岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 83–91.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.03.010

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

页岩气储层特征及含气性主控因素——以湘西北保靖地区龙马溪组为例

胡博文1, 李斌1, 鲁东升1, 罗群2, 李建新1, 王一霖1   

  1. 1. 神华地质勘查有限责任公司, 北京 102209;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京) 非常规天然气研究院, 北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-10 修回日期:2016-10-25 出版日期:2017-05-21 发布日期:2017-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 李斌(1970-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事油气地质研究工作。Email:libin9600@sohu.com。 E-mail:libin9600@sohu.com
  • 作者简介:胡博文(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气地质研究工作。地址:(102209)北京市昌平区北七家镇未来科技城神华集团202号楼。Email:562077639@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“云质岩致密油储层微米-纳米孔喉网络体系及其流体耦合流动机理与流动下限”(编号:41372145)资助

Characteristics and main controlling factors of shale gas reservoirs: a case from Longmaxi Formation in Baojing area, NW Hunan province

HU Bowen1, LI Bin1, LU Dongsheng1, LUO Qun2, LI Jianxin1, WANG Yilin1   

  1. 1. Shenhua Geological Exploration Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China;
    2. The Unconventional Natural Gas Institute, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2016-09-10 Revised:2016-10-25 Online:2017-05-21 Published:2017-05-21

摘要: 湘西北保靖地区龙马溪组富有机质泥页岩是重要的页岩气勘探层位。为研究其页岩气储层特征和气体赋存规律,利用矿物组分、有机地球化学、物性、含气性、等温吸附、扫描电镜和Nano-CT扫描等测试资料,并结合野外地质调查,分析和探讨了龙马溪组岩相特征、储层特征及储层含气性主控因素。结果表明:龙马溪组发育3种岩相,分别为炭质-粉砂质泥页岩相、炭质泥页岩相、含炭泥质粉砂岩相;储层孔隙类型主要包括粒间孔、溶蚀孔、晶间孔、化石孔、有机质孔和微裂缝,其中裂缝类型主要为构造缝和成岩缝;孔隙按孔径大小可分为微孔、介孔和宏孔,介孔占总孔容的比重最大,其次是微孔,宏孔最少。综合分析认为:微孔孔容、页岩比表面积与甲烷最大吸附量呈正相关性,受控于页岩有机质含量(TOC);微裂缝与页岩含气量也呈正相关性,说明微裂缝的发育程度对页岩含气性具有影响作用。利用Nano-CT扫描结果,认为绝大部分气体流动空间位于有机质孔隙以及微裂缝中。TOC和微裂缝的发育程度是该区龙马溪组页岩气富集的主控因素。

关键词: 花岗岩油气藏, 成藏富集因素, 储层, 圈闭, 共生复合成藏

Abstract: The organic-rich shale of Longmaxi Formation is an important shale gas exploration horizon in Baojing area, NW Hunan Province. In order to study the characteristics of Longmaxi shale gas reservoir and gas occurrence rule, combined with field geologic investigation, the data of mineralogy, organic geochemistry, physical properties, gas-bearing property, isothermal adsorption, scanning electronic microscope and Nano-CT, were used to analyze the characteristics of lithofacies and reservoir and main controlling factors for the gas-bearing property of Longmaxi shale. The results show that three types of lithofacies are developed in the Longmaxi Formation,including carbon-silty shale, carbonaceous shale and carbon-argillaceous siltstone; the main pore types are intergranular pores, dissolved pores, intercrystalline pores, fossil pores, organic pores and micro-fractures. The main types of fractures are structural fractures and diagenetic fracture. According to the pore size, the reservoir pore can be divided into micropores, mesopores and macropores. Mesopores have the biggest contribution to the whole pore volume,followed by micropores, and the macropores have the minimum proportion in the whole pore volume. The analysis shows that the microporous volume and surface area of shale have a good positive correlation with the largest methane adsorption contents,which are both controlled by TOC content in shale. Microfractures have a good positive correlation with gas content,which indicates that the micro-fracture has an important influence on shale gas-bearing properties. The results of Nano-CT show that most of the gas flow spaces are organic pores and micro-fractures. The organic matter content and the development of micro-fractures are the main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale gas.

