岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 55–62.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.006

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

川南龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构综合表征及其分形特征

陈居凯1,2, 朱炎铭1,2, 崔兆帮1,2, 张闯辉1,2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 资源与地球科学学院, 江苏 徐州 221116;
    2. 煤层气资源与成藏过程教育部重点实验室(中国矿业大学), 江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-10 修回日期:2017-08-01 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 第一作者:陈居凯(1993-),男,中国矿业大学在读硕士研究生,研究方向为石油地质学。地址:(221008)江苏省徐州市中国矿业大学国家大学科技园煤层气资源与成藏过程教育部重点实验室307室。Email:cumtcjk@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“中上扬子地区龙马溪组页岩微孔结构演变与页岩气成藏效应(编号:41272155)、国家重大科技专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发-页岩气工业化建产区评价与高产主控因素研究”(编号:2017ZX05035004)和山西省煤基重点科技攻关项目“煤层气、页岩气资源潜力综合评价及共探共采选区研究”(编号:MQ2014-02)联合资助

Pore structure and fractal characteristics of Longmaxi shale in southern Sichuan Basin

CHEN Jukai1,2, ZHU Yanming1,2, CUI Zhaobang1,2, ZHANG Chuanghui1,2   

  1. 1. School of Resource and Earth Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2017-06-10 Revised:2017-08-01 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 为了科学评价川南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙发育特征对页岩气赋存与流动过程的影响,综合采用压汞、液氮吸附及二氧化碳吸附等测试方法,对页岩孔隙结构进行全尺度表征,并对不同尺寸的孔隙进行分形拟合,计算综合分形维数,最后结合地球化学和矿物组成对综合分形维数的影响因素进行探讨。结果表明:页岩样品孔径分布呈多峰态,各阶段孔隙均对总体积有一定贡献,而孔隙比表面积主要由微孔和介孔贡献。龙马溪组页岩孔隙符合分形规律,具有自相似性,宏孔孔隙结构较介孔、微孔更为复杂。以2个孔径段的孔体积比为加权值,计算获得综合分形维数为2.491~2.623,平均为2.560,孔隙结构较为复杂。有机碳含量和矿物组成对综合分形维数具有明显控制作用,有机碳含量越高,综合分形维数越大。孔隙结构复杂程度与综合分形维数呈正相关关系,脆性矿物含量与综合分形维数呈负相关关系,有机质成熟度和黏土矿物对孔隙综合分形维数有积极影响。

关键词: 孔隙结构, 综合表征, 分形维数, 龙马溪组, 川南地区

Abstract: The pore development characteristics of Longmaxi shale in the southern Sichuan Basin have influence on shale gas occurrence and flow process. To scientifically evaluate the influence,the high-pressure mercury intrusion,low-temperature nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption were comprehensively used to characterize the pore structure,and the fractal fitting of pores in different size was made to calculate the integrated fractal dimensions,and combined with geochemistry and mineral composition,the influencing factors of the integrated fractal dimensions were discussed. The results indicate that the pore diameter distributions of the samples are multi-modal. The pores in different stages account for the pore volume to some extent,whereas micropores and mesopores account for the pore specific surface area. The pores of Longmaxi shale have self-similarity according with fractals laws,and compared with mesopores and micropores,the structure of macropore is more complex. Considering the pore volume of different pore diameters as the weighted value,the calculated integrated fractal dimensions are from 2.491 to 2.623,with an average of 2.560. The organic carbon content and mineral composition have an obvious controlling effect on the integrated fractal dimension which becomes larger with higher organic carbon content and more complex pore structure. The brittle mineral content is negatively correlated with the integrated fractal dimension,while the maturity and clay minerals have a positive influence on it.

Key words: pore structure, comprehensive characterization, fractal dimension, Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 郭旭升,胡东风,文治东,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素——以焦石坝地区五峰组一龙马溪组为例.中国地质,2014,41(3):893-901. GUO X S,HU D F,WEN Z D,et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery:a case study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba area. Geology in China,2014,41(3):893-901.
[2] 胡东风,张汉荣,倪楷,等.四川盆地东南缘海相页岩气保存条件及其主控因素.天然气工业,2014,34(6):17-23. HU D F,ZHANG H R,NI K,et al. Main controlling factors for gas preservation conditions of marine shales in southeastern margins of the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):17-23.
[3] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一).石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701. ZOU C N,DONG D Z,WANGYM,et al. Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects(Ⅰ). Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[4] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二).石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):166-178. ZOU C N,DONG D Z,WANGYM,et al. Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects(Ⅱ). Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):166-178.
[5] 罗健,戴鸿鸣,邵隆坎,等.四川盆地下古生界页岩气资源前景预测.岩性油气藏,2012,24(4):70-74. LOU J,DAI H M,SHAO L K,et al. Prospect prediction for shale gas resources of the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs,2012,24(4):70-74.
[6] 董大忠,高世葵,黄金亮,等.论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景.天然气工业,2014,34(12):1-15. DONG D Z,GAO S K,HUANG J L,et al. A discussion on the shale gas exploration & development prospect in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(12):1-15.
[7] 肖贤明,宋之光,朱炎铭,等.北美页岩气研究及对我国下古生界页岩气开发的启示.煤炭学报,2013,38(5):721-727. XIAO X M,SONG Z G,ZHUYM,et al. Summary of shale gas research in North American and revelations to shale gas exploration of Lower Paleozoic strata in China south area. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):721-727.
[8] 张小龙,张同伟,李艳芳,等.页岩气勘探和开发进展综述.岩性油气藏,2013,25(2):116-122. ZHANG X L,ZHANG T W,LI Y F,et al. Research advance in exploration and development of shale gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013,25(2):116-122.
[9] HOUBEN M E,DESBOIS G,URAI J L,et al. A comparative study of representative 2 D microstructures in shaly and sandy facies of Opalinus clay(Mont Terri,Switzerland)inferred form BIB-SEM and MIP methods. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014,49:143-161.
[10] 韩超,吴明昊,吝文,等.川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩储层特征.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(3):14-22. HAN C,WU M H,LIN W,et al. Characteristics of black shale reservoir of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Southern Sichuan Basin. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2017,41(3):14-22.
[11] 杨巍,陈国俊,胡士骏,等.川南-黔北地区下古生界页岩孔隙发育特征.岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):47-52. YANG W,CHEN G J,HU S J,et al. Pore characteristics of shale of Lower Paleozoic in southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):47-52.
[12] 胡琳,朱炎铭,陈尚斌,等.蜀南双河龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构的分形特征.新疆石油地质,2013,34(1):79-82. HU L,ZHU Y M,CHEN S B,et al. Fractal characteristics of shale pore structure of Longmaxi Formation in Shuanghe area in southern Sichuan.Xinjiang PetroleumGeology,2013,34(1):79-82.
[13] 梁利喜,熊健,刘向君.川南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构的分形特征.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2015,42(6):700-708. LIANG L X,XIONG J,LIU X J. Fractal characteristics of pore structure of Longmaxi Formation shale in south of Sichuan Basin,China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science and Technology Edition,2015,42(6):700-708.
[14] 郝乐伟,王琪,唐俊.储层岩石微观孔隙结构研究方法与理论综述.岩性油气藏,2013,25(5):123-128. HAO L W,WANG Q,TANG J. Research progress of reservoir microscopic pore structure. Lithologic Reservoirs,2013,25(5):123-128.
[15] 王玉满,董大忠,杨桦,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩储集空间定量表征.中国科学:D辑地球科学,2014,44(6):1348-1356. WANG Y M,DONG D Z,YANG H,et al. Quantitative characterization of reservoir space in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale,southern Sichuan,China. Science in China:Series D Earth Sciences,2014,44(6):1348-1356.
[16] 李可,王兴志,张馨艺,等.四川盆地东部下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征及影响因素.岩性油气藏,2016,28(5):52-58. LI K,WANG X Z,ZHANG X Y,et al. Shale reservoir characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the eastern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(5):52-58.
[17] 朱炎铭,王阳,陈尚斌,等.页岩储层孔隙结构多尺度定性-定量综合表征:以上扬子海相龙马溪组为例.地学前缘,2016, 23(1):154-163. ZHU Y M,WANG Y,CHEN S B,et al. Qualitative-quantitative multiscale characterization of pore structures in shale reservoirs:a case study of Longmaxi Formation in the Upper Yangtzer area. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):154-163.
[18] 田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征.石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427. TIAN H,ZHANG S C,LIU S B,et al. Determination of organicrich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):419-427.
[19] 付常青,朱炎铭,陈尚斌,等.浙西荷塘组页岩孔隙结构及分形特征研究.中国矿业大学学报,2016,45(1):77-86. FU C Q,ZHU Y M,CHEN S B,et al. Pore structure and fractal features of Hetang Formation shale in western Zhejiang. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2016,45(1):77-86.
[20] 杨峰,宁正福,王庆,等.页岩纳米孔隙分形特征.天然气地球科学,2014,25(4):618-623. YANG F,NING Z F,WANG Q,et al. Fractal characteristics of nanopore in shales. Nature Gas Geoscience,2014,25(4):618-623.
[21] 张闯辉,朱炎铭,陈居凯,等.页岩孔隙综合分形特征及其影响因素分析.河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,36(4):42-47. ZHANG C H,ZHU Y M,CHEN J K,et al. The comprehensive fractal characteristic of shale and its influencing factors. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science),2017,36(4):42-47.
[22] 魏建平,代少华,温志辉,等.不同煤级煤样的孔隙综合表征方法研究. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2015,34(3):305-310. WEI J P,DAI S H,WEN Z H,et al. Research on comprehensive characterization method of different rank coal porosity. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science), 2015,34(3):305-310.
[23] 王聪,江成发,储伟.煤的分形维数及其影响因素分析.中国矿业大学学报,2013,42(6):1009-1014. WANG C,JIANG C F,CHU W. Fractal dimension of coals and analysis of its influencing factors. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2013,42(6):1009-1014.
[24] 董大忠,邹才能,李建忠,等.页岩气资源潜力与勘探开发前景.地质通报,2011,30(2):324-336. DONG D Z,ZOU C N,LI J Z,et al. Resource potential,exploration and development prospect of shale gas in the whole world. Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2):324-336.
[25] 郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式.石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36. GUO T L,ZHANG H R. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[26] 彭女佳,何生,郝芳,等.川东南彭水地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构及差异性.地球科学,2017,42(7):1134-1146. PENG N J,HE S,HAO F,et al. The pore structure and difference between Wufeng and Longmsxi shales in Pengshui area, Southeastern Sichuan. Earth Science,2017,42(7):1134-1146.
[27] 杨永飞,王晨晨,姚军,等,页岩基质微观孔隙结构分析新方法.地球科学,2016,41(6):1067-1073. YANG Y F,WANG C C,YAO J,et al. A new method microscopic pore structure analysis in shale matrix. Earth Science, 2016,41(6):1067-1073.
[1] 孔令峰, 徐加放, 刘丁. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系西山窑组褐煤储层孔隙结构特征及脱水演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 15-24.
[2] 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 刘绍军, 夏自强, 徐飞, 范存辉, 李雨桐. 四川盆地宁西地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气富集主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 99-110.
[3] 邱玉超, 李亚丁, 文龙, 罗冰, 姚军, 许强, 文华国, 谭秀成. 川东地区寒武系洗象池组构造特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 122-132.
[4] 朱彪, 邹妞妞, 张大权, 杜威, 陈祎. 黔北凤冈地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩孔隙结构特征及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 147-158.
[5] 程静, 闫建平, 宋东江, 廖茂杰, 郭伟, 丁明海, 罗光东, 刘延梅. 川南长宁地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气储层低电阻率响应特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 31-39.
[6] 计玉冰, 郭冰如, 梅珏, 尹志军, 邹辰. 四川盆地南缘昭通示范区罗布向斜志留系龙马溪组页岩储层裂缝建模[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 137-145.
[7] 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 孙振, 李天, 万慈眩, 杨甫, 张世铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88.
[8] 包汉勇, 刘超, 甘玉青, 薛萌, 刘世强, 曾联波, 马诗杰, 罗良. 四川盆地涪陵南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩古构造应力场及裂缝特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 14-22.
[9] 杨博伟, 石万忠, 张晓明, 徐笑丰, 刘俞佐, 白卢恒, 杨洋, 陈相霖. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 45-58.
[10] 姚秀田, 王超, 闫森, 王明鹏, 李婉. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷新近系馆陶组储层敏感性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 159-168.
[11] 肖玲, 陈曦, 雷宁, 易涛, 郭文杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(2): 80-93.
[12] 杨跃明, 张少敏, 金涛, 明盈, 郭蕊莹, 王兴志, 韩璐媛. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(1): 1-11.
[13] 文志刚, 罗雨舒, 刘江艳, 赵春雨, 李士祥, 田伟超, 樊云鹏, 高和婷. 陇东地区三叠系长7段页岩油储层孔隙结构特征及成因机制[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 47-59.
[14] 闫建平, 罗静超, 石学文, 钟光海, 郑马嘉, 黄毅, 唐洪明, 胡钦红. 川南泸州地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育模式及意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 60-71.
[15] 张凤奇, 李宜浓, 罗菊兰, 任小锋, 张兰馨, 张芥瑜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部奥陶系乌拉力克组页岩微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(5): 50-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .