dissolved pores and marix pores. The massive tuffite lithofacies, massive tuffaceous sandstone lithofacies and wavy-bedding tuffaceous sandstone lithofacies are characterized by extremely low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoir. It is poor reservoir, and its main reservoir spaces are crystal fragments dissolved pores and crystal intergranular pores.

中图分类号:

TE122.2

魏巍, 朱筱敏, 朱世发, 何明薇, 吴健平, 王名巍. 阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 68–76.

WEIWei, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHU Shifa, HE Mingwei, WU Jianping, WANG Mingwei. Lithofacies and reservoir space characteristics of the tuffaceoussiliciclastic mixed rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation in Anan Sag, Erlian Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(2): 68–76.

参考文献

[1] 冯进来,胡凯,曹剑,等. 陆源碎屑与碳酸盐混积岩及其油气地质意义.高校地质学报,2011,17(2):297-307. FENG J L,HU K,CAO J,et al. A review on mixed rocks of terrigenous clastics and carbonates and their petroleum-gas geological significance. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2011,17(2):297-307.
[2] 张金亮,司学强. 断陷湖盆碳酸盐与陆源碎屑混合沉积—— 以东营凹陷金家地区古近系沙河街组第四段上亚段为例. 地质论评,2007,53(4):448-453. ZHANG J L,SI X Q. Mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sediment in rift lacustrine basin—a case on the upper part of the fourth member of the Eogene Shahejie Formation in Jinjia area,Dongying Depression. Geological Review,2007,53(4):448-453.
[3] 朱世发,朱筱敏,吴冬,等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘下二叠统油气储层中火山物质蚀变及控制因素. 石油与天然气地质,2014, 35(1):77-85. ZHU S F,ZHU X M,WU D,et al. Alteration of volcanics and its controlling factors in the Lower Permian reservoirs at northwestern margin of Junggar Basin. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35 (1):77-85.
[4] 朱世发,刘欣,马勋,等. 准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组致密碎屑岩储层发育特征.高校地质学报,2015,21(3):461-470. ZHU S F,LIU X,MA X,et al. The development characteristics of tight clastic reservoirs in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation in Wu-Xia area of the Juggar Basin. Geological Journal of China Universities,2015,21(3):461-470.
[5] 朱世发,朱筱敏,刘继山,等. 富孔熔结凝灰岩成因及油气意义——以准噶尔盆地乌—夏地区风城组为例. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):162-171. ZHU S F,ZHU X M,LIU J S,et al. Genesis and hydrocarbon significance of vesicular ignimbrite:a case study from Fengcheng Formation,Wu-Xia area,Junggar Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):162-171.
[6] 贾国娜. 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一段层序地层及沉积体系研究.北京:中国地质大学(北京),2012. JIA G N. Study on stratigraphy and sedimentary system in the Tenggeer Formation of Anan Sag,Erlian Basin. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2012.
[7] 李秀英,肖阳,杨全凤,等. 二连盆地阿南洼槽岩性油藏及致密油勘探潜力.中国石油勘探,2013,18(6):56-61. LI X Y,XIAO Y,YANG Q F,et al. Lithologic reservoir and tight oil exploration potential in Anan Subsag,Erlian Basin. China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(6):56-61.
[8] 蓝宝锋,杨克兵,彭传利,等. 二连盆地阿南凹陷致密油勘探潜力分析.复杂油气藏,2014,7(2):9-12. BAO J F,YANG K B,PENG C L,et al. Analysis of the exploration potential of tight oil in Anan Sag,Erlian Basin. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2014,7(2):9-12.
[9] 王会来,高先志,杨德相,等. 二连盆地下白垩统湖相云质岩分布及控制因素. 现代地质,2014,28(1):143-172. WANG H L,GAO X Z,YANG D X,et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine dolomitic rock in Erlian Basin. Geoscience,2014,28(1): 143-172.
[10] LIN C S,ERIKSSON K,LI S T,et al. Sequence architecture, depositional systems,and controls on development of lacustrine basin fills in part of the Erlian basin,northeast China. AAPG Bulletin,2001,11(11):2017-2043.
[11] 王璞珺,郑常青,舒萍,等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩岩性分类方案.大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(4):17-22. WANG P J,ZHENG C Q,SHU P,et al. Classification of deep volcanic rocks in Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2007,26(4):17-22.
[12] MACQUAKER J,DAVIES S. Lithofacies variability in finegrained mixed clastic carbonate successions:implications for identifying shale-gas reservoirs. San Antonio,Texas:AAPG Annual Convention,2008:20-23.
[13] 石油地质勘探专业标准化委员会. 油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285—2011.北京:中国标准出版社,2011. Committee for Standardization of Petroleum Geological Exploration. Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs:SY/T 6285—2011. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2011.
[14] HIGGS K E,ARNOT M J,BRINDLE S. Advances in grainsize, mineral,and pore-scale characterization of lithic and clayrich reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin,2015,99(7):1315-1348.
[15] WEI W,ZHU X M,MENG Y L,et al. Porosity model and its application in tight gas sandstone reservoir in the southern part of West Depression,Liaohe Basin,China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,141:24-37.
[16] WEI W,ZHU X M,TAN M X,et al. Distribution of diagenetic alterations within depositional facies and sequence stratigraphic framework of fan delta and subaqueous fan sandstones:evidence from the Lower Cretaceous Bayingebi Formation,Chagan Sag,China-Mongolia frontier area. Geosciences Journal,2015, 20(1):1-11.
[17] 庞德新.砂砾岩储层成因差异及其对储集物性的控制效应—— 以玛湖凹陷玛2 井区下乌尔禾组为例. 岩性油气藏,2015,27 (5):149-154. PANG D X. Sedimentary genesis of sand-conglomerate reservoir and its control effect on reservoir properties:a case study of the lower Urho Formation in Ma 2 well block of Mahu Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(5):149-154.
[18] 孙红华,李旭平,钟建华,等. 辽河西部凹陷南段沙三段致密砂岩储物性特征及主控因素分析. 岩性油气藏,2013,25(6): 53-61. SUN H H,LI X P,ZHONG J H,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of the third member of Shahejie Formation in the southern West Depression,Liaohe Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(6):53-61.
[19] STROKER T M,HARRIS N B,CRAWFORD EW,et al. Diagenesis of a tight gas sand reservoir:Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group,Piceance Basin,Colorado. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013,40(1):48-68.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

阿南凹陷腾格尔组凝灰质混积岩岩相及储集空间特征

Lithofacies and reservoir space characteristics of the tuffaceoussiliciclastic mixed rocks of the Lower Cretaceous Tenggeer Formation in Anan Sag, Erlian Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[2]	尹路, 李博, 齐雯, 孙东, 乐幸福, 马慧. 天然氢气规模生成的成因类型与成藏特点[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 1-11.
[3]	肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[4]	王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5]	魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[6]	张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[7]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[8]	王同川, 陈浩如, 温龙彬, 钱玉贵, 李玉琢, 文华国. 川东五百梯地区石炭系岩溶古地貌识别及储集意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 109-121.
[9]	田亚, 李军辉, 陈方举, 李跃, 刘华晔, 邹越, 张晓扬. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带下白垩统南屯组致密储层特征及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 136-146.
[10]	朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[11]	夏茂龙, 张本健, 曾乙洋, 贾松, 赵春妮, 冯明友, 李勇, 尚俊鑫. 川中地区蓬莱气田震旦系灯影组二段储层发育主控因素及分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 50-60.
[12]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[13]	何文渊, 赵莹, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 1-18.
[14]	计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[15]	雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.