岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 19–31.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220602

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征

王亮1, 苏树特1, 马梓柯2, 蒲静2, 姚蔺芳1, 刘宇1, 罗洋1   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 能源学院, 成都 610059;
    2. 中国石油西南油气田分公司 川中油气矿, 四川 遂宁 629000
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-13 修回日期:2022-05-04 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 作者简介:王亮(1986-),男,博士,教授,主要从事油气测井方法、解释及地质应用方面的教学与研究工作。地址:(610059)四川省成都市二仙桥街道东三路一号成都理工大学。Email:wangliang_swpu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“热液作用下的深部含铀油蚀变砂岩地球物理响应及铀油兼探方法”（编号： U2003102）资助

Sedimentary characteristics of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in central Sichuan Basin

WANG Liang1, SU Shute1, MA Zike2, PU Jing2, YAO Linfang1, LIU Yu1, LUO Yang1   

  1. 1. College of Energy Resources, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
    2. Central Sichuan Oil and Gas Mine, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Suining 629000, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2022-03-13 Revised:2022-05-04 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-09

PDF (PC)

131

摘要： 基于区域构造特征、野外露头、钻井、测井等资料，对川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组沉积特征进行了研究，重建了古沉积环境，明确了各沉积相的横向展布特征并预测了有利储层发育区。研究结果表明：①川中地区德阳—安岳裂陷槽内发育深水陆棚相，以碎屑岩沉积为主；裂陷槽以东高磨—龙女寺—北斜坡地区为浅水陆棚相，可细分为3种亚相，碳酸盐浅水陆棚亚相以细晶或颗粒灰岩、细晶或颗粒白云岩为主，见古杯、腕足类等生物，自然伽马和电阻率曲线均呈箱形；碎屑浅水陆棚亚相以粉砂岩或粉砂质泥岩为主，自然伽马和电阻率曲线均呈钟形或漏斗形；混积浅水陆棚亚相表现为砂质白云岩、砂质灰岩和泥岩互层，自然伽马和电阻率曲线均呈齿状。②研究区整体上为西高东低的沉积古地貌格局，由西向东水体逐渐加深，地层厚度逐渐增大；高磨—龙女寺—北斜坡地区沧一下亚段主要为混积浅水陆棚，沧一上亚段主要为碳酸盐浅水陆棚；沧二段主要为碎屑浅水陆棚相。③研究区沉积相的展布控制着优质储层的发育，沧一上亚段碳酸盐浅水陆棚中，颗粒滩白云岩储层最为有利、灰岩储层次之；平面上优质储层主要沿德阳—安岳裂陷槽边缘的构造高部位发育，呈条带状展布。

关键词: 德阳—安岳裂陷槽, 浅水陆棚, 颗粒滩, 白云岩储层, 沉积特征, 沧浪铺组, 寒武系, 川中地区

Abstract: Based on the regional structural characteristics，field outcrops，drilling and logging data，the sedimentary characteristics of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in central Sichuan Basin were studied，the paleosedimentary environment was reconstructed，the lateral distribution characteristics of each sedimentary facies were defined， and the favorable reservoir development areas were predicted. The results show that：（1）Deep-water shelf facies are developed in Deyang-Anyue rift trough in central Sichuan Basin，mainly composed of clastic rocks. Shallowwater shelf facies are developed in the areas of Gaomo-Longnusi-north slope to the east of the rift trough，which can be divided into three sedimentary sub-facies. The lithologies of carbonate shallow-water shelf facies are mainly finely crystalline limestone and finely crystalline dolomite， followed by grainstone and granular dolomite. Archaeocyatha and brachiopods can be observed，and the gamma and resistivity logs are in a box shape. The lithologies of debris shallow-water shelf facies are mainly siltstone or sandy mudstone with the gamma and resistivity logs bell or funnel-shaped. The mixed shallow-water shelf is interbedded with sandy dolomite，sandy limestone and mudstone with the gamma and resistivity logs toothed.（2）The sedimentary palaeogeomorphology pattern of Canglangpu Formation is high in the west and low in the east. The water body gradually deepened from west to east，and the stratum thickness gradually increased. The lower sub-member of the first member of Canglangpu Formation in Gaomo-Longnvsi-north slope area is mainly mixed shallow-water shelf facies，the upper sub-member of the first member of Canglangpu Formation is mainly carbonate shallow-water shelf facies， and the second member of Canglangpu Formation is mainly debris shallow-water shelf facies.（3）The sedimentary facies of Canglangpu Formation in the study area control the development of high-quality reservoirs. The reservoir mainly develops in the carbonate shallow-water shelf of the upper sub-member of the first member of Canglangpu Formation. The granular shoal is the most favorable sedimentary microfacies，among which dolomite reservoir is the best， followed by limestone. On the plane, high-quality reservoirs mainly develop along the high part of the structure at the edge of Deyang-Anyue rift trough， showing a banded distribution.

Key words: Deyang-Anyue rift trough, shallow-water shelf, shoal, dolomite reservoir, sedimentary features, Canglangpu Formation, Cambrian, central Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 张健, 张奇.四川盆地油气勘探:历史回顾及展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(增刊1):3-7. ZHANG Jian, ZHANG Qi. History and prospects of oil and gas exploration in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(Suppl 1):3-7.
[2] 邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等.四川盆地震旦系-寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3):278-293. ZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):278-293.
[3] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[4] 魏国齐, 谢增业, 宋家荣, 等.四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系- 寒武系天然气特征及成因[J].石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6):702-711. WEI Guoqi, XIE Zengye, SONG Jiarong, et al. Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleouplift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6):702-711.
[5] 严威, 罗冰, 周刚, 等.川中古隆起寒武系沧浪铺组下段天然气地质特征及勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(2):290-302. YAN Wei, LUO Bing, ZHOU Gang, et al. Natural gas geology and exploration direction of the Cambrian lower Canglangpu member in central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(2):290-302.
[6] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):12-22. PENG Jun, CHU Jiangtian, CHEN Youlian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
[7] 张满郎. 四川盆地寒武纪岩相古地理特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(1):128-139. ZHANG Manlang. Characteristics of lithofacies paleogeography of cambrian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(1):128-139.
[8] 杨威, 谢武仁, 魏国齐, 等.四川盆地寒武纪-奥陶纪层序岩相古地理、有利储层展布与勘探区带[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(增刊2):21-34. YANG Wei, XIE Wuren, WEI Guoqi, et al. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography, favorable reservoir distribution and exploration zones of the Cambrian and Ordovician in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(Suppl 2):21-34.
[9] 李皎, 何登发. 四川盆地及邻区寒武纪古地理与构造-沉积环境演化[J].古地理学报, 2014, 16(4):441-460. LI Jiao, HE Dengfa. Palaeogeography and tectonic-depositional environment evolution of the Cambrianin Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2014, 16(4):441-460.
[10] 彭军, 褚江天, 陈友莲, 等.四川盆地高石梯磨溪地区下寒武统沧浪铺组沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4):12-22. PENG Jun, CHU Jiangtian, CHEN Youlian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(4):12-22.
[11] 严威, 钟原, 周刚, 等.四川盆地下寒武统沧浪铺组岩相古地理特征及对储层发育的控制作用[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(4):22-32. YAN Wei, ZHONG Yuan, ZHOU Gang, et al. Lithofacies paleogeography features of the Lower Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in Sichuan Basin and their control on reservoir development[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(4):22-32.
[12] 李亚丁, 陈友莲, 严威, 等.四川盆地寒武系沧浪铺组沉积演化特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(9):1334-1346. LI Yading, CHEN Youlian, YAN Wei, et al. Research on sedimentary evolution characteristics of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(9):1334-1346.
[13] 马石玉, 谢武仁, 杨威, 等.四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统沧浪铺组下段岩相古地理特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(9):1324-1333. MA Shiyu, XIE Wuren, YANG Wei, et al. Lithofacies and paleogeography of the lower Canglangpu Formation of the Lower Cambrian in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(9):1324-1333.
[14] 董同武, 李小娟, 彭才, 等.川中北部西充地区寒武系沧浪铺组储层预测[C]//中国石油学会石油物探专业委员会. 中国石油学会2021年物探技术研讨会论文集.北京:《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》 电子杂志社有限公司, 2021:768-771. DONG Tongwu, LI Xiaojuan, PENG Cai, et al. Reservoir prediction of the Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in the Xichong area of central and northern Sichuan[C]//SPG. Proceedings of the Geophysical Exploration Technology Seminar of China Petroleum Society 2021. Beijing:China Academic Journals(CD Edition)Electronic Publishing House, 2021:768-771.
[15] 郗诚, 郭鸿喜, 代瑞雪, 等.川中古隆起北斜坡沧浪铺组碳酸盐岩预测识别[C]//西安石油大学、中国石油大学(华东)、陕西省石油学会. 2021油气田勘探与开发国际会议论文集(下册). 北京:《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》 电子杂志社有限公司, 2021:513-519. XI Cheng, GUO Hongxi, DAI Ruixue, et al. Prediction and identification of carbonate rocks of Canglangpu Formation in north slope of middle Sichuan paleouplift[C]//Xi' an Shiyou University, China University of Petroleum, Shaanxi Peteoleum Society. Proceedings of International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2021(Volume Ⅲ). Beijing:China Academic Journals (CD Edition)Electronic Publishing House, 2021:513-519.
[16] 代瑞雪, 郗诚, 冉崎, 等.川中地区寒武系沧浪铺组储层地震反射特征研究[C]//西安石油大学、中国石油大学(华东)、陕西省石油学会. 2021油气田勘探与开发国际会议论文集(下册). 北京:《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社有限公司2021:593-600. DAI Ruixue, XI Cheng, RAN Qi, et al. Study on seismic reflection characteristics of reservoirs of Cambrian Canglangpu Formation in central Sichuan[C]//Xi' an Shiyou University, China University of Petroleum, Shaanxi Peteoleum Society. Proceedings of International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2021(Volume Ⅲ). Beijing:China Academic Journals (CD Edition)Electronic Publishing House, 2021:593-600.
[17] 汪泽成, 赵文智.海相古隆起在油气成藏中的作用[J].中国石油勘探, 2006, 11(4):26-32. WANG Zecheng, ZHAO Wenzhi. A role of marine paleo-uplift in reservoir-forming of oil and gas[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2006, 11(4):26-32.
[18] 何登发, 李德生, 张国伟, 等.四川多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J].地质科学, 2011, 46(3):589-606. HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, ZHANG Guowei, et al. Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2011, 46(3):589-606.
[19] 刘树根, 孙玮, 李智武, 等.四川叠合盆地海相碳酸盐岩油气分布特征及其构造主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(5):1-17. LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LI Zhiwu, et al. Distribution characteristics of marine carbonate reservoirs and their tectonic controlling factors across the Sichuan superimposed basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5):1-17.
[20] 李伟, 余华琪, 邓鸿斌.四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6):681-690. LI Wei, YU Huaqi, DENG Hongbin. Stratigraphic division and correlation and sedimentary characteristics of the Cambrian in central-southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):681-690.
[21] 张英利, 贾晓彤, 王宗起, 等.米仓山地区早寒武世仙女洞组沉积物源新认识:沉积学、重矿物和碎屑锆石年代学的证据[J].地质学报, 2018, 92(9):1918-1935. ZHANG Yingli, JIA Xiaotong, WANG Zongqi, et al. New insights into provenance of early Cambrian Xiannüdong Formation in the Micangshan area:Evidence from sedimentology, heavy mineral and detrital zircon chronology[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(9):1918-1935.
[22] 陈旭, 徐均涛, 成汉钧, 等.论汉南古陆及大巴山隆起[J].地层学杂志, 1990, 14(2):81-116. CHEN Xu, XU Juntao, CHENG Hanjun, et al. On the Hannan old land and Dabashan uplift[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 1990, 14(2):81-116.
[23] 武赛军, 魏国齐, 杨威, 等.四川盆地桐湾运动及其油气地质意义[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1):60-70. WU Saijun, WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, et al. Tongwan movement and its geologic significances in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(1):60-70.
[24] 刘树根, 孙玮, 罗志立, 等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(5):511-520. LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LUO Zhili, et al. Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2013, 40(5):511-520.
[25] 钟勇, 李亚林, 张晓斌, 等.川中古隆起构造演化特征及其与早寒武世绵阳-长宁拉张槽的关系[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(6):703-712. ZHONG Yong, LI Yalin, ZHANG Xiaobin, et al. Evolution characteristics of central Sichuan palaeouplift and its relationship with Early Cambrian Mianyang-Changning intracratonic sag[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 41(6):703-712.
[26] 李双建, 高平, 黄博宇, 等.四川盆地绵阳-长宁凹槽构造演化的沉积约束[J].石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5):889-898. LI Shuangjian, GAO Ping, HUANG Boyu, et al. Sedimentary constraints on the tectonic evolution of Mianyang-Changning trough in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5):889-898.
[27] 王瀚.上扬子北缘震旦纪-早寒武世沉积-构造格局及其油气地质意义[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2020. WANG Han. Sedimentary structural pattern and its significance of petroleum geology from Sinian to Early Cambrian in northern margin of Upper Yangtze[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2020.
[28] 周进高, 沈安江, 张建勇, 等.四川盆地德阳-安岳台内裂陷与震旦系勘探方向[J].海相油气地质, 2018, 23(2):1-9. ZHOU Jingao, SHEN Anjiang, ZHANG Jianyong, et al. DeyangAnyue interplatform rift in Sichuan Basin and its direction of exploration in Sinian[J]. Marine Orign Petroleum Geology, 2018, 23(2):1-9.
[29] 文舰, 彭军, 陈友莲, 等.四川盆地中部-北部地区沧浪铺组层序地层研究[J].断块油气田, 2020, 27(4):424-431. WEN Jian, PENG Jun, CHEN Youlian, et al. Study on sequence stratigraphy of Canglangpu Formation in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(4):424-431.
[30] 刘树根, 王一刚, 孙玮, 等.拉张槽对四川盆地海相油气分布的控制作用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1):1-23. LIU Shugen, WANG Yigang, SUN Wei, et al. Control of intracratonic sags on the hydrocarbon accumulations in the marine strata across the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 43(1):1-23.
[31] 刘树根, 刘殊, 孙玮, 等.绵阳-长宁拉张槽北段构造-沉积特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(1):1-13. LIU Shugen, LIU Shu, SUN Wei, et al. Tectonic and sedimentary features of the northern Mianyang-Changning intracratonic sag, Sichuan,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 45(1):1-13.
[32] 刘树根, 黄文明, 张长俊, 等.四川盆地白云岩成因的研究现状及存在问题[J].岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2):6-15. LIU Shugen, HUANG Wenming, ZHANG Changjun, et al. Research status of dolomite genesis and its problems in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2):6-15.
[33] 赵路子.碳酸盐岩隐蔽滩相储层特征及预测模型[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2008. ZHAO Luzi. Characteristics and forecast models of Carbonate subtle shoal reservoir[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2008.
[34] 吴煜宇, 谢冰, 赖强.四川盆地磨溪-龙女寺区块下寒武统龙王庙组测井相划分及分布规律研究[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2015, 38(4):28-32. WU Yuyu, XIE Bing, LAI Qiang. Electrofacies division and distribution rules of lower Cambrian Longwangmiao formation, Moxi-Longnvsi block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2015, 38(4):28-32.
[35] 贺洪举, 齐宝权, 苗清, 等.川中地区龙王庙组颗粒滩储层关键参数计算及评价[J].测井技术, 2021, 45(5):514-520. HE Hongju, QI Baoquan, MIAO Qing, et al. Calculation and evaluation of key parameters for grain beach reservoir of Longwangmiao Formation in central Sichuan area[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2021, 45(5):514-520.
[36] 关新, 陈世加, 苏旺, 等.四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2):67-76. GUAN Xin, CHEN Shijia, SU Wang, et al. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(2):67-76.
[37] 魏国齐, 杨威, 刘满仓, 等.四川盆地大气田分布、主控因素与勘探方向[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(6):1-12. WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, LIU Mancang, et al. Distribution rules, main controlling factors and exploration directions of giant gas fields in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6):1-12.
[38] 刘树根, 宋金民, 赵异华, 等.四川盆地龙王庙组优质储层形成与分布的主控因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(6):657-670. LIU Shugen, SONG Jinmin, ZHAO Yihua, et al. Controlling factors of formation and distribution of Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation high-quality reservoirs in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 41(6):657-670.
[1] 胡忠贵, 王纪煊, 李世临, 郭艳波, 左云安, 庞宇来. 川东地区寒武系高台组白云岩-蒸发岩共生地层高频层序划分及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 113-124.
[2] 文华国, 罗冰, 钟克修, 冯青平, 刘磊, 廖义沙, 彭才, 蔡家兰, 徐文礼, 朱宜新, 郝静, 罗鑫, 徐姁. 川东地区三叠系嘉陵江组邻水-丰都台凹的发现及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 12-24.
[3] 刘永立, 李国蓉, 何钊, 田家奇, 李肖肖. 塔北地区寒武系层序地层格架与台缘带展布特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 80-91.
[4] 周红飞, 戴鑫, 贾敏, 张芮, 李国辉, 李楠, 杨强, 白蓉. 川中古隆起北斜坡震旦系灯影组二段油气成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 130-138.
[5] 阮蕴博, 周刚, 霍飞, 孙豪飞, 郭佩, 罗涛, 蒋华川, 文华国. 川中地区中三叠统雷口坡组三段源储特征及配置关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 139-151.
[6] 李珊珊, 姜鹏飞, 刘磊, 雷程, 曾云贤, 陈仕臻, 周刚. 四川盆地高磨地区寒武系沧浪铺组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩地震响应特征及展布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 22-31.
[7] 康家豪, 王兴志, 谢圣阳, 曾德铭, 杜垚, 张芮, 张少敏, 李阳. 川中地区侏罗系大安寨段页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(4): 53-65.
[8] 李晓辉, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王志萍, 王启明. 辽东湾坳陷东北部新近系馆陶组辫曲过渡型河流沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 93-103.
[9] 张本健, 徐唱, 徐亮, 周刚, 丁熊. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞三段沉积特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 154-163.
[10] 李璐萍, 梁金同, 刘四兵, 郭艳波, 李堃宇, 和源, 金九翔. 川中地区寒武系洗象池组白云岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(3): 39-48.
[11] 文华国, 梁金同, 周刚, 邱玉超, 刘四兵, 李堃宇, 和源, 陈浩如. 四川盆地及周缘寒武系洗象池组层序-岩相古地理演化与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 1-16.
[12] 马正武, 官大勇, 王启明, 刘尧均, 李晓辉. 辽中凹陷古近系东三段湖底扇沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 131-140.
[13] 刘宗堡, 李雪, 郑荣华, 刘化清, 杨占龙, 曹松. 浅水三角洲前缘亚相储层沉积特征及沉积模式——以大庆长垣萨北油田北二区萨葡高油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 1-13.
[14] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[15] 何绪全, 黄东, 赵艾琳, 李育聪. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油气储层测井评价指标体系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(3): 129-137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[3] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[4] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[5] 韩春元，赵贤正，金凤鸣，王权，李先平，王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践（IV）——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[6] 戴朝成，郑荣才，文华国，张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[7] 尹艳树，张尚峰，尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[8] 石雪峰，杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[9] 严世邦，胡望水，李瑞升，关键，李涛，聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .
[10] 张学涛，王祝文，原镜海. 利用时频分析方法在阵列声波测井中区分油水层[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 101 -104 .

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发