岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1–11.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200601

• 油气地质 •    下一篇

碎屑岩储层构型分级方案与研究方法探讨

芦凤明1, 蔡明俊2, 张阳1, 倪天禄3, 萧希航3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大港油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 天津 300280;
    2. 中国石油大港油田分公司, 天津 300280;
    3. 中国石油大港油田分公司 油气开发处, 天津 300280)
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-18 修回日期:2020-01-20 出版日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-10-30
  • 第一作者:芦凤明(1967-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事储层构型及油藏描述方面的研究工作。地址:(300280)天津市滨海新区幸福路1278号。Email:lufming@petrochina.com.cn
  • 通信作者: 张阳(1988-),男,博士,主要从事油田开发地质方面的研究工作。Email:regogo@sina.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项“大港油区效益增储稳产关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2018E-11-06)和中国博士后科学基金资助项目“动静态因素控制的冲积扇储层剩余油分布及形成机理研究”(编号:2019M650998)联合资助

Discussion on architecture classification scheme and research methods of clastic reservoir

LU Fengming1, CAI Mingjun2, ZHANG Yang1, NI Tianlu3, XIAO Xihang3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
    2. PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
    3. Department of Oil and Gas Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2019-10-18 Revised:2020-01-20 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-10-30

摘要: 为了完善碎屑岩储层构型级次划分方案,并更好地应用于油田开发,从大港油田不同沉积类型储层构型研究的实际出发,通过建立以储层构型为基础的三维地质模型,并开展数值模拟,认识储层构型控制的剩余油分布,并对构型研究精度提出要求。将构型分级与地层划分分级、沉积微相分级有机结合和对应,重新确定储层构型分级方案,在此基础上提出储层构型研究的思路、内容和方法。结果表明:这种构型划分方案更明确,6级构型界面对应复合沉积体构型单元。平面上对应复合曲流带或复合辫流带,由2个以上单一复合体构成;剖面上为小层或砂层组,内部由多个单砂层组合而成,单砂层之间发育泥岩隔层。该方法应用于大港官80断块枣Ⅱ、枣Ⅲ油组,划分和表征7,8,9级构型单元(复合河道、单一沉积单元、增生体),对特高含水阶段密井网开发油田的构型研究具有明显优势。

关键词: 储层构型, 分级方案, 微相复合体, 单一微相, 单砂体, 构型解剖

Abstract: In order to improve the architecture classification scheme of clastic reservoir and better apply it to oilfield development,based on the study of reservoir architecture of different sedimentary types in Dagang Oilfield,by establishing three-dimensional geological model and numerical simulation based on reservoir architecture research, the residual oil distribution controlled by architecture was recognized,and the accuracy of reservoir architecture research was required. The classification scheme of reservoir architecture was redefined by combining and corresponding stratigraphic classification with sedimentary microfacies classification. On this basis,the ideas,contents and methods of reservoir architecture research system were put forward. The results show that this reservoir architecture classification scheme is much more explicit,the sixth-order architecture interface corresponds to the composite sedimentary formation unit. On the plane,it corresponds to composite meandering zone or composite braided flow zone,which is composed of more than two single complexes;on the profile,it is composed of small layers or sand layers,and the interior is composed of multiple single sand layers,and mudstone interlayer is developed between the single sand layers. The scheme was applied to Zao Ⅱ and Zao Ⅲ oil formations in Guan 80 fault block of Dagang Oilfield,and the architecture units 7,8 and 9(composite channel,single sedimentary unit and accretion body)were divided and characterized,which have obvious advantages in the study of the archi-tecture of dense well pattern development oilfield in ultra-high water cut stage.