Key words: granite reservoir, accumulation and enrichment factors, reservoir, trap, symbiotic composite accumulation

中图分类号: 

  • P624
[1] 聂海宽, 张金川.页岩气储层类型和特征研究——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例.石油实验地质, 2011, 33(3):219-225. NIE H K, ZHANG J C. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(3):219-225.
[2] 杨超, 张金川, 唐玄.鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩微观孔隙类型及对页岩气渗储的影响.地学前缘, 2013, 20(4):240-250. YANG C, ZHANG J C, TANG X. Microscopic pore types and its impact on the storage and permeability of continental shale gas, Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(4):240-250.
[3] 于炳松. 页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(4):211-220. YU B S. Classification and characterization of gas shale pore system. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(4):211-220.
[4] 徐祖新, 韩淑敏, 王启超.中扬子地区陡山沱组页岩储层中黄铁矿特征及其油气意义.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2):31-37. XU Z X, HAN S M, WANG Q C. Characteristics of pyrite and its hydrocarbon significance of shale reservoir of Doushantuo Formation in middle Yangtze area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(2):31-37.
[5] 黄俨然, 杨荣丰, 肖正辉.湘西北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩含气性影响因素分析.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):11-16. HUANG Y R, YANG R F, XIAO Z H. Influencing factors of shale gas-bearing property of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in northwestern Hunan. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):11-16.
[6] 周恳恳, 牟传龙, 梁薇, 等.湘西北龙山、永顺地区龙马溪组潮控三角洲沉积的发现——志留纪"雪峰隆起"形成的新证据. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(3):468-477. ZHOU K K, MOU C L, LIANG W, et al. Tide-dominated deltaic deposits in Lungamachi Formation, Longshan-Yongshun regions, northwestern Hunan:the initial sedimentary responses to outset of "Xuefeng uplift". Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):468-477.
[7] 范二平, 唐书恒, 姜文, 等.湘西北下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力分析. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(4):18-23. FAN E P, TANG S H, JIANG W, et al. Accumulation conditions and exploration potential of shale has in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation,northwestern Hunan. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(4):18-23.
[8] 叶见玲, 李志能.湘西北下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利区分析.中国煤炭地质, 2014, 26(6):10-14. YE J L, LI Z N. Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoiring condition and favorable area analysis in northwestern Hunan. Coal Geology of China, 2014, 26(6):10-14.
[9] 范二平, 唐书恒, 张成龙, 等.湘西北下古生界黑色页岩扫描电镜孔隙特征.古地理学报, 2014, 16(1):133-142. FAN E P, TANG S H, ZHANG C L, et al. Scanning-electronmicroscopic micropore characteristics of the Lower Paleozoic black shale in northwestern Hunan Province. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014, 16(1):133-142.
[10] 张志平, 程礼军, 刘俊峰, 等.湖南保靖下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏地质条件评价.天然气勘探与开发, 2013, 36(3):4-6. ZHANG Z P, CHENG L J, LIU J F, et al. Reservoir-forming conditions of shale gas reservoir in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Baojing area, Hunan Province. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2013, 36(3):4-6.
[11] 袁照令, 李大明, 易顺华.对保靖-慈利逆冲断裂带的一些认识.地质与勘探, 2000, 36(5):59-61. YUAN Z L, LI D M, YI S H. The knowledge on Baojing-Cili overthrust fault belts. Geology and Prospecting, 2000, 36(5):59-61.
[12] 李斌, 胡博文, 石小虎, 等.湘西地区志留纪沉积体系及典型前陆盆地的形成模式研究.地学前缘, 2015, 22(6):167-176. LI B, HU B W, SHI X H, et al. Study on Silurian sedimentary system of western Hunan and the formation mode of typical foreland basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(6):167-176.
[13] 韩双彪, 张金川, 杨超, 等.渝东南下寒武页岩纳米级孔隙特征及其储气性能.煤炭学报, 2013, 38(6):1038-1043. HAN S B, ZHANG J C, YANG C, et al. The characteristics of nanoscale pore and its gas storage capability in the Lower Cambrian shale of southeast Chongqing. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(6):1038-1043.
[14] 杨巍, 陈国俊, 胡士骏, 等.川南-黔北地区下古生界页岩孔隙发育特征.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4):47-52. YANG W, CHEN G J, HU S J, et al. Pore characteristics of shale of Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4):47-52.
[15] 纪文明, 宋岩, 姜振学, 等.四川盆地东南部龙马溪组页岩微-纳米孔隙结构特征及控制因素.石油学报,2016, 37(2):182-195. JI W M, SONG Y, JIANG Z X, et al. Micro-nano pore structure characteristics and its control factors of shale in Longmaxi Formation,southeastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(2):182-195.
[16] 魏祥峰, 刘若冰, 张廷山, 等.页岩气储层微观孔隙结构特征及发育控制因素——以川南-黔北XX地区龙马溪组为例. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(5):1048-1059. WEI X F, LIU R B, ZHANG T S, et al. Micro-pores structure characteristics and development control factors of shale gas reservoirs-a case of Longmaxi Formation in XX area of southern Sichuan and northern Guizhou. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(5):1048-1059.
[17] 王亮, 陈云燕, 刘玉霞.川东南彭水地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征.中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(5):80-88. WANG L, CHEN Y Y, LIU Y X. Shale porous structural characteristics of Longmaxi Formation in Pengshui area of southeast Sichuan Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(5):80-88.
[18] LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[19] 崔景伟, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等.页岩孔隙研究新进展.地球科学进展, 2012, 27(12):1319-1325. CUI J W, ZOU C N, ZHU R K, et al. New advances in shale porosity research. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(12):1319-1325.
[20] 刘成林, 葛岩, 范柏江, 等.页岩气成藏模式研究.油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(5):1-5. LIU C L, GE Y, FAN B J, et al. Study on shale gas accumulation mode. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(5):1-5.
[21] 关振良, 谢丛姣, 董虎, 等.多孔介质微观孔隙结构三维成像技术.地质科技情报, 2009, 28(2):115-121. GUAN Z L, XIE C J, DONG H, et al. 3D imaging and visualization technology of micro pore structure in porous media. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2009, 28(2):115-121.
[22] 郭雪晶, 何顺利, 陈胜, 等.基于纳米CT及数字岩心的页岩孔隙微观结构及分布特征研究. 中国煤炭地质, 2016, 28(2):28-34. GUO X J, HE S L, CHEN S, et al. Research on microstructure of shale pores and distribution features based on Nano-CT scanning and digital core analysis. Coal Geology of China, 2016, 28(2):28-34.
[23] 张盼盼, 刘小平, 王雅杰, 等.页岩纳米孔隙研究新进展.地球科学进展, 2014, 29(11):1242-1248. ZHANG P P, LIU X P, WANG Y J, et al. Research progress in shale nanopores. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(11):1242-1248.
[24] 王社教, 王兰生, 黄金亮, 等.上扬子区志留系页岩气成藏条件.天然气工业, 2009, 29(5):45-50. WANG S J, WANG L S, HUANG J L, et al. Accumulation conditions of shale gas reservoirs in Silurian of the Upper Yangtze region. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5):45-50.
[25] 杨超, 张金川, 李婉君, 等.辽河坳陷沙三、沙四段泥页岩微观空隙特征及其成藏意义. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2):286-294. YANG C, ZHANG J C, LI W J, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics of Sha-3 and Sha-4 shale and their accumulation significance in Liaohe Depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(2):286-294.
[26] 久凯, 丁文龙, 李玉喜, 等.黔北地区构造特征与下寒武统页岩气储层裂缝研究.天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4):797-803. JIU K, DING W L, LI Y X, et al. Structural features in northern Guizhou area and reservoir fracture of Lower Cambrian shale gas. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4):797-803.
[1] 柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2] 尹兴平, 蒋裕强, 付永红, 张雪梅, 雷治安, 陈超, 张海杰. 渝西地区五峰组—龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 41-51.
[3] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[4] 马乔雨, 张欣, 张春雷, 周恒, 武中原. 基于一维卷积神经网络的横波速度预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 111-120.
[5] 向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 李军, 郭宇豪, 张浩. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[6] 郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[7] 叶涛, 王清斌, 代黎明, 陈容涛, 崔普媛. 台地相碳酸盐岩层序划分新方法——以渤中凹陷奥陶系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 95-103.
[8] 武中原, 张欣, 张春雷, 王海英. 基于LSTM循环神经网络的岩性识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 120-128.
[9] 何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
[10] 姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[11] 李慧莉, 尤东华, 李建交, 谭广辉, 刘士林. 麦盖提斜坡北新1井吐依洛克组角砾岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 26-35.
[12] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[13] 龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 段传丽, 邵映明, 何咏梅, 陈凌云, 焦煦. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.
[14] 李祖兵, 崔俊峰, 宋舜尧, 成亚斌, 卢异, 陈岑. 黄骅坳陷北大港潜山中生界碎屑岩储层特征及成因机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 81-92.
[15] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .