基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究——以川中磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.011

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 92–102.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.011

基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究——以川中磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组为例

司马立强¹, 陈志强¹, 王亮¹, 范玲², 陈河斌¹, 付永红¹

1. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500;
2. 中国石油西南油气分公司川中油气矿, 四川遂宁 629000

收稿日期:2016-09-09 修回日期:2016-12-13 出版日期:2017-05-21 发布日期:2017-05-21
作者简介:司马立强(1961-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气田测井方法、解释及地质应用方面的教学与科研工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。Email:smlq2000@126.com。
基金资助:
大型油气田及煤层气开发国家重大科技专项“四川盆地大型碳酸盐岩气田开发示范工程”（编号：2016ZX05052）资助

Permeability modeling based on the classification of beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs: a case from Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area, central Sichuan Basin

SIMA Liqiang¹, CHEN Zhiqiang¹, WANG Liang¹, FAN Ling², CHEN Hebin¹, FU Yonghong¹

1. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China;
2. Central Sichuan Oil and Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Suining 629000, Sichuan, China

Received:2016-09-09 Revised:2016-12-13 Online:2017-05-21 Published:2017-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 川中磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组白云岩储层渗透率受岩溶作用的影响较大，现有渗透率计算模型的适用性较差。利用岩心照片、岩石薄片、高压压汞、核磁共振、物性分析、测井等资料，首先根据岩溶作用、储集空间、孔隙结构对储层进行分类，将非均质性极强的滩控岩溶型白云岩储层划分为溶洞型、溶孔型与基质孔隙型3种相对均质的储层类型，再运用全直径岩样与标准柱塞样物性分析结果，借助其表征尺度的差异，对各类型储层进行渗透率建模。全直径岩样表征尺度较大，用以建立溶洞型储层渗透率解释模型；标准柱塞样表征尺度较小，用以建立溶孔型与基质孔隙型储层渗透率解释模型。现场应用结果表明，相对于常规Timur公式与核磁Coates等模型，上述分储层类型计算的渗透率值与岩心分析结果更吻合，有效提高了碳酸盐岩滩控岩溶型白云岩储层渗透率计算结果的准确度。

关键词: 成岩作用, 成岩相, 长8 油层组, 马岭油田, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Reservoir permeability is greatly affected by karstification, and the applicability of existing permeability models is poor in Cambrian dolomite reservoirs of Longwangmiao Formation, Moxi-Gaoshiti area, central Sichuan Basin. The core photos, rock slices, mercury injection capillary pressure, nuclear magnetic resonance and logging data were used to classify the reservoir types according to karstification,reservoir space and pore structure. The beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs with strong heterogeneity were divided into karst cave type, dissolved pore type and matrix pore type. Then, new permeability models were established with physical property analysis data of full diameter core and standard plunger core by the difference between their characterization scale. Full diameter core has larger scale of representation, so as to establish the permeability interpretation model of karst cave type; standard plunger core has smaller scale of representation, so as to establish permeability interpretation models of dissolved pore type and matrix pore type. Practical application results show that, compared with the conventional Timur formula and NMR Coates model, the permeability value calculated by classified statistic models is more consistent with core analysis. This method can effectively improve the accuracy of permeability calculation in beach-controlled karst reservoirs.

Key words: diagenesis, diagenetic facies, Chang 8 reservoir, Maling Oilfield, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122

司马立强, 陈志强, 王亮, 范玲, 陈河斌, 付永红. 基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究——以川中磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 92–102.

SIMA Liqiang, CHEN Zhiqiang, WANG Liang, FAN Ling, CHEN Hebin, FU Yonghong. Permeability modeling based on the classification of beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs: a case from Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3): 92–102.

参考文献

[1] 杜金虎, 邹才能, 徐春春, 等.川中古隆起龙王庙组特大型气田战略发现与理论技术创新.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3):268-277. DU J H, ZOU C N, XU C C, et al. Theoretical and technical innovations in strategic discovery of a giant gas field in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):268-277.
[2] 杨雪飞, 王兴志, 唐浩, 等.四川盆地中部磨溪地区龙王庙组沉积微相研究.沉积学报, 2015, 33(5):972-982. YANG X F, WANG X Z, TANG H, et al. Research sedimentary microfacies of the Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi area, central Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(5):972-982.
[3] 杨雪飞, 王兴志, 代林呈, 等.川中地区下寒武统龙王庙组沉积相特征.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):95-101. YANG X F, WANG X Z, DAI L C, et al. Sedimentary features of the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in the central Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):95-101.
[4] 刘树根, 孙玮, 李智武, 等.四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):1-17. LIU S G, SUN W, LI Z W, et al. Distribution characteristics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic controlling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):1-17.
[5] 田艳红, 刘树根, 赵异华, 等.四川盆地中部龙王庙组储层成岩作用.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(6):671-683. TIAN Y H, LIU S G, ZHAO Y H, et al. Diagenesis of Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation reservoirs in central area of Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 41(6):671-683.
[6] 杨雪飞, 王兴志, 杨跃明, 等.川中地区下寒武统龙王庙组白云岩储层成岩作用.地质科技情报, 2015, 34(1):35-41. YANG X F, WANG X Z, YANG Y M, et al. Diagenesis of the dolomite reservoir in Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(1):35-41.
[7] 王学军, 杨志如, 韩冰.四川盆地叠合演化与油气聚集.地学前缘, 2015, 22(3):161-173. WANG X J, YANG Z R, HAN B. Superposed evolution of Sichuan Basin and its petroleum accumulation. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(3):161-173.
[8] 秦瑞宝, 李雄炎, 刘春成, 等.碳酸盐岩储层孔隙结构的影响因素与储层参数的定量评价. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):251-259. QIN R B, LI X Y, LIU C C, et al. Influential factors of pore structure and quantitative evaluation of reservoir parameters in carbonate reservoirs. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):251-259.
[9] 申本科, 薛大伟, 赵君怡, 等.碳酸盐岩储层常规测井评价方法.地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(1):261-270. SHEN B K, XUE D W, ZHAO J Y, et al. The logging evaluating method on carbonates reservoirs. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(1):261-270.
[10] 徐敬领, 王亚静, 曹光伟, 等.碳酸盐岩储层测井评价方法.现代地质, 2012, 26(6):1265-1274. XU J L, WANG Y J, CAO G W, et al. Well-logging evaluation methods on carbonate reservoirs. Geoscience, 2012, 26(6):1265-1274.
[11] 王小敏, 樊太亮.碳酸盐岩储层渗透率研究现状与前瞻.地学前缘, 2013, 20(5):166-174. WANG X M, FAN T L. Progress of research on permeability of carbonate rocks. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(5):166-174.
[12] 张蕾, 成志刚, 程玉梅, 等.应用阵列声波测井资料定量评价碳酸盐岩储层渗透性.测井技术, 2015, 39(5):596-600. ZHANG L, CHENG Z G, CHENG Y M, et al. Applying the array acoustic logging data to evaluate the permeability of carbonate reservoir. Well Logging Technology, 2015, 39(5):596-600.
[13] 孙盼科, 徐怀民, 黄娅, 等.碳酸盐岩含气储集层孔隙度渗透率岩石物理表征方法.测井技术, 2015, 39(6):769-776. SUN P K, XU H M, HUANG Y, et al. Rock physics-based porosity-permeability characterization of carbonate gas reservoir. Well Logging Technology, 2015, 39(6):769-776.
[14] 刘宏, 吴兴波, 谭秀成, 等.多旋回复杂碳酸盐岩储层渗透率测井评价.石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(5):678-684. LIU H, WU X B, TAN X C, et al. Logging evaluation of permeability of multicyclic carbonate rock reservoirs in the Middle Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(5):678-684.
[15] 储昭宏, 马永生, 林畅松.碳酸盐岩储层渗透率预测.地质科技情报, 2006, 25(4):27-32. CHU Z H, MA Y S, LIN C S. Permeability prediction of carbonate reservoir. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2006, 25(4):27-32.
[16] 魏丹, 刘小梅, 秦瑞宝, 等.以岩性识别为核心的碳酸盐岩储层测井评价技术及其应用——以中东M油田为例.中国海上油气, 2014, 26(2):24-29. WEI D, LIU X M, QIN R B, et al. A logging evaluation technique with lithologic identification as its core for carbonate reservoir and its application. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(2):24-29.
[17] 赵军, 江同文, 王焕增, 等.基于流动单元的碳酸盐岩渗透率建模方法.天然气工业, 2007, 27(2):46-48. ZHAO J, JIANG T W, WANG H Z, et al. Flow unit based modeling of carbonate reservoir permeability. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(2):46-48.
[18] 张建勇, 罗文军, 周进高, 等.四川盆地安岳特大型气田下寒武统龙王庙组优质储层形成的主控因素.天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(11):2063-2074. ZHANG J Y, LUO W J, ZHOU J G, et al. Main origins of high quality reservoir of Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in the giant Anyue Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(11):2063-2074.
[19] 金民东, 曾伟, 谭秀成, 等.四川磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组滩控岩溶型储集层特征及控制因素.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6):650-660. JIN M D, ZENG W, TAN X C, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of beach-controlled karst reservoirs in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation, Moxi-Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6):650-660.
[20] 周慧, 张宝民, 李伟, 等.川中地区龙王庙组洞穴充填物特征及油气地质意义.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(2):188-198. ZHOU H, ZHANG B M, LI W, et al. Characteristics and petroleum geological implication of paleo-cave fillings in Longwangmiao Formation of Lower Cambrian in central Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(2):188-198.
[21] 刘树根, 宋金民, 赵异华, 等.四川盆地龙王庙组优质储层形成与分布的主控因素. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(6):657-670. LIU S G, SONG J M, ZHAO Y H, et al. Controlling factors of formation and distribution of Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation high-quality reservoirs in Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 41(6):657-670.
[22] 周进高, 徐春春, 姚根顺, 等.四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组储集层形成与演化.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2):158-166. ZHOU J G, XU C C, YAO G S, et al. Genesis and evolution of Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation reservoirs, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):158-166.
[23] BACETA J I, WRIGHT V P, BEAVINGTON-PENNEY S J, et al. Palaeohydrogeological control of palaeokarst macro-porosity genesis during a major sea-level lowstand:danian of the UrbasaAndiaplateau, Navarra, North Spain. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 199(1):141-169.
[24] 魏国齐, 杨威, 杜金虎, 等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪古隆起构造特征及对特大型气田形成的控制作用.石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(3):257-265. WEI G Q,YANG W,DU J H,et al. Tectonic features of Gaoshiti-Moxi paleo-uplift and its controls on the formation of a giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(3):257-265.
[25] 张满郎, 谢增业, 李熙喆, 等.四川盆地寒武纪岩相古地理特征.沉积学报, 2010, 28(1):128-139. ZHANG M L, XIE Z Y, LI X Z, et al. Characteristics of lithofacies paleogeography of Cambrian in Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(1):128-139.
[26] 赵军辉, 周立发.南祁连盆地碳酸盐岩储层特征与评价.岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2):31-36. ZHAO J H, ZHOU L F. Characteristics and evaluation of carbonate reservoir in the southern Qilian Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(2):31-36.
[27] 何伶, 赵伦, 李建新, 等.碳酸盐岩储集层复杂孔渗关系及影响因素——以滨里海盆地台地相为例. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2):206-214. HE L, ZHAO L, LI J X, et al. Complex relationship between porosity and permeability of carbonate reservoirs and its controlling factors:a case of platform facies in Pre-Caspian Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(2):206-214.
[28] 颜其彬, 陈明江, 汪娟, 等.碳酸盐岩储层渗透率与孔隙度、喉道半径的关系.天然气工业, 2015, 35(6):30-36. YAN Q B, CHEN M J, WANG J, et al. Correlation among permeability, porosity and pore throat radius of carbonate reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(6):30-36.
[29] TIMUR A. An investigation of permeability, porosity, & residual water saturation relationship for sandstone reservoirs. The Log Analyst, 1968, 9(4):8-17.
[30] COATES G R, PEVERARO R C A, HARDWICK A, et al. The magnetic resonance imaging log characterized by comparison with petrophysical properties and laboratory core data. SPE 22723, 1991:627-635.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于滩控岩溶型白云岩储层分类的渗透率建模方法研究——以川中磨溪-高石梯地区龙王庙组为例

Permeability modeling based on the classification of beach-controlled karst dolomite reservoirs: a case from Longwangmiao Formation in Moxi-Gaoshiti area, central Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2]	徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[3]	李志远, 杨仁超, 张吉, 王一, 杨特波, 董亮. 天然气扩散散失率定量评价——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 76-84.
[4]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[5]	许飞. 考虑化学渗透压作用下页岩气储层压裂液的自发渗吸特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 145-152.
[6]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[7]	魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[8]	张晓辉, 张娟, 袁京素, 崔小丽, 毛振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长8₁致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 36-48.
[9]	严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[10]	杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[11]	周新平, 邓秀芹, 李士祥, 左静, 张文选, 李涛涛, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组下组合地层水特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 109-120.
[12]	高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 段长江. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
[13]	曹江骏, 陈朝兵, 罗静兰, 王茜. 自生黏土矿物对深水致密砂岩储层微观非均质性的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部合水地区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 36-49.
[14]	何维领, 罗顺社, 李昱东, 吴悠, 吕奇奇, 席明利. 斜坡背景下沉积物变形构造时空展布规律——以鄂尔多斯盆地镇原地区长7油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 62-72.
[15]	王朋, 孙灵辉, 王核, 李自安. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区延长组长6储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 63-72.