Lithologic Reservoirs ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 67-78.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260306

• PETROLEUM EXPLORATION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reservoir development characteristics and main controlling factors of the second member of Lower Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

ZHOU Kai1(), QI Renli1, XU Wenli2(), YIN Qing1, GAO Lu1, LI Shuangshuang1, HUANG Qinyang1, QUAN Hao3   

  1. 1 Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Branch, Puyang 457001, Henan, China
    2 Sedimentary Geology Research Institute， Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    3 Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2025-10-20 Revised:2026-01-09 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-03-24

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

18

Abstract:

Comprehensively utilizing data from core observation, thin section identification, logging interpretation, physical property analysis, and geochemical testing, reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of carbonate reservoirs in the second member of Lower Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in Puguang area of Sichuan Basin were systematically analyzed. The coupling mechanism between tidal flat deposition controlled by paleogeomorphology and multi-stage diagenetic modifications was clarified, an evolution model for high-quality reservoirs was established, and favorable exploration areas were predicted. The results show that: （1） In Puguang area, reservoir rocks of the second member of Lower Triassic Jialingjiang Formation are dominated by granular dolomite and silt-sized crystalline dolomite, reservoir spaces mainly include intergranular dissolved pores, intercrystalline dissolved pores, and fractures. Reservoirs are generally of low porosity and low permeability, with local occurrences of high porosity and high permeability or low porosity and high permeability. （2） In the study area, compaction and cementation lead to the reduction of primary pores, while dolomitization forms intercrystalline pores and enhances compaction resistance. The seepage-reflux model and evaporation-pumping model represent formation mechanisms of the silt-sized crystalline dolomite and micritic dolomite, respectively. Penecontemporaneous meteoric freshwater dissolution superimposed with burial-stage organic acid dissolution significantly improves the pore structure, and the high-angle fracture network formed by tectonic fracturing enhances reservoir porosity and permeability. （3） Reservoir development of the second member of Jialingjiang Formation in the study area is dually controlled by sedimentary microfacies and diagenesis. Relatively high-quality reservoirs are mainly formed in granular shoal and dolomitic flat microfacies. Dolomitization and dissolution are key factors to the development of high-quality reservoirs, and fracturing improves reservoir connectivity. （4） Class I favorable exploration areas of the second member of Jialingjiang Formation in the study area are mainly distributed in Shuangmiaochang area, which are subfacies of intra platform shoals. There are 5 favorable exploration areas of Class Ⅱ, which develop intra platform beach facies, and distribute in Shuangmiao-chang, Qingxichang, Maoba, and Fenshuiling areas. There are 3 favorable exploration areas of Class Ⅲ, with the development of dolomitic flat, gray flat microfacies or intra platform beach subfacies, which distribute in Chuanfu 85 well area, Ming Ⅰ well area, and Leiyinpu area.

Key words: carbonate reservoir, dolomitization, granular shoal, dolomitic flat, evaporation-restricted platform, the second member of Jialingjiang Formation, Lower Triassic, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

CLC Number: 

  • TE122

Fig. 1

Location of Puguang area（a）， distribution characteristics of sedimentary facies (b) and comprehensive stratigraphic column of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation (c)， Sichuan Basin"

Fig. 2

Typical photos of rocks of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation reservoir in Puguang area"

Fig. 3

Typical photos of reservoir spaces of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in Puguang area"

Fig. 4

Porosity-permeability correlation of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in Puguang area"

Table 1

Statistics of pore structure parameters of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in well Shuangmiao 1 and well Xinqingxi 1， Puguang area"

井名 排驱压力/MPa 中值压力/MPa 最大喉道半径/μm 中值喉道半径/μm 最小含水饱和度/%
双庙1井 0.35~20.46/7.19 0.57~37.78/14.95 0.04~2.17/0.69 0.02~1.31/0.27 1.35~19.65/10.16
新清溪1井 0.15~9.38/1.99 1.23~143.54/31.92 0.08~5.12/1.60 0.01~0.61/0.11 1.59~46.37/14.78

Fig. 5

Typical mercury injection curves of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in well Shuangmiao 1 and well Xinqingxi 1, Puguang area"

Fig. 6

Pore and throat types distribution of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in well Shuangmiao 1 and well Xinqingxi 1, Puguang area"

Fig. 7

Distribution characteristics of sedimentary facies from submembers of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Fig. 8

REE distribution patterns in different lithology of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Fig. 9

Comparison of Sr isotope evolution trend of dolomite and sea level variation curves of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Fig. 10

Microscopic features of core structure fracturing of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Fig. 11

Pore evolution models of dolomite reservoir in the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Fig. 12

Development models of dolomite reservoirs in the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

Table 2

Division of favorable exploration areas of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

有利
勘探区		 孔隙度/% 沉积相 井区
Ⅰ > 12.00 台内滩亚相 双庙1井
Ⅱ 6.00~12.00 台内滩亚相 分4井、川岳83井、
川岳84井、清溪1井、
清溪2井、毛坝4井
Ⅲ 6.00~12.00 灰坪、云坪微相 明1井、雷西1井
2.00~6.00 台内滩亚相 川付85井

Fig. 13

Distribution features of favorable exploration areas of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation， Puguang area"

[1] 赵文智, 胡素云, 刘伟, 等. 再论中国陆上深层海相碳酸盐岩油气地质特征与勘探前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(4):1-9.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, LIU Wei, et al. Petroleum geological features and exploration prospect in deep marine carbonate strata onshore China:A further discussion[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(4):1-9.
[2] 韩云浩, 姜振学, 张志遥, 等. 含油气盆地超高油气柱形成的有利地质条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2):125-135.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230212
HAN Yunhao, JIANG Zhenxue, ZHANG Zhiyao, et al. Favo-rable geological conditions for the formation of ultra-high petroleum columns in petroliferous basins[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(2):125-135.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230212
[3] 陈伟, 江青春, 宋金民, 等. 川东北地区嘉陵江组四段沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 52(3):575-590.
CHEN Wei, JIANG Qingchun, SONG Jinmin, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and the geological significance of oil and gas in the fourth member of the Jialingjiang Formation in the northeas-tern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Techno-logy (Science & Technology Edition), 2025, 52(3):575-590.
[4] 许海龙, 魏国齐, 贾承造, 等. 乐山—龙女寺古隆起构造演化及对震旦系成藏的控制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4):406-416.
XU Hailong, WEI Guoqi, JIA Chengzao, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Leshan-Longnüsi paleo-uplift and its control on gas accumulation in the Sinian strata,Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4):406-416.
[5] 于吉旺, 庞雄奇, 郑定业, 等. 普光地区深层碳酸盐岩气藏主控因素及有利区预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3):28-35.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.03.004
YU Jiwang, PANG Xiongqi, ZHENG Dingye, et al. Main controlling factors and favorable area prediction of deep carbonate gas reservoirs in Puguang area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(3):28-35.
[6] 李勇, 张亚, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地蓬莱气田寒武系龙王庙组优质储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(6):35-47.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250604
LI Yong, ZHANG Ya, ZHOU Gang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of high-quality reservoirs in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of Penglai Gasfield,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6):35-47.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20250604
[7] 林辉. 川东北达县—宣汉地区双庙场构造嘉二段储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2):59-63.
LIN Hui. Reservoir characteristics of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation of Shuangmiaochang structure in Daxian-Xuanhan area of northeastern Sichuan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009, 21(2):59-63.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2009.02.012
[8] 文华国, 梁金同, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系洗象池组层序-岩相古地理演化与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2):1-16.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220201
WEN Huaguo, LIANG Jintong, ZHOU Gang, et al. Sequence-based lithofacies paleogeography and favorable natural gas exploration areas of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2):1-16.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220201
[9] 李璐萍, 梁金同, 刘四兵, 等. 川中地区寒武系洗象池组白云岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3):39-48.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220304
LI Luping, LIANG Jintong, LIU Sibing, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of dolomite reservoirs of Cambrian Xixiangchi Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3):39-48.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220304
[10] 徐文礼, 文华国, 刘均, 等. 川东下三叠统嘉陵江组层序—岩相古地理特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(6):1478-1490.
XU Wenli, WEN Huaguo, LIU Jun, et al. Sequence-lithofacies paleogeographic characteristics of Lower Triassic Jialingjiang formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(6):1478-1490.
[11] 文华国, 罗冰, 钟克修, 等. 川东地区三叠系嘉陵江组邻水-丰都台凹的发现及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1):12-24.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230102
WEN Huaguo, LUO Bing, ZHONG Kexiu, et al. Discovery of Linshui-Fengdu intra-platform depression of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin and its significance for oil and gas exploration[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(1):12-24.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230102
[12] 刘树根, 李智武, 孙纬, 等. 四川含油气叠合盆地基本特征[J]. 地质科学, 2011, 46(1):233-257.
LIU Shugen, LI Zhiwu, SUN Wei, et al. Basic geological features of superimposed basin and hydrocarbon accumulation in Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology (Scientia Geologica Sinica), 2011, 46(1):233-257.
[13] 李爱国, 易海永, 刘超, 等. 川东北地区嘉陵江组嘉二段储层特征研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2008, 31(3):1-5.
LI Aiguo, YI Haiyong, LIU Chao, et al. Reservoir characteristics in Jialingjiang 2 Member in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2008, 31(3):1-5.
[14] 胡明毅, 魏国齐, 李思田, 等. 四川盆地嘉陵江组层序—岩相古地理特征和储层预测[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(6):1145-1152.
HU Mingyi, WEI Guoqi, LI Sitian, et al. Characteristics of sequence-based lithofacies and paleogeography,and reservoir prediction of the Jialingjiang formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(6):1145-1152.
[15] 张凤生, 司马立强, 赵冉, 等. 塔河油田储层裂缝测井识别和有效性评价[J]. 测井技术, 2012, 36(3):261-266.
ZHANG Fengsheng, SIMA Liqiang, ZHAO Ran, et al. Log identification and effectiveness evaluation on reservoir fractures in Tahe oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(3):261-266.
[16] 周刚, 阎泽昊, 雷鼎丞, 等. 白云岩成因模式及其对碳酸盐岩优质储层发育的影响[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024, 47(1):1-11.
doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.01.001
ZHOU Gang, YAN Zehao, LEI Dingcheng, et al. Genetic model of dolomite and its influence on development of high-quality carbonate reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2024, 47(1):1-11.
doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.01.001
[17] 沈安江, 赵文智, 胡安平, 等. 海相碳酸盐岩储集层发育主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5):545-554.
SHEN Anjiang, ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Anping, et al. Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5):545-554.
[18] 余海涛, 王兴志, 李斌, 等. 川东北地区嘉陵江组二段沉积相特征研究[J]. 海相油气地质, 2011, 16(3):55-62.
YU Haitao, WANG Xingzhi, LI Bin, et al. Sedimentation cha-racteristics of Lower Triassic Jialingjiang 2nd member in northeast part of Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geo-logy, 2011, 16(3):55-62.
[19] 赫云兰, 刘波, 秦善. 白云石化机理与白云岩成因问题研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(6):1010-1020.
HE Yunlan, LIU Bo, QIN Shan. Study on the dolomitization and dolostone genesis[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2010, 46(6):1010-1020.
[20] 黄思静, 裴昌蓉, 胡作维, 等. 川东三叠系飞仙关组白云岩锶含量,锶同位素组成与白云石化流体[J]. 岩石学报, 2006, 22(8):2123-2132.
HUANG Sijing, PEI Changrong, HU Zuowei, et al. Strontium concentration,isotope composition and dolomitization fluids in the Feixianguan Formation of Triassic,Eastern Sichuan of China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2006, 22(8):2123-2132.
[21] 王茂林, 周进高, 陈冬霞, 等. 白云石成因模式的研究进展及其适用性探讨[J]. 海相油气地质, 2013, 18(2):31-40.
WANG Maolin, ZHOU Jingao, CHEN Dongxia, et al. Research advances of dolomite genesis models and discussion on applicable models[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2013, 18(2):31-40.
[22] VEIZER J, ALA D, AZMY K, et al. 87Sr/86Sr,δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater[J]. Chemical Geology, 1999, 161(1/2/3):59-88.
doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00081-9
[23] 赵文智, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 等. 白云岩成因类型,识别特征及储集空间成因[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6):923-935.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.06.01
ZHAO Wenzhi, SHEN Anjiang, QIAO Zhanfeng, et al. Genetic types and distinguished characteristics of dolomite and the origin of dolomite reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6):923-935.
[24] 单秀琴, 张静, 张宝民, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组白云岩岩溶储层特征及溶蚀作用证据[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(1):17-29.
doi: 10.7623/syxb201601002
SHAN Xiuqin, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Baomin, et al. Dolomite karst reservoir characteristics and dissolution evidences of Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(1):17-29.
doi: 10.7623/syxb201601002
[25] 陈启林, 黄成刚. 沉积岩中溶蚀作用对储集层的改造研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11):1112-1129.
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.11.1112.
CHEN Qilin, HUANG Chenggang. Research progress of modification of reservoirs by dissolution in sedimentary rock[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2018, 33(11):1112-1129.
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.11.1112.
[26] KNAUTH L P, KENNEDY M J. The late Precambrian greening of the Earth[J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7256):728-732.
doi: 10.1038/nature08213
[27] 郑和荣, 刘春燕, 吴茂炳, 等. 塔里木盆地奥陶系颗粒石灰岩埋藏溶蚀作用[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(1):9-15.
doi: 10.7623/syxb200901003
ZHENG Herong, LIU Chunyan, WU Maobing, et al. Burial dissolution of Ordovician granule limestone in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(1):9-15.
doi: 10.7623/syxb200901003
[28] 刘强, 鲁雪松, 范俊佳, 等. 四川盆地震旦系气藏TSR证据及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(6):929-943.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.02.002
LIU Qiang, LU Xuesong, FAN Junjia, et al. Evidence and controlling factors of thermochemical sulfate reduction in the Sinian gas reservoirs,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(6):929-943.
doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.02.002
[29] 祖克威, 范凌霄, 王波, 等. 四川盆地普光地区嘉陵江组二段碳酸盐岩储层裂缝发育规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6):1188-1196.
ZU Kewei, FAN Lingxiao, WANG Bo, et al. Development patterns of fractures in carbonate reservoirs in the 2nd member of Jialingjiang Formation,Puguang area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6):1188-1196.
[30] 祖克威, 曾大乾, 程秀申, 等. 普光地区嘉二段构造裂缝形成机理及预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(4):407-413.
ZU Kewei, ZENG Daqian, CHENG Xiushen, et al. Forming mechanism and prediction of structural fractures in the second member of Jialingjiang formation in Puguang area[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(4):407-413.
[1] XU Zhongfan, DING Xiong, YIN Hong, TIAN Yunying, SONG Yi, YANG Xiran. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Shuangyushi area, northwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 107-119.
[2] GOU Zhepei, WEI Qianqian, YAN Xueqi, LONG Hui, LU Jiaxun, GAO Xuanbo, TANG Yinhai, TAN Xianfeng. Geochemical characteristics and enrichment rule of natural gas in Ordovician of Weiyuan area, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 120-131.
[3] ZHENG Majia, LIU Yong, WU Ya, CHEN Junyu, CHEN Ying, ZHONG Ziyue, ZHAN Lin, FAN Cunhui. Shale reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 79-93.
[4] LIU Ruotong, ZHANG Dazhi, SUI Liwei, XIAO Limei, TIAN Ya, SUN Shan, PENG Dandan, LI Jianzhi. Intelligent logging identification method for shale lithofacies of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Hechuan area, central Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(3): 94-106.
[5] YU Chuan, WU Xiaochuan, WANG Wei, WANG Shengxiu, ZHANG Yuelei, GUO Dongxin, LIU Aihua. Lithofacies combination characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation condition of lacustrine shale in Lower Jurassic, eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2): 32-43.
[6] GU Wen, CHEN Hui, ZHU Yadong, WU Furong, ZHAO Zhou, WANG Shuyan, WANG Wei. Main controlling factors of hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration directions of the second member of Triassic Jialingjiang Formation, southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2): 56-64.
[7] ZHANG Hong, ZOU Niuniu, YIN Yuanyan, YE Zhilong. Sedimentary environment and hydrocarbon geological significance of Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Mabei slope, Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2026, 38(2): 86-96.
[8] LI Yong, ZHANG Ya, ZHOU Gang, QU Haizhou, LONG Hongyu, LI Chenglong, ZHANG Chi, CHEN Di. Characteristics and main controlling factors of high-quality reservoirs in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of Penglai Gasfield, Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 35-47.
[9] YANG Yang, WANG Haiqing, SHI Xuewen, ZENG Yuting, GAO Xiang, LI Jinyong, ZHANG Xuanang, YAN Jianping. A method and application of identifying shale bedding structures based on FMI image micro-electrical conductivity curve time-frequency information: A case study on the first member of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Zizhong area of Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 59-70.
[10] YANG Liu, ZHU Yadong, LIANG Hong, DIAO Yongbo, PENG Xin, SI Guoshuai, XU Jiao, SUN Qingli. Discovery of seismic anomalies in Silurian reefs in Jiange area of northwestern Sichuan Basin and their geological significance for oil and gas [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 131-139.
[11] MIAO Zhiwei, LI Shikai, ZHANG Wenjun, XIAO Wei, LIU Ming, YU Tong. Seismic prediction technology for complex network fractures in fault-fracture reservoir of tight sandstones: A case study of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in northern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 140-150.
[12] LI Chunyang, WANG Boli, YAN Xiao, LI Kesai, DENG Hucheng, SU Jinyi, WU Yajun, YE Tairan. Current geostress logging evaluation of tight reservoir in the fourth member of Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(6): 151-161.
[13] LUO Bing, ZHOU Gang, MA Kui, WANG Wenzhi, XU Shaoli, WU Luya, WANG Yueyun, ZHANG Xin. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors for hydrocarbon accumulation of the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in the west side of Deyang-Anyue Rift，Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5): 49-58.
[14] WANG Zhen, WANG Xingzhi, ZHU Yiqing, YANG Yuran, YANG Yiming, KANG Jiahao, HUANG Baiwen, LYU Hao. Stratigraphy subdivision and exploration implications of Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Deyang-Anyue aulacogen，Sichuan Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5): 97-110.
[15] ZHAN Lin, FAN Cunhui, TANG Wen, YANG Xiyan, LIU Dongxi, LI Bo, YANG Xinrui. Structural characteristics of Permian Wujiaping Formation，Nanya area， eastern Sichuan Basin and their hydrocarbon reservoir control mechanism [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2025, 37(5): 133-144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
TRENDMD:

Copyright © 2018 Lithologic Reservoirs

Support by Beijing Magtech support@magtech.com.cn