岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 121–129.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220510

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组砂砾岩中砾石磨圆度定量表征

彭妙1, 张磊2, 陶金雨3, 赵康4, 张祥辉4, 张昌民4   

  1. 1. 中国石油新疆油田分公司, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    3. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院 无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏 无锡 214131;
    4. 长江大学 地球科学学院, 武汉 430100
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-20 修回日期:2021-08-01 出版日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2022-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 陶金雨(1990-),女,博士,高级工程师,主要从事储层沉积学方面的工作。Email:taojinyu.syky@sinopec.com。 E-mail:taojinyu.syky@sinopec.com。
  • 作者简介:彭妙(1988-),女,本科,工程师,主要从事勘探开发方面的工作。地址:(834000)新疆维吾尔自治区克拉玛依市克拉玛依区迎宾路66号。Email:tyong@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“中国西部主要盆地周缘及邻区分支河流体系分布与沉积模式”(编号:41772094)与中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项“陆相中高成熟度页岩油勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2019E-2601,2019E-2602)联合资助

Quantitative characterization of gravel roundness of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag

PENG Miao1, ZHANG Lei2, TAO Jinyu3, ZHAO Kang4, ZHANG Xianghui4, ZHANG Changmin4   

  1. 1. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    3. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Production, Sinopec, Wuxi 214131, Jiangsu, China;
    4. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
  • Received:2021-05-20 Revised:2021-08-01 Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-09-06

摘要: 砾石磨圆度表征对分析砂砾岩地层的沉积相具有重要意义。通过砾石颗粒截面面积和周长2个参数计算得到的砾石的磨圆度值,进一步数值标准化后进行磨圆度定量表征,以研究玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组砂砾岩磨圆度特征,进而分析其沉积相。研究结果表明:①砾石磨圆度测量过程包括划分测量单元、砾石图像提取和形态参数计算等3个步骤,然后进行去扁化磨圆度定量计算,最后进行磨圆度定量分级。②玛15井第2回次取心砾石的磨圆度整体较第3回次取心好,2次取心圆球形和椭球形砾石占比分别为19.89%和38.98%。第2回次取心砾石Rdn值呈减小趋势,磨圆度整体向上变差,从次圆状变为次棱—次圆状;第3回次取心砾石Rdn值从下部向上逐渐变大,磨圆度整体向上变好,从次棱角状变为次棱—次圆状。③玛15井百二段从底到顶,沉积相从三角洲平原季节性辫状河道过渡为三角洲平原常年性辫状河道,与砾石磨圆度由次棱变为次棱—次圆的变化相对应。

关键词: 定量表征, 砾石磨圆度, 去扁度方法, 百口泉组, 三叠系, 玛湖凹陷

Abstract: The gravel roundness characterization is important for facies analysis of sandy conglomerate strata. Based on the two parameters of gravel particle cross-sectional area and perimeter,the calculated roundness value was normalized to carry out quantitative characterization of roundness,so as to study the roundness characteris-tics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,and then analyze its sedimentary facies. The results show that:(1)The gravel roundness measurement process includes three steps:dividing the measurement unit,extracting the gravel image and calculating the morphological parameters,then the quantitative calculation of the de-flat roundness was completed,and finally the quantitative classification of the roundness was carried out.(2)The roundness of the gravel in the second coring of well Ma 15 is better than that in the third coring. The spherical and ellipsoidal gravel accounts for 19.89% and 38.98% respectively. The Rdn value of the second coring gravel shows a decreasing trend,and the roundness becomes worse as a whole,from subrounded to sub-angular and sub-rounded. The Rdn value of the third coring gravel gradually increases from the lower part to the upper part,and the roundness becomes better as a whole, from sub-angular to sub-angular and sub-rounded.(3)From the bottom to the top,the sedimentary facies of the second member of Baikouquan Formation of well Ma 15 transits from seasonal braided channel of delta plain to perennial braided channel of delta plain,corresponding to the change of gravel roundness from sub-angular to sub-angular and sub-rounded.

Key words: quantitative characterization, gravel roundness, de-flat roundness, Baikouquan Formation, Trias- sic, Mahu Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+1
[1] WENTWORTH C K. Quantitative studies of the shapes of peb- bles[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,Inc. 1921:245-309.
[2] RUSSELL R,TAYLOR R. Roundness and shape of Mississippi river sands[J]. Journal of Geology,1937,45(3):225-267.
[3] KRUMBEIN W C. The effect of abrasion on the size, shape and roundness of rock fragments[J]. Journal of Geology,1941, 49(5):482-520.
[4] PETTIJOHN B J. Sedimentary rocks[M]. New York:Harper and Brothers,1949:526.
[5] POWERS M C. A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1953. 23(2):117-119.
[6] FOLK R L. Student operator error in determination of roundness, sphericity,and grain size[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1955,25(4):297-301.
[7] SIMON J B,KENNE P. Particle shape:A review and new methods of characterization and classification[J]. Sedimentology,2008, 55(2):31-63.
[8] 张庆云,田德利.利用砾石形状和圆度判别第四纪堆积物的成因[J].长春地质学院学报,1986,16(1):59-64. ZHANG Qingyun,TIAN Deli. The identification of the origin of Quaternary accumulative material by shape and roundness of gravels[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Earth Sciences, 1986,16(1):59-64.
[9] 朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008. ZHU Xiaomin. Sedimentary petrology[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[10] 王为,许刘兵,刘志鹏,等.三种碎屑颗粒形态定量分析方法的比较及应用[J].地质论评,2013,59(3):553-562. WANG Wei,XU Liubing,LIU Zhipeng,et al. Comparison and application of three quantitative methods to describe sedimentary particle shapes[J]. Geological Review,2013,59(3):553-562.
[11] 陈江峰,王振芬,闫纯忠.碎屑颗粒圆度的分形描述[J].煤田地质与勘探,2002,30(4):16-17. CHEN Jiangfeng,WANG Zhenfen,YAN Chunzhong. Fractal description of roundness of clastic particles[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2002,30(4):16-17.
[12] 裴润有,解彩丽,胡科先,等.压裂支撑剂圆度球度测定方法研究[J].电子测量技术,2015,38(1):21-24. PEI Runyou,XIE Caili,HU Kexian,et al. Research on measure- ment of sphericity and roundness of proppant[J]. Electronic Mea- surement Technology,2015,38(1):21-24.
[13] MANGA M,PATEL A,DUFEK J. Rounding of pumice clasts during transport:Field measurements and laboratory studies[J]. Bulletin of Volcanology,2011,73(3):321-333.
[14] 程成,任鑫鑫,王微,等.野外露头砾石圆度测量方法的探究:以巢湖二叠系栖霞组为例[J].沉积学报,2012,30(3):522-529. CHENG Cheng,REN Xinxin,WANG Wei,et al. An approach to get gravel roundness data on field outcrops:Taking Permian Qixia Formation in Chaohu, Anhui Province as an example[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(3):522-529.
[15] LARS O,项光.测定沉积碎屑总磨圆度的一种新方法[J].地质地球化学,1984,4(5):35-38. LARS O,XIANG Guang. A new method for measuring the total roundness of sedimentary debris[J]. Geology Geochemistry,1984, 4(5):35-38.
[16] EHRLICH R,WEINBERG B. An exact method for character- ization of grain shape[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1970,40(1):205-212.
[17] 杨光.岩心图像砾石分析技术在砂砾岩扇体中的应用:以东营凹陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩扇体为例[J].油气地质与采收率, 2010,17(5):20-23. YANG Guang. Analytical technique of gravels in core image and its application in research of conglomerate fan:Taking the con- glomerate fan,northern steep slope,Dongying Sag as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(5):20-23.
[18] BOON J D,EVANS D A,HENNIGAR H F. Spectral informa- tion from Fourier analysis of digitized quartz grain profiles[J]. Mathematical Geology,1982,14(6):589-605.
[19] 叶润青,牛瑞卿,张良培.基于多尺度分割的岩石图像矿物特征提取及分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(4):1253-1261. YE Runqing,NIU Ruiqing,ZHANG Liangpei. Mineral features extraction and analysis based on multiresolution segmentation of petrographic images[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2011,41(4):1253-1261.
[20] 北京天目创新科技有限公司. Defines Developer 7.0向导手册[R].北京:北京天目创新科技有限公司,2009:21-121. Beijing Space Eye Innovation Technology Co.,Ltd. Definitions developer 7.0 user manual[R]. Beijing:Beijing Space Eye Inno- vation Technology Co.,Ltd.,2009:21-121.
[21] 钱广强,董治宝,罗万银,等.基于数字图像的中国西北地区戈壁表面砾石形貌特征研究[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(3):625-633. QIAN Guangqiang,DONG Zhibao,LUO Wanyin,et al. Gravel morphometric analysis based on digital images of different gobi surfaces in northwestern China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2014,34(3):625-633.
[22] 谭开俊,王国栋,罗惠芬,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖斜坡区三叠系百口泉组储层特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):83-88. TAN Kaijun,WANG Guodong,LUO Huifen,et al. Reservoir char- acteristics and controlling factors of the Triassic Baikouquan For- mation in Mahu slope area,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reser- voirs,2014,26(6):83-88.
[23] 李兴,张立强,施辉,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组沉积古环境分析:以玛18井为例[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):80-85. LI Xing,ZHANG Liqiang,SHI Hui,et al. Sedimentary environ- ment of Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin:A case study from Ma 18 well[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):80-85.
[24] 陶金雨,张昌民,郭旭光,等.磨圆度定量表征在扇三角洲沉积微相判别中的应用:以玛湖凹陷百口泉组砾岩为例[J].沉积学报,2020,38(5):957-965. TAO Jinyu,ZHANG Changmin,GUO Xuguang,et al. Applica- tion of quantitative roundness characterization to identify sedimen- tary microfacies in fan delta deposits:A case study of conglom- erates in the Baikouquan Formation,Mahu Sag[J]. Acta Sedimen- tologica Sinica,2020,38(5):957-965.
[25] 况晏,司马立强,瞿建华,等.致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价:以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(4):91-100. KUANG Yan,SIMA Liqiang,QU Jianhua,et al. Influencing fac- tors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure of tight glute- nite reservoir:A case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 well field,Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2017, 29(4):91-100.
[26] 陈静,陈军,李卉,等.准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系-三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):71-80. CHEN Jing,CHEN Jun,LI Hui,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021,33(1):71-80.
[27] TAO Jinyu,ZHANG Changmin,QU Jianhua,et al. Application of gravel roundness quantitative description in conglomerates res- ervoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering Transactions,2017,62(1):457-462.
[28] 杨凡凡,姚宗全,杨帆,等.准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J].岩性油气藏, 2021,33(1):99-108. YANG Fanfan,YAO Zongquan,YANG Fan,et al. Petrophysical facies of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in northern Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(1):99-108.
[29] TAO Jinyu,ZHANG Changmin,QU Jianhua,et al. A de-flat roundness method for particle shape quantitative characterization[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2018,11(15):414-425.
[1] 杨帆, 卞保力, 刘慧颖, 姚宗全, 尤新才, 刘海磊, 卫延召. 玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 63-72.
[2] 苏亦晴, 杨威, 金惠, 王志宏, 崔俊峰, 朱秋影, 武雪琼, 白壮壮. 川西北地区三叠系须家河组深层储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 86-99.
[3] 吕正祥, 廖哲渊, 李岳峰, 宋修章, 李响, 何文军, 黄立良, 卿元华. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖云质岩储层成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 26-37.
[4] 张岩, 侯连华, 崔景伟, 罗霞, 林森虎, 张紫芸. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7富有机质段岩石热膨胀系数随温度演化特征及启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 32-41.
[5] 白雨, 汪飞, 牛志杰, 金开来, 李沛毅, 许多年, 陈刚强. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 116-127.
[6] 雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
[7] 张本健, 徐唱, 徐亮, 周刚, 丁熊. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞三段沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 154-163.
[8] 魏钦廉, 王翀峘, 刘军峰, 胡榕, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟. 鄂尔多斯盆地樊家川地区三叠系长63储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 31-44.
[9] 田建锋, 高永利, 张蓬勃, 喻建, 张志国. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组伊利石包膜成因及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 54-65.
[10] 李阳, 王兴志, 蒲柏宇, 徐昌海, 杨西燕, 朱逸青, 黄梓桑, 康家豪. 四川盆地开江—梁平海槽东侧三叠系飞仙关组鲕滩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 116-130.
[11] 易志凤, 张尚锋, 王雅宁, 徐恩泽, 赵韶华, 王玉瑶. 差异曲率下的曲流河点坝砂体定量表征——以黄河源区白河现代沉积为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 34-42.
[12] 李博, 崔军平, 李莹, 李金森, 赵金, 陈彦武. 伊陕斜坡吴起地区延长组油气成藏期次分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 21-28.
[13] 陈永波, 张虎权, 张寒, 曾华会, 王斌, 王洪求, 许多年, 马永平, 宗兆云. 基于OVT域偏移数据的云质岩储层预测技术及应用——以玛湖凹陷乌夏地区风三段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 145-155.
[14] 杜猛, 向勇, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 张景, 张代燕. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 120-131.
[15] 毛锐, 牟立伟, 王刚, 樊海涛. 基于核磁共振自由弛豫特征的含油性评价方法——以玛湖凹陷下乌尔禾组砾岩储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 140-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!