岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 15–28.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220302

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组“甜点”成因与分布预测

柳忠泉1, 曾治平1, 田继军2, 李艳丽1, 李万安2, 张文文2, 张治恒2   

  1. 1. 中国石化胜利油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257015;
    2. 新疆大学 地质与矿业工程学院, 乌鲁木齐 830047
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-25 修回日期:2021-12-24 出版日期:2022-05-01 发布日期:2022-05-12
  • 作者简介:柳忠泉(1966-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探综合地质研究工作。地址:(257015)山东省东营市东营区聊城路2号。Email:1350319258@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“准噶尔盆地碎屑岩层系油气富集规律与勘探评价”（编号：2016ZX05002-002）资助

Genesis and distribution prediction of sweet spots of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag

LIU Zhongquan1, ZENG Zhiping1, TIAN Jijun2, LI Yanli1, LI Wan'an2, ZHANG Wenwen2, ZHANG Zhiheng2   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257015, Shandong, China;
    2. College of Geology and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
  • Received:2021-09-25 Revised:2021-12-24 Online:2022-05-01 Published:2022-05-12

PDF (PC)

154

摘要： 通过岩石类型、矿物组分、物性特征、沉积环境及成岩作用等资料，对吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油“甜点”成因与空间分布进行了研究。研究结果表明：①研究区上“甜点”主要为砂质白云岩、泥质白云岩及白云质粉砂岩，下“甜点”主要为泥质白云岩、白云质粉砂岩、粉砂岩及白云质泥岩；上“甜点”平均孔隙度为9.4%，平均渗透率为0.0637mD，下“甜点”平均孔隙度为9.3%，平均渗透率为0.0231mD，均属于中低孔、特低渗储层。②研究区“甜点”储层主要孔隙类型为粒内溶孔和粒间溶孔，上、下“甜点”的差异受沉积环境变化和成岩作用影响，近岸滩和远岸滩物性较好，其次为远岸坝和云坪，压实作用和胶结作用是降低储集能力的两大因素，溶蚀作用可一定程度上改善其物性。③研究区上“甜点”具有“高自然伽马-高电阻率”特征，测井曲线呈尖峰状；下“甜点”具有“中自然伽马-高电阻率”特征；核磁孔隙度大于5.5%可作为识别“甜点”的敏感参数，地震反演剖面上“甜点”具有中高阻抗特征。④下“甜点”段相较于上“甜点”段在凹陷内分布更广，储层物性更优。

关键词: 近岸滩-远岸滩, 溶蚀作用, 尖峰状测井曲线, 中高阻抗, “甜点”储层, 芦草沟组, 二叠系, 吉木萨尔凹陷

Abstract: Based on the data of rock types，mineral components，physical properties，sedimentary environment and diagenesis，the genesis and distribution of shale oil sweet spots of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag were studied. The results show that： （1）The upper sweet spots in the study area are mainly composed of sandy dolomite，argillaceous dolomite and dolomitic siltstone，and the lower sweet spots are mainly composed of argillaceous dolomite，dolomitic siltstone，siltstone and dolomitic mudstone. The upper sweet spots have an average poro-sity of 9.4% and an average permeability of 0.063 7 mD， while the lower sweet spots have an average porosity of 9.3% and an average permeability of 0.023 1 mD，all of them belong to medium-low porosity and ultra-low permeability reservoirs. （2）The pores in the sweet spot reservoirs are mainly intragranular dissolved pores and intergranular dissolved pores. The difference between the upper and lower sweet spots is influenced by depositional environment and diagenesis. The physical properties of inshore shoals and far-shore shoals are better，followed by far-shore dam and dolomitic flat. Compaction and cementation are the two major factors to reduce the reservoir capacity，and dissolution can improve their physical properties.（3）The upper sweet spots have the characteristics of high natural gamma and high resistivity，with peak-shaped logging curve，while the lower sweet spots have the characteristics of medium natural gamma and high resistivity. NMR porosity greater than 5.5% can be used as a sensitive parameter to identify sweet spots. The sweet spots on the seismic inversion section have the characteristics of medium and high impedance.（4）Compared with the upper sweet spots，the lower sweet spots are more widely distributed in the sag and has better reservoir physical properties.

Key words: inshore shoals-far shore shoals, dissolution, peak-shaped logging curve, medium and high impedance, sweet spot reservoir, Lucaogou Formation, Permian, Jimsar Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] APLIN A C, MACQUAKER J H S. Mudstone diversity:Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(12):2031-2059.
[2] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136.
[3] 邹才能,陶士振,杨智,等.中国非常规油气勘探与研究新进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012, 31(4):312-322. ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, YANG Zhi, et al. New advance in unconventional petroleum exploration and research in China[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(4):312-322.
[4] 邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术:兼论非常规油气地质学[J].石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):385-399. ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon:On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4):385-399.
[5] 邹才能,董大忠,杨桦,等.中国页岩气形成条件及勘探实践[J].天然气工业, 2011, 31(12):26-39. ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, YANG Hua, et al. Conditions of shale gas accumulation and exploration practices in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(12):26-39.
[6] 杨升宇,张金川,黄卫东,等.吐哈盆地柯柯亚地区致密砂岩气储层"甜点"类型及成因[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(2):272-282. YANG Shengyu, ZHANG Jinchuan, HUANG Weidong, et al. "Sweet spot" types of reservoirs and genesis of tight sandstone gas in Kekeya area, Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):272-282.
[7] 张文文,韩长城,田继军,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):45-58. ZHANG Wenwen, HAN Changcheng, TIAN Jijun, et al. Sequence stratigraphic division and evolutionary features of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):45-58.
[8] ZHANG Jingya, LIU Guangdi, CAO Zhe, et al.Characteristics and formation mechanism of multi-source mixed sedimentary rocks in a saline lake, a case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Depression, northwest China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 102(5):704-724.
[9] 张治恒,田继军,韩长城,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2):116-126. ZHANG Zhiheng, TIAN Jijun, HAN Changcheng, et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Jungger Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2):116-126.
[10] 王小军,杨智峰,郭旭光,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油勘探实践与展望[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):402-413. WANG Xiaojun, YANG Zhifeng, GUO Xuguang, et al. Practices and prospects of shale oil exploration in Jimsar Sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):402-413.
[11] 匡立春,王霞田,郭旭光,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油地质特征与勘探实践[J].新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6):629-634. KUANG Lichun, WANG Xiatian, GUO Xuguang, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practice of tight oil of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6):629-634.
[12] 李红南,毛新军,胡广文,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层特征及产能预测研究[J].石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(10):40-44. LI Hongnan, MAO Xinjun, HU Guangwen, et al. Characteristics and productivity prediction of tight reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation of Jimusa'er Sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(10):40-44.
[13] 马克.陆相湖盆混合沉积成因及储层致密化机理研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2019. MA Ke. Study on the genesis of mixed sedimentation in continental lake basin and the mechanism of reservoir densification[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[14] 支东明,宋永,何文军,等.准噶尔盆地中-下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):389-401. ZHI Dongming, SONG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Geological characteristics, resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in Middle-Lower Permian, Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):389-401.
[15] 王然,常秋生,钱永新,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油"甜点体"储集特征及成因机理[J].石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4):604-611. WANG Ran, CHANG Qiusheng, QIAN Yongxin, et al. Reservoir characteristics and genesis of shale oil "sweet-spot" in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2020, 42(4):604-611.
[16] 鲍海娟,刘旭,周亚丽,等.吉木萨尔凹陷致密油有利区预测及潜力分析[J].特种油气藏, 2016, 23(5):38-42. BAO Haijuan, LIU Xu, ZHOU Yali, et al. Favorable area and potential analyses of tight oil in Jimsar Sag[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23(5):38-42.
[17] 方巧,德勒恰提·加娜塔依,高建军,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层物性特征及主要影响因素[J].西部探矿工程, 2017, 29(1):62-65. FANG Qiao, JIANATAYI Deleqiati, GAO Jianjun, et al. Characteristics and main influencing factors of tight oil reservoir in Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Depression[J].West-China Exploration Engineering, 2017, 29(1):62-65.
[18] 操应长,朱宁,张少敏,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层成岩作用与储集空间特征[J].地球科学与环境学报, 2019, 41(3):253-266. CAO Yingchang, ZHU Ning, ZHANG Shaomin, et al. Diagenesis and reservoiring space characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag of Junggar Basin, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(3):253-266.
[19] 董岩,徐东升,钱根葆,等.吉木萨尔页岩油"甜点"预测方法[J].特种油气藏, 2020, 27(3):54-59. DONG Yan, XU Dongsheng, QIAN Genbao, et al. shale oil "sweet-spot" prediction in Jimusar Sag[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(3):54-59.
[20] 吴俊军,周柯全,赵龙.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组上甜点地震预测方法[J].地质论评, 2013, 59(增刊1):1145-1147. WU Junjun, ZHOU Kequan, ZHAO Long. Seismic prediction method of upper sweet spot of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Depression[J].Geological Review, 2013, 59(Suppl l):1145-1147.
[21] 贾曙光,王军,王玲玲,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油甜点地震预测方法[J].新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(5):535-541. JIA Shuguang, WANG Jun, WANG Lingling, et al. Seismic prediction methods of shale oil sweet spot in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(5):535-541.
[22] 何登发,张磊,吴松涛,等.准噶尔盆地构造演化阶段及其特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5):845-861. HE Dengfa, ZHANG Lei, WU Songtao, et al. Tectonic evolution stages and features of the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5):845-861.
[23] 周锋,梅廉夫,徐振平,等.准噶尔盆地南缘东段构造作用对油气成藏的控制[J].南方油气, 2005, 18(2):10-14. ZHOU Feng, MEI Lianfu, XU Zhenping, et al. Studies on the control of tectonic function over reservoir formations in the east part of southern Jungger Basin[J]. Southern China Oil&Gas, 2005, 18(2):10-14.
[24] 张少敏,操应长,朱如凯,等.湖相细粒混合沉积岩岩石类型划分:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J].地学前缘, 2018, 25(4):198-209. ZHANG Shaomin, CAO Yingchang, ZHU Rukai, et al.Lithofacies classification of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks in the Permian Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(4):198-209.
[25] 谭强,马迪娜·马提吾汗,岳红星,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油藏原油物性垂向倒置原因分析[J].新疆石油天然气, 2019, 15(4):1-5. TAN Qiang, MATIWUHAN Madina, YUE Hongxing, et al. Reason of vertical inversion of crude oil physical properties in Lucaogou tight reservoir in Jimusar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Oil&Gas, 2019, 15(4):1-5.
[26] 邵雨,杨勇强,万敏,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组沉积特征及沉积相演化[J].新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6):635-642. SHAO Yu, YANG Yongqiang, WAN Min, et al. Sedimentary characteristic and facies evolution of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6):635-642.
[27] 邱振,吴晓智,唐勇,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油资源评价[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9):1688-1698. QIU Zhen, WU Xiaozhi, TANG Yong, et al. Resource assessment of tight oil from the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin,China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9):1688-1698.
[28] 匡立春,孙中春,欧阳敏,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组复杂岩性致密油储层测井岩性识别[J].测井技术, 2013, 37(6):638-642. KUANG Lichun, SUN Zhongchun, OUYANG Min, et al.Complication lithology logging identification of the Lucaogou tight oil reservoir in Jimusaer Depression[J].Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(6):638-642.
[29] 李秀彬,王晨,周勇,等.碳酸盐岩分析在吉木萨尔凹陷致密油勘探中的应用[J].录井工程, 2014, 25(4):22-25. LI Xiubin, WANG Chen, ZHOU Yong, et al. Carbonate analysis for tight oil exploration in Jimusaer Depression[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2014, 25(4):22-25.
[30] 张亚奇,马世忠,高阳,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层沉积相分析[J].沉积学报, 2017, 35(2):358-370. ZHANG Yaqi, MA Shizhong, GAO Yang, et al. Depositional facies analysis on tight reservoir of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(2):358-370.
[31] 封猛.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油优质储层评价新方法及应用[J].新疆石油天然气, 2018, 14(4):14-20. FENG Meng. New method and application of high quality reservoir evaluation for tight oil in Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Depression[J]. Xinjiang Oil&Gas, 2018, 14(4):14-20.
[32] 葸克来,操应长,朱如凯,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层岩石类型及特征[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(12):1495-1507. XI Kelai, CAO Yingchang, ZHU Rukai, et al. Rock types and characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(12):1495-1507.
[33] 曲长胜,邱隆伟,操应长,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩有机岩石学特征及其赋存状态[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(2):30-38. QU Changsheng, QIU Longwei, CAO Yingchang, et al. Organic petrology characteristics and occurrence of source rocks in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017, 41(2):30-38.
[34] 田伟,刘慧卿,何顺利,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层岩石微观孔隙结构表征[J].油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(4):24-32. TIAN Wei, LIU Huiqing, HE Shunli, et al. Characterization of microscopic pore structure of tight oil reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation, Jimusaer Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(4):24-32.
[35] 李维岭.东营凹陷博兴洼陷正理庄砂体沉积相及储层特征研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2013. LI Weiling. The sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of the Zhenglizhuang sand body in the Boxing Sag of the Dongying Depression[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2013.
[36] 马克,刘钰铭,侯加根,等.陆相咸化湖混合沉积致密储集层致密化机理:以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3):253-261. MA Ke, LIU Yuming, HOU Jiagen, et al. Densification mechanism of tight reservoir from mixed sedimentation in saline Lacustrine Environment:A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3):253-261.
[37] BOLES J R, FRANKS S G. Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstones of southwest Texas:Implications of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1979, 62(1):55-70.
[38] MCHARGUE T R, PRICE R C. Dolomite from clay in argillaceous limestones or shale associated marine carbonates[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1982, 52:873-886.
[39] KIM J C, LEE Y I, HISADA K I. Depositional and compositional controls on sandstone diagenesis, the Tetori Group (Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous), central Japan[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 195(3):183-202.
[40] 王剑,周路,刘金,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组酸碱交替成岩作用特征及对页岩储集层的影响[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5):898-912. WANG Jian, ZHOU Lu, LIU Jin, et al. Acid-base alternation diagenesis and its influence on shale reservoirs in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Depression, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5):898-912.
[41] 胡文瑄,姚素平,陆现彩,等.典型陆相页岩油层系成岩过程中有机质演化对储集性的影响[J].石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5):947-956. HU Wenxuan, YAO Suping, LU Xiancai, et al. Effects of organic matter evolution on oil reservoir property during diagenesis of typical continental shale sequences[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5):947-956.
[42] 王代富,罗静兰,陈淑慧,等.珠江口盆地白云凹陷深层砂岩储层中碳酸盐胶结作用及成因探讨[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(9):2079-2090. WANG Daifu, LUO Jinglan, CHEN Shuhui, et al. Carbonate cementation and origin analysis of deep sandstone reservoirs in the Baiyun Sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2017, 91(9):2079-2090.
[43] 方世虎,宋岩,徐怀民,等.构造演化与含油气系统的形成:以准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷为例[J].石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2):149-153. FANG Shihu, SONG Yan, XU Huaimin, et al.Relationship between tectonic evolution and petroleum system formation:Taking the Jimsar Sag of eastern Junggar Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2007, 29(2):149-153.
[44] BEARD D C, WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability in unconsolidated sand[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):349-369.
[45] 朱永才,姜懿洋,吴俊军,等.吉木萨尔凹陷致密油储层物性定量预测[J].特种油气藏, 2017, 24(4):42-47. ZHU Yongcai, JIANG Yiyang, WU Junjun, et al. Quantitative prediction of tight oil reservoirs properties in Jimusar Depression[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(4):42-47.
[1] 雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142-153.
[2] 肖威, 张兵, 姚永君, 王艳, 杨洪宇, 杨凯. 川东二叠系龙潭组页岩岩相特征与沉积环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 152-162.
[3] 张文文, 韩长城, 田继军, 张治恒, 张楠, 李正强. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组层序地层划分及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5): 45-58.
[4] 徐宁宁, 王永诗, 张守鹏, 邱隆伟, 张向津, 林茹. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系盒1段储层特征及成岩圈闭[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 52-62.
[5] 魏钦廉, 崔改霞, 刘美荣, 吕玉娟, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 17-25.
[6] 严敏, 赵靖舟, 曹青, 吴和源, 黄延昭. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区二叠系石盒子组储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 49-58.
[7] 张治恒, 田继军, 韩长城, 张文文, 邓守伟, 孙国祥. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 116-126.
[8] 杜金玲, 林鹤, 纪拥军, 江洪, 许文莉, 伍顺伟. 地震与微地震融合技术在页岩油压后评估中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 127-134.
[9] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[10] 蒋中发, 丁修建, 王忠泉, 赵辛楣. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩沉积古环境[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 109-119.
[11] 刘博, 徐刚, 纪拥军, 魏路路, 梁雪莉, 何金玉. 页岩油水平井体积压裂及微地震监测技术实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 172-180.
[12] 孙会珠, 朱玉双, 魏勇, 高媛. CO2驱酸化溶蚀作用对原油采收率的影响机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 136-142.
[13] 刘跃杰, 刘书强, 马强, 姚宗森, 佘家朝. BP神经网络法在三塘湖盆地芦草沟组页岩岩相识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 101-111.
[14] 任大忠, 周兆华, 梁睿翔, 周然, 柳娜, 南郡祥. 致密砂岩气藏黏土矿物特征及其对储层性质的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 42-53.
[15] 刘冬冬, 杨东旭, 张子亚, 张晨, 罗群, 潘占昆, 黄治鑫. 基于常规测井和成像测井的致密储层裂缝识别方法——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 76-85.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发