岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 182–193.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250116

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集规律

吴松1, 冯冰2, 于继良3, 蓝宝锋4, 李龙2, 王胜2, 沈家宁1, 李刚权2   

  1. 1. 贵州乌江能源投资有限公司, 贵阳 550081;
    2. 贵州页岩气勘探开发有限责任公司, 贵州 遵义 563400;
    3. 贵州能源集团有限公司, 贵阳 550081;
    4. 贵州能源产业研究院有限公司, 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-05 修回日期:2023-05-17 出版日期:2025-01-01 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 第一作者:吴松(1995—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事非常规油气地质勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(550081)贵州省贵阳市观山湖区金阳北路233号。Email:1711913985@qq.com。
  • 通信作者: 沈家宁(1989—),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事非常规油气地质勘探开发方面的管理工作。Email:309423172@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技厅青年引导项目“黔北阳溪地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层含气性及富集规律研究”(编号:黔科合基础[-2024]青年379)、中央引导地方科技发展资金项目“贵州页岩气勘探开发科技创新基地”(编号:黔科中引地[2022]4024)与贵州省找矿突破战略行动重大协同创新项目“贵州省页岩气效益开发关键技术及工程试验”(编号:黔科合战略找矿[2022]ZD005)联合资助。

Shale gas enrichment law of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Anchang syncline of Zheng’an area,northern Guizhou

WU Song1, FENG Bing2, YU Jiliang3, LAN Baofeng4, LI Long2, WANG Sheng2, SHEN Jianing1, LI Gangquan2   

  1. 1. Guizhou Wujiang Energy Investment Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, China;
    2. Guizhou Shale Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd., Zunyi 563400, China;
    3. Guizhou Energy Group Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, China;
    4. Guizhou Energy Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550025, China
  • Received:2023-04-05 Revised:2023-05-17 Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-01-04

摘要: 四川盆地外缘黔北地区具有良好的页岩气勘探开发前景。基于测井、录井及分析化验等资料,对黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层特征及富集规律进行了分析。研究结果表明:①黔北正安地区安场向斜奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组岩性主要为硅质页岩与硅质岩,孔隙类型主要为有机孔隙及粒间孔、粒内溶孔、晶间孔等无机孔隙与页理缝和构造缝及微裂缝等。岩石中总有机碳(TOC)为0.34%~6.65%,平均为3.69%,纵向上自下而上总体呈先增大后减小的趋势,平面上在向斜核部的TOC含量较高,呈环带状向四周降低。岩心含气的质量体积为1.6~6.2 m3/t,平均为3.9 m3/t,龙马溪组总含气量垂向上随着深度的增加而增加,平面上从向斜中部向南北两端逐渐降低,从向斜核部向两翼逐渐降低。矿物脆性指数总体较高,具有很好的可压裂性。②研究区五峰组—龙马溪组为“陆棚边缘、改造残留、向斜浅埋”的独特地质背景,其有利的沉积环境及古生产力为页岩气富集成藏奠定了基础,良好的保存条件避免了页岩储层中天然气的大量逸散,上覆的新滩组盖层与下伏的宝塔组底板形成了“上盖下堵”的封堵组合。③盆外残余向斜页岩气在向斜中心明显富集,核部是页岩气聚集的有利位置,两翼低角度逆断层遮挡处也是页岩气的有利富集部位,微裂缝的发育有利于页岩气的聚集与稳产,因此中浅层残余向斜的井位部署应重点考虑“宽、缓、深”的核心部位。

关键词: 页岩气, 储层特征, 脆性指数, 上盖下堵, 断层遮挡, 核部富集, 奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组, 安场向斜, 黔北地区

Abstract: There are good prospects for shale gas exploration and development in northern Guizhou area on the outer edge of Sichuan Basin. Based on wire-logging,mud-logging,and analytical data,the characteristics and enrichment law of shale gas reservoirs of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Anchang syncline of Zheng’an area in northern Guizhou were analyzed. The results show that:(1)The lithologies of Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Anchang syncline of Zheng’an area in northern Guizhou are mainly composed of siliceous shale and siliceous rock,and the pore types are mainly organic pores, intergranular pores,intragranular dissolved pores,intercrystalline pores,as well as bedding fractures,structural fractures and micro-fractures. The total organic carbon(TOC)content in rocks ranges from 0.34% to 6.65%, with an average of 3.69%. It shows an overall trend of first increasing and then decreasing from bottom to top in the vertical direction. On the plane,it is higher in the syncline core and decreases in a circular band. The mass volume of gas in the rock core ranges from 1.6 to 6.2 m3/t,with an average of 3.9 m3/t. The total gas content of Longmaxi Formation increases vertically with depth,and gradually decreases from the middle of the syncline to the north and south ends in the plane,and from the syncline core to the two sides. The overall brittleness index of minerals is relatively high,indicating good fracturing ability.(2)The Wufeng Formation to Longmaxi Formation in the study area has a unique geological background of“shelf margin,reformed residue,and shallow syncline burial”. Its favorable sedimentary environment and paleoproductivity laid the foundation for shale gas enrichment and accumulation,good preservation conditions avoided the large-scale escape of natural gas in shale reservoirs,and the overlying Xintan Formation and the underlying Baota Formation formed a sealing combination of“upper cap and lower seal”.(3)The residual synclinal shale gas outside the basin is obviously enriched in the synclinal center, the core is a favorable location for shale gas accumulation,the low-angle reverse faults on both wings are also favorable enrichment areas for shale fas,and the development of micro-fractures is favorable for shale gas accumulation and stable production. Therefore,the core site of“wide,gentle and deep”should be considered first for the deployment of wells in middle-shallow residual synclines.

Key words: shale gas, reservoir characteristics, brittleness index, upper cap and lower seal, fault barria, enrichment in core, Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Anchang syncline, northern Guizhou

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 姜振学,宋岩,唐相路,等.中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(3):617-628. JIANG Zhenxue,SONG Yan,TANG Xianglu,et al. Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(3):617-628.
[2] 李小佳,邓宾,刘树根,等.川南宁西地区五峰组-龙马溪组多期流体活动[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(6):135-144. LI Xiaojia,DENG Bin,LIU Shugen,et al. Multi-stage fluid activity characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Ningxi area,southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021, 33(6):135-144.
[3] 丁江辉,张金川,李兴起,等.黔南坳陷下石炭统台间黑色岩系有机质富集特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(2):83-95. DING Jianghui,ZHANG Jinchuan,LI Xingqi,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of organic matter enrichment of Lower Carboniferous black rock series deposited in inter-platform region,southern Guizhou Depression[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019,31(2):83-95.
[4] 孟凡洋,陈科,包书景,等.湘西北复杂构造区下寒武统页岩含气性及主控因素分析——以慈页1井为例[J].岩性油气藏, 2018,30(5):29-39. MENG Fanyang,CHEN Ke,BAO Shujing,et al. Gas-bearing property and main controlling factors of Lower Cambrian shale in complex tectonic area of northwestern Hunan province:A case of well Ciye 1[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):29-39.
[5] 朱逸青,王兴志,冯明友,等.川东地区下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相划分及其与储层关系[J].岩性油气藏,2016, 28(5):59-66. ZHU Yiqing,WANG Xingzhi,FENG Mingyou,et al. Lithofacies classification and its relationship with reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):59-66.
[6] 何贵松,何希鹏,高玉巧,等.中国南方3套海相页岩气成藏条件分析[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(1):57-68. HE Guisong,HE Xipeng,GAO Yuqiao,et al. Analysis of accumulation conditions of three sets of marine shale gas in southern China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(1):57-68.
[7] 周文,徐浩,余谦,等.四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):18-25. ZHOU Wen,XU Hao,YU Qian,et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):18-25.
[8] 丁佳彤,陈孔全,汤济广,等.页岩气富集与保存条件差异研究:以焦石坝-武隆地区为例[J].石油地球物理勘探,2023, 58(6):1472-1480. DING Jiatong,CHEN Kongquan,TANG Jiguang,et al. A study on differences of shale gas enrichment and preservation conditions:Taking the Jiaoshiba-Wulong area as an example[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2023,58(6):1472-1480.
[9] 张梦琳,李郭琴,何嘉,等.川西南缘天宫堂构造奥陶系五峰组-志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2022,34(2):141-151. ZHANG Menglin,LI Guoqin,HE Jia,et al. Main controlling factors of Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi shale gas enrichment in Tiangongtang structure,southwestern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,34(2):141-151.
[10] XU Shang,GOU Qiyang,HAO Fang,et al. Multiscale faults and fractures characterization and their effects on shale gas accumulation in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Scienceand Engineering,2020,189:107026.
[11] 高键,李慧莉,何治亮,等.渝东彭水地区常压页岩气压力演化与富集保存[J].天然气工业,2022,42(8):124-135. GAO Jian,LI Huili,HE Zhiliang,et al. Pressure evolution,enrichment and preservation of normal-pressure shale gas in the Pengshui area of eastern Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022,42(8):124-135.
[12] 曾宇,侯宇光,胡东风,等.川东南盆缘常压区页岩裂缝脉体特征及古压力演化[J].地球科学,2022,47(5):1819-1833. ZENG Yu,HOU Yuguang,HU Dongfeng,et al. Characteristics of shale fracture veins and paleo-pressure evolution in normal pressure shale gas zone,southeast margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science,2022,47(5):1819-1833.
[13] 方志雄. 中国南方常压页岩气勘探开发面临的挑战及对策[J].油气藏评价与开发,2019,9(5):1-13. FANG Zhixiong. Challenges and countermeasures for exploration and development of normal pressure shale gas in southern China[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2019,9(5):1-13.
[14] 何希鹏,王运海,王彦祺,等.渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气勘探实践[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(1):126-136. HE Xipeng,WANG Yunhai,WANG Yanqi,et al. Exploration practices of normal-pressure shale gas in the marginal transition zone of the southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(1):126-136.
[15] SUN Chuanxiang,NIE Haikuan,DANG Wei,et al. Shale gas exploration and development in China:Current status,geological challenges,and Future Directions[J]. Energy & Fuels,2021,35(8):6359-6379.
[16] 何希鹏,齐艳平,何贵松,等.渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气富集高产主控因素再认识[J].油气藏评价与开发,2019,9(5):32-39. HE Xipeng,QI Yanping,HE Guisong,et al. Further understanding of main controlling factors of normal pressure shale gas enrichment and high yield in the area with complex structure of the southeast area of Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2019,9(5):32-39.
[17] 崔凯.黔北绥页1井牛蹄塘组页岩气地质特征及资源潜力分析[J].中国地质调查,2016,3(3):16-20. CUI Kai. Geological characteristics and resource potential of shale gas from well Suiye 1 in the Niutitang Formation,northern Guizhou[J]. Geological Survey of China,2016,3(3):16-20.
[18] 刘伟,余谦,张海全,等.黔北地区页岩气资源调查评价子项目研究报告[R].成都:成都地质矿产研究所,2013. LIU Wei,YU Qian,ZHANG Haiquan,et al. Research report of the sub-project of shale gas resource investigation and evaluation in northern Guizhou[R]. Chengdu:Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,2013.
[19] 何治亮,聂海宽,张钰莹.四川盆地及其周缘奥陶系五峰组志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(2):8-17. HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Yuying. The main factors of shale gas enrichment of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):8-17.
[20] 吴松,于继良,徐尚,等.黔北地区窄陡型向斜页岩气水平井地质导向技术对策[J].地质科技通报,2022,41(4):309-316. WU Song,YU Jiliang,XU Shang,et al. Shale gas horizontal well geosteering technologies and countermeasures research in narrow and steep syncline formations of northern Guizhou area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2022,41(4):309-316.
[21] 雷子慧,赵安坤,余谦,等.贵州北部安场向斜下志留统龙马溪组页岩气保存条件[J].地质科技情报,2016,35(4):121-127. LEI Zihui,ZHAO Ankun,YU Qian,et al. Preservation of shale gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Anchang syncline unit in northern Guizhou,South China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2016,35(4):121-127.
[22] 李琪琪,蓝宝锋,李刚权,等.黔中隆起北缘五峰-龙马溪组页岩元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].地球科学,2021,46(9):3172-3188. LI Qiqi,LAN Baofeng,LI Gangquan,et al. Element geochemical characteristics and their geological significance of WufengLongmaxi Formation shales in north margin of the central Guizhou Uplift[J]. Earth Science,2021,46(9):3172-3188.
[23] BOYER C,ROBERTO J K,LEWIS R. Producing gas from its source[J]. Oilfield Review,2006,18:36-49.
[24] 张福,黄艺,戴岑璞,等.黔北地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层特征分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,2020,43(3):94-101. ZHANG Fu,HUANG Yi,DAI Cenpu,et al. Characteristics on shale reservoirs of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations,northern Guizhou Province[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020,43(3):94-101.
[25] 尹兴平,蒋裕强,付永红,等.渝西地区五峰组-龙马溪组龙一 1亚段页岩岩相及储层特征[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(4):41-51. YIN Xingping,JIANG Yuqiang,FU Yonghong,et al. Shale lithofacies and reservoir characteristics of Wufeng Formation-lower Long 1 submember of Longmaxi Formation in western Chongqing[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(4):41-51.
[26] 杨巍,陈国俊,胡士骏,等.川南-黔北地区下古生界页岩孔隙发育特征[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):47-52. YANG Wei,CHEN Guojun,HU Shijun,et al. Pore characteristics of shale of Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):47-52.
[27] 叶亚培,唐书恒,郗兆栋,等.黔北地区牛蹄塘组页岩矿物组成特征与脆性评价[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):62-71. YE Yapei,TANG Shuheng,XI Zhaodong,et al. Mineral compositions and brittleness evaluation of shale of Niutitang Formation in northern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(4):62-71.
[28] 吴松,胡忠贵,邱小松,等.鄂东通山地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组富有机质页岩矿物组成及意义[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(29):11867-11874. WU Song,HU Zhonggui,QIU Xiaosong,et al. Mineral composition and its significance of organic shale of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Tongshan area,eastern Hubei[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(29):11867-11874.
[29] 赵佩,李贤庆,孙杰,等.川南地区下古生界页岩气储层矿物组成与脆性特征研究[J].现代地质,2014,28(2):396-403. ZHAO Pei,LI Xianqing,SUN Jie,et al. Study on mineral composition and brittleness characteristics of shale gas reservoirs from the Lower Paleozoic in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience,2014,28(2):396-403.
[30] 胡春锋,梅俊伟,李仕钊,等.四川盆地东部南川常压页岩气开发效果地质与工程因素分析[J].油气藏评价与开发,2021, 11(4):559-568. HU Chunfeng,MEI Junwei,LI Shizhao,et al. Analysis on geological and engineering factors of development effects on normal pressure shale gas in Nanchuan Block,eastern Suchuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2021, 11(4):559-568.
[31] 张春明,张维生,郭英海.川东南-黔北地区龙马溪组沉积环境及对烃源岩的影响[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):136-145. ZHANG Chunming,ZHANG Weisheng,GUO Yanghai. Sedimentary environment and its effect on hydrocarbon source rocks of Longmaxi Formation in southeast Sichuan and northern Guizhou[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):136-145.
[32] 张廷山,张志诚,伍坤宇.滇黔北地区地层压实恢复及沉积速率反演[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):99-106. ZHANG Tingshan,ZHANG Zhicheng,WU Kunyu. Restoration of formation compaction and inversion of deposition rate in Dianqianbei exploration area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(5):99-106.
[33] 卢龙飞,秦建中,申宝剑,等.中上扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组硅质页岩的生物成因证据及其与页岩气富集的关系[J].地学前缘,2018,25(4):226-236. LU Longfei,QIN Jianzhong,SHEN Baojian,et al. The origin of biogenic silica in siliceous shale from Wufeng -Longmaxi Formation in the Middle and Upper Yangtze region and its relationship with shale gas enrichment[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018,25(4):226-236.
[34] ABANDA P A,HANNIGAN R E. Effect of diagenesis on trace element partitioning in shales[J]. Chemical Geology,2006,230(1/2):42-59.
[35] PAPADOMANOLAKI N M,LENSTRA W K,WOLTHERS M,et al. Enhanced phosphorus recycling during past oceanic anoxia amplified by low rates of apatite authigenesis[J]. Science Advances,2022,8(26):2370.
[36] 汪生秀,汪威,张志平,等.渝东南强变形区断裂对页岩气藏保存条件的控制作用[J].断块油气田,2020,27(6):695-699. WANG Shengxiu,WANG Wei,ZHANG Zhiping,et al. Controlling effect of faults in strong deformation zone on shale gas reservoir preservation conditions in southeast Chongqing[J]. FaultBlock Oil & Gas Field,2020,27(6):695-699.
[1] 罗冰, 文华国, 廖义沙, 张兵, 姚永君, 温思宇, 杨凯. 川东北地区二叠系吴家坪组二段页岩储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 1-12.
[2] 钱永新, 赵毅, 刘新龙, 刘鸿, 刘国梁, 朱涛, 邹阳, 陈方文. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及高产主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 115-125.
[3] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[4] 闫建平, 来思俣, 郭伟, 石学文, 廖茂杰, 唐洪明, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 页岩气井地质工程套管变形类型及影响因素研究进展[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 1-14.
[5] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[6] 包汉勇, 赵帅, 张莉, 刘皓天. 川东红星地区中上二叠统页岩气勘探成果及方向展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 12-24.
[7] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[8] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[9] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[10] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[11] 魏全超, 李小佳, 李峰, 郝景宇, 邓双林, 吴娟, 邓宾, 王道军. 四川盆地米仓山前缘旺苍地区下寒武统筇竹寺组裂缝脉体发育特征及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 62-70.
[12] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[13] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[14] 程丹华, 焦霞蓉, 王建伟, 庄东志, 王政军, 江山. 黄骅坳陷南堡凹陷古近系沙一段页岩油储层特征及油气意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 70-81.
[15] 邱晨, 闫建平, 钟光海, 李志鹏, 范存辉, 张悦, 胡钦红, 黄毅. 四川盆地泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩沉积微相划分及测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 117-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!