岩性油气藏 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 23–39.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20260503

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿姆河右岸萨曼杰佩气田中生界复合岩性气藏地质特征及勘探开发潜力

冷有恒1(), 杨亚东2(), 王强2, 李韵竹2, 魏占军1, 黄锋2, 薛陶峰2, 刘洋3   

  1. 1 中国石油国际（土库曼斯坦） 阿姆河天然气公司， 北京 100101
    2 中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司 地质勘探开发研究院， 成都 610051
    3 西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院， 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-20 修回日期:2026-03-26 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-04
  • 第一作者:冷有恒（1975—），男，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事油气田开发工作。地址:（100101）北京市中国石油国际（土库曼斯坦）阿姆河天然气公司。Email:lengyouheng@cnpcag.com。
  • 通信作者: 杨亚东
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“裂缝孔隙型碳酸盐岩气藏高效开发技术”(2025ZD1406406);中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司科技项目“萨曼杰佩地区多层系综合评价及挖潜研究技术服务”(CQZT-dyy-2025-JS-98)

Geological characteristics and exploration & development potential of Mesozoic composite lithologic gas reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field, right bank of Amu Darya

LENG Youheng1(), YANG Yadong2(), WANG Qiang2, LI Yunzhu2, WEI Zhanjun1, HUANG Feng2, XUE Taofeng2, LIU Yang3   

  1. 1 Amu Darya Natural Gas Company， CNPC International (Turkmenistan)， Beijing 100101, China
    2 Research Institute of Geology Exploration and Development, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Chengdu 610051, China
    3 Faculty of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2026-01-20 Revised:2026-03-26 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-04
  • Contact: YANG Yadong E-mail:lengyouheng@cnpcag.com;yangyd_jx@cnpc.com.cn

RichHTML

18

PDF (PC)

20

摘要：

为延长萨曼杰佩气田寿命，需要探索潜力层系。基于导航金字塔地震处理技术，以气田浅层阿普特阶致密砂岩、中层卡洛夫—牛津阶碳酸盐岩、深层中下侏罗统致密砂岩3套含气层系为研究对象，系统分析了不同层系的成藏路径、富集规律与开发特征差异；采用井-震联合定量评价方法，开展了多层系气藏潜力评价与差异化挖潜对策研究。研究结果表明：①萨曼杰佩气田3套含气层系具有差异化成藏模式与富集规律，浅层受构造-岩性双重控制，为远源次生成藏，呈局部弱富集特征；中层为下生上储型整装气藏，剩余气受相变与隔夹层遮挡，呈现边部富集、主体零散分布特征；深层为自生自储型致密砂岩气藏，具大面积连片含气特征，“甜点”区受优质砂体与裂缝共同控制。②研究区3套层系差异化挖潜方案为，以中层剩余气（预测剩余地质储量为256.27×108 m3）精细挖潜为核心、浅层（预测地质储量为56.90×108 m3）补孔快速建产为近期产量接替、深层（预测地质储量为2 126.00×108 m3）直井勘探地质-工程一体化评价为储备，预计可新建产能为27.49×104 m3/d，累计新增产气量为64.13×108 m3。

关键词: 致密砂岩气藏, 碳酸盐岩气藏, 构造-岩性, 潜力预测, 地质-工程一体化, 多层系气藏, 卡洛夫—牛津阶, 中下侏罗统, 阿姆河右岸

Abstract:

To extend the production life of Samandepe Gas Field, it is necessary to explore potential strata. Based on the Navigation Pyramid seismic processing technology, differences of hydrocarbon accumulation pathways, enrichment patterns, and development characteristics among three gas-bearing series, such as the shallow Aptian tight sandstone, the middle Callovian-Oxfordian carbonate rock, and the deep Middle-Lower Jurassic tight sandstone were systematically analyzed. A well-seismic joint quantitative evaluation method was adopted to carry out potential assessment and differentiated potential-tapping strategy studies for multi-layer gas reservoirs. The results show that: （1） Three gas-bearing series in Samandepe Gas Field exhibit differentiated accumulation models and enrichment patterns. Shallow series, controlled by both structure and lithology, are far-source secondary accumulation with localized weak enrichment. Middle series are lower-generation and upper-storage integral gas reservoirs, where the remaining gas is shielded by facies changes and interlayers, characterized by edge enrichment and scattered distribution in the main body. Deep series are self-generation and self-storage tight sandstone gas reservoirs with large-scale contiguous gas-bearing properties, and “sweet spots” are jointly controlled by high-quality sand bodies and fractures. （2） The differentiated potential-tapping scheme for the abovementioned three series in the study area is as follows: Precisely tapping of remaining gas in middle series (predicted remaining geological reserves of 256.27×108 m3) as core task; rapid production build-up by adding perforations in shallow series (predicted geological reserves of 56.90×108 m3) as near-term production replacement; and geology-engineering integrated evaluation for vertical well exploration in deep series (predicted geological reserves of 2 126.00×108 m3) as the backup plan. It is estimated that a new deliverability of 27.49×104 m3/d can be established, with a cumulative incremental gas production of 64.13×108 m3.

Key words: tight sandstone gas reservoir, carbonate gas reservoir, structure-lithology, potential prediction, geology-engineering integration, multi-layer gas reservoir, Callovian-Oxfordian, Middle-Lower Jurassic, right bank of Amu Darya

中图分类号: 

  • TE122

图1

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田构造位置（a）（据文献[20-21]修改）及岩性地层综合柱状图（b）"

图2

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏测井-沉积旋回特征"

图3

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏综合录井图"

图4

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏连井沉积相序图"

图5

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏上段沉积微相平面展布"

图6

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏常规叠后地震剖面"

图7

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏K1a1储层物性及天然气储量分布"

表1

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田白垩系阿普特阶气藏上段K1a1发育11个砂体特征参数"

砂体编号 延伸
方向		 长度/km 宽度/km 有效储层
厚度/m		 已钻井数/口
1号砂体 北东东 5.0 1.0~2.4 3.0~14.0 0
2号砂体 北东东 6.1 1.3~2.6 5.0~16.0 6
3号砂体 北东 5.3 0.7~2.0 5.0~15.0 2
4+5号砂体 北东 5.4 1.5~2.4 5.0~15.0 9
6 + 7 + 8号砂体 北东 5.4 1.8 6.0~16.0 8
9号砂体 北东 5.1 0.7~2.6 5.0~15.0 4
10号砂体 北东 2.7 0.9~3.0 4.0~14.0 4
11号砂体（小砂体集合） 北东 2.1 2.5 4.0~12.0 2

图8

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田侏罗系卡洛夫—牛津阶气藏隔夹层厚度分布特征"

表2

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田侏罗系卡洛夫—牛津阶气藏储层段测井物性统计"

序
号		 层位 井数/
口		 孔隙度/% 渗透率/mD
取值范围 均值 取值范围 均值
1 XVac 71 5.00~12.83 7.57 0.153~13.716 2.021
2 XVp 72 5.00~15.39 10.07 0.285~40.449 5.664
3 XVm 62 5.00~20.02 10.99 0.314~148.195 14.177

图9

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田侏罗系卡洛夫—牛津阶气藏储层物性特征"

图10

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田中下侏罗统气藏测井连井剖面"

图11

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田中下侏罗统气藏下段上亚段不同沉积期次沉积相、砂岩百分含量平面分布"

表3

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田三大气藏开发条件量化对比"

评价
维度		 评价指标 阿普特阶
气藏		 卡洛夫—牛津阶气藏 中下侏罗统
气藏
埋藏
深度		 埋深/m 1 270~1 500 2 000~2 900 2 483~3 240
储量
规模		 储量/108 m3 56.90 256.27（剩余） 2 126.00
储层
条件		 孔隙度/% 6.0~10.3 8.0~14.0 5.5~10.0
渗透率/mD 6.0~17.9 0.5~10.0 0.2~0.5
有效储层厚度/m 3.0~16.2 15.0~85.0 8.5~45.0
挖潜
措施		 储层改造需求 小型压裂 边部井需酸化 需体积压裂
措施井数 老井补孔9口 复产井3口、补孔5口 —
补充井数/口 5 5 8
经济
效益		 单井钻井成本/万元 800~1 200 1 500~2 000 2 500~3 000
预测单井日产/104 m3 35.50~44.02 12.18~26.95 5.14~7.52
开发优先级 潜力挖潜 接替优先 勘探评价

图12

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田多层系井位部署"

表4

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田多层系开发风险评价指标体系及权重"

准则层 权重 指标层 权重
储量风险 0.40 井控程度 0.50
储量规模 0.30
储量品质 0.20
产能风险 0.35 储层物性 0.40
裂缝发育 0.25
改造效果 0.35
压力风险 0.25 水体能量 0.50
压力 0.50

表5

阿姆河盆地萨曼杰佩气田多层系开发各层系指标打分及综合风险值"

层系 井
控
程
度		 储
量
规
模		 储
量
品
质		 储
层
物
性		 裂
缝
发
育		 改
造
效
果		 水
体
能
量		 压力 综合
风险值		 风险
等级
浅层阿普特阶 60 70 65 70 80 60 20 30 56.9 中风险
中层卡洛夫—
牛津阶主体区		 20 30 25 25 40 30 50 60 32.4 低风险
中层卡洛夫—
牛津阶边部		 75 40 50 60 70 50 30 30 52.5 中风险
深层中下
侏罗统		 85 20 60 75 60 80 70 70 65.3 高风险
[1] NIE Minglong, ZHAO Wei, HE Dengfa, et al. Hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in the large Samandepe Gas Field in the Chardzhou step-fault zone,Amu Darya Basin,northeastern Turkmenistan:A response to the tectonic evolution of the northern margin of the Tethys[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 145:105874.
[2] 费怀义, 徐刚, 王强, 等. 阿姆河右岸区块气藏特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(5):13-17.
FEI Huaiyi, XU Gang, WANG Qiang, et al. Characteristics of gas reservoirs in the Amu Darya Right Bank Block,Turkmenistan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(5):13-17.
[3] 董霞, 郑荣才, 吴蕾, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2):54-61.
DONG Xia, ZHENG Rongcai, WU Lei, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of carbonate reservoirs in Samandepe Gas Field,Turkmenistan[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2010, 22(2):54-61.
[4] 张培军, 程绪彬, 刘荣和, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田气井异常积液与对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(4):62-67.
ZHANG Peijun, CHENG Xubin, LIU Ronghe, et al. Abnormal liquid loading in gas-producing wells of the Samandepe Gasfield in Turkmenistan and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(4):62-67.
[5] 聂明龙, 童晓光, 刘群明, 等. 土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸地区盐下碳酸盐岩气藏类型及油气富集因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(1):70-75.
NIE Minglong, TONG Xiaoguang, LIU Qunming, et al. Types of pre-salt carbonate gas reservoirs and hydrocarbon enrichment factors of Amu Darya right bank area in Turkmenistan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(1):70-75.
[6] 王红军, 张良杰, 陈怀龙, 等. 阿姆河右岸盐下侏罗系大中型气田地质特征与分布规律[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(4):52-64.
WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, CHEN Huailong, et al. Geological characteristics and distribution law of pre-salt Jurassic large and medium gas fields in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(4):52-64.
[7] 左应祥, 冉丰华, 王明泉, 等. 萨曼杰佩气田集输系统安全控制与应急管理浅析[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2013, 42(3):316-319.
ZUO Yingxiang, RAN Fenghua, WANG Mingquan, et al. Safety control and emergency management analysis of gathering and transportation system in Salman Jiepei gas field[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2013, 42(3):316-319.
[8] CHAI Hui, OUYANG Cheng, JIANG Linwei, et al. Pressurized production optimization and engineering practice of Samandepe Gas Field[R]. Wuhan: Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference, 2023.
[9] 刘荣和, 高仪君, 冷有恒, 等. 阿姆河右岸气田复杂出水模式精细识别和长效治理对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6):63-68.
LIU Ronghe, GAO Yijun, LENG Youheng, et al. Fine identification and long-term countermeasures of complex water production patterns in the gasfields,the right bank of the Amu Darya[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(6):63-68.
[10] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1):71-80.
CHEN Jing, CHEN Jun, LI Hui, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1):71-80.
[11] 窦立荣, 魏小东, 王景春, 等. 乍得Bongor盆地花岗质基岩潜山储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8):897-904.
DOU Lirong, WEI Xiaodong, WANG Jingchun, et al. Characte-ristics of granitic basement rock buried-hill reservoir in Bongor Basin,Chad[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8):897-904.
[12] 张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 等. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3):1-13.
ZHANG Manlang, KONG Fanzhi, GU Jiangrui, et al. Assessment of glutenite reservoirs and optimization of prospects of Zhenzhuchong Formation in Jiulongshan gas field,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3):1-13.
[13] 张新顺, 王红军, 马锋, 等. 北美白垩系烃源岩发育特征与油气分布关系[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(1):119-127.
ZHANG Xinshun, WANG Hongjun, MA Feng, et al. Relationship between the development characteristics of Cretaceous source rocks and the hydrocarbon distribution,North America[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(1):119-127.
[14] 陈昭国. 川西拗陷与北美致密砂岩气藏类比分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(1):71-76.
CHEN Zhaoguo. Analogy analysis of west Sichuan Depression and northern America sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2012, 34(1):71-76.
[15] 王旭, 李祖友, 邓文龙, 等. 川西坳陷中江含气构造沙溪庙组气藏JS21气层开发潜力分析及对策[J]. 中外能源, 2013, 18(3):46-52.
WANG Xu, LI Zuyou, DENG Wenlong, et al. Exploitation potential analysis and countermeasures on Shaximiao JS21 gas re-servoir in Zhongjiang gas bearing structure of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2013, 18(3):46-52.
[16] 王小娟, 陈双玲, 谢继容, 等. 川西南地区侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1):78-87.
WANG Xiaojuan, CHEN Shuangling, XIE Jirong, et al. Accumulation characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in southwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(1):78-87.
[17] 冀光, 贾爱林, 孟德伟, 等. 大型致密砂岩气田有效开发与提高采收率技术对策:以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3):602-612.
JI Guang, JIA Ailin, MENG Dewei, et al. Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight gas field: A case study of Sulige gas field,Ordos Basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3):602-612.
[18] 李宪文, 肖元相, 陈宝春, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏多层分压开采面临的难题及对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8):66-73.
LI Xianwen, XIAO Yuanxiang, CHEN Baochun, et al. Separate layer fracturing and multi-layer production of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field,Ordos Basin:Problems and countermeasures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8):66-73.
[19] 张志伟, 何永垚, 王春生, 等. 中亚地区阿姆河盆地查尔朱、布哈拉阶地构造特征及演化[J]. 海相油气地质, 2010, 15(4):48-56.
ZHANG Zhiwei, HE Yongyao, WANG Chunsheng, et al. Structural characteristics and evolution of Chardzhou and Bukhara terraces in Amu-Darya Basin,Middle Asia[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2010, 15(4):48-56.
[20] 罗海. 阿姆河右岸A区碳酸盐岩储层特征研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
LUO Hai. Study on characteristics of carbonate reservoirs in area A on the right bank of the Amu Darya River[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
[21] 陈海西. 土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸萨曼杰佩气田构造对储层的控制作用[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2022.
CHEN Haixi. Structural control of gas reservoir in Samanjepe gas field,right bank of Amu Darya River,Turkmenistan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2022.
[22] 马文辛, 欧阳诚, 廖波勇, 等. 阿姆河盆地东部牛津阶微生物灰岩储层特征及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(5):59-69.
MA Wenxin, OUYANG Cheng, LIAO Boyong, et al. Characte-ristics and genesis of Oxfordian microbial limestone reservoirs in eastern Amu Darya Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(5):59-69.
[23] 王强, 程绪彬, 费怀义, 等. 阿姆河右岸A区气藏成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2012, 35(2):1-4.
WANG Qiang, CHENG Xubin, FEI Huaiyi, et al. Reservoir-forming process of A block in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2012, 35(2):1-4.
[24] 张培军, 谢明贤, 罗敏, 等. 巨厚膏盐岩形变机制解析及其对油气成藏的影响:以阿姆河右岸东部阿盖雷地区侏罗系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6):36-44.
ZHANG Peijun, XIE Mingxian, LUO Min, et al. Analysis of deformation mechanism of ultra thick gypsum salt rock and its significance for oil and gas reservoir formation: A case study of the Jurassic gypsum salt layers in the Agayry region,eastern right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6):36-44.
[25] 姚建廷, 周栋, 刘荣和, 等. 阿姆河右岸中-下侏罗统烃源岩地球化学特征及其沉积环境研究[J]. 地质科学, 2024, 59(2):352-364.
YAO Jianting, ZHOU Dong, LIU Ronghe, et al. Geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environment of the Middle and Lower Jurassic source rocks in the right bank of the Amu Darya River[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2024, 59(2):352-364.
[26] 白振华, 张良杰, 王红军, 等. 阿姆河右岸区块侏罗系盐下碳酸盐岩油气动态成藏过程研究[J]. 海相油气地质, 2022, 27(4):429-439.
BAI Zhenhua, ZHANG Liangjie, WANG Hongjun, et al. Analysis of dynamic hydrocarbon accumulating process of Jurassic pre-salt carbonate reservoirs in the right bank block of Amu Darya River[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2022, 27(4):429-439.
[27] 方杰, 徐树宝, 吴蕾, 等. 阿姆河右岸地区侏罗系海相烃源岩生烃潜力[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(1):8-18.
FANG Jie, XU Shubao, WU Lei, et al. Hydrocarbon generation potential of Jurassic source rocks in right bank of Amu Darya[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(1):8-18.
[28] 刘石磊, 郑荣才, 颜文全, 等. 阿姆河盆地阿盖雷地区牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(1):57-63.
LIU Shilei, ZHENG Rongcai, YAN Wenquan, et al. Characte-ristics of Oxfordian carbonate reservoir in Agayry area,Amu Darya Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(1):57-63.
[29] 张兵, 郑荣才, 刘合年, 等. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田卡洛夫阶—牛津阶碳酸盐岩储层特征[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(1):117-126.
ZHANG Bing, ZHENG Rongcai, LIU Henian, et al. Characte-ristics of carbonate reservoir in Callovian-Oxfordian of Samandepe Gasfield,Turkmenistan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010, 84(1):117-126.
[30] 张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 等. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6):56-65.
ZHANG Tianze, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, et al. Application of ray-path elastic impedance inversion in carbonate gas reservoir prediction of the right bank of Amu Darya River[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(6):56-65.
[31] 熊钰, 牛全锋, 孙泽威, 等. 采气速度对不同储集空间类型碳酸盐岩气藏水侵动态的影响:以四川盆地震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2025, 46(2):654-669.
XIONG Yu, NIU Quanfeng, SUN Zewei, et al. Impact of gas production rate on water invasion dynamics in carbonate gas reservoirs with varying storage spaces on: A case study of the Sinian Dengying Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2025, 46(2):654-669.
[32] 熊钰, 刘斯琪, 余翔, 等. 四川盆地自流井区块自2井缝洞系统结构与水侵途径和模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7):925-936.
XIONG Yu, LIU Siqi, YU Xiang, et al. Research on the fractured-vuggy system structure and pathways and patterns of water intrusion from Well Z2[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(7):925-936.
[33] 张婷, 王强, 刘斌. 阿姆河右岸中下侏罗统沉积相及平面展布[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(6):27-38.
ZHANG Ting, WANG Qiang, LIU Bin. Sedimentary facies and its lateral distribution of the Middle-Lower Jurassic in Amu Darya right bank area[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(6):27-38.
[1] 张云峰, 史晓东, 刘宗堡, 杨雪微, 王鸿军, 郝彬. 松辽盆地龙虎泡油田白垩系构造-岩性圈闭类型及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2025, 37(5): 111-121.
[2] 张培军, 谢明贤, 罗敏, 张良杰, 陈仁金, 张文起, 乐幸福, 雷明. 巨厚膏盐岩形变机制解析及其对油气成藏的影响——以阿姆河右岸东部阿盖雷地区侏罗系为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 36-44.
[3] 张天择, 王红军, 张良杰, 张文起, 谢明贤, 雷明, 郭强, 张雪锐. 射线域弹性阻抗反演在阿姆河右岸碳酸盐岩气藏储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 56-65.
[4] 窦立荣, 李志, 杨紫, 张兴阳, 康海亮, 张明军, 张良杰, 丁梁波. 中国石油海外岩性地层油气藏勘探进展与前景展望[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 1-9.
[5] 马文杰, 王景春, 田作基, 马中振, 万学鹏, 林金逞, 许翔麟, 周玉冰. 南美洲Oriente盆地斜坡带W区块构造-岩性复合油藏成藏模式及有利区预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 29-36.
[6] 马峰, 庞文珠, 赵文光, 张斌, 赵艳军, 薛罗, 郑茜, 陈彬滔. 南苏丹境内裂谷盆地源上构造-岩性油藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 92-105.
[7] 唐昱哲, 柴辉, 王红军, 张良杰, 陈鹏羽, 张文起, 蒋凌志, 潘兴明. 中亚阿姆河右岸东部地区侏罗系盐下碳酸盐岩储层特征及预测新方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 147-158.
[8] 徐壮, 石万忠, 王任, 骆福嵩, 夏永涛, 覃硕, 张晓. 塔北隆起西部地区白垩系碎屑岩油气成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 31-46.
[9] 柳娜, 周兆华, 任大忠, 南珺祥, 刘登科, 杜堃. 致密砂岩气藏可动流体分布特征及其控制因素——以苏里格气田西区盒8段与山1段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(6): 14-25.
[10] 任大忠, 周兆华, 梁睿翔, 周然, 柳娜, 南郡祥. 致密砂岩气藏黏土矿物特征及其对储层性质的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 42-53.
[11] 左国平, 范国章, 吕福亮, 邵大力. 孟加拉湾浅层气成藏条件及地震识别技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(2): 110-119.
[12] 杨特波, 王继平, 王一, 付斌, 薛雯, 郝骞. 基于地质知识库的致密砂岩气藏储层建模——以苏里格气田苏X区块为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 138-145.
[13] 袁 淋，王朝明，李晓平，胡新佳，曾 力. 致密砂岩气藏气水同产水平井产能公式推导及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 121-126.
[14] 张文，王禄春，郭玮琪，赵鑫. 特高含水期水驱油井压裂潜力研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4): 115-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

陇ICP备17006252号
版权所有© 2018 中国石油集团西北地质研究所有限公司《岩性油气藏》编辑部

地址：甘肃省兰州市城关区雁儿湾路535号(陇ICP备17006252号)    电话：0931-8686158;8686058;8686288    邮箱：yxyqc@petrochina.com.cn

甘公网安备 62010202002827号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发