岩性油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 63–72.doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220505

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组限制性湖盆扇三角洲沉积特征

杨帆1, 卞保力2, 刘慧颖3, 姚宗全3, 尤新才2, 刘海磊2, 卫延召1   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油新疆油田公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    3. 新疆大学 地质与矿业工程学院, 乌鲁木齐 830047
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-06 修回日期:2022-03-23 出版日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2022-09-06
  • 第一作者:杨帆(1984-),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩性地层油气藏勘探方面的研究工作。地址:(100083)北京市海淀区学院路20号910信箱。Email:yf2010@petrochina.com.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“准噶尔盆地岩性地层油气藏分布规律与目标评价”(编号:2017ZX05001-004)与新疆维吾尔自治区天山青年项目“不同沉积体系的探地雷达相刻画”(编号:2020Q064)联合资助

Sedimentary characteristics of fan delta in restricted lacustrine basin of Permian Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag

YANG Fan1, BIAN Baoli2, LIU Huiying3, YAO Zongquan3, YOU Xincai2, LIU Hailei2, WEI Yanzhao1   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China;
    3. School of Geological and Mining Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
  • Received:2021-12-06 Revised:2022-03-23 Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-09-06

摘要: 根据岩心观察、测井和地震资料解释成果等,利用古地貌、岩相特征、单井相及连井沉积相对比,对玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组的沉积背景和沉积体系进行了系统分析和研究。研究结果表明:①受可容空间控制,玛湖凹陷二叠系夏子街组岩性多为砂砾岩,发育扇三角洲沉积,构造运动形成的古地貌使得玛湖凹陷夏子街组的沉积空间受到限制,最终表现为“北断、西剥、东南超”的构造格局;②玛湖凹陷夏子街组发育四大物源沉积体系:北部地区为长轴远物源,砂地比低,储层较薄;西部、南部、东部等地区主要为短轴近物源,快速沉积,垂向厚度大,相带平面展布较窄,但在南部地区存在1套近南北向的长轴远物源;③玛湖凹陷夏子街组主要为粗砾岩和中砾岩,分选性较差,磨圆度中等,杂基含量较高,主要分布于坡折带附近,并发育于辫状河道和水下分流河道内;④夏子街组沉积时期,玛湖凹陷靠山一侧可容空间大,发育巨厚的扇三角洲砂砾体且延伸较局限,玛南地区的狭长沟谷地貌为沉积物搬运至玛湖凹陷中部提供了通道,这种长轴远物源沉积体系可形成规模较大的有效储层,砂地比可超过50%,沉积物分选性、磨圆度均相对较好,是有利储层发育带。

关键词: 砂砾岩储层, 古地貌特征, 物源, 可容空间, 限制性湖盆扇三角洲, 夏子街组, 二叠系, 玛湖凹陷

Abstract: Based on core observation,well logging and seismic interpretation,the sedimentary settings and sedimentary system of Permian Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag were systematically analyzed by using paleogeomorphology,lithofacies characteristics,single well facies and well-tie sedimentary facies contrast. The results show that:(1)Controlled by the accommodation space,the lithologies of Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag are mostly sandy conglomerate,and fan delta deposits are developed. The paleogeomorphology formed by tectonic movement controls the sedimentary space. The tectonic pattern shows "fault in the north,denudation in the west,and overlap in the southeast".(2)There are four major provenance systems in Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag. The northern region is a long axis far-source area with low sand-stratum ratio and thin reservoirs. The western,southern and eastern regions are mainly short-axis near-source areas with rapid deposition,large vertical thickness and narrow plane distribution of facies zone. However,a long-axis far-source is developed in the southern region.(3)The Xiazijie Formation in Mahu Sag is mainly composed of coarse and medium conglomerates with poor sorting,medium roundness and high content of matrix. The reservoirs are mainly distributed near the slope break zone and developed in braided channels and underwater distributary channels.(4)During the sedimentary period of Xiazijie Formation,the accommodation space is large at the mountain side of Mahu Sag where huge thick fan delta sand gravel body developed and extended limitedly. The narrow and long valley landform in Manan area provides a channel for sediment transportation to the middle of Mahu Sag. This long axis far-source sedimentary system can form large-scale effective reservoirs,the sand-stratum ratio is greater than 50%,and the sediment sorting and roundness are relatively good,which is a favorable reservoir development zone.

Key words: sandy conglomerate reservoir, paleogeomorphic features, provenance, accommodation space, fan delta in restricted lacustrine basin, Xiazijie Formation, Permian, Mahu Sag

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+1
[1] NEMEC W,STEEL R J,GJELBERG J,et al. Exhumed rota- tional slides and scar infill features in a Cretaceous delta front, eastern Spitsbergen[J]. Polar Research,1988,6(1):105-112.
[2] FLINT S,CLEMMEY H,TURNER P. The Lower Cretaceous Way Group of northern Chile:An alluvial fan-fan delta complex[J]. Sedimentary Geology,1986,46(1/2):1-22.
[3] 金杰华. 准西地区侏罗系层序地层与砂体分布[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2015. JIN Jiehua. Sequence stratigraphy and sand distribution of Juras- sic in Zhunxi area[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petro- leum(East China),2015.
[4] KOMATSU Y,SUZUKI K,FUJII T. Sequence stratigraphy and controls on gas hydrate occurrence in the eastern Nankai Trough, Japan[J]. Interpretation,2016,4(1):SA73-SA81.
[5] 雷鸣,杨香华,朱红涛,等.渤中凹陷南部东二下段沉积体地震反射特征及沉积模式[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(3):278-285. LEI Ming,YANG Xianghua,ZHU Hongtao,et al. Seismic reflection characteristics and sedimentary model of sedimentary bodies of lower Ed2 of Dongying Formation,southern of central Bohai Sag[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information,2017, 36(3):278-285.
[6] FURLAN S,CHAUDHURI S,CLAUER N,et al. Geochemistry of formation waters and hydrodynamic evolution of a young and restricted sedimentary basin(Mahakam Delta Basin,Indo- nesia)[J]. Basin Research,1995,7(1):9-20.
[7] 李兵,党玉芳,贾春明,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系碎屑岩沉积相特征[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):432-439. LI Bing,DANG Yufang,JIA Chunming,et al. Sedimentary fa- cies of Permian clastic rocks in Zhongguai-Wuba area in north- western margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011,22(3):432-439.
[8] 雷德文,阿布力米提·依明,唐勇,等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组油气高产区控制因素与分布预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014,35(5):495-499. LEI Dewen,ABLIMITI Yiming,TANG Yong,et al. Control- ling factors and occurrence prediction of high oil-gas produc- tion zones in Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation of Mahu Sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(5):495-499.
[9] 雷德文,陈刚强,刘海磊,等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷大油(气)区形成条件与勘探方向研究[J]. 地质学报,2017,91(7):1604-1619. LEI Dewen,CHEN Gangqiang,LIU Hailei,et al. Study on the forming conditions and exploration fields of the Mahu giant oil (gas)province,Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2017, 91(7):1604-1619.
[10] 支东明,唐勇,郑孟林,等. 玛湖凹陷源上砾岩大油区形成分布与勘探实践[J].新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):1-8. ZHI Dongming,TANG Yong,ZHENG Menglin,et al. Discovery,distribution and exploration practice of large oil provinces of above-source conglomerate in Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petro- leum Geology,2018,39(1):1-8.
[11] 唐勇,郭文建,王霞田,等.玛湖凹陷砾岩大油区勘探新突破及启示[J].新疆石油地质,2019,40(2):127-137. TANG Yong,GUO Wenjian,WANG Xiatian,et al. A new break- through in exploration of large conglomerate oil province in Mahu Sag and its implications[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019,40(2):127-137.
[12] 杨帆,卫延召,阿布力米提·依明,等.准噶尔盆地环玛湖凹陷中-上二叠统有利储盖组合优选[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(2):131-137. YANG Fan,WEI Yanzhao,ABLIMITI Yiming,et al. Optimiza- tion of favorable reservoir-caprock assemblages of Middle-Upper Permian in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(2):131-137.
[13] 陈波,刘云利,刘海上,等.准噶尔盆地乌尔禾地区二叠系夏子街组储层特征及评价[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):53-60. CHEN Bo,LIU Yunli,LIU Haishang,et al. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of the Permian Xiazijie Formation in Wuerhe area,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):53-60.
[14] 杨志冬.准噶尔盆地红山嘴油田红153井区二叠系夏子街组砂砾岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017,28(12):1829-1838. YANG Zhidong. Reservoir characteristics and influencing fac- tors of the Permian Xiazijie Formation sand and gravel reser- voir in Red 153 area of Hongshanzui Oilfield,Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(12):1829-1838.
[15] 胡潇,曲永强,胡素云,等. 玛湖凹陷斜坡区浅层油气地质条件及勘探潜力[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(2):67-77. HU Xiao,QU Yongqiang,HU Suyun,et al. Geological condi- tions and exploration potential of shallow oil and gas in slope area of Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2020, 32(2):67-77.
[16] 毛锐,牟立伟,王刚,等. 基于核磁共振自由弛豫特征的含油性评价方法:以玛湖凹陷下乌尔禾组砾岩储层为例[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(5):140-147. MAO Rui,MU Liwei,WANG Gang,et al. Oil-bearing evalua- tion method based on NMR free relaxation characteristics:A case study of conglomerate reservoirs of lower Urho Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021, 33(5):140-147.
[17] 于兴河,瞿建华,谭程鹏,等.玛湖凹陷百口泉组扇三角洲砾岩岩相及成因模式[J].新疆石油地质,2014,35(6):619-627. YU Xinghe,QU Jianhua,TAN Chengpeng,et al. Conglomerate lithofacies and origin models of fan deltas of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(6):619-627.
[18] 陈静,陈军,李卉,等.准噶尔盆地玛中地区二叠系-三叠系叠合成藏特征及主控因素[J].岩性油气藏,2021,33(1):71-80. CHEN Jing,CHEN Jun,LI Hui,et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of Permian-Triassic superimposed reservoirs in central Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021,33(1):71-80.
[19] 张鹏,陈世悦.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区侏罗系八道湾组储层特征[J].西部探矿工程,2007,19(3):76-79. ZHANG Peng,CHEN Shiyue. Reservoir characteristics of Jurassic Badaowan Formation at Wuxia area,Junggar Basin[J]. WestChina Exploration Engineering,2007,19(3):76-79.
[20] 张昌民,尹太举,唐勇,等.准噶尔盆地西北缘及玛湖凹陷沉积储集层研究进展[J].古地理学报,2020,22(1):129-146. ZHANG Changmin,YIN Taiju,TANG Yong,et al. Advances in sedimentological reservoir research in Mahu Sag and northwest margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Paleogeography(Chinese Edition),2020,22(1):129-146.
[21] HENDRIX A N,LOFTUS W F. Distribution and relative abun- dance of the crayfishes Procambarus alleni(Faxon)and P. fallax (Hagen)in southern Florida[J]. Wetlands,2000,20(1):194-199.
[22] 刘和甫,汪泽成,熊保贤,等.中国中西部中、新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):55-72. LIU Hefu,WANG Zecheng,XIONG Baoxian,et al. Coupling analysis of Mesozoic -Cenozoic foreland basins and mountain system in central and western China[J]. Earth Science Fron- tiers,2000,7(3):55-72.
[23] 贾承造,魏国齐,李本亮,等.中国中西部两期前陆盆地的形成及其控气作用[J].石油学报,2003,24(2):13-17. JIA Chengzao,WEI Guoqi,LI Benliang,et al. Tectonic evolu- tion of two epoch foreland basin and its control for natural gas accumulation in China's western area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003,24(2):13-17.
[24] 何登发,尹成,杜社宽,等.前陆冲断带构造分段特征:以准噶尔盆地西北缘断裂构造带为例[J]. 地学前缘,2004,11(3):91-101. HE Dengfa,YIN Cheng,DU Shekuan,et al. Characteristics of structural segmentation of foreland thrust belt:A case study of the fault belts in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2004,11(3):91-101.
[25] 张驰,于兴河,姚宗全,等.准噶尔盆地南缘西段中、上侏罗统沉积演化及控制因素分析[J].中国地质,2021,48(1):284-296. ZHANG Chi,YU Xinghe,YAO Zongquan,et al. Sedimentary evolution and controlling factors of the Middle-Upper Jurassic in the western part of the southern Junggar Basin[J]. Geology in China,2021,48(1):284-296.
[26] ALLEN J. Studies in fluviatile sedimentation:Bars,bar-com- plexes and sandstone sheets(low-sinuosity braided streams)in the Brownstones(L. Devonian),Welsh Borders[J]. Sedimentary Geology,1983,33(4):237-293.
[1] 白玉彬, 李梦瑶, 朱涛, 赵靖舟, 任海姣, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组烃源岩地球化学特征及页岩油“甜点”评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 110-121.
[2] 王义凤, 田继先, 李剑, 乔桐, 刘成林, 张景坤, 沙威, 沈晓双. 玛湖凹陷西南地区二叠系油气藏相态类型及凝析油气地球化学特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 149-159.
[3] 魏成林, 张凤奇, 江青春, 鲁雪松, 刘刚, 卫延召, 李树博, 蒋文龙. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷东部深层二叠系超压形成机制及演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 167-177.
[4] 杨海波, 冯德浩, 杨小艺, 郭文建, 韩杨, 苏加佳, 杨皩, 刘成林. 准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷二叠系平地泉组烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 156-166.
[5] 易珍丽, 石放, 尹太举, 李斌, 李猛, 刘柳, 王铸坤, 余烨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘—哈得地区中生界物源转换及沉积充填响应[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(5): 56-66.
[6] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 张松航, 郗兆栋, 杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[7] 徐田录, 吴承美, 张金凤, 曹爱琼, 张腾. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层天然裂缝特征与压裂模拟[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 35-43.
[8] 王宏波, 张雷, 曹茜, 张建伍, 潘星. 鄂尔多斯盆地二叠系盒8段河流扇沉积模式及勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 117-126.
[9] 宋志华, 李垒, 雷德文, 张鑫, 凌勋. 改进的U-Net网络小断层识别技术在玛湖凹陷玛中地区三叠系白碱滩组的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 40-49.
[10] 邵威, 周道容, 李建青, 章诚诚, 刘桃. 下扬子逆冲推覆构造后缘凹陷油气富集关键要素及有利勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 61-71.
[11] 段逸飞, 赵卫卫, 杨天祥, 李富康, 李慧, 王嘉楠, 刘钰晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区二叠系山西组页岩气源储特征及聚集规律[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(3): 72-83.
[12] 薄尚尚, 田继先, 李曜良, 王晔桐, 王昊, 孙国强. 川东北地区上三叠统须家河组物源分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 99-112.
[13] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 姜楠, 朱朝彬, 王桥, 瞿雪姣, 王佳. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 147-159.
[14] 张文播, 李亚, 杨田, 彭思桥, 蔡来星, 任启强. 四川盆地简阳地区二叠系火山碎屑岩储层特征与成岩演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 136-146.
[15] 邓远, 陈轩, 覃建华, 李映艳, 何吉祥, 陶鑫, 尹太举, 高阳. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组一段沉积期古地貌特征及有利储层分布[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(1): 136-144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 2022年 34卷 2 期 封面[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(2): 0 .
[2] 李在光, 李琳. 以井数据为基础的AutoCAD 自动编绘图方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 84 -89 .
[3] 程玉红, 郭彦如, 郑希民, 房乃珍, 马玉虎. 井震多因素综合确定的解释方法与应用效果[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(2): 97 -101 .
[4] 刘俊田,靳振家,李在光,覃新平,郭 林,王 波,刘玉香. 小草湖地区岩性油气藏主控因素分析及油气勘探方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 44 -47 .
[5] 商昌亮,付守献. 黄土塬山地三维地震勘探应用实例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 106 -110 .
[6] 王昌勇, 郑荣才, 王建国, 曹少芳, 肖明国. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区下侏罗统八道湾组沉积特征及演化[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 37 -42 .
[7] 王克, 刘显阳, 赵卫卫, 宋江海, 时振峰, 向惠. 济阳坳陷阳信洼陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 54 -59 .
[8] 孙洪斌, 张凤莲. 辽河坳陷古近系构造-沉积演化特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 60 -65 .
[9] 李传亮. 地层抬升会导致异常高压吗?[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 124 -126 .
[10] 魏钦廉,郑荣才,肖玲,马国富,窦世杰,田宝忠. 阿尔及利亚438b 区块三叠系Serie Inferiere 段储层平面非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(2): 24 -28 .