渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20230215

岩性油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 159–168.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230215

• 石油工程与油气田开发 • 上一篇

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性

姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉

中国石化胜利油田分公司孤岛采油厂, 山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2022-08-21 修回日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2023-03-07
通讯作者: 王超(1985-),男,本科,高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发研究工作。Email:wangchao990.slyt@sinopec.com。 E-mail:wangchao990.slyt@sinopec.com
作者简介:姚秀田(1978-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事油气田开发研究工作。地址:(257000)山东省东营市胜利油田孤岛采油厂。Email:yxiutian@163.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“渤海湾济阳坳陷致密油开发示范工程”（编号：2017ZX05049-004）资助。

Reservoir sensitivity of Neogene Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

YAO Xiutian, WANG Chao, YAN Sen, WANG Mingpeng, LI Wan

Gudao Oil Production Plant, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, Shandong, China

Received:2022-08-21 Revised:2022-09-01 Published:2023-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 储层敏感性分析是判别储层伤害程度的重要手段，对后期高效开发和剩余油挖潜具有重要意义。选取渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷垦西油田新近系馆陶组储层岩心样品，结合薄片观察、X射线衍射分析及压汞测试、流动水驱实验，对馆陶组上段和下段储层伤害指数和敏感性特征进行了分析。研究结果表明：①渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层岩石胶结疏松，孔隙结构总体孔径较大，孔喉分布较均匀，连通性较好；岩石矿物组成以石英、斜长石、钾长石和岩屑为主，黏土矿物主要包括高岭石、伊利石、绿泥石及伊蒙混层；馆上段以细粒为主，馆下段以中粒为主。②馆陶组储层普遍具中等速敏性、弱碱敏性、弱盐敏性特征；上下两段的酸敏性特征差异较大，上段具有非酸敏性特征，而下段具有强酸敏性特征，酸敏指数达78.28%；③研究区馆陶组铁白云石、绿泥石含量及孔隙结构对储层敏感性具有控制作用。④控制注采流速是研究区开发方案中的重要内容，对馆下段酸敏带来的储层伤害要进行防护和治理。

关键词: 储层敏感性, 孔隙结构, 黏土矿物, 储层伤害, 馆陶组, 新近系, 沾化凹陷, 渤海湾盆地

Abstract: Reservoir sensitivity analysis is an important means to evaluate the degree of reservoir damage, which is of great significance for the later efficient development and remaining oil tapping. The core samples from Neogene Guantao Formation in Kenxi oilfield of Zhanhua Sag in Bohai Bay Basin were selected to analyze the damage index and sensitivity characteristics of reservoirs of Guantao Formation in combination with thin section observation, X-ray diffraction analysis, mercury injection test and flowing water drive experiment. The results show that:(1) The Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag of Bohai Bay Basin is loosely cemented. The pore structure is characterized by large pore size, uniform distribution of pore throat and good connectivity. The rock minerals are mainly composed of quartz, plagioclase, K-feldspar and rock debris, and the clay minerals mainly include kaolinite, illite, chlorite and chlorite-illite mixed layer. The upper member of Guantao Formation is dominated by fine grains, while the lower member is dominated by medium grains.(2) The reservoirs of Guantao Formation are generally characterized by medium velocity sensitivity, weak alkali sensitivity and weak salt sensitivity. The acid sensitivity characteristics of the upper and lower members are quite different. The upper member has non-acid sensitivity characteristics, while the lower member has strong acid sensitivity characteristics with index of 78.25%.(3) The content of ankerite and chlorite and pore structure of Guantao Formation in the study area control the reservoir sensitivity.(4) Controlling of injection-production flow rate is an important content of the development plan in the study area, while the reservoir damage caused by acid sensitivity in the lower member of Guantao Formation should be protected and treated.

Key words: reservoir sensitivity, pore structure, clay mineral, reservoir damage, Guantao Formation, Neogene, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2+3

姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159–168.

YAO Xiutian, WANG Chao, YAN Sen, WANG Mingpeng, LI Wan. Reservoir sensitivity of Neogene Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2): 159–168.

参考文献

[1] 韩长城, 徐子煜, 王文峰, 等. 南图尔盖盆地Aryskum坳陷中侏罗统多尚组储层敏感性研究[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 38(5):599-606. HAN Changcheng, XU Ziyu, WANG Wenfeng, et al. Study on reservoir sensitivity of the Upper Jurassic Duoshang Formation in the Aryskum Depression, South Turgay Basin[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 38(5):599-606.
[2] 单祥, 徐洋, 郭华军, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷北斜坡玛131井区块三叠系百口泉组储层敏感性评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(1):176-182. SHAN Xiang, XU Yang, GUO Huajun, et al. Reservoir sensitivity evaluation of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 block of Mabei slope in Mahu Depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, 36(1):176-182.
[3] 李勇, 王延斌, 孟尚志, 等. 煤系非常规天然气合采地质基础理论进展及展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(4):1406-1418. LI Yong, WANG Yanbin, MENG Shangzhi, et al. Theoretical basis and prospect of coal measure unconventional natural gas co-production[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(4):1406-1418.
[4] 徐豪飞, 马宏伟, 尹相荣, 等. 新疆油田超低渗透油藏注水开发储层损害研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(2):100-106. XU Haofei, MA Hongwei, YIN Xiangrong, et al. Study on formation damage with water flooding for ultra-low permeability reservoir in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(2):100-106.
[5] 熊山, 王学生, 张遂, 等. WXS油藏长期水驱储层物性参数变化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3):120-129. XIONG Shan, WANG Xuesheng, ZHANG Sui, et al. Physical properties variation of WXS reservoir after long-term water flooding[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(3):120-129.
[6] CIVAN F. Formation damage mechanisms and their phenomenological modeling:An overview[C]. Oklahoma:Proceedings of 7 th European Formation Damage Conference(EFDC), 2007.
[7] 江涛, 韦涛, 范旭, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘C-P煤系致密砂岩储层敏感性分析[J]. 高校地质学报, 2020, 26(3):313-322. JIANG Tao, WEI Tao, FAN Xu, et al. Sensitivity analysis of tight sandstone reservoirs of Carboniferous-Permian coal-series in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2020, 26(3):313-322.
[8] 王玉霞, 周立发, 焦尊生, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区延长组致密砂岩储层敏感性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4):981-990. WANG Yuxia, ZHOU Lifa, JIAO Zunsheng, et al. Sensitivity evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir in Yanchang Formation in Shanbei area, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4):981-990.
[9] 邵东波, 陈建文. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层敏感性特征及其控制因素:以新安边地区延长组长6储层为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(3):55-60. SHAO Dongbo, CHEN Jianwen. Sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoir in Ordos Basin and its controlling factor:Taking the Chang 6 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Xin'anbian area as example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(3):55-60.
[10] 段春节, 魏旭光, 李小冬, 等. 深层高压低渗透砂岩油藏储层敏感性研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(3):94-99. DUAN Chunjie, WEI Xuguang, LI Xiaodong, et al. Formation sensitivity of the deep section high pressure and low-permeability sandstone reservoir[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(3):94-99.
[11] 党犇, 赵虹, 康晓燕, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡中部延长组深部层系特低渗储层敏感性微观机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(3):1100-1107.DANG Ben, ZHAO Hong, KANG Xiaoyan, et al. Sensitivity microscopic mechanism study of super-low permeability reservoirs in depth of Yanchang Formation in central of Shanbei slop Ordos Basin NW China[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2013, 44(3):1100-1107.
[12] 李琴. 孤岛油田孤北1地区稠油油藏特征及储层敏感性分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2005, 12(4):28-30. LI Qin. The characteristic of the viscous oil reservoirs and analysis of reservoir sensitivity in Gudao Oilfield Gubei 1 area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2005, 12(4):28-30.
[13] 张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3):293-306. ZHANG Jianguo, JIANG Zaixing, LIU Li'an, et al. Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3):293-306.
[14] 赵笑笑, 闫建平, 王敏, 等. 沾化凹陷沙河街组湖相泥页岩夹层特征及测井识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1):118-129. ZHAO Xiaoxiao, YAN Jianping, WANG Min, et al. Logging identification method of lacustrine shale interlayers of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(1):118-129.
[15] 陈雨茂, 邓文秀, 滕彬彬. 曲流河点坝内部构型精细解剖:以垦西油田垦71断块馆陶组为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2011, 18(4):25-27. CHEN Yumao, DENG Wenxiu, TENG Binbin. Internal detailed description on bar sand of meandering river based on multiscale data:Case study of Guantao Formation, Ken 71 fault block, Kenxi Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2011, 18(4):25-27.
[16] 孙淑云, 曾晚丽, 周丽君, 等. 垦西垦71断块特高含水期产能挖潜方向[J]. 国外油田工程, 2004(8):40-41. SUN Shuyun, ZENG Wanli, ZHOU Lijun, et al. Production potential tapping direction in Kenxi Ken 71 fault block during extra high water cut period[J]. Foreign Oilfield Engineering, 2004(8):40-41.
[17] 王可君. 深层特稠油油藏HDCS开发技术政策界限[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(6):93-95. WANG Kejun. Technical limits of HDCS for developing deep extra-heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(6):93-95.
[18] 国家能源局. 储层敏感性流动实验评价方法:SY/T 5358-2010[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2020. National Energy Administration. Formation damage evaluation by flow test:SY/T 5358-2010[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2020.
[19] 任大忠, 张晖, 周然, 等. 塔里木盆地克深地区巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层敏感性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6):27-36. REN Dazhong, ZHANG Hui, ZHOU Ran, et al. Sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoir of Bashijiqike Formation in Keshen area, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(6):27-36.
[20] 成赛男, 田继军, 张鹏辉. 伊通盆地莫里青断陷西北缘双阳组二段储层敏感性流动实验评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2013, 20(3):76-78. CHENG Sainan, TIAN Jijun, ZHANG Penghui. Study on flow test evaluation of reservoir sensitivity in second member of Shuangyang Formation, northwest edge of Moliqing fault depression, Yitong Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2013, 20(3):76-78.
[21] 李冠男, 孙卫, 刘登科. 鄂尔多斯盆地吴起薛岔地区长6储层敏感性研究及其主控因素[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(6):138-147. LI Guannan, SUN Wei, LIU Dengke. Sensitivity of Chang 6 reservoir in Wuqi-Xuecha area of Ordos Basin and its main controlling factors[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(6):138-147.
[22] 徐铠烔, 王纳申, 申彪, 等. 银额盆地巴北凹陷二叠系埋汗哈达组储层敏感性[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(10):1600-1607. XU Kaitong, WANG Nashen, SHEN Biao, et al. Maihanhada Formation reservoir sensitivity of Permian in Babei Sag, Yin'e Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(10):1600-1607.
[23] 徐会林, 王新海, 魏少波, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪区块震旦系储层敏感性实验评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(2):13-17. XU Huilin, WANG Xinhai, WEI Shaobo, et al. Evaluation of reservoir sensitivity of Sinian in Gaoshiti-Moxi block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(2):13-17.
[24] 李云, 祁利褀, 胡作维, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡中侏罗统头屯河组储层敏感性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(1):52-57. LI Yun, QI Liqi, HU Zuowei, et al. Reservoir sensitivity of Middle Jurassic Toutunhe Formation in Fudong slope, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(1):52-57.
[25] 曾伟, 董明, 孔令明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田中、下二叠统砂岩储层敏感性影响因素分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2011, 34(3):31-34. ZENG Wei, DONG Ming, KONG Lingming, et al. Influencing factors of reservoir sensitivity in Middle and Lower Permian sandstone, Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2011, 34(3):31-34.
[26] 束青林. 孤岛油田河流相储层结构与剩余油分布规律研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2005. SHU Qinglin. Study on the fluvial reservoir architecture and distribution modes of remaining oil in Gudao oil field[D]. Guangzhou:Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2005.
[27] 石砥石. 沾化凹陷东部北西向断裂系统与油气成藏研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2006. SHI Dishi. Northwestward(NW) faults and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern part of Zhanhua Sag[D]. Guangzhou:Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry), 2006.
[28] 郇金来, 杨丽, 代百祥, 等. 乌石凹陷X油田流沙港组三段储层敏感性分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(5):49-53. HUAN Jinlai, YANG Li, DAI Baixiang, et al. Reservoir sensitivity analysis of the third member of Liushagang Formation in X oilfield of Wushi Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(5):49-53.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性

Reservoir sensitivity of Neogene Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[2]	杨楷乐, 何胜林, 杨朝强, 王猛, 张瑞雪, 任双坡, 赵晓博, 姚光庆. 高温-超压-高CO₂背景下致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征——以莺歌海盆地LD10区新近系梅山组-黄流组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 83-95.
[3]	吕栋梁, 杨健, 林立明, 张恺漓, 陈燕虎. 砂岩储层油水相对渗透率曲线表征模型及其在数值模拟中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[4]	文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[5]	任梦怡, 胡光义, 范廷恩, 范洪军. 秦皇岛32-6油田北区新近系明化镇组下段复合砂体构型及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 141-151.
[6]	李国欣, 石亚军, 张永庶, 陈琰, 张国卿, 雷涛. 柴达木盆地油气勘探、地质认识新进展及重要启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
[7]	马奎前, 刘东, 黄琴. 渤海旅大油田新近系稠油油藏水平井蒸汽驱油物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 152-161.
[8]	张凤奇, 李宜浓, 罗菊兰, 任小锋, 张兰馨, 张芥瑜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 50-62.
[9]	王立锋, 宋瑞有, 陈殿远, 徐涛, 潘光超, 韩光明. 莺歌海盆地D13区新近系黄流组大型海底扇地震识别及含气性预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 42-52.
[10]	张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[11]	刘阳平, 吴博然, 于忠良, 余成林, 王立鑫, 尹艳树. 辫状河砂岩储层三维地质模型重构技术——以冀东油田高尚堡区块新近系馆陶组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 159-170.
[12]	周东红, 谭辉煌, 张生强. 渤海海域垦利6-1油田新近系复合河道砂体地震描述技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 13-21.
[13]	李晓辉, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王志萍, 王启明. 辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 93-103.
[14]	雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
[15]	何玉, 周星, 李少轩, 丁洪波. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷古近系地层超压成因及测井响应特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 60-69.