玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价

doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20220313

岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 142–153.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220313

玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价

雷海艳^1,2, 郭佩^3,4, 孟颖^1,2, 齐婧^1,2, 刘金^1,2, 张娟^1,2, 刘淼^1,2, 郑雨^1,2

1. 新疆页岩油勘探开发重点实验室, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2. 中国石油新疆油田分公司实验检测研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
3. 成都理工大学沉积地质研究院, 成都 610059;
4. 成都理工大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610059

收稿日期:2021-10-18 修回日期:2022-01-16 出版日期:2022-05-01 发布日期:2022-05-12
第一作者:雷海艳(1987-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事沉积储层方面的研究工作。地址:(834000)新疆克拉玛依市克拉玛依区准噶尔路29号实验检测研究院。Email:lhy1987@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“碱湖油页岩中微晶白云石沉淀-成岩机理研究”（编号：42002116）资助

Pore structure and classification evaluation of shale oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag

LEI Haiyan^1,2, GUO Pei^3,4, MENG Ying^1,2, QI Jing^1,2, LIU Jin^1,2, ZHANG Juan^1,2, LIU Miao^1,2, ZHENG Yu^1,2

1. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Shale Oil Exploration and Development, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
2. Research Institute of Experiment and Detection, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
3. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Received:2021-10-18 Revised:2022-01-16 Online:2022-05-01 Published:2022-05-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组为盆地西北缘的主力烃源岩，具有较大的页岩油勘探前景。利用场发射电子扫描显微镜以及高压压汞等测试手段，对研究区玛页1井风城组页岩油储层的孔隙结构进行了精细研究和分类评价。研究结果表明：①玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油储层以薄层状或块状云质、粉砂质、钙质或硅质泥岩为主，且泥岩中常发育大量白云石、方解石、及硅质条带、团块或斑块。②研究区风城组页岩油储层孔隙类型主要有粒间孔、基质溶孔、粒内溶孔、晶间孔、晶内溶孔以及微裂缝等，以基质溶孔和晶间孔最为发育。储层物性差，孔隙度为0.4%～17.7%，大多小于3.0%；渗透率最大值为2.90 mD，大多小于0.03 mD，属于低孔特低渗储层。③研究区样品孔隙体积普遍较小，平均为0.25cm³；均值系数平均为13.95；分选系数平均为2.44；偏态平均为0.97；峰态平均为1.25；变异系数平均为0.17；最大进汞饱和度低，平均为37.23%；退汞效率低，平均仅为25.73%。④研究区页岩油储层可分为Ⅰ，Ⅱ，Ⅲ等3类，其中物性好且内部孔隙连通性好的Ⅰ类页岩油储层具有好的油气勘探开发前景。

关键词: 页岩油储层, 孔隙结构, 孔隙类型, 风城组, 二叠系, 玛湖凹陷, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract: The Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag is the major source rock in the NW Junggar Basin，with great prospects for shale oil exploration. The pore structure of shale oil reservoirs of Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1 in the study area was studied and classified by means of field emission electron scanning microscope and high-pressure mercury injection. The results show that：（1）The shale oil reservoir of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag is dominated by thin-layer or massive dolomitic，silty，calcareous or siliceous mudstone， and a large amount of dolomite，calcite and siliceous bands，lumps or patches are often developed in the mudstone. （2）The pore types of shale oil reservoirs of Fengcheng Formation in the study area are mainly intergranular pores， matrix dissolved pores，intragranular dissolved pores，intercrystalline pores，intracrystalline dissolved pores and microfractures，among which matrix dissolved pores and intercrystalline pores are the most developed. The physical properties of the shale oil reservoirs are poor，the porosity values range from 0.4% to 17.7% and are mostly less than 3.0%，and the permeability value are mostly less than 0.03 mD，with the maximum of 2.90 mD，belonging to low porosity and extra-low permeability reservoirs.（3）The pore volume of samples in the study area is generally small，with an average of 0.25 cm³. The average values of average coefficient，sorting coefficient，skewness， peakedness and coefficient of variation is 13.95，2.44，0.97，1.25 and 0.17，respectively. The maximum mercury saturation is low，with an average of³7.23%，and the efficiency of mercury-ejection is low，with an average of only 25.73%.（4）The shale oil reservoirs in the study area can be divided into three types： Ⅰ， Ⅱ and Ⅲ. Among them，type Ⅰ shale oil reservoirs with good physical properties and good internal pore connectivity have good prospects for oil and gas exploration and development.

