岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 148–154.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.05.018

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

渤海海域A油田夹层控制下的剩余油分布模式

刘超, 李云鹏, 张伟, 冯海潮, 王颍超   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海石油研究院, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-17 修回日期:2017-07-19 出版日期:2017-09-21 发布日期:2017-09-21
  • 第一作者:刘超(1984-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事油田开发地质方面的研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市滨海新区海川路2121号渤海石油研究院。Email:liuchao5@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项“海上油田丛式井网整体加密及综合调整油藏工程技术示范”（编号：2011ZX05057-001）和“渤海油田加密调整及提高采收率油藏工程技术示范”（编号：2016ZX05058-001）联合资助

Remaining oil distribution pattern controlled by interlayer in A oilfield in Bohai Sea

LIU Chao, LI Yunpeng, ZHANGWei, FENG Haichao, WANG Yingchao   

  1. Bohai Oilfield Research Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2017-03-17 Revised:2017-07-19 Online:2017-09-21 Published:2017-09-21

PDF (PC)

486

摘要： 为分析并总结夹层控制下的剩余油分布规律，以高含水开发阶段的渤海海域A油田为研究对象，开展了储层夹层构型精细解剖和数值模拟研究。结果表明：渤海A油田夹层以泥质夹层和物性夹层为主，平均厚度小于1m，表现为顺物源的“前积式”和垂直物源的“上拱式”展布样式。内部夹层的延伸规模、发育位置控制着剩余油的分布位置和富集程度。夹层水平延伸距离越远，夹层底部区域剩余油的富集范围越大；在注采井与夹层配置方面，采油井钻遇夹层的情况下，夹层对剩余油分布影响更大，夹层底部剩余油更为富集；在夹层和储层韵律性控制下，层内剩余油分布模式分为夹层顶部富集型、夹层上下富集型和夹层底部富集型3种。该成果对油田后期调整挖潜和实施稳油控水措施均提供了决策依据。

关键词: 致密油储层, 溶蚀孔隙, 成因机理, 芦草沟组, 吉木萨尔凹陷

Abstract: In order to analyze distribution rule of remaining oil controlled by interlayer,the reservoir architecture and numerical simulation analysis of interlayer were carried out in Bohai A oilfield with high water cut stage. The results show that foreset imbricate interlayers are mainly composed of shale interlayer and tight sandstone interlayer,which average thickness is less than one meter. The remaining oil is controlled by position and area of interlayer. The longer the horizontal extension length of interlayer is,the greater the enrichment area of remaining oil is in the bottom zone of interlayer. In the injection well,oil well and interlayer configuration,when the production well penetrated into interlayer,interlayer has greater effect on remaining oil,which will be more enriched in bottom zone of the interlayer. Under the control of interlayer and reservoir rhythmicity,the remaining oil distribution patterns were divided into three types:interlayer top enrichment type,interlayer top-bottom enrichment type and interlayer bottom enrichment type. The results provide decision basis for adjustment,tapping potential and stabilizing oil and controlling water measures in late stage of oilfield.

Key words: tight oil reservoirs, dissolved pores, formation mechanism, Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 卢虎胜,林承焰,程奇,等. 东营凹陷永安镇油田沙二段三角洲相储层构型及剩余油分布.东北石油大学学报,2013,37(3):40-47. LU H S,LIN C Y,CHENG Q,et al. Deltaic reservoir architecture and remaining oil distribution study of Es2 member in Yonganzhen oilfield,Dongying Sag. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(3):40-47.
[2] 陈清华,曾明,章凤奇,等. 河流相储层单一河道的识别及其对油田开发的意义.油气地质与采收率,2004,11(3):13-15. CHEN Q H,ZENG M,ZHANG F Q,et al. Identification of single channel in fluvial reservoir and its significance to the oilfield development. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004,11(3):13-15.
[3] 邹志文,斯春松,杨梦云. 隔夹层成因、分布及其对油水分布的影响——以准噶尔盆地腹部莫索湾莫北地区为例. 岩性油气藏,2010,22(3):66-70. ZOU Z W,SI C S,YANG M Y. Origin and distribution of interbeds and the influence on oil-water layer:an example from Mosuowan area in the hinterland of Junggar basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010,22(3):66-70.
[4] 刘超,马奎前,陈剑,等. 旅大油田非均质性定量表征及开发调整. 油气地质与采收率,2012,19(5):88-90. LIU C,MAK Q,CHEN J,et al. Research on quantitative characterization of reservoir heterogeneity and adjustments suggestion in LD oilfield. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012,19(5):88-90.
[5] 阎海龙,孙卫. 水下分流河道砂体中夹层的识别及定量分析——以靖安油田盘古梁长6油层为例. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,36(1):133-136. YAN H L,SUN W. Quantitative analysis of interlayer in underwater distributary channel:analyzing the interlayers of Chang 6 reservoir in Jing'an oilfield. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition),2006,36(1):133-136.
[6] 刘海磊,戴俊生,尹鹤,等. 塔河油田1区三叠系隔夹层研究. 岩性油气藏,2011,23(5):121-126. LIU H L,DAI J S,YIN H,et al. Research on Triassic interbeds in block one of Tahe Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(5):121-126.
[7] 岳大力,赵俊威,温立峰. 辫状河心滩内部夹层控制的剩余油分布物理模拟实验.地学前缘,2012,19(2):157-161. YUE D L,ZHAO J W,WEN L F. Physical simulation experiment of remaining oil distribution controlled by interlayer with-in braided bar of braided river reservoir. Earth Science Frontier, 2012,19(2):157-161.
[8] 屈亚光,丁祖鹏,潘彩霞,等. 厚油层层内夹层分布对水驱效果影响的物理实验研究. 油气地质与采收率,2014,21(3):105-107. QU Y G,DING Z P,PAN C X,et al. Physical experiment on distribution of interlayers impact on water flooding recovery efficiency. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014, 21(3):105-107.
[9] 王延章,林承焰,温长云,等. 夹层分布模式及其对剩余油的控制作用.西南石油学院学报,2006,28(5):6-10. WANG Y Z,LIN C Y,WEN C Y,et al. The distribution pattern of interlayer and its controlling function on remaining oil. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2006,28(5):6-10.
[10] 崔建,李海东,冯建松,等. 辫状河储层隔夹层特征及其对剩余油分布的影响. 特种油气藏,2013,20(4):26-30. CUI J,LI H D,FENG J S,et al. Barrier-beds and inter-beds characteristics and their effects on remaining oil distribution in braided river reservoirs:a case study of the Ng IV oil unit in shallow north Gaoshangpu oilfield. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013,20(4):26-30.
[11] 吴胜和,纪友亮,岳大力,等. 碎屑沉积地质体构型分级方案探讨. 高校地质学报,2013,19(1):12-22. WU S H,JI Y L,YUE D L,et al. Discussion on hierarchical scheme of architectural units in clastic deposits. Geological Journal of China Universities,2013,19(1):12-22.
[12] 杨圣贤,严科. 河口坝储层内部结构及对剩余油分布的影响. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(4):56-62. YANG S X,YAN K. The inner architecture of debouch bar reservoir and its influence on remaining oil distribution. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016,38(4):56-62.
[13] 李志鹏,林承焰,董波,等. 河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体内部建筑结构模式. 石油学报,2012,33(1):101-105. LI Z P,LIN C Y,DONG B,et al. An internal structure model of subaqueous distributary channel sands of the fluvial-dominated delta. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(1):101-105.
[14] 孙玉花,辛治国.河口坝砂体剩余油分布规律及影响因素——以东营凹陷胜坨油田为例. 新疆石油地质,2009,30(2):215-218. SUN Y H,XIN Z G. Remaining oil distribution and impact factors in mouth bar sands:an example from Shengtuo field in Dongying Sag. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(2):215-218.
[15] 胡浩. 基于砂体结构的剩余油挖潜调整措施研究. 岩性油气藏,2016,28(4):113-120. HU H. Adjustment measures of remaining oil tapping based on sand body structure. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(4):113-120.
[1] 肖博雅. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系凝灰岩类储层特征及有利区分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 135-148.
[2] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[3] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[4] 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
[5] 刘海磊, 朱永才, 刘龙松, 尹鹤, 王学勇, 杜小弟. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带上盘二叠系芦草沟组页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 90-101.
[6] 柳忠泉, 赵乐强, 曾治平, 田继军, 李正强, 罗锦昌, 胡美玲. 准噶尔盆地阜康断裂带二叠系芦草沟组页岩油成藏条件[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 126-137.
[7] 罗锦昌, 田继军, 马静辉, 闫嘉启, 梁雅菲, 胡卓浩. 吉木萨尔凹陷吉页1井区二叠系芦草沟组沉积环境及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 73-85.
[8] 张记刚, 杜猛, 陈超, 秦明, 贾宁洪, 吕伟峰, 丁振华, 向勇. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 89-102.
[9] 柳忠泉, 曾治平, 田继军, 李艳丽, 李万安, 张文文, 张治恒. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组“甜点”成因与分布预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 15-28.
[10] 张文文, 韩长城, 田继军, 张治恒, 张楠, 李正强. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 45-58.
[11] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[12] 杜金玲, 林鹤, 纪拥军, 江洪, 许文莉, 伍顺伟. 地震与微地震融合技术在页岩油压后评估中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 127-134.
[13] 蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 赵辛楣. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 109-119.
[14] 刘博, 徐刚, 纪拥军, 魏路路, 梁雪莉, 何金玉. 页岩油水平井体积压裂及微地震监测技术实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 172-180.
[15] 刘跃杰, 刘书强, 马强, 姚宗森, 佘家朝. BP神经网络法在三塘湖盆地芦草沟组页岩岩相识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 101-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣，侯中健，王亚辉，王莹，王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才，李晓平，窦天财，吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳，张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯，郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜，秦伟军，郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉，陆正元，袁帅，李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云， 卢渊，伊向艺，张俊良，张锦良，王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发