岩性油气藏 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 150–154.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2018.01.015

• 油气田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

大庆油田长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层综合分类

殷代印, 项俊辉, 王东琪   

  1. 东北石油大学 石油工程学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-26 修回日期:2017-09-30 出版日期:2018-01-21 发布日期:2018-01-21
  • 第一作者:殷代印(1966-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气藏数值模拟和油气田开发动态分析方面的教学和科研工作。地址:(163318)黑龙江省大庆市高新技术产业开发区学府街99号东北石油大学石油工程学院。Email:yindaiyin@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“低渗透油藏表面活性剂驱微乳液渗流机理及数值模拟研究”(编号:51474071)资助

Classification of Fuyang oil reservoir with ultra-low permeability around placanticline of Daqing Oilfield

YIN Daiyin, XIANG Junhui, WANG Dongqi   

  1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2017-08-26 Revised:2017-09-30 Online:2018-01-21 Published:2018-01-21

摘要: 为了满足大庆油田长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层精细水驱挖潜的需求,常采用油藏分类界限的方法对投产初期的区块进行合理分类。对于多个分类参数介于不同分类结果的特低渗透区块,该方法却加剧了划分结果的不确定性。为了解决这一问题,在已有长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层分类界限成果的基础上,建立了多参数聚类分析、动静态一致性检验与综合评判分级相结合的油藏分类方法,明确了两大类、四小类区块的分类评价标准,并对各区块分类结果进行了验证。结果表明:该方法解决了个别区块分类参数介于不同分类结果造成的分类困难等问题,实现了63个已开发特低渗透区块的合理分类,并且具有计算简便、精确度高的特点,为大庆油田新投产特低渗透区块的高效精细分类提供了有力的依据。

关键词: 流沙港组, 源-汇分析, 浊积扇, 曲流河三角洲, 涠西南凹陷

Abstract: In order to meet the demand of fine waterflooding of Fuyang oil reservoir with ultra-low permeability around placanticline of Daqing Oilfield,the method of reservoir classification limit is usually used to realize the reasonable classifications on ultra-low permeability reservoir blocks at early stage of production. However,for some ultra-low permeability blocks,different classification parameters fall into different classification results, which exacerbates the non-determinacy of results. To solve this problem,on the basis of existed achievements of classification limits for Fuyang oil reservoirs with ultra-low permeability,the method combined multi-parameter cluster analysis,dynamic and static consistency test with comprehensive evaluation was established. The classification evaluation criteria for two groups and four sub-groups were determined,and the classification results of each block were verified. The results show that this method solves the problem of classification difficulty caused by different classification parameters of individual blocks falling into different classification results,and realizes the reasonable classifications of 63 developed ultra-low permeability blocks. In addition,it has the characteristics of simple calculation and high accuracy,which provides a powerful basis for efficient and fine classifications of ultra-low permeability blocks in Daqing Oilfield.

Key words: Liushagang Formation, source-sink analysis, turbidite fan, meandering river delta, Weixinan Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE348
[1] 杨钊. 大庆外围低渗透油田分类方法及开发对策研究. 大庆:东北石油大学,2010. YANG Z. A study on daqing peripheral low permeability reservoir classification method and development countermeasures. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2010.
[2] 何超.特低渗透油藏扶杨油层分类及水驱规律研究.大庆:东北石油大学,2016. HE C. A study on classification and water flooding law of Fuyang layer in the ultra-low permeability reservoir. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2016.
[3] 孙娜. 低渗透油藏水驱开发效果综合评价方法研究与应用. 特种油气藏,2008,15(6):56-58. SUN N. Comprehensive evaluation of waterflooding effect in low permeability reservoirs. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2008,15(6):56-58.
[4] 刘辉,何顺利,李俊健,等.特低渗油藏水驱开发效果评价方法研究.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(1):58-60. LIU H,HE S L,LI J J,et al. Evaluating methods of water-flooding development effectiveness in ultra-low permeability reservoir. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2009,31(1):58-60.
[5] 李武广,邵先杰,康园园,等.油藏分类体系与方法研究.岩性油气藏,2010,22(2):124-127. LI G W,SHAO X J,KANG Y Y,et al. Study on reservoir classification system and method. Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(2):124-127.
[6] 殷代印,王东琪,周亚洲,等.长垣外围特低渗透油藏扶杨油层分类界限.大庆石油地质开发,2016,35(6):37-42. YIN D Y,WANG D Q,ZHOU Y Z,et al. Classifying limits of Fuyang oil reservoirs with ultra-low permeability around the placanticline. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2016,35(6):37-42.
[7] 袁自学,王靖云,李淑珣,等.特低渗透注水砂岩油藏采收率确定方法.石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):341-348. YUAN Z X,WANG J Y,LI S X,et al. A new approach to estimating recovery factor for extra-low permeability water-flooding sandstone reservoir. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014,41(3):341-348.
[8] 周锡生,李莉,韩德金,等.大庆外围外围扶杨油层分类评价及调整对策.大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(3):35-37. ZHOU X S,LI L,HAN D J,et al. Research on peripheral Fuyang oil layer classified evaluation and adjustment strategy. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2006,25(3):35-37.
[9] 周永炳,崔宝文,周锡生.大庆外围扶杨油层难采储量优选界限及开发方案.石油实验地质,2006,28(4):399-403. ZHOU Y B,CUI B W,ZHOU X S. Trouble reserve optimal limit and development design plan for Fuyang oil layer,Daqing Oilfield. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2006,28(4):399-403.
[10] 张仲宏,杨正明,刘先贵,等.低渗透油藏储层分级评价方法及应用.石油学报,2012,33(3):437-441. ZHANG Z H,YANG Z M,LIU X G,et al. A grading evaluation method for low-permeability reservoirs and its application. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):437-441.
[11] 张美玲,祁蒙,林丽丽. 大庆外围油田特低渗透油藏水淹层综合评价方法.岩性油气藏,2016,28(2):93-100. ZHANG M L,QI M,LIN L L. Integrated evaluation method of water flooded layer in ultra-low permeability reservoir in peri-pheral Daqing Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(2):93-100.
[12] 王秀娟,杨学保,迟博,等.大庆外围油田精细油藏描述技术研究.石油学报,2006,27(增刊1):106-110. WANG X J,YANG X B,CHI B,et al. Refined description technique of oil reservoirs in Daqing peripheral oilfields. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(Suppl 1):106-110.
[13] 王东琪,殷代印.水驱油藏相对渗透率曲线经验公式研究.岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):159-164. WANG D Q,YIN D Y. Empirical formulas of relative permeability curve of water drive reservoirs. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017,29(3):159-164.
[14] 杨红,王宏,南宇峰,等.油藏CO2驱油提高采收率适宜性评价.岩性油气藏,2017,29(3):140-146. YANG H,WANG H,NAN Y F,et al. Suitability evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017,29(3):140-146.
[15] 汪艳勇. 榆树林油田特低渗透储层分类评价及开发规律研究.大庆:东北石油大学,2016. WANG Y Y. Research on the classification evaluation and the development law of extra low permeability reservoir in Yushulin Oilfield. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2016.
[16] 周游,李治平,景成,等. 基于"岩石物理相-流动单元"测井响应定量评价特低渗透油藏优质储层——以延长油田东部油区长6油层组为例. 岩性油气藏,2017,29(1):116-123. ZHOU Y,LI Z P,JING C,et al. Quantitative evaluation of favorable reservoir in ultra-low permeable reservoir based on"petrophysical facies-flow unit"log response:a case study of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Yanchang Oilfield. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017,29(1):116-123.
[17] JONATHAN S O,DAVID S O,RODOLFO S B. A new reservoir classification based on pore types improves characterizationPART B. SPE 177237-MS,2015.
[18] SOTO B R,PEREZ O,ARTEAGA D. A new reservoir classification based on pore types improves characterization. SPE 152872-MS,2012.
[19] GILMAN J R,WANG H,FADAEI S,et al. A new classification plot for naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE 146580-MS,2011.
[20] 郑剑锋,沈安江,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地下古生界白云岩储集空间特征及储层分类探讨.天然气地球科学,2015,26(7):1256-1267. ZHENG J F,SHEN A J,CHEN Y Q,et al. Reservoir space and reservoir classification of Lower Paleozoic dolomite in the Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(7):1256-1267.
[1] 李恒萱, 温志新, 宋成鹏, 刘祚冬, 季天愚, 沈一平, 耿珂. 塞内加尔盆地演化过程与岩性油气藏勘探前景[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(6): 45-53.
[2] 满晓, 胡德胜, 吴洁, 宫立园, 柳智萱, 姜应德, 赵晔. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷始新统流一段湖底扇发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 137-144.
[3] 金秋月. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷东南斜坡原油成因类型及成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(1): 11-18.
[4] 张辉, 吴子瑾, 周伟, 于兴河, 孙乐, 胡勇, 谭程鹏. 北部湾盆地WZA区流一上亚段源-汇分析及沉积相展布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(5): 55-66.
[5] 王建民, 王佳媛. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长7深水浊积特征与储层发育[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4): 11-19.
[6] 朱茂, 朱筱敏, 曾洪流, 董艳蕾, 刘畅, 郑荣华. 冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷浅水曲流河三角洲沉积体系——以赵皇庄—肃宁地区沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(2): 59-67.
[7] 唐 武,王英民,仲米虹 . 隆后坳陷区三角洲沉积特征及演化模式—— — 以桑塔木地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(3): 34-41.
[8] 罗 薇,何幼斌,马 波. 惠民凹陷临 7 断块区沙三段沉积相分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6): 57-63.
[9] 胡斌,张靓,季汉成,郭新安,陈栋. 北部湾盆地迈陈凹陷东部物源方向及沉积体系时空演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4): 22-27.
[10] 王宁,何幼斌,王思文,张竹林. 惠民凹陷商河油田商三区沙三上亚段浊积扇沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3): 38-44.
[11] 夏景生,王志坤,陈刚,朱鑫,张一航,冀晓静. 东营凹陷东部深层浊积扇油藏成藏条件与模式研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(1): 55-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段天向, 刘晓梅, 张亚军, 肖述琴. Petrel 建模中的几点认识[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 102 -107 .
[2] 张立秋. 南二区东部二类油层上返层系组合优化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 116 -120 .
[3] 张娣,侯中健,王亚辉,王莹,王春联. 板桥—北大港地区沙河街组沙一段湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(4): 92 -97 .
[4] 樊怀才,李晓平,窦天财,吴欣袁. 应力敏感效应的气井流量动态特征研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(4): 130 -134 .
[5] 田淑芳,张鸿文. 应用生命周期旋回理论预测辽河油田石油探明储量增长趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(1): 98 -100 .
[6] 杨凯,郭肖. 裂缝性低渗透油藏三维两相黑油数值模拟研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(3): 118 -121 .
[7] 翟中喜,秦伟军,郭金瑞. 油气充满度与储层通道渗流能力的定量关系———以泌阳凹陷双河油田岩性油藏为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 92 -95 .
[8] 戚明辉,陆正元,袁帅,李新华. 塔河油田12 区块油藏水体来源及出水特征分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 115 -119 .
[9] 李相博,陈启林,刘化清,完颜容,慕敬魁,廖建波,魏立花. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组3种沉积物重力流及其含油气性[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 16 -21 .
[10] 刘云, 卢渊,伊向艺,张俊良,张锦良,王振喜. 天然气水合物预测模型及其影响因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3): 124 -127 .