Key words: reservoir architecture, classification scheme, microfacies complex, single microfacies, single sand body, architecture anatomy

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3
[1] MIALL A D. Architectural-element analysis:a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth Science Reviews, 1985, 22(2):261-308.
[2] MIALL A D. Architectural elements and bounding surfaces in fluvial deposits:Anatomy of the Kayenta Formation(Lower Jurassic), Southwest Colorado. Sedimentary Geology, 1988, 55(3-4):233-262.
[3] MIALL A D. Hierarchies of architectural units in terrigenous clastic rocks,and their relationship to sedimentation rate. Concepts in Sedimentology & Paleontology, 1992:6-12.
[4] MIALL A D. Reconstructing the architecture and sequence stratigraphy of the preserved fluvial record as a tool for reservoir development:a reality check. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90:989-1002.
[5] 陈飞, 胡光义, 胡宇霆, 等.储层构型研究发展历程与趋势思考.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5):1-14. CHEN F, HU G Y, HU Y T, et al. Development history and future trends in reservoir architecture research. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 40(5):1-14.
[6] 张阳, 蔡明俊, 芦凤明, 等.碎屑-牵引流控冲积扇储层构型特征及模式:以沧东凹陷小集油田为例. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(3):538-552. ZHANG Y, CAI M J, LU F M, et al. Reservoir architecture characteristics and mode of middle and edge alluvial fan controlled by debris flow and traction flow:a case study of Xiaoji Oilfield, Cangdong Sag. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(3):538-552.
[7] 岳大力, 胡光义, 李伟, 等.井震结合的曲流河储层构型表征方法及其应用:以秦皇岛32-6油田为例. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(1):99-109. YUE D L, HU G Y, LI W, et al. Meandering fluvial reservoir architecture characterization method and application by combining well logging and seismic data:a case study of QHD32-6 Oilfield. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(1):99-109.
[8] 涂乙, 王亚会, 闫正和, 等.基于构型单元"势控论"研究与剩余油开发效果分析.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4):133-140. TU Y, WANG Y H, YAN Z H, et al. Potential control theory based on configuration unit and remaining oil development effect. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4):133-140.
[9] 常海燕, 严耀祖, 陈更新, 等.近岸水下扇储层构型及剩余油分布模式:以柴达木盆地七个泉油田E31油藏为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):143-152. CHANG H Y, YAN Y Z, CHEN G X, et al. Reservoir configuration and remaining oil distribution patterns of nearshore subaqueous fan:a case from E31 reservoir in Qigequan Oilfield, Qaidam Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):143-152.
[10] 张建兴, 林承焰, 张宪国, 等.基于储层构型与油藏数值模拟的点坝储层剩余油分布研究.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):146-153. ZHANG J X, LIN C Y, ZHANG X G, et al. Remaining oil distribution of point bar reservoir based on reservoir architecture and reservoir numerical simulation. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(4):146-153.
[11] 李岩.扇三角洲前缘储层构型及其控油作用:以赵凹油田赵凹区块核桃园组三段Ⅳ31厚油层为例. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):132-139. LI Y. Reservoir architecture of fan delta front and its oil-control models:a case of Eh 3Ⅳ31 reservoir in Zhaowa block of Zhaowa Oilfield, Biyang Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):132-139.
[12] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 等.基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6):145-154. LONG M, LIU Y X, CHEN X Q, et al. Optimization adjustment of injection-production structure based on meandering river reservoir architecture. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(6):145-154.
[13] 陈立炯, 林承焰, 孙志峰, 等.基于构型级次的曲流河剩余油模式及挖潜措施.大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 37(5):49-58. CHEN L J, LIN C Y, SUN Z F, et al. Remained oil patterns and potential tapping measures for the meandering river based on the architecture grade. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2018, 37(5):49-58.
[14] 刘群明, 唐海发, 吕志凯, 等.鄂东致密气水下分流河道复合体储层构型布井技术.中国矿业大学学报, 2017, 46(5):1144-1151. LIU Q M, TANG H F, LYU Z K, et al. Well deployment technique for composite subwater distributary channel sand body reservoir architecture of Edong tight gas. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2017, 46(5):1144-1151.
[15] 吴胜和, 纪友亮, 岳大力, 等.碎屑沉积地质体构型分级方案探讨.高校地质学报, 2013, 19(1):12-22. WU S H, JI Y L, YUE D L, et al. Discussion on hierarchical scheme of architectural units in clastic deposits. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013, 19(1):12-22.
[16] 姜在兴. 沉积学. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003:286. JIANG Z X. Sedimentology. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003:286.
[17] 胡光义, 肖大坤, 范廷恩, 等.河流相储层构型研究新理论、新方法:海上油田河流相复合砂体构型概念、内容及表征方法. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(1):143-159. HU G Y, XIAO D K, FAN T E, et al. New theory and method of fluvial reservoir architecture study:Concepts, contents and characterization of offshore oilfield fluvial compound sand-body architecture. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2019, 21(1):143-159.
[18] 吴胜和, 冯文杰, 印森林, 等.冲积扇沉积构型研究进展.古地理学报, 2016, 18(4):497-512. WU S H, FENG W J, YIN S L, et al. Research advances in alluvial fan depositional architecture. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition), 2016, 18(4):497-512.
[19] 朱超, 刘占国, 杨少勇, 等.利用相控分频反演预测英西湖相碳酸盐岩储层.石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(4):832-841. ZHU C, LIU Z G, YANG S Y, et al. Lacustrine carbonate reservoir prediction in Yingxi, Qaidam Basin with the facies-constrained and segmented-frequency-band inversion. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(4):832-841.
[20] 岳大力, 李伟, 王军, 等.基于分频融合地震属性的曲流带预测与点坝识别:以渤海湾盆地埕岛油田馆陶组为例.古地理学报, 2018, 20(6):941-951. YUE D L, LI W, WANG J, et al. Prediction of meandering belt and point-bar recognition based on spectral-decomposed and fused seismic attributes:a case study of the Guantao Formation, Chengdao Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 20(6):941-951.
[1] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[2] 尹艳树, 丁文刚, 安小平, 徐振华. 鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田塞160井区三叠系长611储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 37-49.
[3] 张皓宇, 李茂, 康永梅, 吴泽民, 王广. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇北油田长3油层组储层构型及剩余油精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(6): 177-188.
[4] 邓猛, 邵英博, 赵军寿, 廖辉, 邓琪. 渤海A油田明化镇组下段河-坝砂体储层构型及剩余油分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 154-163.
[5] 何康, 张鹏志, 周军良, 甘立琴, 舒晓. 复合曲流带内部构型界面识别新方法及其应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 126-135.
[6] 龙明, 刘英宪, 陈晓祺, 王美楠, 于登飞. 基于曲流河储层构型的注采结构优化调整[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 145-154.
[7] 常海燕, 严耀祖, 陈更新, 郭宁, 项燚伟, 杨会洁. 近岸水下扇储层构型及剩余油分布模式——以柴达木盆地七个泉油田E31油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3): 143-152.
[8] 刘化清, 苏明军, 倪长宽, 洪忠, 崔向丽, 胡凯峰, 李政阳, 毛俊丽. 薄砂体预测的地震沉积学研究方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 1-11.
[9] 刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 冯海潮, 王颍超. 渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 148-154.
[10] 张建兴, 林承焰, 张宪国, 孙志峰, 陈家昀. 基于储层构型与油藏数值模拟的点坝储层剩余油分布研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 146-153.
[11] 李岩. 扇三角洲前缘储层构型及其控油作用——以赵凹油田赵凹区块核桃园组三段Ⅳ31厚油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3): 132-139.
[12] 孙雨,董毅明,王继平,马世忠,于利民,闫百泉. 松辽盆地红岗北地区扶余油层储层单砂体分布模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4): 9-15.
[13] 秦国省,吴胜和,郑联勇,喻 宸 . 基于沉积过程的三角洲前缘河口坝储层构型精细分析——以老君庙油田 L 1 1 小层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 55-63.
[14] 陈玉琨,王延杰,朱亚婷,刘红现,周玉辉,闫家宁 . 克拉玛依油田七东1 区克下组冲积扇储层构型表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(5): 92-97.
[15] 王珂,戴俊生,贾开富,刘海磊. 塔河油田 1 区三叠系储层流动单元研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3): 119-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .