岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 100–107.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200210

• 勘探技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密砂岩储层电性特征分析

侯振学1, 陈朕2, 牛全兵3, 宋光建2, 刘延斌4   

  1. 1. 中海油田服务股份有限公司 油田技术事业部, 河北 廊坊 065201;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田公司 风城油田作业区, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    3. 中国石油青海油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736200;
    4. 中国石油新疆油田公司 准东采油厂, 新疆 阜康 831511
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-26 修回日期:2019-06-27 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 第一作者:侯振学(1986-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事非常规储层测井解释与评价方面的工作。地址:(065201)河北省廊坊市三河市燕郊开发区行宫西大街中海油基地。Email:houzhenxue@qq.com。

Analysis of electrical characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs

HOU Zhenxue1, CHEN Zhen2, NIU Quanbing3, SONG Guangjian2, LIU Yanbin4   

  1. 1. Well Tech of China Oilfield Services Limited, Langfang 065201, Hebei, China;
    2. Fengcheng Oilfield Operating Area, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China;
    4. Zhundong Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Fukang 831511, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2019-03-26 Revised:2019-06-27 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

PDF (PC)

356

摘要： 为了弄清致密砂岩储层复杂的电性特征，以高分辨率阵列感应资料为基础，结合核磁测井、岩心微观分析资料及试气成果，对鄂尔多斯盆地东缘L区块二叠系上石盒子组致密砂岩储层的电性特征进行了分析，找出了导致电阻率值存在差异以及储层具有不同侵入特征的原因。研究表明：致密砂岩储层流体性质并不是电阻率值存在差异的主控因素，低电阻率主要是孔喉边缘黏土矿物的束缚水与可联通孔隙喉道内的毛管水共同导电造成的，中—高电阻率与孤立孔隙无法导电有关；侵入特征与含气性及喉道的沟通能力有关，低电阻率负差异储层是含气性与优质孔隙结构的指示，低电阻率无差异为片状喉道导致的不动水导电和毛管阻力及黏土矿物阻止钻井液侵入有关，中—高电阻率无差异与孤立孔隙无法导电及无法侵入有关。导致地层出现这种电性特征是沉积作用、成岩作用及后期成藏的共同影响的。该研究成果对指导研究区致密储层的勘探开发具有重要意义。

关键词: 电性特征, 致密砂岩, 阵列感应电阻率, 上石盒子组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: In order to clarify the complex electrical characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs,the electrical characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs of Permian upper Shihezi Formation in L block in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin were analyzed based on high resolution array induction data,combined with nuclear magnetic logging,core micro-analysis data and gas testing results,and the causes of resistivity differences and different intrusion characteristics were found out. The results show that fluid property of tight sandstone reservoir is not the dominant factor for the difference of resistivity. The low resistivity is mainly caused by co-conductivity of bound water caused by clay minerals at the edge of pore throat and capillary water in the connectable pore throat. The medium and high resistivity is mainly related to the non-conductivity of isolated pore. The invasion characteristics are mainly related to gas-bearing property and the communication ability of throat. Low resistivity negative difference reservoir is indicator of gas-bearing property and high-quality pore structure. No difference in low resistivity is related to the immovable water conductivity caused by flaky throat,capillary resistance and clay minerals preventing drilling fluid invasion. No difference between medium and high resistivity is related to the inability of conduction and invasion of isolated pore. It is the common influence of sedimentation,diagenesis and later accumulation that leads to the formation of such electrical characteristics. The research results are of great significance for guiding exploration and development of tight reservoirs in the study area.

Key words: electrical characteristics, tight sandstone, array induction resistivity, upper Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2
[1] 王国亭, 贾爱林, 闫海军, 等.苏里格致密砂岩气田潜力储层特征及可动用性评价.石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(5):896-904. WANG G T, JIA A L, YAN H J, et al. Characteristics and recoverability evaluation on the potential reservoir in Sulige tight sandstone gas field. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5):896-904.
[2] 张渝悦, 张威.鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗探区二叠系下石盒子组盒1段致密砂岩气层测井评价方法. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2016, 36(4):53-59. ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG W. Well logging assessment of tight sandstone gas reservoirs from the He-1 member of the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation in the Hangjinqi exploration area,Ordos Basin. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2016, 36(4):53-59.
[3] 王迪, 戚家振, 陈现, 等.东海N气田低阻气层成因分析及饱和度定量评价.复杂油气藏, 2017, 10(4):7-13. WANG D, QI J Z, CHEN X, et al. Forming reason analysis and saturation quantitative evaluation of low-resistivity gas layer in N Gas field of Donghai Sea. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2017, 10(4):7-13.
[4] 赵军龙, 李甘, 朱广社, 等.低阻油层成因机理及测井评价方法综述.地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(4):1334-1342. ZHAO J L, LI G, ZHU G S, et al. Review of logging evaluating method and contributing factor or mechanism on low resistivity reservoirs. Progress in Geophysics, 2011, 26(4):1334-1342.
[5] 杨锐祥, 王向公, 白松涛, 等.Oriente盆地海相低阻油层成因机理及测井评价方法.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):84-90. YANG R X, WANG X G, BAI S T, et al. Formation mechanism and log evaluation methods of marine low resistivity reservoir in Oriente Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):84-90.
[6] 雍世和, 张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释.东营:中国石油大学出版社, 2007:262-270. YONG S H, ZHANG C M. Logging data processing and comprehensive interpretation. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 2007:262-270.
[7] 牛鑫磊, 曹代勇, 徐浩, 等.海陆过渡相煤系致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素.煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(4):188-195. NIU X L, CAO D Y, XU H, et al. Characteristics and control factors of tight sandstone reservoirs in marine-continental transitional coal measures. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(4):188-195.
[8] 杨仁超, 王秀平, 樊爱萍, 等.苏里格气田东二区砂岩成岩作用与致密储层成因.沉积学报, 2012, 30(1):111-119. YANG R C, WANG X P, FAN A P, et al. Diagenesis of sand-stone and genesis of compact reservoirs in the eastⅡpart of Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(1):111-119.
[9] 谢英刚, 秦勇, 叶建平, 等.临县地区上古生界煤系致密砂岩气成藏条件分析.煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1):181-191. XIE Y G, QIN Y, YE J P, et al. Accumulation conditions of tight gas in the Upper Paleozoic of Linxing block. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(1):181-191.
[10] 刘成林, 朱筱敏, 曾庆猛.苏里格气田储层成岩序列与孔隙演化.天然气工业, 2005, 25(11):1-3. LIU C L, ZHU X M, ZENG Q M. Reservoir diagenetic sequence and por evolution of Sulige Gas Field in Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(11):1-3.
[11] 彭真, 秦臻, 潘和平, 等.杭锦旗地区低阻气层成因及测井评价方法.天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(11):2054-2063. PENG Z, QIN Z, PAN H P, et al. Low-resistivity gas reservoir genesis and log evaluation method in Hangjinqi area. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(11):2054-2063.
[12] 郭冀宁, 韩艺, 陈烈, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地L地区致密低阻气层成因研究.中国锰业, 2017, 35(1):19-21. GUO J N, HAN Y, CHEN L, et al. A research on genesis of low resistivity of tight gas reservoir in L area of Ordos Basin. China's Manganese Industry. 2017, 35(1):19-21.
[13] 段新国, 衡勇, 王洪辉, 等.苏里格气田南区上古气藏低阻气层形成机理.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(4):427-434. DUAN X G, HENG Y, WANG H H, et al. Genetic mechanism of Upper Paleozoic low-resistivity gas reservoirs in south of Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin,China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 42(4):427-434.
[14] 窦伟坦, 刘新社, 王涛.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田地层水成因及气水分布规律.石油学报, 2010, 31(5):767-772. DOU W T, LIU X S, WANG T. The origin of formation water and the regularity of gas and water distribution for the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(5):767-772.
[15] 姚泾利, 王怀厂, 裴戈, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界致密砂岩超低含水饱和度气藏形成机理. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(1):37-43. YAO J L, WANG H C, PEI G, et al. The formation mechanism of Upper Paleozoic tight sand gas reservoirs with ultra-low water saturation in eastern Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(1):37-43.
[16] 叶礼友, 高树生, 杨洪志, 等.致密砂岩气藏产水机理与开发对策.天然气工业, 2015, 35(2):41-45. YE L Y, GAO S S, YANG H Z, et al. Water production mechanism and development strategy of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(2):41-45.
[17] 李长喜, 李潮流, 周灿灿, 等.淡水钻井液侵入对双感应和双侧向测井响应的影响. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(5):603-608. LI C X, LI C L, ZHOU C C, et al. Effects of fresh drilling mud invasion on logging responses of dual induction and dual lateral to reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(5):603-608.
[18] 高楚桥, 毛志强, 李进福.岩石导电效率及其与含水饱和度之间的关系.石油物探, 1998, 37(3):130-136. GAO C Q, MAO Z Q, LI J F. The electrical efficiency of rocks and its relationship with water saturation. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 1998, 37(3):130-136.
[19] 薛辉, 窦连彬, 吕亚辉, 等.钻井液侵入对阵列感应电阻率的影响及电阻率特征分析. 天然气勘探与开发, 2016, 39(2):25-30. XUE H, DOU L B, LYU Y H, et al. Effect of mud invasion on array-induction resistivity logging and resistivity characteristics. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2016, 39(2):25-30.
[20] 张莉, 孙宏智, 张美玲, 等.应用阵列感应资料对复杂侵入现象的解释.大庆石油地质与开发, 2005, 24(4):99-100. ZHANG L, SUN H Z, ZHANG M L, et al. Interpretation of complex intrusion phenomena using array induction data. Petroleum Geology and Development in Daqing, 2005, 24(4):99-100.
[21] 王海燕, 孙维昭, 张智, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上石盒子组致密砂岩储层特征及优质储层形成机制.桂林理工大学学报, 2018, 38(3):392-400. WANG H Y, SUN W Z, ZHANG Z, et al. Characteristics of tight sandstone reservoir and formation mechanism of high quality reservoir from the Upper Shihezi formation in Linxing area,Ordos Basin. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2018, 38(3):392-400.
[22] 张晓峰, 侯明才, 陈安清.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部下石盒子组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素.天然气工业, 2010, 30(11):34-38. ZHANG X F, HOU M C, CHEN A Q. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoirs of lower Shihezi Formation in northeastern Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(11):34-38.
[23] 马超.定北地区下石盒子组盒1段致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):89-93. MA C. Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of He-1 member of the lower Shihezi Formation in Dingbei area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):89-93.
[24] 刘喜杰, 马遵敬, 韩冬, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块致密砂岩优质储层形成的主控因素. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4):481-490. LIU X J, MA Z J, HAN D, et al. Research on the main factors of high quality tight sandstone reservoir in Linxing block, Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(4):481-490.
[25] 呼延钰莹, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):56-65. HUYAN Y Y, JIANG F J, PANG X Q, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):56-65.
[26] 乔博, 夏守春, 艾庆琳, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界致密砂岩气成藏特征.科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(13):42-49. QIAO B, XIA S C, AI Q L, et al. Accumulation character of the upper Paleozoic tight sandstone gas in ordos Basin. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(13):42-49.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[3] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[4] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[5] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[6] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[7] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[8] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[9] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[10] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[11] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[12] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[13] 翟咏荷, 何登发, 开百泽. 鄂尔多斯盆地及邻区中—晚二叠世构造-沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 32-44.
[14] 王小娟, 陈双玲, 谢继容, 马华灵, 朱德宇, 庞小婷, 杨田, 吕雪莹. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 78-87.
[15] 龙盛芳, 侯云超, 杨超, 郭懿萱, 张杰, 曾亚丽, 高楠, 李尚洪. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部庆城地区三叠系长7段—长3段层序地层特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 145-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄思静,黄培培,王庆东,刘昊年,吴　萌,邹明亮. 胶结作用在深埋藏砂岩孔隙保存中的意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 7 -13 .
[2] 刘震, 陈艳鹏, 赵阳,, 郝奇, 许晓明, 常迈. 陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成控制因素及分布规律概述[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 121 -127 .
[3] 丁超，郭兰，闫继福. 子长油田安定地区延长组长6 油层成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 46 -50 .
[4] 李彦山，张占松，张超谟，陈鹏. 应用压汞资料对长庆地区长6 段储层进行分类研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 91 -93 .
[5] 罗 鹏,李国蓉,施泽进,周大志,汤鸿伟,张德明. 川东南地区茅口组层序地层及沉积相浅析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 74 -78 .
[6] 左国平，屠小龙，夏九峰. 苏北探区火山岩油气藏类型研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(2): 37 -41 .
[7] 王飞宇. 提高热采水平井动用程度的方法与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(Z1): 100 -103 .
[8] 袁云峰，才业，樊佐春，姜懿洋，秦启荣，蒋庆平. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带石炭系火山岩储层裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(1): 47 -51 .
[9] 袁剑英，付锁堂，曹正林，阎存凤，张水昌，马达德. 柴达木盆地高原复合油气系统多源生烃和复式成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 7 -14 .
[10] 石战战，贺振华，文晓涛，唐湘蓉. 一种基于EMD 和GHT 的储层识别方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(3): 102 -105 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发