岩性油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 194–200.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250117

• 石油工程与油气田开发 • 上一篇    

海上边水驱砂岩油田合理油水井数比计算方法

陈肖, 缪云, 李伟, 谢明英, 施浩, 王伟峰   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 深圳分公司, 广东 深圳 518054
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-10 修回日期:2024-03-25 出版日期:2025-01-01 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 第一作者:陈肖（1993—），男，硕士，工程师，主要从事油气藏工程方面的研究工作。地址：（518000）深圳市南山区后海滨路（深圳湾段）3168号中海油大厦A座。Email：chenxiao12@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 通信作者: 施浩（1996—），男，硕士，工程师。主要从事油气藏工程方面的研究工作。Email:2085263198@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国海洋石油集团有限公司“十四五”重大项目“海上油田大幅度提高采收率关键技术”（编号：KJGG2021-0503）与中国海洋石油集团有限公司综合科研项目“海上不同类型油田开发效果分级体系研究与应用”（编号：KJZH-2023-2205）联合资助。

Calculation method for reasonable oil-water well ratio in the edge water drive offshore sandstone oilfield

CHEN Xiao, MIAO Yun, LI Wei, XIE Mingying, SHI Hao, WANG Weifeng   

  1. Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC Limited, Shenzhen 518054, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2024-01-10 Revised:2024-03-25 Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-01-04

PDF (PC)

72

摘要： 基于物质平衡和极值原理，推导考虑边水能量影响下的合理油水井数比与合理地层压力的计算公式，并结合珠江口盆地新近系珠江组A油藏开发实践，对边水油藏合理油水井数比随含水率的变化规律进行详细研究。研究结果表明：①在计算不同含水率阶段的合理油水井数比时，相较于传统计算方法，考虑边水能量影响的计算结果更接近矿场实践。②合理油水井数比受制于多种因素的综合影响，其中边水水侵系数对其影响最为显著，且水侵系数越大，不考虑水侵因素方法的计算误差越大。③为达到高产液量和天然能量高利用率，通过计算得到珠江口盆地A油藏现阶段合理油水井数比为1.97，该条件下，日注水量为18 878 m3，天然水侵量为1 693 m3/d，地层压力为21.27 MPa，与数值模拟结果相近。

关键词: 边水驱油藏, 物质平衡, 合理油水井数比, 合理地层压力, 注采比, 水侵系数, 数值模拟, 新近系, 珠江口盆地

Abstract: Based on the calculation formulas for reasonable oil-water well ratio and reasonable formation pressure in oil fields considering the influence of edge water energy were derived through material balance and extreme value principles. This method was applied to reservoir A，which is developed in Neogene the Pearl River Formation of the Pearl River Mouth Basin. Meanwhile，the variation law of reasonable oil-water well ratio with water content in edge water reservoirs has been analyzed through the new method. The results show that：（1）Compare with natural energy supplementation，the new method can determine the reasonable oil-water well ratio for different water content stages of edge water reservoirs and the calculation results are closer to field practice.（2）The reasonable ratio of oil-water wells is subject to the comprehensive influence of multiple factors. The coefficient of edge water invasion has the most significant impact on it. The larger water invasion coefficient，the greater the calculation error of traditional methods.（3）To meet the conditions of high liquid yield and high utilization of natural energy，the current reasonable oil-water well ratio was 1.97 for reservoir A of the Pearl River Mouth Basin. Under this condition，the daily water injection volume was 18 878 m3/d. The natural water influx was 1 693 m3/d. The formation pressure was 21.27 MPa. The calculation results were similar to the numerical simulation results.

Key words: edge-water drive reservoirs, material balance, reasonable ratio of production and injection wells, reasonable pressure, injection-production ratio, invasion coefficient, numerical simulation, neogene, Pearl River Mouth Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE341
[1] 谢明英,戴宗,孙晓娜,等. 海上强水驱砂岩油田产液结构优化研究与实践[J]. 中外能源,2019,24(9):50-54. XIE Mingying,DAI Zong,SUN Xiaona,et al. Research and practice of structure optimization of fluid production in offshore strong water flooding sandstone oilfield[J]. Sino-Global Energy,2019,24(9):50-54.
[2] 李振君,李晓玲. 南海东部油田高产稳产开发实践[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),2002,16(2):54-60. LI Zhenjun,LI Xiaoling. The practice of development with high and stable production for Nahai East Oilfields[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2002,16(2):54-60.
[3] 聂海峰,谭蓓,谢爽,等. 应用矢量井网优化小型油藏注水井位[J]. 岩性油气藏,2013,25(3):123-126. NIE Haifeng,TAN Bei,XIE Shuang,et al. Applying vector well pattern to optimize the flooding well site of small reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(3):123-126.
[4] 陶帅,郝永卯,周杰,等. 透镜体低渗透岩性油藏合理井网井距研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2018,30(5):116-123. TAO Shuai,HAO Yongmao,ZHOU Jie,et al. Reasonable pattern well spacing deployment of lens lithologic reservoirs with low permeability[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(5):116-123.
[5] 张吉磊,罗宪波,张运来,等. 提高稠油底水油藏转注井注水效率研究[J]. 岩性油气藏,2019,31(4):141-148. ZHANG Jilei,LUO Xianbo,ZHANG Yunlai,et al. Improving water injection efficiency of transfer injection well in heavy oil bottom water reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(4):141-148.
[6] 徐伟,缪云,闫正和,等. 南海东部海相砂岩油藏开发井网适应性定量评价[J]. 石油地质与工程,2023,37(6):90-96. XU Wei,MIAO Yun,YAN Zhenghe,et al. Quantitative evaluation of well pattern adaptability for marine sandstone reservoirs in the eastern South China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2023,37(6):90-96.
[7] 蔡晖,屈丹,陈民锋. 组合井网储量动用规律及水平井加密合理技术策略:以渤海HD油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(4):147-155. CAI Hui,QU Dan,CHEN Minfeng. Reserve producing law of combined well pattern and technology strategy of horizontal well infilling:A case study from HD oilfield in Bohai Sea[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(4):147-155.
[8] 张俊,黄琴,王月杰,等. 基于断层井网组合模式下的极限注采比确定方法[J].石油化工应用,2023,42(5):11-14. ZHANG Jun,HUANG Qin,WANG Yuejie,et al. Method for determining the limit injection production ratio based on the combined pattern of fault well networks[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application,2023,42(5):11-14.
[9] 张意超,陈民锋,屈丹,等. X油田特低渗透油藏井网加密效果预测方法[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(1):144-151. ZHANG Yichao,CHEN Minfeng,QU Dan,et al. Prediction method of well pattern infilling effect for ultra-low permeability reservoir in X oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(1):144-151.
[10] 陈元千,吕恒宇,傅礼兵,等. 注水开发油田加密调整效果的评价方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2017,24(6):60-64. CHEN Yuanqian,LYU Hengyu,FU Libing,et al. Evaluation method of infill adjustment effect for waterflooding development oilfields[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(6):60-64.
[11] 方凌云,万新德. 高含水中后期砂岩油山的强化注水[J].石油勘探与开发,1993,20(2):47-55. FANG Lingyun,WAN Xinde. Enhanced water injection in sandstone oil fields with high water content in the later stage[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1993,20(2):47-55.
[12] 李留仁,袁士义,胡永乐,等. 合理注采井数比与合理压力保持水平的确定[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,26(3):59-61. LI Liuren,YUAN Shiyi,HU Yongle,et al. Determination of reasonable ratio of injectors to producers and reasonable pressure maintenance level[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition),2011,26(3):59-61.
[13] 邹存友,常毓文,王国辉,等. 水驱开发油田合理油水井数比的计算[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(2):211-214. ZOU Cunyou,CHANG Yuwen,WAN Guohui,et al. Calculation on a reasonable production-injection well ratio in waterflooding oil fields[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(2):211-214.
[14] 贾自力,高文君,赵晓萍,等. 水驱油田合理井网密度和注采井数比的确定[J]. 新疆石油地质,2005,26(3):562-564. JIA Zili,GAO Wenjun,ZHAO Xiaoping,et al. Determination of reasonable well spacing density and injection to production well ratio in waterflooding field[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2005,26(3):562-564.
[15] 杨志军,杜旭林,曹仁义,等. 复杂小断块采收率及经济合理井网密度模型[J]. 断块油气田,2020,27(1):80-84. YANG Zhijun,DU Xulin,CAO Renyi,et al. Recovery ratio of complex small fault blocks and economic reasonable well pattern density model[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2020,27(1):80-84.
[16] 侯建锋,胡亚斐,刘畅,等. 水驱油藏经济极限和合理井网密度确定方法[J]. 新疆石油天然气,2018,14(3):53-57. HOU Jianfeng,HU Yafei,LIU Chang,et al. A new approach to estimate economic limit and reasonable well spacing density for water flooding reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Oil&Gas,2018,14(3):53-57.
[17] 于成龙,李慧敏,赵敏,等. 水驱油田井网加密合理井数的计算方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(1):111-113. YU Chenglong,LI Huimin,ZHAO Min,et al. Research on the calculation method of reasonable number of wells for well network infiltration in water drive oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(1):111-113.
[18] 俞启泰. 计算水驱砂岩油藏合理井网密度与极限井网密度的一种方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1986,13(4):49-54. YU Qitai. A method for calculating the reasonable and extreme well density in a water flooding sandstone reservoir[J]. Petroleum exploration and development,1986,13(4):49-54.
[19] 齐与峰,李炎波. 采注井数比对水驱采收率影响研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1995,22(11):52-54. QI Yufeng,LI Yanbo. Research on the influence of the ratio of production and injection wells on water drive recovery[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(11):52-54.
[20] 耿站立,安桂荣,周文胜,等.水驱砂岩油藏开发调整全过程井网密度与采收率关系[J]. 中国海上油气,2015,27(6):57-62. GENG Zhanli,AN Guirong,ZHOU Wensheng,et al. Relation between well pattern density and recovery factor through the whole period of development adjusting in sandstone reservoir[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(6):57-62.
[21] 赵向宏. 水驱小油藏合理采液速度、合理井网密度及布井方式研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(1):75-79. ZHAO Xianghong. A study on proper recovery rate,well pattern and well spacing of a small oil reservoir with active water drive[J]. Petroleum exploration and development,1994,21(1):75-79.
[22] 金一,唐恩高,张健,等. 海上油田聚合物驱极限井网密度研究:以渤海S油田为例[J]. 复杂油气藏,2022,15(3):84-90. JIN Yi,TANG Engao,ZHANG Jian,et al. Study on limit well pattern density of polymer flooding in offshore oilfield:A case study of Oilfield S in Bohai Bay[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2022,15(3):84-90.
[23] 曲海旭,许必锋,王作乾,等. 哈萨克斯坦Z油田中高含水期井网加密调整潜力评价[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(12):123-130. QU Haixu,XU Bifeng,WANG Zuoqian,et al. Potential evaluation of infill well pattern adjustment in middle and high water cut period of Z Oilfield in Kazakhstan[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2019,19(12):123-130.
[24] 李晓平,袁淋,罗诚,等. 边水推进对水平井产量的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):107-112. LI Xiaoping,YUAN Lin,LUO Cheng,et al. Effect of edge water incursion on productivity of horizontal well[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(5):107-112.
[25] 吴雅丽,敖文君,张宁,等. 渤海B油田边水对注水井调剖调驱效果的影响研究[J]. 非常规油气,2020,7(3):55-59. WU Yali,AO Wenjun,ZHANG Ning,et al. Study on the influence of side water in b oilfield on profile control and flooding effects of water injection wells[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2020,7(3):55-59.
[26] 孟智强,葛丽珍,祝晓林,等.气顶边水油藏气/水驱产油量贡献评价方法[J].岩性油气藏,2022,34(5):162-170. MENG Zhiqiang,GE Lizhen,ZHU Xiaolin,et al. Oil production contribution evaluation method of gas/water drive in gascap and edge-water reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2022, 34(5):162-170.
[27] 张保康,徐国瑞,铁磊磊,等."堵水+调剖"工艺参数优化和油藏适应评价实验:以渤海SZ36-1油田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(5):155-161. ZHANG Baokang,XU Guorui,TIE Leilei,et al. Optimization of technological parameters and evaluation of reservoir adaptation by water plugging and profile control:A case from Bohai SZ36-1 oil field[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(5):155-161.
[1] 刘志峰, 朱小二, 柳广弟, 王祥, 李泽坤, 吴璇, 梁禹洋. 渤中凹陷西洼古近系和新近系油气成藏差异对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 78-89.
[2] 何岩, 许维娜, 党思思, 牟蕾, 林少玲, 雷章树. 准噶尔盆地陆梁地区侏罗系西山窑组钙质夹层成因及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(1): 90-101.
[3] 崔传智, 李静, 吴忠维. 扩散吸附作用下CO2非混相驱微观渗流特征模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 181-188.
[4] 刘仁静, 陆文明. 断块油藏注采耦合提高采收率机理及矿场实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 180-188.
[5] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[6] 徐中波, 汪利兵, 申春生, 陈铭阳, 甘立琴. 渤海蓬莱19-3油田新近系明下段曲流河储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 100-107.
[7] 岳世俊, 刘应如, 项燚伟, 王玉林, 陈汾君, 郑长龙, 景紫岩, 张婷静. 一种水侵气藏动态储量和水侵量计算新方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 153-160.
[8] 何雁兵, 肖张波, 郑仰帝, 刘君毅, 易浩, 赵庆, 张月霞, 贺勇. 珠江口盆地陆丰13洼转换带中生界陆丰7-9潜山成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 18-28.
[9] 李丰丰, 倪小威, 徐思慧, 魏新路, 刘迪仁. 斜井各向异性地层随钻侧向测井响应规律及快速校正方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 161-168.
[10] 黄军立, 张伟, 刘力辉, 蔡国富, 曾有良, 孟庆友, 刘浩. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组三元地震构形解释技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 103-112.
[11] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[12] 贺勇, 邱欣卫, 雷永昌, 谢世文, 肖张波, 李敏. 珠江口盆地陆丰13东洼新生代构造演化与油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 74-82.
[13] 杨楷乐, 何胜林, 杨朝强, 王猛, 张瑞雪, 任双坡, 赵晓博, 姚光庆. 高温-超压-高CO2背景下致密砂岩储层成岩作用特征——以莺歌海盆地LD10区新近系梅山组-黄流组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 83-95.
[14] 吕栋梁, 杨健, 林立明, 张恺漓, 陈燕虎. 砂岩储层油水相对渗透率曲线表征模型及其在数值模拟中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 145-159.
[15] 李国欣, 石亚军, 张永庶, 陈琰, 张国卿, 雷涛. 柴达木盆地油气勘探、地质认识新进展及重要启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 1-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发