Key words: shale oil reservoir, pore structures, pore types, Fengcheng Formation, Permian, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

中图分类号:

TE122

雷海艳, 郭佩, 孟颖, 齐婧, 刘金, 张娟, 刘淼, 郑雨. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 142–153.

LEI Haiyan, GUO Pei, MENG Ying, QI Jing, LIU Jin, ZHANG Juan, LIU Miao, ZHENG Yu. Pore structure and classification evaluation of shale oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(3): 142–153.

参考文献

[1] 张道伟,薛建勤,伍坤宇,等.柴达木盆地英西地区页岩油储层特征及有利区优选[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):1-11. ZHANG Daowei, XUE Jianqin, WU Kunyu, et al. Shale oil reservoir characteristics and favorable area optimization in Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):1-11.
[2] 张治恒,田继军,韩长城,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2):116-126. ZHANG Zhiheng, TIAN Jijun, HAN Changcheng, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2):116-126.
[3] ALEXANDRA A H, AMIN G, BERNHARD M K. Transport properties of unconventional gas systems[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 31(1):90-99.
[4] 刘得光,周路,李世宏,等.玛湖凹陷风城组烃源岩特征与生烃模式[J].沉积学报, 2020, 38(5):947-955. LIU Deguang, ZHOU Lu, LI Shihong, et al. Characteristics of source rocks and hydrocarbon generation models of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(5):947-955.
[5] 张志杰,袁选俊,汪梦诗,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖沉积特征与古环境演化[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6):972-984. ZHANG Zhijie, YUAN Xuanjun, WANG Mengshi, et al. Alkaline-lacustrine deposition and paleoenvironmental evolution in Permian Fengcheng Formation at the Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6):972-984.
[6] 曹剑,雷德文,李玉文,等.古老碱湖优质烃源岩:准噶尔盆地下二叠统风城组[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(7):781-790. CAO Jian, LEI Dewen, LI Yuwen, et al. Ancient high-quality alkaline lacustrine source rocks discovered in the Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7):781-790.
[7] 宇振昆,丁金岗,冯振伟,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱性成岩作用浅析[J].非常规油气, 2021, 8(2):24-32. YU Zhenkun, DING Jingang, FENG Zhenwei, et al. Analysis on alkaline diagenesis of the Fengcheng Formation of Permian in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, China[J]. Unconventional Oil&Gas, 2021, 8(2):24-32.
[8] 许琳,常秋生,冯林丽,等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及控制因素[J].中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5):650-660. XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, FENG Linli, et al. The reservoir characteristics and control factors of shale oil in Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5):650-660.
[9] 支东明,唐勇,何文军,等.玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组常规-非常规油气有序共生与全油气系统成藏模式[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1):38-51. ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Orderly coexistence and accumulation models of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1):38-51.
[10] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.致密油与页岩油内涵、特征、潜力及挑战[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1):3-17.ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, BAI Bin, et al. Significance, geologic characteristics, resource potential and future challenges of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(1):3-17.
[11] 董岩,肖佃师,彭寿昌,等.页岩油层系储集层微观孔隙非均质性及控制因素:以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2021, 40(1):115-123. DONG Yan, XIAO Dianshi, PENG Shouchang, et al. Heterogeneity of microscopic pores in shale oil reservoir and its controlling factors:Taking the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusar Sag as an example[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2021, 40(1):115-123.
[12] 张晓辉,张娟,袁京素,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南梁-华池地区长81致密储层微观孔喉结构及其对渗流的影响[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2):36-48. ZHANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Juan, YUAN Jingsu, et al. Micro pore throat structure and its influence on seepage of Chang 81 tight reservoir in Nanliang-Huachi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2):36-48.
[13] 薛冰,张金川,唐玄,等.黔西北龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构及储气特征[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(2):138-149. XUE Bing, ZHANG Jinchuan, TANG Xuan, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas accumulation on shale in Longmaxi Formation, northwest Guizhou[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(2):138-149.
[14] LI Changzhi, WANG Haihong, WANG Liangguo, et al. Characteristics of tight oil sandstone reservoirs:A case study from the Upper Triassic Chang 7 member in Zhenyuan area, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13(2):78.
[15] 支东明,宋永,何文军,等.准噶尔盆地中-下二叠统页岩油地质特征、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4):390-401. ZHI Dongming, SONG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Geological characteristics, resource potential and exploration direction of shale oil in Middle-Lower Permian, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4):390-401.
[16] 鲁新川,孔玉华,常娟,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘克百地区二叠系风城组砂砾岩储层特征及主控因素分析[J].天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(3):474-481. LU Xinchuan, KONG Yuhua, CHANG Juan, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of sand-gravel stone reservoir of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Kebaiarea, northwest Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(3):474-481.
[17] 吴康军,刘洛夫,徐正建,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏物性下限研究[J].石油实验地质, 2016, 38(1):63-69. WU Kangjun, LIU Luofu, XU Zhengjian, et al. Lower limits of pore throat radius, porosity and permeability for tight oil accumulations in the Chang 7 member, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2016, 38(1):63-69.
[18] 魏钦廉,崔改霞,刘美荣,等.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部二叠系盒8下段储层特征及控制因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2):17-25. WEI Qinlian, CUI Gaixia, LIU Meirong, et al. Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Permian lower He 8 member in southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2):17-25.
[19] 王允诚,向阳,邓礼正,等.油层物理学[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社, 2006:1-282. WANG Yuncheng, XIANG Yang, DENG Lizheng, et al. Reservoir physics[M]. Chengdu:Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 2006:1-282.
[20] CHALMERS G R, ROSS D J, BUSTIN R M. Geological controls on matrix permeability of gas shales in the Horn river and Liard basins, northeastern British Columbia, Canada[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 103:120-131.
[21] GAO Zhiye, YANG Xibing, HU Chenhui, et al. Characterizing the pore structure of low permeability Eocene Liushagang Formation reservoir rocks from Beibuwan Basin in northern South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 99:107-121.
[22] 王俊杰,吴胜和,肖淑明,等.东营凹陷沙三中亚段浊积砂岩储层微观孔喉分布特征[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4):12-21. WANG Junjie, WU Shenghe, XIAO Shuming, et al. Distribution characteristics of micro pore throat size of turbidite sandstone reservoir in middle sub-rnember of³rd member, Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(4):12-21.
[23] 唐仁骐,曾玉华.岩石退汞效率几个影响因素的研究[J].石油实验地质, 1994, 16(1):84-93. TANG Renqi, ZENG Yuhua. The study on the retro-mercurometric efficiency of rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 1994, 16(1):84-93.
[24] 吴松涛,朱如凯,李勋,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术有效性评价与应用[J].地学前缘, 2018, 25(2):191-203. WU Songtao, ZHU Rukai, LI Xun, et al. Evaluation and application of porous structure characterization technologies in unconventional tight reservoirs[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(2):191-203.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层孔隙结构及分类评价

Pore structure and classification evaluation of shale oil reservoirs of Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 李啸, 苏航, 周俊峰, 仇庭聪, 石小茜. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[2]	白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[3]	王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[4]	乔桐, 刘成林, 杨海波, 王义凤, 李剑, 田继先, 韩杨, 张景坤. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷侏罗系三工河组凝析气藏特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 169-180.
[5]	余琪祥, 罗宇, 段铁军, 李勇, 宋在超, 韦庆亮. 准噶尔盆地环东道海子凹陷侏罗系煤层气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 45-55.
[6]	杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[7]	魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[8]	孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[9]	申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[10]	朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[11]	徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[12]	曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[13]	宋志华, 李垒, 雷德文, 张鑫, 凌勋. 改进的U-Net网络小断层识别技术在玛湖凹陷玛中地区三叠系白碱滩组的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 40-49.
[14]	邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[15]	段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.