岩性油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 1–13.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20200201

• 油气地质 •    下一篇

黄河口凹陷北缘古近系物源及其对优质储层的控制

庞小军, 王清斌, 解婷, 赵梦, 冯冲   

  1. 中海石油 (中国) 有限公司天津分公司 渤海石油研究院, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-22 修回日期:2019-11-18 出版日期:2020-03-21 发布日期:2020-01-19
  • 第一作者:庞小军(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质综合研究工作。地址:(300459)天津市中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海石油研究院。Email:pangxj@cnooc.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项“渤海海域勘探新领域及关键技术研究”(编号:2016ZX05024-003)资助

Paleogene provenance and its control on high-quality reservoir in the northern margin of Huanghekou Sag

PANG Xiaojun, WANG Qingbin, XIE Ting, ZHAO Meng, FENG Chong   

  1. Bohai Petroleum Research Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Limited, Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2019-07-22 Revised:2019-11-18 Online:2020-03-21 Published:2020-01-19

摘要: 黄河口凹陷北部陡坡带古近系物源复杂,储层物性差异较大。利用岩心、薄片、录井、三维地震及物性等资料,对黄河口凹陷北缘古近系的物源面貌进行了恢复,并探讨了古物源对优质储层的控制作用。结果表明:①研究区古近系沟谷体系发育,沙河街组至东三段沉积期,母岩岩性和面积均发生了明显的变化,且物源区的范围经历了“大—小—大”的演化过程。②古物源演化对砂体具有明显的控制作用。纵向上,沙三段沉积期物源区范围大,有大量中生界碎屑岩参与供源,沉积区形成薄层砂砾岩;沙二段沉积期物源区范围大,物源以火山岩剥蚀为主,沉积区形成厚层砂砾岩;沙一段沉积期发生快速湖侵,物源区范围减小,在沉积区形成薄层砂砾岩;东三段沉积期发生湖退,物源区范围扩大,有大量沙一段泥岩参与供源,在沉积区形成薄层砂砾岩。平面上,同一沉积期,物源区西部和东部东段沟谷体系范围大,以火山岩、花岗岩剥蚀为主,在沉积区形成的砂砾岩厚度、规模均大;东部西段以碳酸盐岩剥蚀为主,在沉积区形成的砂砾岩厚度、规模均小。③母岩对储层物性具有明显的控制作用,沙三段至东三段,东部东段以火山岩剥蚀为主,且埋深较浅,储层中含有大量火山岩岩屑,后期易溶解,胶结作用弱,储层物性好;东部西段以碳酸盐岩剥蚀为主,埋深浅,但胶结作用强,物性差;西部埋深较深,压实作用和胶结作用均强,储层物性差。因此,在相近深度段内,碳酸盐岩母岩供源时,沉积区储层中含有大量的碳酸盐岩砾石和岩屑,填隙物以灰质胶结物为主,胶结作用强烈,储层物性差;火山岩和变质花岗岩供源时,沉积区储层中以火山岩或花岗岩砾石和岩屑为主,灰质胶结物含量较少,胶结作用相对较弱,储层物性整体较好。该项成果可为研究区下一步的勘探评价提供参考。

关键词: 古物源, 沉积相, 成岩作用, 储层特征, 古近系, 黄河口凹陷, 渤海海域

Abstract: The provenance of Paleogene is complex in the northern steep slope zone of Huanghekou Sag,and the reservoir physical properties are quite different. The data of cores,thin section,logging,3-D seismic and physical properties were used to reveal the provenance of Paleogene,and the controlling effect of the paleo-prov-enance on high-quality reservoir was discussed. The results show that:(1)Paleo-gullies were commonly developed in the study area. During the sedimentary period from the Es to Ed,the lithology and area of the parent rock changed significantly,and the area of the provenance experienced the evolution process of "large-smalllarge".(2)The denudation stage of the paleo-provenance had obvious control effect on the sand body. In the longitudinal direction,in Es3,the range of the provenance was large. In the provenance,a large number of Mesozoic clastic rocks participated in the source,and the sedimentary area formed a thin layer of glutenite with a small thickness. In Es 2,the provenance was large. The source was mainly volcanic rock erosion. The sedimentary area formed thick glutenite with a large thickness. In Es1,a rapid lake invasion occurred. The range of the provenance was reduced. The thin layer of glutenite formed in the sedimentary zone had a small thickness. In Ed3,a lake retreat occurred. The area of the provenance expanded. There were a large number of mudstones formed in Es1 to participate in the supply. The sedimentary area formed a thin layer of glutenite with a small thickness. On the plane, during the same deposition period,the valley system in the western and eastern section of the eastern part of the provenance was large. The provenance was dominated by volcanic rocks and granite erosion. The glutenite which formed in the sedimentary area was large in thickness and scale. The western section of the eastern part was dominated by carbonate rock erosion,and the glutenite formed in the sedimentary area was small in thickness and scale.(3)The parent rock had obvious control effected on reservoir physical properties. From Es3 to Ed3,the eastern section of the eastern part was dominated by volcanic rock erosion,and the buried depth was shallow. The reservoir contained a large number of volcanic rock cuttings,which were easy to dissolve in the later stage,and were weak in cementation and good in reservoir properties. The western section of the eastern part was mainly characterized by carbonate rock erosion and shallow depth,but the cementation was strong and the physical properties were poor. The burial was deep in the west,the compaction and cementation were strong,and the reservoir properties were poor. Therefore,in the similar depth section,when the carbonate parent rock was supplied,the reservoir in the sedimentary area contained a large amount of carbonate gravel and cuttings,and the interstitial material was mainly calcareous cement,with strong cementation and poor physical properties. When volcanic rocks and metamorphic granites were supplied,the reservoir in the sedimentary area was mainly volcanic rocks or granite gravel and cuttings. The content of calcareous cement was less,the cementation was relatively weak,and the reservoir properties were better overall. This result can provide reference for further exploration and evaluation in the study area.

Key words: paleo-provenance, sedimentary facies, diagenesis, reservoir characteristics, Paleogene, Huanghekou Sag, Bohai Sea

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 徐长贵.陆相断陷盆地源-汇时空耦合控砂原理:基本思想、概念体系及控砂模式.中国海上油气, 2013, 25(4):1-11. XU C G. Controlling sand principle of source-sink coupling in time and space in continental rift basins:Basic idea,conceptual systems and controlling sand models. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2013, 25(4):1-11.
[2] 徐长贵, 杜晓峰, 徐伟, 等. 沉积盆地"源-汇" 体系统研究新进展. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1):1-11. XU C G, DU X F, XU W, et al. New advances of the "sourceto-sink" system research in sedimentary basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1):1-11.
[3] 林畅松, 夏庆龙, 施和生, 等.地貌演化、源-汇过程与盆地分析.地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):9-20. LIN C S, XIA Q L, SHI H S, et al. Geomorphological evolution, source to sink system and basin analysis. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):9-20.
[4] 刘强虎, 朱筱敏, 李顺利, 等.沙垒田凸起前古近系基岩分布及源-汇过程.地球科学, 2016, 41(11):1935-1949. LIU Q H, ZHU X M, LI S L, et al. Pre-palaeogene bedrock distribution and source-to-sink system analysis in the Shaleitian uplift. Earth Science, 2016, 41(11):1935-1949.
[5] 操应长, 徐琦松, 王健.沉积盆地"源-汇" 系统研究进展.地学前缘, 2018, 25(4):116-131. CAO Y C, XU Q S, WANG J. Progress in "source to sink" system research. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(4):116-131.
[6] 罗静兰, 魏新善, 姚泾利, 等.物源与沉积相对鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界天然气优质储层的控制. 地质通报, 2010, 29(6):811-820. LUO J L, WEI X S, YAO J L, et al. Provenance and depositional facies controlling on the Upper Paleozoic excellent natural gasreservoir in northern Ordos Basin, China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010, 29(6):811-820.
[7] 林潼, 王东良, 王岚, 等.准噶尔盆地南缘侏罗系齐古组物源特征及其对储层发育的影响. 中国地质, 2013, 40(3):909-918. LIN T, WANG D L, WANG L, et al. The provenance feature of Jurassic Qigu formation and its effect on reservoir development in the southern margin of Junggar Basin. Geology in China, 2013, 40(3):909-918.
[8] 刘杰, 操应长, 樊太亮, 等.东营凹陷民丰地区沙三段中下亚段物源体系及其控储作用. 中国地质, 2014, 41(4):1399-1410. LIU J, CAO Y C, FAN T L, et al. An analysis of the source system and its effect on the reservoir of the middle-lower submember of 3 rd member of Shahejie Formation in Minfeng area, Dongying Depression. Chinese Geology, 2014, 41(4):1399-1410.
[9] 马东旭, 许勇, 吕剑文, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区下石盒子组物源特征及其与储层关系.天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7):1215-1224. MA D X, XU Y, LYU J W, et al. Relationship between provenance and formation of lower Shihezi formation in Linxing area, Ordos Basin, China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(7):1215-1224.
[10] 庞小军, 王清斌, 杜晓峰, 等.渤中凹陷西北缘古近系物源演化及其对储层的影响. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(5):34-41. PANG X J, WANG Q B, DU X F, et al. Matter provenance evolution and its influences on Palaeogene reservoirs in the northwestern margin of Bozhong Sag. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(5):34-41.
[11] 杜晓峰, 庞小军, 王清斌, 等.石臼坨凸起东段围区沙一二段古物源恢复及其对储层的控制. 地球科学, 2017, 42(11):1897-1909. DU X F, PANG X J, WANG Q B, et al. Restoration of the paleoprovenance of the Es12 in the eastern of Shijiutuo uplift and its control on Reservoir. Earth Science, 2017, 42(11):1897-1909.
[12] 代黎明, 徐长贵, 王清斌, 等.石臼坨凸起西部陡坡带古物源差异演化模式及其对储层的控制作用.中国海上油气, 2017, 29(4):51-59.DAI L M, XU C G, WANG Q B, et al. Difference of provenance evolution mode and its impact on reservoir in the western steep slope zone of Shijiutuo uplift, Bohai Sea. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(4):51-59.
[13] 强昆生, 吕修祥, 周心怀, 等. 渤海海域黄河口凹陷油气成藏条件及其分布特征. 现代地质, 2012, 26(4):792-800. QIANG K S, LYU X X, ZHOU X H, et al. Accumulative conditions and distribution characteristics of hydrocarbon in Huanghekou depression, Offshore Bohai Bay Basin. Geoscience, 2012, 26(4):792-800.
[14] 张新涛, 周心怀, 牛成民, 等.黄河口凹陷古近纪构造坡折带对沉积体系的控制.地质论评, 2014, 60(2):332-338. ZHANG X T, ZHOU X H, NIU C M, et al. Constraints by tectonic slope break zones on the depositional systems in Eogene in the sag of the Yellow River Estuary. Geological Review, 2014, 60(2):332-338.
[15] 刘豪, 田立新, 周心怀, 等.断陷湖盆坡折体系与剥蚀沉积响应:以黄河口凹陷古近系为例.中国海上油气, 2017, 29(4):28-38. LIU H, TIAN L X, ZHOU X H, et al. Slope break systems of rift lacustrine basin and erosion-depositional response:a case study of the Paleogene in Huanghekou Sag, Bohai Sea. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(4):28-38.
[16] 霍沈君, 杨香华, 王清斌, 等.黄河口凹陷H-1构造沙河街组混积岩储层控制因素.现代地质, 2015, 29(6):1348-1359. HUO S J, YANG X H, WANG Q B, et al. Controlling factors on diamictite reservoir in Shahejie Formation, H-1 structure, Huanghekou Depression. Geoscience, 2015, 29(6):1348-1359.
[17] 杜晓峰, 王清斌, 庞小军, 等.渤中凹陷石南陡坡带东三段源汇体系定量表征. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(5):1-10. DU X F, WANG Q B, PANG X J, et al. Quantitative characterization of source-sink system of Ed3 in Shinan steep slope zone, Bozhong Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(5):1-10.
[18] 呼延钰莹, 姜福杰, 庞雄奇, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘康宁地区二叠系致密储层成岩作用与孔隙度演化.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):56-65. HUYAN Y Y, JIANG F J, PANG X Q, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Permian tight reservoirs in Kangning area, eastern margin of Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):56-65.
[19] 王华超, 韩登林, 欧阳传湘, 等.库车坳陷北部阿合组致密砂岩储层特征及主控因素.岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(2):115-123. WANG H C, HAN D L, OUYANG C X, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone reservoir of Ahe Formation in northern Kuqa Depression. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(2):115-123.
[20] 庞小军, 王清斌, 万琳, 等.沙南凹陷东北缘东三段储层差异及其成因.中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(3):615-630. PANG X J, WANG Q B, WAN L, et al. Quality differences and its influence on glutenite reservoirs in the Ed3 of the northeast margin, Shanan Sag, Bohai Sea. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(3):615-630.
[21] 王冠民, 张婕, 王清斌, 等.渤海湾盆地秦南凹陷东南缘中深层砂砾岩优质储层发育的控制因素. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(2):330-339. WANG G M, ZHANG J, WANG Q B, et al. Factors controlling medium-to-deep coarse siliciclastic reservoirs of high quality at the southeastern margin of Qinnan Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(2):330-339.
[1] 关蕴文, 苏思羽, 蒲仁海, 王启超, 闫肃杰, 张仲培, 陈硕, 梁东歌. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬宜地区古生界天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 77-88.
[2] 周自强, 朱正平, 潘仁芳, 董於, 金吉能. 基于波形相控反演的致密砂岩储层模拟预测方法——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷南部古近系孔二段为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 77-86.
[3] 张磊, 李莎, 罗波波, 吕伯强, 谢敏, 陈新平, 陈冬霞, 邓彩云. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段超压岩性油气藏成藏机理[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 57-70.
[4] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[5] 方旭庆, 钟骑, 张建国, 李军亮, 孟涛, 姜在兴, 赵海波. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系沙三下亚段旋回地层学分析及地层划分[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 19-30.
[6] 冯斌, 黄晓波, 何幼斌, 李华, 罗进雄, 李涛, 周晓光. 渤海湾盆地庙西北地区古近系沙河街组三段源-汇系统重建[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 84-95.
[7] 朱康乐, 高岗, 杨光达, 张东伟, 张莉莉, 朱毅秀, 李婧. 辽河坳陷清水洼陷古近系沙河街组深层烃源岩特征及油气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 146-157.
[8] 西智博, 廖建平, 高荣锦, 周晓龙, 雷文文. 辽河坳陷陈家断裂带北部构造演化解析及油气成藏[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 127-136.
[9] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 路研, 王永平, 刘超. 基于SSOM的流动单元划分方法及生产应用——以渤海湾盆地F油田古近系沙三中亚段湖底浊积水道为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 160-169.
[10] 牛成民, 惠冠洲, 杜晓峰, 官大勇, 王冰洁, 王启明, 张宏国. 辽中凹陷西斜坡古近系东三段湖底扇发育模式及大油田发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 33-42.
[11] 王天海, 许多年, 吴涛, 关新, 谢再波, 陶辉飞. 准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷三叠系百口泉组沉积相展布特征及沉积模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 98-110.
[12] 李盛谦, 曾溅辉, 刘亚洲, 李淼, 焦盼盼. 东海盆地西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区古近系平湖组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 49-61.
[13] 胡望水, 高飞跃, 李明, 郭志杰, 王世超, 李相明, 李圣明, 揭琼. 渤海湾盆地廊固凹陷古近系沙河街组油藏单元精细表征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 92-99.
[14] 魏嘉怡, 王红伟, 刘刚, 李涵, 曹茜. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘冲断带石炭系羊虎沟组沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(5): 120-130.
[15] 付文俊, 张昌民, 冀东升, 娄林, 刘家乐, 王绪龙. 准噶尔盆地南安集海河剖面中侏罗统头屯河组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 145-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .