岩性油气藏 ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 34–41.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.03.006

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

隆后坳陷区三角洲沉积特征及演化模式—— — 以桑塔木地区为例

唐 武1,王英民2,仲米虹3   

  1.  1. 中海油研究总院,北京 100028 ; 2. 浙江大学 海洋学院,杭州 310023 ;3. 中海石油气电集团有限责任公司技术研发中心,北京 100028
  • 出版日期:2016-05-20 发布日期:2016-05-20
  • 作者简介:唐武( 1987- ),男,博士,工程师,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学及储层预测等方面研究工作。 地址:( 100028 )北京市朝阳区太阳宫南街 6号海油大厦 A 座 1110 室。 E-mail : tw_geology@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大油气专项“前陆盆地油气成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”(编号: 2011ZX05003 )资助

Sedimentary characteristics and evolution model of delta in backbulge zone:A case study in Sangtamu area

Tang Wu1, Wang Yingmin2, Zhong Mihong3   

  1.  1. CNOOC Research Institute , Beijing 100028 , China ; 2. Ocean College , Zhejiang University , Hangzhou 310023 , China ;3. Research and Development Center , CNOOC Gas and Power Group , Beijing 100028 , China
  • Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-20

摘要:

三叠纪时期,塔里木盆地进入前陆盆地演化阶段,发育前陆坳陷、前缘隆起及隆后坳陷 3 个典型的前陆盆地构造单元。 为了探讨隆后坳陷区三角洲沉积特征,以桑塔木地区为例,利用岩心、钻井、测井、分析化验及三维地震等资料,采用“点-线-面”相结合的方法系统研究其三叠系克拉玛依组沉积特征。 结果表明,研究区发育辫状河三角洲和曲流河三角洲两大沉积体系,并且垂向上具有辫状河三角洲向曲流河三角洲演化的特征。 辫状河三角洲平原以分流河道沉积为主,辫状河三角洲前缘以水下分流河道沉积为主,而河口坝与远砂坝发育规模均较小;曲流河三角洲平原发育分流河道、天然堤及沼泽等,曲流河三角洲前缘则以水下分流河道和河口坝沉积为主。 克拉玛依组三角洲的演化不仅受控于前陆盆地构造运动所导致的地形坡度的变化,而且气候由干旱—半干旱向湿润的转化也起到一定作用。 在对 2 类三角洲沉积特征及成因分析的基础上,建立隆后坳陷区三角洲的沉积演化模式。

关键词: 扇三角洲, 砂砾岩, 百口泉组, 玛北斜坡区, 准噶尔盆地

Abstract:

 Tarim Basin entered into foreland basin evolution stage during Triassic period, forming three typical tectonic units (foredeep, forebulge, and backbulge). In order to discuss the sedimentary characteristics of deltas in the backbulge zone, based on the comprehensive analyses of cores, logging, analysis assay as well as 3D seismic data, the sedimentary characteristics of Triassic Karamay Formation in Sangtamu area were analyzed. The results show that two types of deltas were developed in the study area, namely braided river delta and meandering river delta, and it changed from the former to the latter vertically. The underlying braided river delta is mainly consisted of coarse sandstone, with well lateral continuity and large thickness, while the overlying meandering river delta is exact opposite. Both deltas mainly developed plain and front subfacies. The plain subfacies of braided river delta is primarily composed of distributary channel, while the subaqueous distributary channel microfacies composes the main part of front subfacies, with mouth bar and distal bar locally developed. The distributary channel, levee and swamp microfacies can be identified in meandering river delta plain subfacies, and its front subfacies is chiefly consisted of subaqueous distributary channel and mouth bar. The delta pattern transformation in the study area is controlled by topographic slope change caused by tectonic activities of foreland basin. The paleoclimate changed from arid-semiarid to humid also played an important role. Finally, based on the origin analysis of deltas, the evolution models of delta in backbulge zone were built.

Key words: fan delta, glutenite, Baikouquan Formation, Mabei slope, Jungger Basin

[1] Bell C M. Quaternary lacustrine braid deltas on Lake General Carrera in southern Chile[J]. Adean Geology,2009,36(1): 51-65.

[2] Park M E,Cho H,Son M,et al. Depositional processes,paleoflow patterns,and evolution of a Miocene gravelly fan-delta system in SE Korea constrained by anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis of interbedded mudrocks[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2013, 48:206-223.

[3] 薛良清,Galloway W E.扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲与三角洲体系的分类[J].地质学报,1991,65(2):141-153.

Xue Liangqing,Galloway G E. Fan-delta,braid delta and the Classification of Delta systems[J]. Acta Geology Sinica,1991,65(2):141153.

[4] 李国栋,白卫卫,孙金磊,等.扇三角洲岩性油气藏储层描述技术研究———以营子街地区为例[J].岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):55-59.

Li Guodong,Bai Weiwei,Sun Jinlei,et al. Technology of lithologic reservoir description in fan delta:A case study from Yingzijie area [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(2):55-59.

[5] 代黎明,李建平,周心怀,等.渤海海域新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系分析[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(4):75-81.

Dai Liming,Li Jianping,Zhou Xinhuai,et al. Depositional system of the Neogene shallow water delta in Bohai Sea area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(4):75-81.

[6] 王建功,王天琦,卫平生,等.大型坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积模式———以松辽盆地北部葡萄花油层为例[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(2):28-34.

Wang Jiangong,Wang Tianqi,Wei Pingsheng,et al. Sedimen-tary mode of shallow lacustrine delta of large continental basin-an example from Putaohua Formation in northern Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(2):28-34.

[7] 李雅楠,郑荣才,李国晖,等.四川盆地三台—盐亭地区上三叠统须家河组沉积体系分析[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(2):38-46.

Li Yanan,Zheng Rongcai,Li Guohui,et al. Sedimentary system of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Santai-Yanting area,Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(2):38-46.

[8] Ricketts B D,Evenchick C A. Evidence of different contractional styles along foredeep margins provided by Gilbert deltas,examples from Bowser Basin,British Columbia,Canada[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(4):243-261.

[9] Herrero A,Gavilan G A,Colmenero J R. Depositional sequences in a foreland basin (north-western domain of the continental Duero basin,Spain)[J]. Sedimentary Geology,2010,223:235-264.

2016年

[10] 唐武,王英民,张雷,等.塔里木盆地三叠系隆后坳陷区层序地层特征[J].中国矿业大学学报,2013,42(6):1015-1024.

Tang Wu,Wang Yingmin,Zhang Lei,et al. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics of Triassic back-bulge zone in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2013,42 (6): 1015-1024.

[11] 孙林,陈旭,董玉文,等.塔里木盆地台盆区三叠系大型辫状河三角洲沉积[J].石油地球物理勘探,2012,47(4):642-652.

Sun Lin,Chen Xu,Dong Yuwen,et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Triassic braided river delta in Tarim Basin Platform[J]. Oil Geophysics Prospecting,2012,47(4):642-652.

[12] 庞雯,郑俊茂.轮南地区三叠系辫状河三角洲沉积储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(1):58-62

Pang Wen,Zheng Junmao. Sedimantary characteristic and physical property of braid delta of Triassic in Lunnan region[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2008,30(1):58-62.

[13] 程海艳,李江海,赵星.塔北隆起古生代构造样式和构造反演[J].中国地质,2009,36(2):314-321.

Cheng Haiyan,Li Jianghai,Zhao Xing. Paleozoic structural styles and evolution of the North Tarim Uplift[J]. Geology in China,2009, 36(2):314-321.

[14] 徐国强,刘树根,李国蓉,等.塔中、塔北古隆起形成演化及油气地质条件对比[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1):114-121.

Xu Guoqiang,Liu Shugen,Li Guorong,et al. Comparison of tectonic evolution and petroleum geologic conditions in Tazhong and Tabei paleohigh in Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2005,26(1):114-121.

[15] 唐武,王英民,张雷,等.塔里木盆地三叠纪前缘隆起迁移演化规律[J].古地理学报,2013,15(2):219-230.

Tang Wu,Wang Yingmin,Zhang Lei,et al. Forebulge migration and evolution of the Triassic in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(2):219-230.

[16] 汤良杰,邱海峻,云露,等.塔里木盆地北缘—南天山造山带盆-山耦合和构造转换[J].地学前缘,2012,19(5):195-204.

Tang Liangjie,Qiu Haijun,Yun Lu,et al. Analysis of basin-mountain coupling and transition of the Northern Tarim Basin-Southern Tianshan Orogenic Belt[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(5): 195-204.

[17] 袁文芳,陈世悦,曾昌民,等.柴达木盆地西部地区第三系碎屑岩粒度概率累积曲线特征[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(5):12-18.

Yuan Wenfang,Chen Shiyue,Zeng Changmin,et al. Probability cumulative grain size curves in terrigenous of the Tertiary in west Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China: Edition of Natyral Science,2005,29(5):12-18.

[18] 郭岭,贾超超,朱毓,等.现代渭河西安段沉积体沉积相与岩相特征[J].沉积学报,2015,33(3):543-550.

Guo Ling,Jia Chaochao,Zhu Yu,et al. Characteristics of sedimentary facies and lithofacies of modern Weihe River in Xi’an [J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(3):543-550.

[19] 罗薇,何幼斌,马波.惠民凹陷临 7 断块区沙三段沉积相分析[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(6):57-63.

Luo Wei,He Youbin,Ma Bo. Study on sedimentary facies of the third member of Shahejie Formation in Lin7 fault block,Huimin Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(6):57-63.

[20] 黄克难,詹家祯,邹义声,等.新疆库车河地区三叠系和侏罗系沉积环境及古气候[J].古地理学报,2003,5(2):197-208.

Huang Kenan,Zhan Jiazhen,Zou Yisheng,et al. Sedimentary environments and palaeoclimate of the Triassic and Jurassic in Kuqa River area,Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2003,5(2): 197-208.

 

[1] 张本健, 田云英, 曾琪, 尹宏, 丁熊. 四川盆地西北部三叠系须三段砂砾岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 20-28.
[2] 郭秋麟, 吴晓智, 卫延召, 柳庄小雪, 刘继丰, 陈宁生. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气运移路径模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 37-45.
[3] 陈棡, 卞保力, 李啸, 刘刚, 龚德瑜, 曾德龙. 准噶尔盆地腹部中浅层油气输导体系及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 46-56.
[4] 马永平, 张献文, 朱卡, 王国栋, 潘树新, 黄林军, 张寒, 关新. 玛湖凹陷二叠系上乌尔禾组扇三角洲沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 57-70.
[5] 陈静, 陈军, 李卉, 努尔艾力·扎曼. 准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系—三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 71-80.
[6] 余兴, 尤新才, 白雨, 李鹏, 朱涛. 玛湖凹陷南斜坡断裂识别及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 81-89.
[7] 关新, 潘树新, 曲永强, 许多年, 张寒, 马永平, 王国栋, 陈雪珍. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷滩坝砂的发现及油气勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 90-98.
[8] 杨凡凡, 姚宗全, 杨帆, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张磊, 曹天儒. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组岩石物理相[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 99-108.
[9] 张闻亭, 龙礼文, 肖文华, 魏浩元, 李铁锋, 董震宇. 酒泉盆地青西凹陷窟窿山构造带下沟组沉积特征及储层预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 186-197.
[10] 李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[11] 宁从前, 周明顺, 成捷, 苏芮, 郝鹏, 王敏, 潘景丽. 二维核磁共振测井在砂砾岩储层流体识别中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 267-274.
[12] 卿繁, 闫建平, 王军, 耿斌, 王敏, 赵振宇, 晁静. 砂砾岩体沉积期次划分及其与物性的关系——以东营凹陷北部陡坡带Y920区块沙四上亚段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 50-61.
[13] 杨文杰, 胡明毅, 苏亚拉图, 刘昌, 元懿, 李金池. 松辽盆地苏家屯次洼初始裂陷期扇三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 59-68.
[14] 张满郎, 孔凡志, 谷江锐, 郭振华, 付晶, 郑国强, 钱品淑. 九龙山气田珍珠冲组砂砾岩储层评价及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 1-13.
[15] 徐子煜, 王安, 韩长城, 田继军, 张军生, 刘磊, 张楠. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组优质砂砾岩储层形成机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 82-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 崔攀峰. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51 -56 .
[2] 张杰, 赵玉华. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组地震层序地层研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 71 -74 .
[3] 杨占龙, 张正刚, 陈启林, 郭精义,沙雪梅, 刘文粟. 利用地震信息评价陆相盆地岩性圈闭的关键点分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 57 -63 .
[4] 朱小燕, 李爱琴, 段晓晨, 田随良, 刘美荣. 镇北油田延长组长3 油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 82 -86 .
[5] 方朝合, 王义凤, 郑德温, 葛稚新. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系烃源岩显微组分分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 87 -90 .
[6] 韩春元,赵贤正,金凤鸣,王权,李先平,王素卿. 二连盆地地层岩性油藏“多元控砂—四元成藏—主元富集”与勘探实践(IV)——勘探实践[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 15 -20 .
[7] 戴朝成,郑荣才,文华国,张小兵. 辽东湾盆地旅大地区古近系层序—岩相古地理编图[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 39 -46 .
[8] 尹艳树,张尚峰,尹太举. 钟市油田潜江组含盐层系高分辨率层序地层格架及砂体分布规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 53 -58 .
[9] 石雪峰,杜海峰. 姬塬地区长3—长4+5油层组沉积相研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 59 -63 .
[10] 严世邦,胡望水,李瑞升,关键,李涛,聂晓红. 准噶尔盆地红车断裂带同生逆冲断裂特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 64 -68 .