岩性油气藏 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 56–65.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20190207

• 油气地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化

呼延钰莹1,2, 姜福杰2, 庞雄奇2, 刘铁树3, 陈晓智3, 李龙龙2,4, 邵新荷2, 郑定业2   

  1. 1. 中国地质科学院 地球物理地球化学勘查研究所, 河北 廊坊 065000;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司, 北京 100028;
    4. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院 无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏 无锡 214126
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-09 修回日期:2018-12-04 出版日期:2019-03-21 发布日期:2019-03-21
  • 第一作者:呼延钰莹(1993-),女,硕士,主要从事储层沉积学与油气成藏方面的研究工作。地址:(065000)河北省廊坊市金光道84号物化探所。Email:huyanyuying@igge.com
  • 通信作者: 姜福杰(1979-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事油气成藏机理与资源评价方面的教学和科研工作。Email:jiangfijwl@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点基金“广泛连续型致密砂岩气藏成因机制与预测方法”(编号:U1262205)和中海石油(中国)有限公司综合科研项目“康宁—神府区块致密砂岩气成藏机理研究”(编号:YXKY-2016-ZY-04)联合资助

Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area,eastern margin of Ordos Basin

HUYAN Yuying1,2, JIANG Fujie2, PANG Xiongqi2, LIU Tieshu3, CHEN Xiaozhi3, LI Longlong2,4, SHAO Xinhe2, ZHENG Dingye2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China;
    3. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China;
    4. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2018-10-09 Revised:2018-12-04 Online:2019-03-21 Published:2019-03-21

摘要: 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区具有广阔的天然气勘探前景,是我国致密气勘探开发的重点区域之一。为研究其储层成岩作用及致密化机理,开展了铸体薄片鉴定、扫描电镜分析、X射线衍射测试、粒度分析等研究,对二叠系致密储层的岩石成分、孔隙类型和成岩演化等进行了深入探讨。结果表明:①岩石类型以细-中粒长石岩屑砂岩和岩屑砂岩为主,石英体积分数平均49%,岩屑体积分数平均36%,长石体积分数平均15%;②储层物性以低孔-特低渗型为主,平均孔隙度为7%,平均渗透率为0.46 mD,为典型致密储层;孔径小,喉道细,分选差,以次生溶蚀孔隙为主;③二叠系砂岩经历了压实作用、胶结作用、溶蚀-交代作用,成岩阶段为中成岩A-B期。④压实作用是导致储层致密的主要因素,使得初始孔隙度减少了16.39%,碳酸盐胶结作用和黏土矿物的充填作用次之,使孔隙度减少了约12.30%,后期溶蚀作用使孔隙度增加了6.01%,这一结论与现今实测平均孔隙度平均值7.46%较为吻合。上述研究成果对研究区致密气藏勘探中寻找次生溶蚀"甜点"具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 成岩作用, 孔隙度演化, 致密砂岩, 二叠系, 康宁地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Giant natural gas potential exists in Kangning area in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin which is one of the tight sands gas targets in China. To investigate the diagenesis characteristics and genesis of densification, based on the data of thin sections,scanning electron microscope (SEM),X-ray diffraction,particle size analysis, the rock composition,pore type and diagenesis-porosity evolution process of Permian reservoirs were analyzed. The results show that reservoirs are dominated by fine-medium feldspathic lithic sandstone and lithic sandstone. The average content of quartz is 49%. Rock fragment and feldspar content is in average values of 36% and 15% respectively. The reservoirs are typical low porosity and extra-low permeability tight sandstone,with an average porosity of 7% and an average permeability of 0.46 mD. The pore diameter is small with fine throat and poor sorting. Additionally,secondary dissolved pore dominates the main pore system. The Permian sandstone reservoirs have experienced compaction,cementation and dissolution-replacement,which are divided into middle A-B diagenetic stage. Compaction is the key to cause the formation of tight reservoirs,resulting in a porosity loss of 16.39%. Second leading factor is carbonate cementation and clay mineral filling,which reduces porosity by 12.30%,whereas later dissolution increases porosity by 6.01%. The calculated porosity is almost equivalent to the measured average porosity of 7.46%. The above research results have a certain reference value for searching for secondary dissolution sweet spot in exploration of tight gas reservoirs in the study area.

Key words: diagenesis, porosity evolution, tight sandstone, Permian, Kangning area, Ordos Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] HOLDITCH S A. Tight gas sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2006, 58(6):86.
[2] 魏新善, 胡爱平, 赵会涛, 等.致密砂岩气地质认识新进展. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):12. WEI X S, HU A P, ZHAO H T, et al. New geological understanding of tight sandstone gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):12.
[3] 傅宁, 杨树春, 贺清, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴-神府区块致密砂岩气高效成藏条件.石油学报, 2016, 37(增刊1):111. FU N, YANG S C, HE Q, et al. High-efficiency reservoir for-mation conditions of tight sandstone gas in Linxing-Shenfu blocks on the east margin of Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(Suppl 1):111.
[4] 赵达, 许浩, 汤达祯, 等. 临兴地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及有利成岩相研究.科技通报, 2016, 32(7):31. ZHAO D, XU H, TANG D Z, et al. Diagenesis and favorable diageneticfacies analysis on the tight sand stone reservoirs of the Lower Shihezi Formation in Linxing area. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2016, 32(7):31.
[5] ATHY L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 1930, 14(1):13.
[6] MAXWELL J C. Influence of depth,temperature and geologic age on porosity of quartz sandstone. AAPG Bulletin, 1964, 48(5):707.
[7] SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones:a model for sandstone porosity prediction. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5):486.
[8] 王瑞飞, 陈明强. 储层沉积-成岩过程中孔隙度参数演化的定量分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地沿25区块、庄40区块为例. 地质学报, 2007, 81(10):1435. WANG R F, CHEN M Q. Quantitative analysis of porosity evolution during the reservoir sedimentation-diagenesis:Taking the Yan 25 and Zhuang 40 areas in the Ordos Basin as examples. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(10):1435.
[9] 郝杰, 周立发, 袁义东, 等. 断陷湖盆致密砂砾岩储层成岩作用及其对孔隙演化的影响. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(5):635. HAO J, ZHOU L F, YUAN Y D, et al. Diagenetic characteristics and their control on porosity of sandy conglomerate reservoirs in faulted basins. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(5):635.
[10] 汪洋, 李树同, 牟炜卫, 等. 姬塬西部地区长81致密储层特征及孔隙度演化分析. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(4):62-63. WANG Y, LI S T, MOU W W, et al. Tight reservoir characteristics and porosity evolution of Chang 81 in western Jiyuan area. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(4):62-63.
[11] ZOU C N, ZHU R K, LIU K Y, et al. Tight gas sandstone reservoirs in China:Characteristics and recognition criteria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 83:82-89.
[12] 冯旭, 刘洛夫, 李朝玮, 等. 碎屑岩孔隙演化定量计算方法的改进和应用. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(6):1199. FENG X, LIU L F, LI C W, et al. Improvement and application of quantitative calculation of porosity evolution of clastic rock. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(6):1199.
[13] 武文慧. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界储层砂岩特征及成岩作用研究. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011. WU W H. Research on the characteristics and diagenesis of sandstone in the Upper Paleozoic reservoir in Ordos Basin. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[14] DOWEY P J, HODGSON D M, WORDEN R H. Pre-requisites, processes, and prediction of chlorite grain coatings in petroleum reservoirs:a review of subsurface example. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 32(1):73.
[15] 吴陈冰洁, 朱筱敏, 魏巍, 等.查干凹陷下白垩统巴二段储层特征及孔隙演化. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(1):75. WU-CHEN B J, ZHU X M, WEI W, et al. Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of the second member of the Lower Cretaceous Bayingebi Formation in Chagan Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1):75.
[16] 范萌萌, 李文厚, 袁珍. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长6成岩作用及其对孔隙的影响. 地质通报, 2016, 35(2/3):449. FAN M M, LI W H, YUAN Z. Diagenesis and its influence on porosity of Chang 6 reservoir in southeast Ordos Basin. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(2/3):449.
[17] 刘再振, 刘玉明, 李洋冰, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地神府地区太原组致密砂岩储层特征及成岩演化.岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(6):55. LIU Z Z, LIU Y M, LI Y B, et al. Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and diagenesis evolution of Taiyuan Formation in Shenmu-Fugu area, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(6):55.
[18] 任战利, 于强, 崔军平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史及其对油气的控制作用.地学前缘, 2017, 24(3):138-139. REN Z L, YU Q, CUI J P, et al. Thermal history and its controls on oil and gas of the Orods Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(3):138-139.
[19] 赵孟为. 磷灰石裂变径迹分析在恢复盆地沉降抬升史中的应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地为例. 地球物理学报, 1996, 39(增刊1):241-242. ZHAO M W. The application of apatite fission track analysis to the reconstruction of the subsidence and uplift history of sedimentary basins:a case study from the Ordos Basin. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1996, 39(Suppl 1):241-242.
[20] 于强. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部地区古生界热演化史与天然气成藏. 西安:西北大学, 2012. YU Q. The Paleozoic thermal evolution history and natural gas accumulation of the central and eastern parts of Ordos Basin. Xi'an:Northwestern University, 2012.
[21] BEARD D C,WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2):352.
[22] SCLATER J G, CHRISTIE P A F. Continental stretching:an exploration of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1980, 85(B7):3732.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[3] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[4] 张晓丽, 王小娟, 张航, 陈沁, 关旭, 赵正望, 王昌勇, 谈曜杰. 川东北五宝场地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 87-98.
[5] 陈康, 戴隽成, 魏玮, 刘伟方, 闫媛媛, 郗诚, 吕龑, 杨广广. 致密砂岩AVO属性的贝叶斯岩相划分方法——以川中地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 111-121.
[6] 王子昕, 柳广弟, 袁光杰, 杨恒林, 付利, 王元, 陈刚, 张恒. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区三叠系长7段烃源岩特征及控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 133-144.
[7] 尹虎, 屈红军, 孙晓晗, 杨博, 张磊岗, 朱荣幸. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系长7油层组深水沉积特征及演化规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 145-155.
[8] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[9] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[10] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[11] 牟蜚声, 尹相东, 胡琮, 张海峰, 陈世加, 代林锋, 陆奕帆. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区三叠系长7段致密油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 71-84.
[12] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[13] 曹江骏, 王茜, 王刘伟, 李诚, 石坚, 陈朝兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区三叠系长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 158-171.
[14] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[15] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .