岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 128–134.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.06.016

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

曲流河储层隔夹层研究——以秦皇岛32-6油田为例

甘立琴, 苏进昌, 谢岳, 李超, 何康, 来又春   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司 渤海石油研究院, 天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-15 修回日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2017-11-21 发布日期:2017-11-21
  • 第一作者:甘立琴(1987-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事油气田开发地质研究工作。地址:(300452)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号海油大厦B座1325室。Email:ganliqin77@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项"海上油田丛式井网整体加密及综合调整技术"(2008ZX05024-004)资助

Interlayers of meandering river reservoir:a case from Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield

GAN Liqin, SU Jinchang, XIE Yue, LI Chao, HE Kang, LAI Youchun   

  1. Bohai Oilfield Research Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2016-04-15 Revised:2016-06-06 Online:2017-11-21 Published:2017-11-21

摘要: 为揭示曲流河储层隔夹层对剩余油分布和油层水淹的影响,通过分析物性参数与米采油指数关系得出隔夹层物性上限,并选择自然伽马、电阻率、厚度为主要敏感参数,采用灰色关联法进行权重系数计算,得到隔夹层判别指数及综合判别图版。在秦皇岛32-6油田南区明化镇组下段Ⅰ油组应用证实,该判别图版符合率达96%;在剩余油滞留带底部和油层水淹层顶部进行调整挖潜,生产效果明显。在曲流河储层隔夹层发育区,隔夹层延缓采油井含水上升速度;隔夹层不发育区域,易形成水串区,导致相邻隔夹层发育区形成剩余油滞留区。这种认识对油田开发中后期产能挖潜有指导作用。

关键词: 致密砂砾岩储层, 孔隙结构, 核磁共振, 成岩综合系数, 储层品质因子, 百口泉组, 玛湖凹陷

Abstract: To reveal the distribution rules of remaining oil and water flooded reservoir influenced by the meandering river reservoir interlayer, the interlayers' upper limit of physical property was obtained through the analysis of the physical parameters and the relation between the productivity index per-meter,and the choice of natural gamma,resistivity and thickness as the main sensitive parameters,calculate weight coefficients are obtained by using the grey correlation method,interlayer and comprehensive index discriminant chart. The application of the oil zone in the lower Minghuazheng Formation in the south area of Qinhuangdao 32-6 oilfield proves that the coincidence rate of the discrimination plate is upmost 96%. The adjustment is carried out at the bottom of the remaining oil retention zone and the top of the water flooded layer of the reservoir,and the production effect is obvious. In the meandering river reservoir interlayer development zone,the interlayer retards water cut rising rate of the production well;the formation of water flooding zone is easy to form in the interlayer non-developed area,which leads to the formation of remaining oil retention zone in the adjacent interlayer growth zone. The understanding will guide the potential tapping of productivity in the middle and late stages of oilfield development.

Key words: tight glutenite reservoir, pore structure, nuclear magnetic resonance, comprehensive diagenetic coefficient, reservoir quality factor, Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 赵春明, 胡景双, 霍春亮, 等.曲流河与辫状河沉积砂体连通模式及开发特征——以渤海地区秦皇岛32-6油田为例. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(6):88-91. ZHAO C M, HU J S, HUO C L, et al. Sandbody interconnectivity architecture and development characteristics of meandering river and braided river deposits-a case study of Qinhuangdao 32-6 Oilfield, Bohai area. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(6):88-91.
[2] 秦润森, 廖新武, 冯鑫, 等.秦皇岛32-6油田南区明下段Ⅰ油组3小层河道砂体叠置类型及其动态响应特征.油气地质与采收率, 2014, 21(3):15-19. QIN R S, LIAO X W, FENG X, et al. Study on stacking patterns of multi-staged channel sand and its function on production performance in sub-layer lower NmⅠ3, south area of QHD32-6 oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014, 21(3):15-19.
[3] 邹志文, 斯春松, 杨梦云.隔夹层成因、分布及其对油水分布的影响——以准噶尔盆地腹部莫索湾莫北地区为例.岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3):66-70. ZHOU Z W, SI C S, YANG M Y. Origin and distribution of interbeds and the influence on oil-water layer:an example from Mosuowan area in the hinterland of Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3):66-70.
[4] 严耀祖, 段天向.厚油层中隔夹层识别及井间预测技术.岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2):127-131. YAN Y Z, DUAN T X. Identification and inter-well prediction of interbeds in thick oil layer. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2):127-131.
[5] 姜建伟, 李庆明.夹层对厚油层开发效果的影响.西南石油学院学报, 1996, 18(1):35-38. JIANG J W, LI Q M. The influence of intercalation on the effect of thick reservoir exploitation. Journal of Southwestern Petroleum Institute, 1996, 18(1):35-38.
[6] 孙天建, 穆龙新, 赵国良. 砂质辫状河储集层隔夹层类型及其表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例.石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):112-120. SUN T J, MU L X, ZHAO G L. Classification and characterization of barrier-intercalation in sandy braided river reservoirs:taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):112-120.
[7] 张吉, 张烈辉, 胡书勇.陆相碎屑岩储层隔夹层成因、特征及其识别.测井技术, 2003, 27(3):221-224. ZHANG J, ZHANG L H, HU S Y. The genesis and characteristics and identification of intercalations in non-marine reservoir with clastic rock. Well Logging Technology, 2003, 27(3):221-224.
[8] 刘建民, 徐守余.河流相储层沉积模式及对剩余油分布的控制.石油学报, 2003, 24(1):58-62. LIU J M, XU S Y. Reservoir sedimentary model of fluvial facies and it's control to remaining oil distribution. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(1):58-62.
[9] 焦养泉, 李桢.河道储层砂体中隔挡层的成因与分布规律.石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(4):78-81. JIAO Y Q, LI Z. Genesis and distribution regularity of isolate barrier beds in channel reservoir sandbody. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1995, 22(4):78-81.
[10] 朱东亚, 胡文瑄, 曹学伟, 等.临南油田隔层类型划分及其分布规律研究.地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2004, 29(2):211-218. ZHU D Y, HU W X, CAO X W, et al. Classification and distribution of insulating layers in Linnan Oilfield. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2004, 29(2):211-218.
[11] 束青林.孤岛油田馆陶组河流相储层隔夹层成因研究.石油学报, 2006, 27(3):100-103. SHU Q L. Interlayer characterization of fluvial reservoir in Guantao Formation of Gudao Oilfield. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3):100-103.
[12] 徐寅, 徐怀民, 郭春涛, 等.隔夹层成因、特征及其对油田开发的影响——以塔中地区海相砂岩储层为例.科技导报, 2012, 30(15):17-21. XU Y, XU H M, GUO C T, et al. Origin characteristics and effects on oilfield development of interlayer of shore sandstone reservoir in Tazhong Area. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(15):17-21.
[13] 王健, 徐守余, 仲维苹. 河流相储层隔夹层成因及其分布特征.地质科技情报, 2010, 29(4):84-88. WANG J, XU S Y, ZHONG W P. Genesis and distribution of the interlayer in fluvial reservoir. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2010, 29(4):84-88.
[14] 彭得兵, 唐海, 李呈祥, 等.灰色关联法在剩余油分布研究中的应用.岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3):133-136. PENG D B, TANG H, LI C X, et al. Application of grey association analysis to the study of remaining oil distribution. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(3):133-136.
[15] 李胜利, 于兴河, 高兴军, 等.剩余油分布研究新方法——灰色关联法.石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(2):175-179. LI S L, YU X H, GAO X J, et al. A new method for studying remaining oil distribution-grey association analysis. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(2):175-179.
[16] 岳大力, 吴胜和, 刘建民.曲流河点坝地下储层构型精细解剖方法.石油学报, 2007, 28(4):99-103. YUE D L, WU S H, LIU J M. An accurate method for anatomizing architecture of subsurface reservoir in point bar of meandering river. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4):99-103.
[17] 刘超, 赵春明, 廖新武, 等.海上油田大井距条件下曲流河储层内部构型精细解剖及应用分析. 中国海上油气, 2014, 26(1):58-64. LIU C, ZHAO C M, LIAO X W, et al. A refined anatomy of the internal structure of meandering river reservoirs under large well spacing in offshore oilfields and its application. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(1):58-64.
[18] 丁世梅, 季民, 史洁, 等.泥岩隔夹层类型及剩余油控制研究. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(4):130-134. DING S M, JI M, SHI J, et al. Type of mudstone barriers and its residual oil control. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2004, 26(4):130-134.
[19] 付志国, 石成方, 赵翰卿, 等.喇萨杏油田河道砂岩厚油层夹层分布特征.大庆石油地质与开发, 2007, 26(4):55-58. FU Z G, SHI C F, ZHAO H Q, et al. The distribution characteristics of interlayer in thick channel sand oil reservoir in Lasaxing Oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(4):55-58.
[20] 杜庆军, 陈月明, 侯键, 等.胜坨油田厚油层内夹层分布对剩余油的控制作用.石油天然气学报, 2006, 28(4):111-114. DU Q J, CHEN Y M, HOU J, et al.Control of interlayer on the distribution of remaining oil in thick reservoirs of Shengtuo Oilfield. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2006, 28(4):111-114.
[21] 刘佳, 程林松.底水油藏中隔夹层对水平井开发影响研究.科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(32):9662-9665. LIU J, CHENG L S. The impact of interlayer to horizontal wells production in bottom water reservoir. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(32):9662-9665.
[1] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[3] 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[4] 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[5] 宋志华, 李垒, 雷德文, 张鑫, 凌勋. 改进的U-Net网络小断层识别技术在玛湖凹陷玛中地区三叠系白碱滩组的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 40-49.
[6] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[7] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[8] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[9] 尹路, 许多年, 乐幸福, 齐雯, 张继娟. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组储层特征及油气成藏规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 59-68.
[10] 覃建华, 王建国, 李思远, 李胜, 窦智, 彭仕宓. 玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组致密砾岩储层水力裂缝特征及形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 29-36.
[11] 司马立强, 马骏, 刘俊丰, 杨会洁, 王亮, 赵宁. 柴达木盆地涩北地区第四系泥岩型生物气储层孔隙有效性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 1-10.
[12] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[13] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[14] 夏青松, 陆江, 杨鹏, 张昆, 杨朝屹, 聂俊杰, 朱云舫, 李立芳. 柴达木盆地英西地区渐新统下干柴沟组上段储层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 132-144.
[15] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .