基于“岩石物理相-流动单元”测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.015

岩性油气藏 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 116–123.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.015

基于“岩石物理相-流动单元”测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例

周游^1,2, 李治平^1,2, 景成³, 谷潇雨³, 孙威⁴, 李晓³

1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国地质大学(北京)非常规天然气能源地质评价与开发工程北京市重点实验室, 北京 100083;
3. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 山东青岛 266580;
4. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第八采油厂, 西安 710065

收稿日期:2016-06-25 修回日期:2016-08-26 出版日期:2017-01-21 发布日期:2017-01-21
通讯作者: 李治平(1963-),男,博士,教授,长期从事油气田开发工程方面的教学和科研工作。Email:lzpswpi@163.com。
作者简介:周游(1988-),男,中国地质大学(北京)在读博士研究生,研究方向为油气田开发地质学。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路29号中国地质大学(北京)能源学院。Email:zypetro@126.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项“中西部地区碎屑岩储层预测、保护与改造技术”（编号:2011ZX05002-005）资助

Quantitative evaluation of favorable reservoir in ultra-low permeable reservoir based on“petrophysical facies-flow unit”log response： a case study of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Yanchang Oilfield

ZHOU You^1,2, LI Zhiping^1,2, JING Cheng³, GU Xiaoyu³, SUN Wei⁴, LI Xiao³

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geology Evaluation and Development Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
3. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
4. No. 8 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710065, China

Received:2016-06-25 Revised:2016-08-26 Online:2017-01-21 Published:2017-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 岩石物理相和流动单元均可从不同角度表征储层的非均质性，鄂尔多斯盆地东部地区特低渗透储层非均质性极强，单独利用岩石物理相或流动单元对该地区进行储层评价会存在一定偏差。通过定性识别和定量划分，建立了“岩石物理相-流动单元”定量综合评价指标体系，并提出利用这一体系来定量评价优质储层。研究结果表明：一类、二类“岩石物理相-流动单元”具有较好的储集性能和渗流结构，由其圈定的近期可开发或评价后可开发的优质储层共49 个，从而确定了含油甜点区的分布规律和延展方向。这一研究成果能兼顾岩石物理相对于油气富集的控制作用和流动单元的流动特性，可有效减小单独利用岩石物理相或流动单元筛选优质储层所造成的误差，现场应用效果较好，为研究区增储上产提供了有利井位和区域。

Abstract: Petrophysical facies and flow unit can both represent the heterogeneity of the reservoir from different angles. The ultra-low permeability reservoir is characterized by strong heterogeneity in the eastern Ordos Basin, so there will be some deviations in reservoir evaluation by using petrophysical facies or flow unit. Combined with qualitative identification and quantitative classification, a comprehensive assessment target system of“petro physical facies- flow unit”was established to quantitatively evaluate the high quality reservoirs. Meanwhile,it utilized grey system theory to integrate multiple information and established relationship between limited core data and logging data,achieving to use well log information to quantitatively evaluate and divide“petrophysical facies- flow unit”. The results show that the first-class and the second-class“petrophysical facies-flow unit”possess relatively preponderant reservoir properties and seepage structure,by which 49 high quality reservoirs was optimized for developing,and the distribution and extension direction of oiliness zones were determined. This method can effectively reduce the error caused by the use of petrophysical facies or flow unit only to optimize high quality reservoirs. At the same time,the field application effect is good,and it also can provide favorable well site and district for enhancing reserve and productivity in the study area.

中图分类号:

P618.13

周游, 李治平, 景成, 谷潇雨, 孙威, 李晓. 基于“岩石物理相-流动单元”测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1): 116–123.

ZHOU You, LI Zhiping, JING Cheng, GU Xiaoyu, SUN Wei, LI Xiao. Quantitative evaluation of favorable reservoir in ultra-low permeable reservoir based on“petrophysical facies-flow unit”log response： a case study of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Yanchang Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1): 116–123.

参考文献

[1] 付金华,魏新善,任军峰,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探形势与发展前景.石油学报,2006,27(6):1-4. FU J H,WEI X S,REN J F,et al. Gas exploration and developing prospect in Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(6): 1-4.
[2] 何辉,宋新民,蒋有伟,等. 砂砾岩储层非均质性及其对剩余油分布的影响——以克拉玛依油田二中西区八道湾组为例. 岩性油气藏,2012,24(2):117-123. HE H,SONG X M,JIANG Y W,et al. Heterogeneity of sandy conglomerate reservoir and its influence on remaining oil distribution: A case study from Badaowan Formation in the midwest of block Ⅱ in Karamay Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012,24(2):117-123.
[3] 王月莲,宋新民. 按流动单元建立测井储集层解释模型. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(3):53-55. WANG Y L,SONG X M. New method for well log interpretation by single fluid flow unit. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002,29(3):53-55.
[4] 董春梅,林承焰,赵海朋,等. 基于流动单元的测井储层参数解释模型.测井技术,2006,30(5):425-428. DONG C M,LIN C Y,ZHAO H P,et al. Model of well logging reservoir parameters interpretation based on flow units. Well Logging Technology,2006,30(5):425-428.
[5] 曾少军,何胜林,王利娟,等. 基于流动单元的测井储层参数精细建模技术.天然气工业,2011,31(8):12-15. ZENG S J,HE S L,WANG L J,et al.Well logging reservoir parameter elaboration modelling technology based on flow unit. Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(8):12-15.
[6] 谭成仟,段爱英. 基于岩石物理相的储层渗透率解释模型研究.测井技术,2001,25(4):287-290. TAN C Q,DUAN A Y. On the permeability models based on the petrophysical facie. Well Logging Technology,2001,25(4): 287-290.
[7] 宋子齐,杨红刚,孙颖,等. 利用岩石物理相分类研究特低渗透储层参数建模. 断块油气田,2010,17(6):672-677. SONG Z Q,YANG H G,SUN Y,et al. Study on parametric modeling of ultra-low permeability reservoir with petrophysical facies classification. Fault- Block Oil and Gas Field,2010,17 (6):672-677.
[8] 景成,宋子齐,蒲春生,等. 基于岩石物理相分类确定致密气储层渗透率——以苏里格东区致密气储层渗透率研究为例. 地球物理学进展,2013,28(6):3222-3230. JING C,SONG Z Q,Pu C S,et al. Refined permeability of tight gas reservoir based on petrophysical facies classification: Taking the study of tight gas reservoir permeability in the eastern of Sulige for an example. Progress in Geophysics,2013,28(6): 3222-3230.
[9] 赖锦,王贵文,罗官幸,等. 基于岩石物理相约束的致密砂岩气储层渗透率解释建模. 地球物理学进展,2014,29(3):1173- 1182. LAI J,WANG G W,LUO G X,et al. Tight sandstone gas permeability interpretation modeling controlled by petrophysical facies. Progress in Geophysics,2014,29(3):1173-1182.
[10] 宋子齐,唐长久,刘晓娟,等. 利用岩石物理相“甜点”筛选特低渗透储层含油有利区.石油学报,2008,29(5):711-716. SONG Z Q,TANG C J,LIU X J,et al. Determination of favorable oi-l bearing areas with extra low-permeability reservoir by “dessert”of petro-physical facies. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29 (5):711-716.
[11] 张吉,张烈辉,陈军,等. 岔河集油田岔39 块流动单元系统聚类划分及特征分析.河南石油,2004,18(6):33-36. ZHANG J,ZHANG L H,CHEN J,et al. Systematic clustering classfication and feature analysis of flow units in cha 39 block in Chaheji Oilfield. Henan Petroleum,2004,18(6):33-36.
[12] 王奇,祝敏荣. 模糊聚类分析在储层流动单元研究中的应用. 石油化工应用,2009,28(5):55-57. WANG Q,ZHU M R. Application of fuzzy clustering analysis to study on reservoir flow unit. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2009,28(5):55-57.
[13] 岳大力,吴胜和,林承焰. 碎屑岩储层流动单元研究进展. 中国科技论文在线,2008,3(11):810-817. YUE D L,WU S H,LIN C Y. Research progress in flow unit of clastic reservoir. Sciencepaper Online,2008,3(11):810-817.
[14] 宋子齐. 测井多参数的地质应用. 西安,西北大学出版社, 1993:110-140. SONG Z Q. Geological application of logging multi-parameter. Xi'an:Northwestern University Press,1993:110-140.
[15] 景成,蒲春生,周游,等. 基于成岩储集相测井响应特征定量评价致密气藏相对优质储层——以SULG东区致密气藏盒8 上段成岩储集相为例. 天然气地球科学,2014,25(5):657- 664. JING C,PU C S,ZHOU Y,et al. Quantitatively evaluating relatively beneficial reservoir of tight gas reservoirs based on diagenetic reservoir facies log response feature:Taking the diagenetic reservoir facies classification of the He 8-1 in the tight gas reservoir of SULG east area for an example. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014,25(5):657-664.
[16] 宋子齐,杨立雷,王宏,等. 灰色系统储层流动单元综合评价方法. 大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(3):76-81. SONG Z Q,YANG L L,WANG H,et al. Comprehensive evaluation method of reservoir flow unit with grey system. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development In Daqing,2007,26 (3):76-81.
[17] 宋子齐,王建功. 储层定量评价指标和权系数研究. 测井技术,1997,21(5):351-355. SONG Z Q,WANG J G. A Study on quantitative reservoir evaluation norms and weight coefficient. Logging Technology, 1997,21(5):351-355.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于“岩石物理相-流动单元”测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例

Quantitative evaluation of favorable reservoir in ultra-low permeable reservoir based on“petrophysical facies-flow unit”log response： a case study of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Yanchang Oilfield

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	石文武, 雍运动, 吴开龙, 田彦灿, 王鹏. 渤海湾盆地老爷庙地区火山岩速度建模与成像[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 101-110.
[2]	赵军, 韩东, 何胜林, 汤翟, 张涛. 基于水气比计算的低对比度储层流体性质识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 128-136.
[3]	姚海鹏, 于东方, 李玲, 林海涛. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 1-8.
[4]	袁成, 苏明军, 倪长宽. 基于稀疏贝叶斯学习的薄储层预测方法及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 229-238.
[5]	李树博, 郭旭光, 郑孟林, 王泽胜, 刘新龙. 准噶尔盆地东部西泉地区石炭系火山岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 258-266.
[6]	梁志凯, 李卓, 李连霞, 姜振学, 刘冬冬, 高凤琳, 刘晓庆, 肖磊, 杨有东. 松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩孔径多重分形特征与岩相的关系[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 22-35.
[7]	余烨, 蔡灵慧, 尹太举, 王莉, 张兴强, 徐吉丰. 下刚果盆地早白垩世Pointe Indienne组湖相浊积岩特征及石油地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(6): 12-21.
[8]	孙予舒, 黄芸, 梁婷, 季汉成, 向鹏飞, 徐新蓉. 基于XGBoost算法的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性测井识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 98-106.
[9]	朱博远, 张超谟, 张占松, 朱林奇, 周雪晴. 渤中19-6太古界潜山复杂岩性储层矿物组分反演[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(4): 107-114.
[10]	李宏涛, 马立元, 史云清, 胡向阳, 高君, 李浩. 基于井-震结合的水下分流河道砂岩储层展布分析与评价——以什邡气藏JP₃⁵砂组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 78-89.
[11]	仲鸿儒, 成育红, 林孟雄, 高世臣, 仲婷婷. 基于SOM和模糊识别的复杂碳酸盐岩岩性识别[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 84-91.
[12]	陈相霖, 郭天旭, 石砥石, 侯啓东, 王超. 陕南地区牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及吸附能力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(5): 52-60.
[13]	涂乙, 王亚会, 闫正和, 高永明, 魏启任. 基于构型单元“势控论”研究与剩余油开发效果分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 133-140.
[14]	余川, 周洵, 方光建, 汪生秀, 余忠樯. 地层温压条件下页岩吸附性能变化特征——以渝东北地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(6): 10-17.
[15]	余江浩, 王登, 王亿, 谢通, 石先滨, 陈威. 湖北西部上二叠统大隆组页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(4): 84-90.