四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20210403

岩性油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 20–28.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210403

四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征

张本健¹, 田云英¹, 曾琪¹, 尹宏¹, 丁熊²

1. 中国石油西南油气田公司川西北气矿, 四川江油 621700;
2. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 成都 610500

收稿日期:2020-08-09 修回日期:2020-09-10 出版日期:2021-08-01 发布日期:2021-08-06
通讯作者: 丁熊(1981-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事储层地质方面的研究工作。Email:xiongding@swpu.edu.cn。 E-mail:xiongding@swpu.edu.cn
作者简介:张本健(1980-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地质勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(621700)四川省江油市太白东路1号川西北气矿。Email:zbjian@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油西南油气田公司勘探综合研究项目“双鱼石地区须家河组沉积、储层特征研究”（编号：JS2020-09）资助

Sedimentary characteristics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin

ZHANG Benjian¹, TIAN Yunying¹, ZENG Qi¹, YIN Hong¹, DING Xiong²

1. Northwestern Sichuan Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Jiangyou 621700, Sichuan, China;
2. School of Geosciences and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2020-08-09 Revised:2020-09-10 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段的天然气勘探持续获得新发现。为了系统研究四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩的沉积特征，开展了钻井岩心观察、测井解释、相标志鉴定和砂砾岩优势相分析。结果表明：①研究区须三段冲积扇扇中辫状河道、扇缘漫流沉积和扇三角洲平原辫状分流河道、扇三角洲前缘水下分流河道、河口坝和远砂坝等均发育砂砾岩沉积，其中辫状河道主要发育块状砾岩，砾多砂少，漫流沉积砂多砾少、发育板状交错层理和平行层理，具有向上变细的正粒序特征。②扇三角洲以砂岩沉积为主，辫状分流河道、水下分流河道、河口坝和远砂坝发育冲刷面、板状交错层理、平行层理和沙纹交错层理等为主，辫状分流河道、水下分流河道具有向上变细的正粒序特征，河口坝和远砂坝具有向上变粗的反粒序特征。③辫状河道、漫流沉积、辫状分流河道砂砾岩较发育，水下分流河道、河口坝和远砂坝砂砾岩次之。该研究成果对四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段的天然气勘探具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 沉积特征, 砂砾岩, 冲积扇, 扇三角洲, 须三段, 三叠系, 四川盆地西北部

Abstract: In recent years,there are new discoveries in natural gas exploration of the third member of Xujiahe Formation（Xu-3 member）of Triassic in northwest Sichuan Basin. In order to systematically study the sedimentary characteristics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin,drilling core observation,logging interpretation,facies identification and dominant facies analysis of sandy conglomerates were carried out. The results show that：（1）Sandy conglomerates were developed in braided channels and overflow deposition in alluvial fan and distributary channels,subaqueous distributary channels,mouth bars and distal bars in fan delta of Xu-3 member in the study area. The braided channel was mainly composed of massive conglomerate, with more conglomerates and less sandstone,and overflow deposition mainly developed tabular cross bedding and parallel bedding,with more sandstone and less conglomerates,showing positive grain order characteristics of upward thinning.（2）Fan deltas were dominated by sandstone,the braided distributary channels,subaqueous distributary channels,mouth bars and distal bars developed scour surface,tabular cross bedding,parallel bedding and sandy cross bedding. Braided distributary channels and subaqueous distributary channels have fining-upwards normal cycle as the dominate features. Mouth bars and distal bars have coarsening-upwards normal cycle as the dominate features.（3）Sandy conglomerates were mostly developed in the braided channels,overflow depo-sition and braided distributary channels,followed by subaqueous distributary channels,mouth bars and distal bars. The research results have reference significance for natural gas exploration of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin.

Key words: sedimentary characteristics, sandy conglomerates, alluvial fan, fan delta, Xu-3 member, Triassic, northwestern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.1

张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20–28.

ZHANG Benjian, TIAN Yunying, ZENG Qi, YIN Hong, DING Xiong. Sedimentary characteristics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4): 20–28.

参考文献

[1] ORHAN M, HENNING D, ERIK H. Diagenetic influence on reservoir quality evolution, examples from Triassic conglomerates/arenites in the Edvard Grieg field, Norwegian North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 93:247-271.
[2] AWILSA G C, LUIZ F R. Diagenesis of Aptian sandstones and conglomerates of the Campos Basin. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 125:189-200.
[3] LEGGITT S M, WALKER R G, EYLES C. Control of reservoir geometry and stratigraphic trapping by erosion surface E5 in the Pembina-Carrot Creek area, Upper Cretaceous Cardium Formation, Alberta, Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(8):1165-1182.
[4] HICKSON T A, LOWE D R. Facies architecture of a submarine fan channel-levee complex:the Juniper Ridge conglomerate, Coalinga, California. Sedimentology, 2002, 49(2):335-362.
[5] 袁静, 袁炳存.永安镇地区永1砾岩体储层微观特征. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 23(1):13-16. YUAN J, YUAN B C. Reservoir micro-properties of Yong 1 conglomerate body in Yonganzhen area. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 1999, 23(1):13-16.
[6] 卿繁, 闫建平, 王军, 等.砂砾岩体沉积期次划分及其与物性的关系:以东营凹陷北部陡坡带Y920区块沙四上亚段为例. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6) 50-61. QIN F, YAN J P, WANG J, et al. Division of sedimentary cycle of sandy conglomerate body and its relationship with physical properties:a case study from the upper submember of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation in Y920 block of northern steep slope zone in Dongying Sag. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(6):50-61.
[7] 张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 等.九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):1-13. ZHANG M L, KONG F Z, GU J R, et al. Assessment of glutenite reservoirs and optimization of prospects of Zhenzhuchong Formation in Jiulongshan gas field, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):1-13.
[8] 陈欢庆, 舒治睿, 林春燕, 等.粒度分析在砾岩储层沉积环境研究中的应用:以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(6):6-12. CHEN H Q, SHU Z R, LIN C Y, et al. Application of grain-size analysis in research of sedimentary environment of conglomerate reservoir:Taking alluvial fan reservoir in the lower member of Kelamayi Formation in some area of the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin as an example. Journal of Xi'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(6):6-12.
[9] 周际春, 王旭丽, 罗静, 等.川西北部须三段砂砾岩气藏开发潜力再认识. 成都, 2017年全国天然气学术年会, 2017:984-989. ZHOU J C, WANG X L, LUO J, et al. Re-understanding of the development potential of sandy conglomerates gas reservoirs in the 3 member of Xujiahe Formation in northwestern Sichuan. Chengdu, the 2017 National Natural Gas Academic Conference, 2017:984-989.
[10] 刘君龙, 纪友亮, 杨克明, 等.川西须家河组前陆盆地构造层序及沉积充填响应特征.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):11-23. LIU J L, JI Y L, YANG K M, et al. Tectono-stratigraphy and sedimentary infill characteristics of Xujiahe Formation in western Sichuan foreland basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(6):11-23.
[11] 李雅楠, 郑荣才, 李国晖, 等.四川盆地三台-盐亭地区上三叠统须家河组沉积体系分析.岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2):38-46. LI Y N, ZHENG R C, LI G H, et al. Sedimentary system of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Santai-Yanting area, Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(2):38-46.
[12] 郑荣才, 李国晖, 雷光明, 等. 四川盆地须家河组层序分析与地层对比.天然气工业, 2011, 31(6):12-20. ZHENG R C, LI G H, LEI G M, et al. Sequence analysis and stratigraphic correlation of Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(6):12-20.
[13] 朱如凯, 赵霞, 刘柳红, 等.四川盆地须家河组沉积体系与有利储集层分布.石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):46-55. ZHU R K, ZHAO X, LIU L H, et al. Depositional system and favorable reservoir distribution of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1):46-55.
[14] 杨文杰, 胡明毅, 苏亚拉图, 等.松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):59-68. YANG W J, HU M Y, SUYA L T, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta during initial rifting stage in Sujiatun sub-depression, Songliao Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):59-68.
[15] 张家强, 李士祥, 周新平, 等.志丹地区长82砂层组缓坡浅水三角洲前缘砂体发育模式及成因.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1):36-50. ZHANG J Q, LI S X, ZHOU X P, et al. Development pattern and genesis of gentle slope shallow water delta front sand bodies of Chang 82 sand set in Zhidan area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(1):36-50.
[16] 陈斌, 李勇, 王伟明, 等. 晚三叠世龙门山前陆盆地须家河组物源及构造背景分析. 地质学报, 2016, 90(5):857-872. CHEN B, LI Y, WANG W M, et al. The provenance and tectonic setting of Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Longmenshan foreland Basin, SW China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(5):857-872.
[17] 苑伯超, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 等.酒泉盆地鸭儿峡地区白垩系下沟组砂砾岩储层特征及主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):61-70. YUAN B C, XIAO W H, WEI H Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of Cretaceous Xiagou Formation in Ya'erxia area, Jiuquan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):61-70.
[18] 徐子煜, 王安, 韩长城, 等.玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组优质砂砾岩储层形成机制.岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):82-92. XU Z Y, WANG A, HAN C C, et al. Formation mechanism of highquality sandy-conglomerate reservoir of Triassic Karamay Formation in Mahu area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):82-92.
[19] 李晨, 樊太亮, 高志前, 等.冲积扇高分辨率层序地层分析:以辽河坳陷曙一区杜84块SAGD开发区馆陶组为例.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(3):66-75. LI C, FAN T L, GAO Z Q, et al. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of alluvial fan:a case from Guantao Formation in SAGD development zone of Du 84 block,Shuyi area,Liaohe Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(3):66-75.
[20] 邹妞妞,张大权,钱海涛,等.准噶尔盆地玛北斜坡区扇三角洲砂砾岩储层主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):24-33. ZOU N N,ZHANG D Q,QIAN H T,et al. Main controlling factors of glutenite reservoir of fan delta in Mabei slope,Junggar Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016, 28(4):24-33.
[21] 蔡全升,胡明毅,陈孝红,等.小型断陷湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征与发育模式:以徐家围子断陷北部沙河子组为例.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):86-96. CAI Q S,HU M Y,CHEN X H,et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development model of fan delta in small faulted basin:a case of Shahezi Formation in northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression, NE China. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):86-96.
[22] 陈程, 孙义梅, 贾爱林. 扇三角洲前缘地质知识库的建立及应用. 石油学报, 2006, 27(2):53-57. CHEN C, SUN Y M, JIA A L. Development and application of geological knowledge database for fan delta front in the dense spacing area. Acta Petreolei Sinica, 2006, 27(2):53-57.
[23] 秦国省, 吴胜和, 郑联勇, 等. 基于沉积过程的三角洲前缘河口坝储层构型精细分析:以老君庙油田L11小层为例. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6):55-63. QIN G S, WU S H, ZHENG L Y, et al. Detailed architecture analysis of mouth bar in delta front based on sedimentary process:a case study of L11 layer in Laojunmiao Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(6):55-63.
[24] 王鹏, 沈忠民, 何崇康, 等.川南地区须家河组天然气地球化学特征及成藏过程.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5):19-27. WANG P, SHEN Z M, HE C K, et al. Geochemical characteristics and accumulation process of natural gas of Xujiahe Formation in southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(5):19-27.
[25] 王威.川东北地区须家河组天然气高效成藏模式探讨.岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(3):27-34. WANG W. Highly efficient reservoir accumulation models of natural gas of Xujiahe Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(3):27-34.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征

Sedimentary characteristics of sandy conglomerates of Triassic Xu-3 member in northwestern Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴毓, 王贵文, 柴新. 四川盆地金秋区块三叠系须二段储层非均质性及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 29-40.
[2]	郑荣臣, 李宏涛, 史云清, 肖开华. 川东北元坝地区三叠系须三段沉积特征及成岩作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 13-26.
[3]	马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[4]	陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[5]	杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[6]	张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[7]	宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[8]	袁选俊, 周红英, 张志杰, 王子野, 成大伟, 郭浩, 张友焱, 董文彤. 坳陷湖盆大型浅水三角洲沉积特征与生长模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 1-11.
[9]	卿繁, 闫建平, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 赵振宇, 晁静. 砂砾岩体沉积期次划分及其与物性的关系——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带Y920区块沙四上亚段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 50-61.
[10]	吴青鹏, 吕锡敏, 陈娟, 周在华, 袁成. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下白垩统下沟组沉积特征及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 54-62.
[11]	杨文杰, 胡明毅, 苏亚拉图, 刘昌, 元懿, 李金池. 松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 59-68.
[12]	薛辉, 韩春元, 肖博雅, 王芳, 李玲. 蠡县斜坡高阳地区沙一下亚段浅水三角洲前缘沉积特征及模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 69-80.
[13]	张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 郭振华, 付晶, 郑国强, 钱品淑. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 1-13.
[14]	徐子煜, 王安, 韩长城, 田继军, 张军生, 刘磊, 张楠. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组优质砂砾岩储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 82-92.
[15]	李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP₃⁵砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.